1
|
Eichten C, Kuhl A, Baker M, Kwon JM, Seroogy CM, Williams KB. Development and assessment of educational materials for spinal muscular atrophy carrier screening in the Plain community. J Genet Couns 2024. [PMID: 38197741 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) has been reported in both Amish and Mennonite (Plain) communities, and a higher incidence has been observed in certain Mennonite communities compared to the general population. There are several therapies for SMA, but all are most effective in pre-symptomatic newborns. To identify couples from the Wisconsin Plain community who are most likely to have a child with SMA, carrier screening is offered via mailed kits with at-home specimen collection. Our survey data about Plain families' perspectives on genetic testing suggest educational materials are needed for individuals providing informed consent with at-home specimen collection. We therefore developed a Plain population-specific educational trifold brochure about SMA carrier screening by incorporating existing medical education strategies and feedback from Plain community members and their health care providers. Along with the brochure, surveys were included in the kits to assess baseline knowledge about SMA carrier screening ("pre-education") as well as improvement in knowledge after reviewing the brochure and cultural appropriateness of the brochure ("post-education"). Fifty-five testing kits were distributed, and 26 survey pairs (pre- and post-education) were returned and analyzed (response rate 47%). Respondents had high baseline knowledge with an average of 5 of 7 questions (71%) answered correctly on the pre-education survey. Knowledge improved after reviewing the brochure as the average score increased to 6.5 of 7 questions (93%) answered correctly. Questions about risks of having an affected child after positive or negative carrier screening showed the most improvement from the pre-education to post-education surveys. Most respondents indicated the brochure was helpful, was easy to understand, and contained the right amount of information. Overall, incorporating elements of existing medical education strategies with feedback from the target population and stakeholders about appropriate language seems to be an effective method for creating beneficial, culturally responsive educational materials for the Plain population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly Eichten
- University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Ashley Kuhl
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Mei Baker
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Newborn Screening Laboratory, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Jennifer M Kwon
- Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Christine M Seroogy
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Katie B Williams
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Center for Special Children, La Farge Medical Clinic - Vernon Memorial Healthcare, La Farge, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Beck NM, Sagaser KG, Lawson CS, Hertenstein C, Jachens A, Forster KR, Miller KA, Jelin AC, Blakemore KJ, Hoover‐Fong J. Not just a carrier: Clinical presentation and management of patients with heterozygous disease-causing alkaline phosphatase (ALPL) variants identified through expanded carrier screening. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2023; 11:e2056. [PMID: 36444396 PMCID: PMC9834184 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.2056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Hypophosphatasia (HPP) is an underrecognized, complex bone mineralization disorder with variable manifestations caused by one or two deleterious variants in the alkaline phosphatase (ALPL) gene. Expanded carrier screening (ECS), inclusive of ALPL, intends to inform reproductive risk but may incidentally reveal an HPP diagnosis with 50% familial risks. We sought to investigate at-risk individuals and develop a multidisciplinary referral and evaluation protocol for ECS-identified ALPL heterozygosity. A retrospective database query of ECS results from 8 years to 1 month for heterozygous pathogenic/likely pathogenic ALPL variants was completed. We implemented a clinical protocol for diagnostic testing and imaging, counseling, and interdisciplinary care management for identified patients, and outcomes were documented. Heterozygous ALPL variants were identified in 12/2248 unrelated patients undergoing ECS (0.53%; heterozygote frequency 1/187). Of 10 individuals successfully contacted, all demonstrated symptomatology and/or alkaline phosphatase values consistent with HPP. ECS may reveal incidental health risks, including recognition of missed HPP diagnoses in ALPL heterozygotes. In our cohort, all ECS-identified ALPL heterozygotes with clinical and/or biochemical data available demonstrated features of HPP. Referral to a genetics professional familiar with HPP is indicated for family history assessment, genetic counseling, cascade testing, and long-term bone health management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie M. Beck
