Pretreatment of skin using an abrasive skin preparation pad, a microneedling device or iontophoresis improves absorption of methyl aminolevulinate in ex vivo human skin

Systematic characterization of the barrier function of diverse ex vivo models of damaged human skin

Background

The skin barrier plays a crucial role in protecting our body against external agents. Disruption of this barrier's function leads to increased susceptibility to infections and dermatological diseases. Damaged skin can be due to the use of detergents, sunburn or excessive scratching. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic the recommended hygiene measures to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2, such as wearing masks, frequent handwashing, and the use of sanitizers, can also potentially alter the skin barrier.

Objectives

The purpose of the study was to characterize the barrier function of ex vivo models of damaged human skin.

Methods

Skin barrier damage was induced through different chemical and mechanical treatments, representative of the potential factors damaging human skin. The skin barrier function was evaluated in terms of permeability, dermal absorption capacity, stratum corneum thickness and gene expression of barrier markers. As inflammation is linked to skin barrier integrity, inflammatory markers were also analyzed.

Results and discussion

The different treatments applied to ex vivo skin models allow the simulation of diverse degrees of skin damage, making these models valuable for assessing the efficacy of topical products targeted at skin repair and for studying the effects of compromised skin barrier on viral penetration.

Sandpaper curettage: A simple method to improve PDT outcomes for actinic keratosis

INTRODUCTION

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a non-scarring, repeatable, and safe treatment for actinic keratosis (AK), but improvements in efficacy are still needed.

BACKGROUND

Devices such as steel blades, needle rollers, and lasers are currently used to remove hypertrophic stratum corneum on AKs to improve PDT outcomes. However, curettage with fine sandpaper could be a gentler, effective alternative.

METHODS

A retrospective study was designed to compare PDT with or without sandpaper curettage. Patients were selected from a database registry of patients with face and scalp AKs (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03319251). Patients in Group 1 underwent PDT alone (20% ALA, 15 min; blue light 417 nm, 30 min). Patients in Group 2 were pretreated with gentle sandpaper curettage prior to ALA and illumination. The two groups were compared using multivariate matching, normalizing for age, sex, initial AK counts, and time to follow-up.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients were selected for matching analysis (n=38, PDT only; n=28, PDT+curettage). Demographics between the groups were similar (mean ± SD), including age (71.0 ± 8.3 vs. 71.0 ± 8.0 years), baseline AK count (53 ± 39 vs. 44± 32), and time to post-PDT follow-up (111 ± 28 vs. 113 ± 32 days). At follow-up, patients who received curettage showed an overall 55% improvement in scalp AK clearance compared to patients who did not receive curettage, adjusting for sex, age, time to follow-up, and baseline AK count (p = 0.0322, multivariable linear regression).

DISCUSSION

Sandpaper curettage before PDT treatment is an easy and inexpensive method to significantly improve AK clearance rates.

Comparison of physical enhancement technologies in the skin permeation of methyl amino levulinic acid (mALA)

Physical drug delivery enhancement in skin has been shown to enhance cosmeceutical actives efficacy. Among the physical drug delivery enhancement technologies, microneedle is the most commercially successful technology. However, there are pros and cons like other physical enhancement technologies including variabilities in penetration depth and lack of efficacy. In this study, three physical topical dug delivery enhancements, elongated microparticles, microneedles and dermaroller, were applied to ex vivo pig skin and compared. The model topical drug that was used is 5-Aminolevulinic acid, the most commonly used photosensitiser prodrug. The skin was pre-treated before mounting on to Franz cell diffusion apparatus. Transdermal epidermal water loss was measured, and receptor fluids were collected at 7 time points for HPLC analysis. The results show that all three technologies disrupted the skin surface. All microporation pre-treatments significantly enhanced mALA cumulative permeation over 8 h (p < 0.001), with the 24x dermaroller significantly greater than 12x dermaroller (p < 0.001) and both dermaroller treatments significantly greater than microneedles and elongated microparticles (p < 0.05). The microporation pre-treatments all significantly increased mALA deposition in the stratum corneum and deeper skin tissues compared to passive administration, with deposition increases ranging from 3.6x to 15.1x that of passive administration. The DR pretreatment showed highest enhancement ratios (amount 5-Aminolevulinic acid in skin at 8 h following pretreatment v passive) with the following order of enhancement: 24x dermaroller > 12x dermaroller > microneedles > elongated microparticles. In conclusion, physical enhancement tools such as microneedles, dermarollers and elongated microparticles demonstrated significant penetration and retention of mALA through/into piglet skin. Further study is needed to determine the cost, dose and patient compliance.

