1
|
Padamsee TJ, Bijou C, Swinehart-Hord P, Hils M, Muraveva A, Meadows RJ, Shane-Carson K, Yee LD, Wills CE, Paskett ED. Risk-management decision-making data from a community-based sample of racially diverse women at high risk of breast cancer: rationale, methods, and sample characteristics of the Daughter Sister Mother Project survey. Breast Cancer Res 2024; 26:8. [PMID: 38212792 PMCID: PMC10785448 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01753-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To understand the dynamics that limit use of risk-management options by women at high risk of breast cancer, there is a critical need for research that focuses on patient perspectives. Prior research has left important gaps: exclusion of high-risk women not in risk-related clinical care, exclusion of non-white populations, and lack of attention to the decision-making processes that underlie risk-management choices. Our objective was to create a more inclusive dataset to facilitate research to address disparities related to decision making for breast cancer risk management. METHODS The Daughter Sister Mother Project survey collects comprehensive information about the experiences of women at high risk of breast cancer. We collected novel measures of feelings about and reactions to cancer screenings; knowledge, barriers, and facilitators of risk-management options; beliefs related to cancer risk and risk management; and involvement with loved ones who had cancer. Eligible individuals were non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic Black adult women who self-identified as having high risk of breast cancer and had no personal history of cancer. Between October 2018 and August 2019, 1053 respondents completed the online survey. Of these, 717 were confirmed through risk prediction modeling to have a lifetime breast cancer risk of ≥ 20%. Sociodemographic characteristics of this sample were compared to those of nationally representative samples of the US population: the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey and the Pew Research Center report: Jewish Americans in 2020. RESULTS The sample of 717 women at objectively high risk of breast cancer was largely (95%) recruited from non-clinical sources. Of these respondents, only 31% had seen a genetic counselor, 34% had had genetic testing specific to breast cancer risk, and 35% had seen at least one breast or cancer care specialist. The sample includes 35% Black respondents and 8% with Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry. Although encompassing a substantial range of ages, incomes, and education levels, respondents are overall somewhat younger, higher-income, and more educated than the US population as a whole. CONCLUSIONS The DSM dataset offers comprehensive data from a community-based, diverse sample of women at high risk of breast cancer. The dataset includes substantial proportions of Black and Ashkenazi Jewish women and women who are not already in clinical care related to their breast cancer risk. This sample will facilitate future studies of risk-management behaviors among women who are and are not receiving high-risk care, and of variations in risk-management experiences across race and ethnicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tasleem J Padamsee
- Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 280F Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43220, USA.
| | - Christina Bijou
- Department of Sociology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Paige Swinehart-Hord
- Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 280F Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43220, USA
| | - Megan Hils
- Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, 280F Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43220, USA
| | - Anna Muraveva
- Government Resources Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Rachel J Meadows
- Center for Epidemiology and Healthcare Delivery Research, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | | | - Lisa D Yee
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Celia E Wills
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Electra D Paskett
- James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lin L, Zhang X, Yu M, Bernardo B, Adeyanju T, Paskett ED. The relationship between family history of cancer and cancer attitudes & beliefs within the Community Initiative Towards Improving Equity and Health Status (CITIES) cohort. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0287629. [PMID: 37368880 PMCID: PMC10298770 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the relationship between family history of cancer with cancer attitudes and beliefs (CABs) and cancer screening knowledge. METHODS This study used data collected for the Community Initiative Towards Improving Equity and Health Status (CITIES) project which surveyed Ohioans ages 21-74. In the current analysis, we included data on age, gender, race, marital status, education, income, financial security, health insurance, CABs, knowledge about the correct age to begin cancer screenings, and presence of a first-degree relative with cancer. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association of family history of cancer with CABs and knowledge about the correct age to begin cancer screening. RESULTS Participants were predominantly over the age of 41, female, and white. Out of 603 participants, 295 (48.92%) reported not having a first-degree relative with cancer and 308 (51.08%) reported having a first-degree relative with cancer. Overall, 109 (18.08%) participants reported negative CABs, 378 (62.69%) reported moderate CABs, and 116 (19.24%) reported positive CABs. Participants who reported a first-degree relative with cancer were more likely to report positive CABs, but the association was not significant (p = .11). We observed that older, more educated, and married participants were more likely to have positive CABs (all p < 0.05). Family history of cancer was not associated with differences in knowledge about the correct age for beginning colorectal cancer screening (p = .85) and mammography (p = .88). CONCLUSIONS Having a first-degree relative with cancer was not found to be associated with CABs or knowledge about cancer screening. However, age and socioeconomic status were associated with more positive CABs and increased knowledge about cancer screening. Future research should focus on standardizing a CABs scale and expanding the generalizability of our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Lin