- Greenberg Center for Skeletal Dysplasias, Department Genetic of MedicineJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Genome Medical ServicesSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Katelynn G. Sagaser
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- JunoDxSan DiegoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Cathleen S. Lawson
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Christine Hertenstein
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Ashley Jachens
- Center for Maternal and Fetal MedicineHoward County General Hospital, Johns Hopkins HospitalBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Katherine R. Forster
- Center for Fetal TherapyJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Sibley Memorial Hospital Maternal Fetal MedicineWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - Kristen A. Miller
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Angie C. Jelin
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Karin J. Blakemore
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Julie Hoover‐Fong
- Greenberg Center for Skeletal Dysplasias, Department Genetic of MedicineJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
A cross-sectional survey of genetic counselors providing carrier screening regarding GBA variants and Parkinson disease susceptibility. J Assist Reprod Genet 2022; 39:747-755. [PMID: 35146589 PMCID: PMC8995214 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02430-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Adult-onset disease risks associated with carriers of recessive disease have and will continue to be identified. As carrier screening becomes more broadly utilized, providers face the dilemma of whether they should discuss these risks during discussions with prospective parents. This study aimed to understand whether preconception/prenatal genetic counselors (PPGCs) were aware of the risk of Parkinson disease in carriers of, and persons with, Gaucher disease and the reasons behind choosing whether to discuss this risk with patients. METHODS Eligible participants included board-certified or board-eligible genetic counselors who had counseled preconception/prenatal patients within the past 3 years. An online survey was distributed via the National Society of Genetic Counselors in November of 2017. RESULTS One hundred twenty genetic counselors completed the quantitative survey, distributed in Fall of 2017. While the majority of respondents knew of the Gaucher-related Parkinson's link (n = 78; 65%), just over one-third reported discussing it in preconception/prenatal settings (n = 30; 38.5%). Respondents reported discussing these links more consistently when disclosing positive results or when the patient/family approached the topic. Respondents cited the lack of professional guidelines as one of the main reasons for not discussing the link. CONCLUSION These results highlight an inconsistency in PPGCs' discussions of the Parkinson's risk in Gaucher disease carriers, and the need to develop guidelines regarding these issues to help standardize the care and education of patients.
Collapse
|
4
|
Defining the Critical Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11121304. [PMID: 34945775 PMCID: PMC8706495 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11121304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Informed consent for genetic testing has historically been acquired during pretest genetic counseling, without specific guidance defining which core concepts are required. Methods: The Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Consent and Disclosure Recommendations Workgroup (CADRe) used an expert consensus process to identify the core concepts essential to consent for clinical genetic testing. A literature review identified 77 concepts that are included in informed consent for genetic tests. Twenty-five experts (9 medical geneticists, 8 genetic counselors, and 9 bioethicists) completed two rounds of surveys ranking concepts’ importance to informed consent. Results: The most highly ranked concepts included: (1) genetic testing is voluntary; (2) why is the test recommended and what does it test for?; (3) what results will be returned and to whom?; (4) are there other types of potential results, and what choices exist?; (5) how will the prognosis and management be impacted by results?; (6) what is the potential family impact?; (7) what are the test limitations and next steps?; and (8) potential risk of genetic discrimination and legal protections. Conclusion: Defining the core concepts necessary for informed consent for genetic testing provides a foundation for quality patient care across a variety of healthcare providers and clinical indications.
