Current interventional therapies in acute pulmonary embolism

Pulmonary embolism response teams: Changing the paradigm in the care for acute pulmonary embolism

Pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs) have emerged as a multidisciplinary, multispecialty team of experts in the care of highly complex symptomatic acute pulmonary embolism (PE), with a centralized unique activation process, providing rapid multimodality assessment and risk stratification, formulating the best individualized diagnostic and therapeutic approach, streamlining the care in challenging clinical case scenarios (e.g., intermediate-high risk and high-risk PE), and facilitating the implementation of the recommended therapeutic strategies on time. PERTs are currently changing how complex acute PE cases are approached. The structure, organization, and function of a given PERT may vary from hospital to hospital, depending on local expertise, specific resources, and infrastructure for a given academic hospital center. Current emerging data demonstrate the value of PERTs in improving time to PE diagnosis; shorter time to initiation of anticoagulation reducing hospital length of stay; increasing use of advanced therapies without an increase in bleeding; and in some reports, decreasing mortality. Importantly, PERTs are positively impacting outcomes by changing the paradigm of care for acute PE through global adoption by the health-care community.

A brief review on failed hybrid treatment for massive pulmonary embolism: catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and pharmaco-mechanical thrombolysis (PMT)

Acute massive or high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE), described as a lung arteries occlusion by an embolus, causes a significant compromise of hemodynamic stability and could lead to a lethal event. Systemic fibrinolytic therapy has been accepted as the standard reperfusion therapy in massive PE, except when there is an increased risk of bleeding. Catheter-based mechanical strategies (thrombofragmentation, thromboaspiration with catheter-guided thrombolysis) are described as options when there are absolute contraindications to systemic thrombolysis. We briefly reviewed clinical situations when patients with severe pneumonia due to COVID-19 are complicated by a high-risk saddle pulmonary embolism and underwent repeated pharmacomechanical thrombolysis and high-flow oxygen therapy. There are scarce reports of failed catheter-guided pharmacomechanical thrombolysis in patients with PE secondary to COVID-19. Re-administration of systemic thrombolysis and alteplase (15 mg dose) can show favorable results.