- College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Xiaochen Zhang
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Mengda Yu
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Brittany Bernardo
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Toyin Adeyanju
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Electra D. Paskett
- College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Peipins LA, Rodriguez JL, Hawkins NA, Soman A, White MC, Hodgson ME, DeRoo LA, Sandler DP. Communicating with Daughters About Familial Risk of Breast Cancer: Individual, Family, and Provider Influences on Women's Knowledge of Cancer Risk. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2018; 27:630-639. [PMID: 29377785 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Women facing complex and uncertain situations such as cancer in their families may seek information from a variety of sources to gain knowledge about cancer risk and reduce uncertainty. We describe and assess the relative importance of information sources about familial breast cancer at the individual, family, and healthcare provider levels influencing women's reporting they had enough information to speak with daughters about breast cancer. This outcome we refer to as being informed about breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sister Study participants, a cohort of women with a family history of breast cancer, were surveyed on family cancer history, family communication, social support, and interactions with healthcare providers (n = 11,766). Adjusted percentages and 95% confidence intervals for being informed about breast cancer versus not being informed were computed for individual-, family-, and provider-level characteristics in three steps using multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS We found 65% of women reported being informed about breast cancer while 35% did not. Having a trusted person with whom to discuss cancer concerns, having a lower versus higher perceived risk of breast cancer, having undergone genetic counseling, and being satisfied with physician discussions about breast cancer in their families were predictors of being informed about breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS Although acquiring objective risk information, such as through genetic counseling, may contribute to a basic level of understanding, communication with providers and within other trusted relationships appears to be an essential component in women's reporting they had all the information they need to talk with their daughters about breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy A Peipins
- 1 Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Juan L Rodriguez
- 1 Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Nikki A Hawkins
- 2 National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Disease Promotion, Division of Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ashwini Soman
- 3 Northrop Grumman Corporation , Information Systems, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mary C White
- 1 Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Lisa A DeRoo
- 5 Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen , Bergen, Norway
| | - Dale P Sandler
- 6 Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences , Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
John NA, Seme A, Roro MA, Tsui AO. Understanding the meaning of marital relationship quality among couples in peri-urban Ethiopia. CULTURE, HEALTH & SEXUALITY 2017; 19:267-278. [PMID: 27684713 PMCID: PMC5525023 DOI: 10.1080/13691058.2016.1215526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
This study explores the meaning of marital relationship quality (MRQ) among couples in peri-urban Ethiopia. We examined the factor structure of MRQ by assessing the reliability and validity of four validated Western scales capturing domains of trust, commitment, satisfaction and communication through exploratory factor analysis. Although most of the items of the original Western scales were relevant for the study population, the domains did not mirror the original Western scales and varied by gender. Interestingly, while the domains of commitment and trust followed the Western scales and were very similar across gender, the third domain, which we labelled conflict differed by gender. For women, items from the constructive communication scale seemed relevant, indicating an interest in resolving conflicts, whereas for men, items from the satisfaction scale appeared more important, indicating a desire to avoid or reduce conflict in their relationships. Our study highlights the usefulness of adapting existing validated scales in a new context after assessing their psychometric properties. Such applications provide opportunities for broadening understanding of fundamental MRQ domains that may universally be shared cross-culturally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neetu A John
- a Bloomberg School of Public Health , Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore , USA
| | - Assefa Seme
- b School of Public Health , Addis Ababa University , Addis Ababa , Ethiopia
| | | | - Amy O Tsui
- a Bloomberg School of Public Health , Johns Hopkins University , Baltimore , USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Peipins LA, McCarty F, Hawkins NA, Rodriguez JL, Scholl LE, Leadbetter S. Cognitive and affective influences on perceived risk of ovarian cancer. Psychooncology 2015; 24:279-86. [PMID: 24916837 PMCID: PMC4522899 DOI: 10.1002/pon.3593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2014] [Revised: 05/07/2014] [Accepted: 05/16/2014] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Studies suggest that both affective and cognitive processes are involved in the perception of vulnerability to cancer and that affect has an early influence in this assessment of risk. We constructed a path model based on a conceptual framework of heuristic reasoning (affect, resemblance, and availability) coupled with cognitive processes involved in developing personal models of cancer causation. METHODS From an eligible cohort of 16 700 women in a managed care organization, we randomly selected 2524 women at high, elevated, and average risk of ovarian cancer and administered a questionnaire to test our model (response rate 76.3%). Path analysis delineated the relationships between personal and