Collapse
|
5
|
Farrell RM, Pierce M, Collart C, Yao M, Coleridge M, Chien EK, Rose SS, Lintel M, Perni U, Edmonds BT. Decision-making for prenatal genetic screening: how will pregnant women navigate a growing number of aneuploidy and carrier screening options? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21:806. [PMID: 34863134 PMCID: PMC8642756 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-04282-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prenatal genetic screens, including carrier screening (CS) and aneuploidy screening (AS), comprise an important component of reproductive healthcare delivery. Clinical practice guidelines emphasize the importance of informed decision-making and patient's preferences regarding the use of these screens. Yet, it is unclear how to achieve this ideal as prenatal genetic screening options rapidly become more complex and increasingly available to patients. With increased complexity and availability of reproductive testing options, decision-support strategies are critical to prepare patients to consider AS and/or CS. METHODS A self-administered survey evaluated knowledge and decision-making preferences for expanded carrier (CS) and aneuploidy (AS) prenatal screening. The survey was administered to participants before their first prenatal visit to assess baseline decision-making needs and preference at the initiation of prenatal care. Analysis was approached as a descriptive process. RESULTS Participants had similar familiarity with the concepts associated with AS compared to CS; mean knowledge scores for CS was 0.59 [possible range 0.00 to 1.00] and 0.55 for AS. Participants reported preferences to learn about a range of conditions, including those with severe or mild impact, childhood-onset, and adult-onset. Decision-making preference with respect to learning about the associated disease phenotypes for the contained on AS and CS panel shifted with the complexity of the panel, with a greater preference to learn about conditions post-test compared pre-test education as panels increased from 5 to 100 conditions. CONCLUSION Patients' baseline knowledge of prenatal genetic screens coupled with evolving decision-making preferences presents challenges for the delivery of prenatal genetic screens. This calls for the development and implementation of innovative approaches to support pregnant patients' decision-making commensurate with advances in prenatal genomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth M Farrell
- OB/GYN and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
- Center for Bioethics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Madelyn Pierce
- OB/GYN and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Christina Collart
- OB/GYN and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Meng Yao
- Quantitative Health Science Department, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Marissa Coleridge
- OB/GYN and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Edward K Chien
- OB/GYN and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Susannah S Rose
- Office of Patient Experience, Clinical Transformation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mary Lintel
- OB/GYN and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Uma Perni
- OB/GYN and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Savich RD, Tigges BB, Rios LI, McCloskey J, Tollestrup K, Annett RD. Willingness of women to participate in obstetrical and pediatric research involving biobanks. J Community Genet 2019; 11:215-223. [PMID: 31782046 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-019-00446-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Use of biobanks for future genetic/genomic testing has increased. Biospecimens are increasingly being collected from infants/children; however, little is known about attitudes towards collection of biospecimens from postpartum women and their child. Using a hypothetical consent, this study investigated willingness to participate and attitudes, beliefs, and concerns related to consent materials requesting the biobanking genetic samples. A cross-sectional mixed methods design included women who reviewed a hypothetical consent related to biobanking genetic samples. Women were asked about their willingness to participate, followed by a focus group about biobanks and genetic/genomic testing. Post-focus group questionnaires assessed willingness to participate, the influence of study characteristics, and attitudes about genetic testing. Women (N = 37) were 29.0± 7.3 years of age (range 19-44); 51% had children and 28% were currently pregnant. A total of 46% were Hispanic (H), 38% were White non-Hispanic (WNH), and 16% were Native American (NA). Seventy-six percent (28/37) initially indicated that they would participate in the hypothetical study. Race and ethnicity impacted whether women would participate. Fewer NA women indicated that they would participate compared with H women and with WNH women (p < 0.02). Age, pregnancy status, having children, education level, insurance status, and income had no impact on participation decision and willingness to biobank specimens. NA and H women indicated that they were less likely than WNH women to agree to participate in a long-term biobank study. Given the importance of determining the genetic influence of health and disease, it is critical to attend to the questions and concerns of minority women regarding genetic studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renate D Savich
- Pediatrics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N State St, Jackson, MS, 39216-4505, USA
| | - Beth B Tigges
- College of Nursing, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | | | - Joanne McCloskey
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Kristine Tollestrup
- College of Population Health, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Robert D Annett