Safety Testing of Cosmetic Products: Overview of Established Methods and New Approach Methodologies (NAMs)

Cosmetic products need to have a proven efficacy combined with a comprehensive toxicological assessment. Before the current Cosmetic regulation N°1223/2009, the 7th Amendment to the European Cosmetics Directive has banned animal testing for cosmetic products and for cosmetic ingredients in 2004 and 2009, respectively. An increasing number of alternatives to animal testing has been developed and validated for safety and efficacy testing of cosmetic products and cosmetic ingredients. For example, 2D cell culture models derived from human skin can be used to evaluate anti-inflammatory properties, or to predict skin sensitization potential; 3D human skin equivalent models are used to evaluate skin irritation potential; and excised human skin is used as the gold standard for the evaluation of dermal absorption. The aim of this manuscript is to give an overview of the main in vitro and ex vivo alternative models used in the safety testing of cosmetic products with a focus on regulatory requirements, genotoxicity potential, skin sensitization potential, skin and eye irritation, endocrine properties, and dermal absorption. Advantages and limitations of each model in safety testing of cosmetic products are discussed and novel technologies capable of addressing these limitations are presented.

Dissolving microneedles containing aminolevulinic acid improves protoporphyrin IX distribution

One important limitation of topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) is the limited tissue penetration of precursors. Microneedles (MNs) are minimally invasive devices used to promote intradermal drug delivery. Dissolving MNs contain drug-associated to polymer blends, dissolving after insertion into skin, allowing drug release. This study comprises development and characterization of a pyramidal model of dissolving MNs (500 μm) prepared with 5% wt/wt aminolevulinic acid and 20% wt/wt Gantrez AN-139 in aqueous blend. Protoporphyrin IX formation and distribution were evaluated in tumor mice model by using fluorescence widefield imaging, spectroscopy, and confocal microscopy. MNs demonstrated excellent mechanical resistance penetrating about 250 μm with minor size alteration in vitro, and fluorescence intensity was 5-times higher at 0.5 mm on average compared to cream in vivo (being 10 ± 5 a.u. for MNs and 2.4 ± 0.8 a.u. for cream). Dissolving MNs have overcome topical cream application, being extremely promising especially for thicker skin lesions treatment using PDT.

Comparison of the Effect of Skin Preparation Pads on Transepidermal Water Loss in Ex Vivo Human Skin

Introduction

Pre-treatment of the skin to remove scales and crusts prior to photodynamic therapy (PDT) is essential to enhance the uptake of topically applied methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) and to improve treatment efficacy. This study compared the effect of two different skin preparation pads on skin integrity in ex vivo human skin.

Methods

Ex vivo human skin samples from three donors were pre-treated in triplicates with PREPSTER™ (PR) skin preparation pad (6, 8, and 10 passages) or Ambu Unilect™ (A-UN) skin preparation pad (6, 8, and 10 passages). In addition, skin samples were pre-treated with tape strippings (10 adhesive tape strips) as a reference method for comparison. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) was measured on intact skin and following skin barrier impairment using skin preparation pads and tape stripping. Histological analysis was performed to verify the impairment of the stratum corneum (SC) barrier function in samples from intact skin (control), 10 tape strippings (reference method), 10 passages of PR, and 10 passages of A-UN.

Results

TEWL increased with the increasing number of passages of skin preparation pads, with 2.4- and 3.3-fold increases following 10 passages of A-UN and PR, respectively, versus a 2.2-fold increase with 10 tape strippings (reference). Histological analysis showed only partial removal of the SC, with no damage observed on the epidermis, regardless of the procedure used.

Conclusion

Pre-treatment of skin using PR and A-UN skin preparation pads markedly increases TEWL, indicating slight impairment of the SC barrier function. Comparison of both skin preparation pads showed that PR pad consistently induced significantly higher TEWL than A-UN pad (p < 0.05), regardless of the number of passages. Both skin preparation pads are thought to increase the uptake of MAL and can therefore be used for the preparation of skin prior to PDT.

Funding

Nestlé Skin Health – Galderma R&D.