cognitive characteristics (number of relatives with cancer, age, ideas about cancer causation, perceived resemblance to an affected friend or relative, and ovarian cancer knowledge) and emotional constructs (closeness to an affected relative or friend, time spent processing the cancer experience, and cancer worry) on perceived risk of ovarian cancer. RESULTS Our final model fit the data well (root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.028, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.99, normed fit index (NFI) = 0.98). This final model (1) demonstrated the nature and direction of relationships between cognitive characteristics and perceived risk; (2) showed that time spent processing the cancer experience was associated with cancer worry; and (3) showed that cancer worry moderately influenced perceived risk. DISCUSSION Our results highlight the important role that family cancer experience has on cancer worry and shows how cancer experience translates into personal risk perceptions. This understanding informs the discordance between medical or objective risk assessment and personal risk assessment. Published in 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy A. Peipins
- Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Frances McCarty
- National Center for Health Statistics, CDC, Hyattsville, MD, USA
| | - Nikki A. Hawkins
- Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Juan L. Rodriguez
- Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Steven Leadbetter
- Epidemiology and Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Witt J, Elwyn G, Wood F, Rogers MT, Menon U, Brain K. Adapting the coping in deliberation (CODE) framework: a multi-method approach in the context of familial ovarian cancer risk management. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2014; 97:200-210. [PMID: 25064250 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2013] [Revised: 06/28/2014] [Accepted: 07/03/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test whether the coping in deliberation (CODE) framework can be adapted to a specific preference-sensitive medical decision: risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in women at increased risk of ovarian cancer. METHODS We performed a systematic literature search to identify issues important to women during deliberations about RRSO. Three focus groups with patients (most were pre-menopausal and untested for genetic mutations) and 11 interviews with health professionals were conducted to determine which issues mattered in the UK context. Data were used to adapt the generic CODE framework. RESULTS The literature search yielded 49 relevant studies, which highlighted various issues and coping options important during deliberations, including mutation status, risks of surgery, family obligations, physician recommendation, peer support and reliable information sources. Consultations with UK stakeholders confirmed most of these factors as pertinent influences on deliberations. Questions in the generic framework were adapted to reflect the issues and coping options identified. CONCLUSIONS The generic CODE framework was readily adapted to a specific preference-sensitive medical decision, showing that deliberations and coping are linked during deliberations about RRSO. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Adapted versions of the CODE framework may be used to develop tailored decision support methods and materials in order to improve patient-centred care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Witt
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- Dartmouth Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Hanover, NH, USA; Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Fiona Wood
- Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Usha Menon
- Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kate Brain
- Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Radecki Breitkopf C, Asiedu GB, Egginton J, Sinicrope P, Opyrchal SML, Howell LA, Patten C, Boardman L. An investigation of the colorectal cancer experience and receptivity to family-based cancer prevention programs. Support Care Cancer 2014; 22:2517-25. [PMID: 24728620 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2245-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2013] [Accepted: 04/01/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer is a shared family experience and may provide a "teachable moment" to motivate at-risk family members to adopt cancer prevention and health promotion behaviors. This study explored how a diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) is experienced by family members and may be used to develop a family-based CRC prevention program. Preferences regarding content, timing, and modes of program delivery were examined. Social cognitive theory provided the conceptual framework for the study. METHODS This study employed mixed methodology (semi-structured interviews and self-report questionnaires). Participants included 73 adults (21 patients, 52 family members) from 23 families (two patients were deceased prior to being interviewed). Most patients (n = 14; 67 %) were interviewed 1-5 years post-diagnosis. Individual interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and content analyzed. RESULTS For many, a CRC diagnosis was described as a shared family experience. Family members supported each other's efforts to prevent CRC through screening, exercising, and maintaining a healthy diet. Teachable moments for introducing a family-based program included the time of the patient's initial cancer surgery and post-chemotherapy. Reported willingness to participate in a family-based program was associated with risk perception, self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, and the social/community context in which the program would be embedded. Program preferences included cancer screening, diet/nutrition, weight management, stress reduction, and exercise. Challenges included geographic dispersion, variation in education levels, generational differences, and scheduling. CONCLUSIONS CRC patients and family members are receptive to family-based programs. Feasibility concerns, which may be mitigated but not eliminated with technological advances, must be addressed for successful family-based programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Radecki Breitkopf