- Pediatrics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N State St, Jackson, MS, 39216-4505, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Peyron C, Pélissier A, Béjean S. Preference heterogeneity with respect to whole genome sequencing. A discrete choice experiment among parents of children with rare genetic diseases. Soc Sci Med 2018; 214:125-132. [DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2018] [Revised: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 08/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
8
|
Canary HE, Clark YK, Holton A. Structurating Expanded Genetic Carrier Screening: A Longitudinal Analysis of Online News Coverage. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2018; 23:534-541. [PMID: 29799365 PMCID: PMC6252291 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2018.1477884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
Expanded carrier screening (ECS) is a genetic test that is designed to assess the risk of a healthy person passing down a genetic disorder, such as spinal muscular atrophy, to future children. ECS screens for up to several hundred disorders in one test, expanding on traditional carrier screening tests that target one or a few genetic disorders. However, little is known about how this health technology is being presented to the public in media coverage. Accordingly, this study is a qualitative content analysis of online news and information of ECS over a 6-year period, beginning in 2010 when the technology was publicly available. Results indicate that major coverage themes were consistent across the years included, although content within those themes changed over time. Using structuration theory to guide analysis, results reveal that online news and information from 2010 to 2015 structurated ECS as a health technology innovation, an opportunity for business and investment, and a tool for family planning. Results are discussed in terms of implications for future research, for health journalism practice, and for clinical interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yvonne K Clark
- b Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Avery Holton
- b Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Holton AE, Canary HE, Wong B. Business and Breakthrough: Framing (Expanded) Genetic Carrier Screening for the Public. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2017; 32:1051-1058. [PMID: 27483980 PMCID: PMC5837031 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1196515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
A growing body of research has given attention to issues surrounding genetic testing, including expanded carrier screening (ECS), an elective medical test that allows planning or expecting parents to consider the potential occurrence of genetic diseases and disorders in their children. These studies have noted the role of the mass media in driving public perceptions about such testing, giving particular attention to ways in which coverage of genetics and genetic testing broadly may drive public attitudes and choices concerning the morality, legality, ethics, and parental well-being involved in genetic technologies. However, few studies have explored how mass media are covering the newer test, ECS. Drawing on health-related framing studies that have shown in varying degrees the impact particular frames such as gain/loss and thematic/episodic can have on the public, this study examines the frame selection employed by online media in its coverage of ECS. This analysis-combined with an analysis of the sources and topics used in such coverage and how they relate to selected frames-helps to clarify how mass media are covering an increasingly important medical test and offers considerations of how such coverage may inform mass media scholarship as well as health-related practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Bob Wong
- College of Nursing, University of Utah
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Swedish healthcare providers' perceptions of preconception expanded carrier screening (ECS)-a qualitative study. J Community Genet 2016; 7:203-14. [PMID: 27225888 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-016-0268-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2015] [Accepted: 05/16/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Reproductive autonomy, medicalization, and discrimination against disabled and parental responsibility are the main ongoing ethical debates concerning reproductive genetic screening. To examine Swedish healthcare professionals' views on preconception expanded carrier screening (ECS), a qualitative study involving academic and clinical institutions in Sweden was conducted in September 2014 to February 2015. Eleven healthcare professionals including clinicians, geneticists, a midwife, and a genetic counselor were interviewed in depth using a semi-structured interview guide. The questionnaire was constructed after reviewing the main literature and meetings with relevant healthcare providers. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and content analyzed for categories and subcategories. Participants nurtured many ethical and non-ethical concerns regarding preconception ECS. Among the ethical concerns were the potential for discrimination, medicalization, concerns with prioritization of healthcare resources, and effects on reproductive freedom. The effects of implementation of preconception ECS, its stakeholders, regulations, and motivation are some of non-ethical concerns. These concerns, if not addressed, may affect the uptake and usage of carrier screening within Swedish healthcare system. As this is a qualitative study with a small non-random sample size, the findings cannot be generalized. The participants had little to no working experience with expanded screening panels. Moreover, the interviews were conducted in English, a second language for the participants, which might have limited the expression of their views. However, the authors claim that the findings may be pertinent to similar settings in other Scandinavian countries.
