Preliminary application of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in postoperative gastrointestinal fistula

Diagnostic accuracy of abdominal contrast-enhanced multi-slice spiral CT after oral diluted iodide in a time segment for gastrointestinal fistula in patients with severe acute pancreatitis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of abdominal contrast-enhanced multi-slice spiral CT after oral diluted iodide in a time segment (post-ODI ACE-MSCT) for gastrointestinal fistula (GIF) in severe acute pancreatitis (SAP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with SAP who underwent both post-ODI ACE-MSCT and endoscopy/surgery from 2017 to 2023 were continuously retrospectively involved. Their demographic information and clinical features were recorded prospectively in an in-hospital database. Using endoscopy/surgery results as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of post-ODI ACE-MSCT for diagnosing GIF in SAP were calculated by a four-cell table. The consistency of the two diagnostic methods was evaluated by the Kappa test and McNemar's test.

RESULTS

Using endoscopy/surgery as the reference standard, a total of 86 cases were divided into the GIF group (N = 52) and the non-GIF group (N = 34). Among the 52 cases of GIF, 88.5% (46/52) cases had a positive result and 11.5% (5/52) cases had a negative result of post-ODI ACE-MSCT for GIF. Among the 34 cases of non-GIF, 2.9% (1/34) case had a positive result and 97.1% (33/34) cases had a negative result of post-ODI ACE-MSCT for GIF. Post-ODI ACE-MSCT had a sensitivity of 88.5% (95% CI 75.9%-95.2%), a specificity of 97.1% (95% CI 82.9%-99.8%), a positive predictive value of 97.9% (95% CI 87.3%-99.9%), a negative predictive value of 84.6% (95% CI 68.8%-93.6%), and an accuracy of 91.9% (83.4%-96.4%). The kappa value was 0.834, and P < 0.001 by McNemar's test. There were no significant differences in diagnostic test characteristics between the two modalities.

CONCLUSION

Post-ODI ACE-MSCT can diagnose GIF in SAP in a simple, noninvasive, and accurate way, and can provide earlier imaging evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Application of indocyanine green in surgery: A review of current evidence and implementation in trauma patients

Background: Modern surgical medicine strives to manage trauma while improving outcomes using functional imaging. Identification of viable tissues is crucial for the surgical management of polytrauma and burn patients presenting with soft tissue and hollow viscus injuries. Bowel anastomosis after trauma-related resection is associated with a high rate of leakage. The ability of the surgeon’s bare eye to determine bowel viability remains limited, and the need for a more standardized objective assessment has not yet been fulfilled. Hence, there is a need for more precise diagnostic tools to enhance surgical evaluation and visualization to aid early diagnosis and timely management to minimize trauma-associated complications. Indocyanine green (ICG) coupled with fluorescence angiography is a potential solution for this problem. ICG is a fluorescent dye that responds to near-infrared irradiation. Methods: We conducted a narrative review to address the utility of ICG in the surgical management of patients with trauma as well as elective surgery. Discussion: ICG has many applications in different medical fields and has recently become an important clinical indicator for surgical guidance. However, there is a paucity of information regarding the use of this technology to treat traumas. Recently, angiography with ICG has been introduced in clinical practice to visualize and quantify organ perfusion under several conditions, leading to fewer cases of anastomotic insufficiency. This has great potential to bridge this gap and enhance the clinical outcomes of surgery and patient safety. However, there is no consensus on the ideal dose, time, and manner of administration nor the indications that ICG provides a genuine advantage through greater safety in trauma surgical settings. Conclusions: There is a scarcity of publications describing the use of ICG in trauma patients as a potentially useful strategy to facilitate intraoperative decisions and to limit the extent of surgical resection. This review will improve our understanding of the utility of intraoperative ICG fluorescence in guiding and assisting trauma surgeons to deal with the intraoperative challenges and thus improve the patients’ operative care and safety in the field of trauma surgery.