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Howell LA, Sinicrope PS, Brockman TA, Patten CA, Decker PA, Ehlers SL, Nadeau A, Rabe KG, Breitkopf CR, Petersen GM. Receptivity and preferences of pancreatic cancer family members for participating in lifestyle programs to reduce cancer risk. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2013; 11:3. [PMID: 23724897 PMCID: PMC3691837 DOI: 10.1186/1897-4287-11-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2012] [Accepted: 05/21/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cancer is a shared family experience that might provide an opportunity for lifestyle change among at-risk family members. The purpose of this study was to assess receptivity and preferences for cancer risk reduction programs among at-risk family members with two or more relatives affected with pancreas cancer. Methods We surveyed 401 at-risk family members in an existing pancreatic cancer family registry. Participants completed a mailed survey which examined demographic, medical, and psychosocial correlates of willingness to participate in lifestyle cancer risk reduction programs. Multivariable generalized estimating equation approaches were used to model preferences. Results Overall, 85% (n = 342) of at-risk family members were receptive to lifestyle cancer risk reduction programs. Participant preferred programs focused on nutrition (36%, n = 116) and weight management (33%, n = 108), with Web/Internet (46%, n = 157) being the most preferred delivery channel. Most respondents preferred to participate in programs with their family or friends (74%, n = 182), rather than alone (25%, n = 85). In multivariable analysis, younger age (p = 0.008) and higher perceived likelihood of developing cancer (p = 0.03) were associated with willingness to participate in lifestyle programs. Conclusions Family members of those with pancreatic cancer are receptive to cancer risk reduction programs focusing on nutrition and weight management delivered via the internet. Further research is indicated to determine how to best incorporate a family-based approach when designing lifestyle intervention programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa A Howell
- Department of Psychology and Psychiatry, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Pamela S Sinicrope
- Department of Psychology and Psychiatry, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.,Behavioral Health Research Program, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tabetha A Brockman
- Department of Psychology and Psychiatry, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.,Behavioral Health Research Program, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Christi A Patten
- Department of Psychology and Psychiatry, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.,Behavioral Health Research Program, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Paul A Decker
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Shawna L Ehlers
- Department of Psychology and Psychiatry, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ashley Nadeau
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kari G Rabe
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Carmen Radecki Breitkopf
- Division of Health Care Policy & Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Gloria M Petersen
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Howell LA, Brockman TA, Sinicrope PS, Patten CA, Decker PA, Ehlers SL, Lindor NM, Nigon SK, Petersen GM. Receptivity and Preferences in Cancer Risk Reduction Lifestyle Programs: A Survey of Colorectal Cancer Family Members. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013; 2:279-290. [PMID: 25606348 DOI: 10.5455/jbh.20130921013627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer is a shared family experience, and thus the purpose of this study was to assess receptivity and preferences for cancer risk reduction programs among at-risk family members with two or more relatives affected with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS The sample comprised 401 at-risk family members with two or more relatives affected with CRC from the Colon Cancer Family Registry. In March 2009, respondents completed a mailed survey assessing receptivity and preferences for participating in cancer risk reduction programs and evaluated their relationship to demographic, medical, and psychosocial variables. Multivariable generalized estimating equation approaches were used to model preferences. RESULTS Overall, 81% of respondents were receptive to a lifestyle cancer risk reduction program; of these, about half (54%) preferred to participate with their family. Program preferences included: weight management (36%) and nutrition (31%); delivered through the internet (41%) or mail (39%). In a multivariate model, a greater level of concern about cancer (p<0.001), female gender (p=0.002), and higher education (p=0.016) were significantly correlated with willingness to participate in lifestyle programs. CONCLUSIONS Family members of those with CRC are receptive to cancer risk reduction programs that focus on weight management and nutrition delivered via the internet or mail. Future research is needed to determine how best to incorporate a family-based approach that addresses the cancer experience when designing lifestyle intervention programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa A Howell
- Department of Psychology and Psychiatry, 200 First St. SW, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Tabetha A Brockman
- Behavioral Health Research Program, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Pamela S Sinicrope
- Department of Psychology and Psychiatry, 200 First St. SW, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN 55905, USA ; Behavioral Health Research Program, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Christi A Patten
- Department of Psychology and Psychiatry, 200 First St. SW, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN 55905, USA ; Behavioral Health Research Program, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Paul A Decker
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Shawna L Ehlers
- Department of Psychology and Psychiatry, 200 First St. SW, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Noralane M Lindor
- Department of Medical Genetics, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Sandra K Nigon
- Department of Medical Genetics, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Gloria M Petersen
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|