Collapse
|
11
|
Minear MA, Alessi S, Allyse M, Michie M, Chandrasekharan S. Noninvasive Prenatal Genetic Testing: Current and Emerging Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2015; 16:369-98. [DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-090314-050000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mollie A. Minear
- Duke Science & Society, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708
| | - Stephanie Alessi
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
| | - Megan Allyse
- Biomedical Ethics Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905
| | - Marsha Michie
- Institute for Health and Aging, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Reeves A, Trepanier A. Comparison of Informed Consent Preferences for Multiplex Genetic Carrier Screening among a Diverse Population. J Genet Couns 2015; 25:166-78. [PMID: 26174936 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9854-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2015] [Accepted: 06/22/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Multiplex genetic carrier screening is increasingly being integrated into reproductive care. Obtaining informed consent becomes more challenging as the number of screened conditions increases. Implementing a model of generic informed consent may facilitate informed decision-making. Current Wayne State University students and staff were invited to complete a web-based survey by blast email solicitation. Participants were asked to determine which of two generic informed consent scenarios they preferred: a brief versus a detailed consent. They were asked to rank the importance of different informational components in making an informed decision and to provide demographic information. Comparisons between informational preferences, demographic variables and scenario preferences were made. Six hundred ninety three participants completed the survey. When evaluating these generic consents, the majority preferred the more detailed consent (74.5%), and agreed that it provided enough information to make an informed decision (89.5%). Those who thought it would be more important to know the severity of the conditions being screened (p = .002) and range of symptoms (p = .000) were more likely to prefer the more detailed consent. There were no significant associations between scenario preferences and demographic variables. A generic consent was perceived to provide sufficient information for informed decision making regarding multiplex carrier screening with most preferring a more detailed version of the consent. Individual attitudes rather than demographic variables influenced preferences regarding the amount of information that should be included in the generic consent. The findings have implications for how clinicians approach providing tailored informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angela Trepanier
- Wayne State University Genetic Counseling Graduate Program, 540 E. Canfield Street, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Boland PM, Ruth K, Matro JM, Rainey KL, Fang CY, Wong YN, Daly MB, Hall MJ. Genetic counselors' (GC) knowledge, awareness, understanding of clinical next-generation sequencing (NGS) genomic testing. Clin Genet 2015; 88:565-72. [PMID: 25523111 DOI: 10.1111/cge.12555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2014] [Revised: 12/12/2014] [Accepted: 12/15/2014] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Genomic tests are increasingly complex, less expensive, and more widely available with the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS). We assessed knowledge and perceptions among genetic counselors pertaining to NGS genomic testing via an online survey. Associations between selected characteristics and perceptions were examined. Recent education on NGS testing was common, but practical experience limited. Perceived understanding of clinical NGS was modest, specifically concerning tumor testing. Greater perceived understanding of clinical NGS testing correlated with more time spent in cancer-related counseling, exposure to NGS testing, and NGS-focused education. Substantial disagreement about the role of counseling for tumor-based testing was seen. Finally, a majority of counselors agreed with the need for more education about clinical NGS testing, supporting this approach to optimizing implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P M Boland
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine, Medical Oncology, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - K Ruth
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Clinical Genetics, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - J M Matro
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Clinical Genetics, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - K L Rainey
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Clinical Genetics, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - C Y Fang
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Clinical Genetics, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Y N Wong
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Clinical Genetics, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - M B Daly
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Clinical Genetics, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - M J Hall
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Clinical Genetics, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Attitudes towards non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy among US adults of reproductive age. J Perinatol 2014; 34:429-34. [PMID: 24603453 PMCID: PMC4399855 DOI: 10.1038/jp.2014.30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2013] [Revised: 01/19/2014] [Accepted: 01/27/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine how adults in the United States view non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA testing) in order to help estimate uptake. STUDY DESIGN A national sample of 1861 US-based adults was surveyed using a validated online survey instrument. The survey was administered by a commercial survey research company. Respondents were randomized to receive a survey about prenatal testing for trisomy 13 and 18 or trisomy 21. Participants were asked to select among testing modalities, including cffDNA testing, and rank the features of testing that they considered most important to decision making. RESULT There was substantive interest in the use of cffDNA testing rather than traditional screening mechanisms, with a minority of respondents reporting that they would support the use of both methods in combination. The lower rates of false-negative and false-positive test results and the ability to use the test earlier in the pregnancy were the most highly rated benefits of cffDNA testing. Participants expressed strong support for diagnostic confirmation via invasive testing after a positive result from either screening or cffDNA testing. However, almost one-third of participants reported that they would not endorse the use of either invasive or non-invasive prenatal testing. CONCLUSION There appears to be support for uptake of non-invasive prenatal tests. Clinical guidelines should therefore go forward in providing guidance on how to integrate non-invasive methods into the current standard of care. However, our findings indicate that even when accuracy, which is rated by patients as the most important aspect of prenatal testing, is significantly improved over existing screening methods and testing is offered non-invasively, the number of individuals who reported that they would decline any testing remained the same. Attention should therefore be directed at ensuring that the right of informed refusal of prenatal testing is not impacted by new, non-invasive methods.
Collapse
|
15
|
Trait anxiety, information modality, and responses to communications about prenatal genetic testing. J Behav Med 2014; 37:988-99. [PMID: 24481564 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-014-9555-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2013] [Accepted: 01/18/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Decisions to undergo invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures can be anxiety provoking. Individuals receive information about these procedures in one of three modalities: written text, audio (verbal description), or video. We examined whether modality influences emotional responses and testing decisions, and whether trait anxiety, a disposition linked with heightened sensitivity to threatening information, moderates these effects. New Zealand adults (N = 176) completed a trait anxiety measure before random allocation to view a text, audio, or video message about amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling. Participants completed measures of child related worry, anticipated emotional distress, anticipated coping efficacy, perceived likelihood of miscarriage, and testing interest. High-anxious individuals reported greater distress and lower coping efficacy in response to the video message compared to the audio message. They also reported greater miscarriage likelihood in response to the video message compared to the text message. These findings suggest that use of video, assumed to be most informative for educating patients, could induce greater distress about prenatal testing in individuals prone to anxiety.
Collapse
|
16
|
Hammami MM, Al-Jawarneh Y, Hammami MB, Al Qadire M. Information disclosure in clinical informed consent: "reasonable" patient's perception of norm in high-context communication culture. BMC Med Ethics 2014; 15:3. [PMID: 24406055 PMCID: PMC3930349 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2013] [Accepted: 09/18/2013] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The current doctrine of informed consent for clinical care has been developed in cultures characterized by low-context communication and monitoring-style coping. There are scarce empirical data on patients’ norm perception of information disclosure in other cultures. Methods We surveyed 470 adults who were planning to undergo or had recently undergone a written informed consent-requiring procedure in a tertiary healthcare hospital in Saudi Arabia. Perceptions of norm and current practice were explored using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly agree with disclosure) and 30 information items in 7 domains: practitioners’ details, benefits, risks, complications’ management, available alternatives, procedure’s description, and post-procedure’s issues. Results Respondents’ mean (SD) age was 38.4 (12.5); 50.2% were males, 57.2% had ≥ college education, and 37.9% had undergone a procedure. According to norm perception, strongly agree/agree responses ranged from 98.0% (major benefits) to 50.5% (assistant/trainee’s name). Overall, items related to benefits and post-procedure’s issues were ranked better (more agreeable) than items related to risks and available alternatives. Ranking scores were better in post-procedure respondents for 4 (13.3%) items (p < 0.001 to 0.001) and in males for 8 (26.7%) items (p = 0.008 to <0.001). Older age was associated with better ranking scores for 3 (10.0%) items and worse for one (p < 0.001 to 0.006). According to current practice perception, strongly agree/agree responses ranged from 93.3% (disclosure of procedure’s name) to 13.9% (lead practitioner’s training place), ranking scores were worse for all items compared to norm perception (p < 0.001), and post-procedure status, younger age, and lower educational level were associated with better ranking scores for 15 (50.0%), 12 (40.0%), and 4 (13.3%) items, respectively (p < 0.001 to 0.009). Conclusions 1) even in an overall high-context communication culture, extensive and more information than is currently disclosed is perceived as norm, 2) the focus of the desired information is closer to benefits and post-procedure’s issues than risks and available alternatives, 3) male, post-procedure, and older patients are in favor of more information disclosure, 4) male, older, and more educated patients may be particularly dissatisfied with current information disclosure. The focus and extent of information disclosure for clinical informed consent may need to be adjusted if a “reasonable” patient’s standard is to be met.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad M Hammami
- Clinical Studies and Empirical Ethics Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, P O Box # 3354 (MBC 03), Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Constantine ML, Allyse M, Wall M, Vries RD, Rockwood TH. Imperfect informed consent for prenatal screening: Lessons from the Quad screen. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013. [DOI: 10.1177/1477750913511339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Objective The study evaluated patient informed consent (IC) for the Quad screen and examined differences in IC between test acceptors and test refusers. A multidimensional model of IC was used. Methods Women seeking prenatal care at nine obstetrics clinics in a large Midwestern city completed surveys between February and December 2006. Surveys contained measures for three dimensions of IC: intention, understanding and controlling influence. Results 56.2% of women did not meet criteria for all three of our dimensions of IC and therefore failed to give it. The failure rate was higher among women who choose to screen (72.6%) than women who choose not screen (50%) (p < 0.001). Women who met all criteria for IC were over three times less likley to choose to screen (or = 0.32, CI 0.17–0.62 ( p < 0.01)) than women who did not meet criteria for IC. Conclusion The decision to screen for fetal anomalies is less of a deliberated action than the decision not to screen. Women who lack a fundamental understanding of the purpose and nature of the screen may be operating on the belief that the screen is part of standard care and presents no need to deliberate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- ML Constantine
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - M Allyse
- Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - M Wall
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - R De Vries
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Medical Education/Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Academie Verloskunde Maastricht/Zuyd University; CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care/Maastricht University, Maastricht, NL
| | - TH Rockwood
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kirkby HM, Calvert M, McManus RJ, Draper H. Informing potential participants about research: observational study with an embedded randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2013; 8:e76435. [PMID: 24098499 PMCID: PMC3789820 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2013] [Accepted: 08/11/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess: 1) the feasibility of electronic information provision; 2) gather evidence on the topics and level of detail of information potential research participant's accessed; 3) to assess satisfaction and understanding. DESIGN Observational study with an embedded randomised controlled trial. SETTING Low risk intervention study based in primary care. PARTICIPANTS White British & Irish, South Asian and African-Caribbean subjects aged between 40-74 years eligible for a blood pressure monitoring study. INTERVENTIONS PDF copy of the standard paper participant information sheet (PDF-PIS) and an electronic Interactive Information Sheet (IIS) where participants could choose both the type and level of detail accessed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES 1) Proportion of participants providing an email address and accessing electronic information 2) Willingness to participate in a recruitment clinic. 3) Type and depth of information accessed on the IIS. 4) Participant satisfaction and understanding. RESULTS 1160 participants were eligible for the study. Of these, 276 (24%) provided an active email address, of whom 84 did not respond to the email. 106 responded to the email but chose not to access any electronic information and were therefore ineligible for randomisation. 42 were randomised to receive the PDF-PIS and 44 to receive the IIS (with consent rates of 48% and 36%, respectively; odds ratio 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.25 to 1.4). Electronic observation of information accessed by potential participants showed 41% chose to access no information and only 9% accessed the detail presented on the Research Ethics Committee approved participant information sheet before booking to attend a recruitment clinic for the intervention study. 63 of the 106 participants (59%) who chose not to access any electronic information also booked an appointment. CONCLUSIONS Current written information about research may not be read, emphasising the importance of the consent interview and consideration of new ways of presenting complex information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen M. Kirkby
- Medical Research Council Midland Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, School of Cancer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Melanie Calvert
- Medical Research Council Midland Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Primary Care Clinical Sciences, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Richard J. McManus
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Heather Draper
- Medical Research Council Midland Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Medicine, Ethics, Society and History, School of Health and Population Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Allyse MA, Sayres LC, Havard M, King JS, Greely HT, Hudgins L, Taylor J, Norton ME, Cho MK, Magnus D, Ormond KE. Best ethical practices for clinicians and laboratories in the provision of noninvasive prenatal testing. Prenat Diagn 2013; 33:656-61. [PMID: 23613322 PMCID: PMC4057377 DOI: 10.1002/pd.4144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2012] [Revised: 04/18/2013] [Accepted: 04/18/2013] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal of this study is to provide an ethical framework for clinicians and companies providing noninvasive prenatal testing using cell-free fetal DNA or whole fetal cells. METHOD In collaboration with a National Institutes of Health-supported research ethics consultation committee together with feedback from an interdisciplinary group of clinicians, members of industry, legal experts, and genetic counselors, we developed a set of best practices for the provision of noninvasive prenatal genetic testing. RESULTS Principal recommendations include the amendment of current informed consent procedures to include attention to the noninvasive nature of new testing and the potential for a broader range of results earlier in the pregnancy. We strongly recommend that tests should only be provided through licensed medical providers and not directly to consumers. CONCLUSION Prenatal tests, including new methods using cell-free fetal DNA, are not currently regulated by government agencies, and limited professional guidance is available. In the absence of regulation, companies and clinicians should cooperate to adopt responsible best ethical practices in the provision of these tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Allyse
- Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Siegal G, Bonnie RJ, Appelbaum PS. Personalized disclosure by information-on-demand: attending to patients' needs in the informed consent process. THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2012; 40:359-367. [PMID: 22789051 DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2012.00669.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Obtaining informed consent has typically become a stylized ritual of presenting and signing a form, in which physicians are acting defensively and patients lack control over the content and flow of information. This leaves patients at risk both for being under-informed relative to their decisional needs and of receiving more information than they need or desire. By personalizing the process of seeking and receiving information and allowing patients to specify their desire for information in a prospective manner, we aim to shift genuine control over the informational process to patients. A new paradigm of Information on Demand, such as we suggest, would also enhance legal certainty, achieve greater congruence between the information patients want and the information they receive, and promote more meaningful patient-physician interactions, a desirable outcome that has been difficult to achieve by other means.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gil Siegal
- University of Virginia School of Law, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Olufowote JO. A dialectical perspective on informed consent to treatment: an examination of radiologists' dilemmas and negotiations. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2011; 21:839-852. [PMID: 21403091 DOI: 10.1177/1049732311402097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Informed consent to treatment (ICT), designed to honor patient autonomy, has been an important subject of inquiry in many disciplines. To foreground the dynamic and dilemmatic tendencies of ICT practice implied by previous inquiries, I advanced relational dialectics theory into the realm of physicians' experiences with ICT. On performing a dialectical analysis of transcripts from focus group discussions with radiologists, I found them experiencing four primary tensions: (a) between simple and complex ICT; (b) between radiologist and patient control; (c) between standardized and idiosyncratic practice (involving struggles between documentation and conversational process, and between vague and detailed language use); and (d) between withholding and disclosing alternatives. Moreover, I drew on concepts from relational dialectics theory to capture the various ways radiologists negotiate these dialectics. I conclude with practical applications for physician and patient training and interprofessional coordination.
Collapse
|