1
|
Minton ME, Isaacson MJ, Da Rosa P. Psychometric analysis of the Comfort with Communication in Palliative and End-of-Life Care (C-COPE) instrument. Int J Palliat Nurs 2020; 26:404-412. [PMID: 33331209 DOI: 10.12968/ijpn.2020.26.8.404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nurses must be comfortable facilitating palliative and end-of-life communication with patients and their families. AIM A validated instrument measuring the comfort of nurses with conducting end-of-life communication is essential for meeting the goals and wishes of patient care. This study aimed to develop and conduct a psychometric evaluation of the Comfort with Communication in Palliative and End-of-Life Care (C-COPE) instrument. METHODS Face, content, and construct validity, including test-retest reliability, were conducted. RESULTS Four experts subjectively confirmed face content validity and the quantitative item content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.67 to 1 and scale content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) was 0.98. Principal axis factoring with Promax rotation yielded a five-factor solution accounting for 66.2% of the variance. The items loading on the five factors ranged from 0.46-0.96 (factor 1), 0.67-0.93 (factor 2), 0.49-0.86 (factor 3), 0.68-0.79 (factor 4), and 0.24-0.96 (factor 5). Internal consistency reliability (coefficient a) was 0.90 for the total C-COPE, and above 0.75 for each factor. The five factors are 'cultural/spiritual considerations,' 'team considerations,' 'addressing decision-making,' 'addressing symptomatology,' and 'deliberate awareness.' Test-retest reliability yielded an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.87 (CI 95%, 0.82-0.91). CONCLUSIONS The C-COPE is a reliable and valid instrument measuring nurse comfort with palliative and end of-life care communication, yet requires testing in more diverse samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary E Minton
- College of Nursing, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota
| | - Mary J Isaacson
- College of Nursing, South Dakota State University, Rapid City, South Dakota
| | - Patricia Da Rosa
- College of Nursing, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reblin M, Heyman RE, Ellington L, Baucom BRW, Georgiou PG, Vadaparampil ST. Everyday couples' communication research: Overcoming methodological barriers with technology. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2018; 101:551-556. [PMID: 29111310 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2017] [Revised: 10/12/2017] [Accepted: 10/26/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Relationship behaviors contribute to compromised health or resilience. Everyday communication between intimate partners represents the vast majority of their interactions. When intimate partners take on new roles as patients and caregivers, everyday communication takes on a new and important role in managing both the transition and the adaptation to the change in health status. However, everyday communication and its relation to health has been little studied, likely due to barriers in collecting and processing this kind of data. The goal of this paper is to describe deterrents to capturing naturalistic, day-in-the-life communication data and share how technological advances have helped surmount them. We provide examples from a current study and describe how we anticipate technology will further change research capabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maija Reblin
- Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA.
| | - Richard E Heyman
- Family Translational Research Group, New York University, New York, USA
| | - Lee Ellington
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Brian R W Baucom
- Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Panayiotis G Georgiou
- Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Penner JL, Stevenson M, Parmar MP, Bélanger E. The psychosocial needs of students conducting research with patients and their families in advanced cancer and palliative care: A scoping review. Palliat Support Care 2017; 15:260-266. [PMID: 27418460 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951516000481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this article was to explore the extent of the scientific literature and evidence base about the psychosocial needs of students conducting research in the fields of advanced cancer and palliative care. METHOD A scoping review was conducted in major scientific databases. English-language articles on the topic of interest were retained if they were published in peer-reviewed journals between 1995 and 2013. RESULTS A total of 3,161 references were screened, and 7 were retained for analysis. Only two articles were empirical studies involving the collection of primary empirical data. The remaining ones were commentaries and personal reflections. While there is a near absence of empirical research about the psychosocial needs of students, several commentaries suggest that students in this field have a high need for support. Three themes were identified in the limited literature retrieved: (1) the importance of proper training and supervision; (2) the availability of emotional support structures; and (3) the use of effective and deliberate self-care strategies. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS This scoping review demonstrates that little is known about the psychosocial needs of students conducting research in advanced cancer and palliative care. However, what is clear is that there is a large emotional impact on student researchers engaged in this type of work. Adequate training and support is needed to promote students' health and well-being, encourage retention of students, and foster high-quality studies. More empirical data are needed to better understand the experiences of students conducting this type of research and to ensure the sustainability of training and research in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie L Penner
- Ingram School of Nursing,McGill University,Montreal,Quebec,Canada
| | - Moire Stevenson
- West-Central Montreal Health - MAB Mackay Rehabilitation Centre,Montreal,Quebec,Canada
| | - Monica P Parmar
- Ingram School of Nursing,McGill University,Montreal,Quebec,Canada
| | - Emmanuelle Bélanger
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine,Public Health Research Institute (IRSPUM),University of Montreal,Montreal,Quebec,Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Reblin M, Clayton MF, John KK, Ellington L. Addressing Methodological Challenges in Large Communication Data Sets: Collecting and Coding Longitudinal Interactions in Home Hospice Cancer Care. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2016; 31:789-97. [PMID: 26580414 PMCID: PMC4853241 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2014.1000480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
In this article, we present strategies for collecting and coding a large longitudinal communication data set collected across multiple sites, consisting of more than 2000 hours of digital audio recordings from approximately 300 families. We describe our methods within the context of implementing a large-scale study of communication during cancer home hospice nurse visits, but this procedure could be adapted to communication data sets across a wide variety of settings. This research is the first study designed to capture home hospice nurse-caregiver communication, a highly understudied location and type of communication event. We present a detailed example protocol encompassing data collection in the home environment, large-scale, multisite secure data management, the development of theoretically-based communication coding, and strategies for preventing coder drift and ensuring reliability of analyses. Although each of these challenges has the potential to undermine the utility of the data, reliability between coders is often the only issue consistently reported and addressed in the literature. Overall, our approach demonstrates rigor and provides a "how-to" example for managing large, digitally recorded data sets from collection through analysis. These strategies can inform other large-scale health communication research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maija Reblin
- a Department of Health Outcomes & Behavior , Moffitt Cancer Center
| | | | - Kevin K John
- c School of Communications , Brigham Young University
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gramling R, Gajary-Coots E, Stanek S, Dougoud N, Pyke H, Thomas M, Cimino J, Sanders M, Alexander SC, Epstein R, Fiscella K, Gramling D, Ladwig S, Anderson W, Pantilat S, Norton SA. Design of, and enrollment in, the palliative care communication research initiative: a direct-observation cohort study. BMC Palliat Care 2015; 14:40. [PMID: 26286538 PMCID: PMC4544824 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-015-0037-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2015] [Accepted: 08/11/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding the characteristics of communication that foster patient-centered outcomes amid serious illness are essential for the science of palliative care. However, epidemiological cohort studies that directly observe clinical conversations can be challenging to conduct in the natural setting. We describe the successful enrollment, observation and data collection methods of the ongoing Palliative Care Communication Research Initiative (PCCRI). METHODS The PCCRI is a multi-site cohort study of naturally occurring inpatient palliative care consultations. The 6-month cohort data includes directly observed and audio-recorded palliative care consultations (up to first 3 visits); patient/proxy/clinician self-report questionnaires both before and the day after consultation; post-consultation in-depth interviews; and medical/administrative records. RESULTS One hundred fourteen patients or their proxies enrolled in PCCRI during Enrollment Year One (of Three). Seventy percent of eligible patients/proxies were invited to hear about a communication research study (188/269); 60% of them ultimately enrolled in the PCCRI (114/188), resulting in a 42% sampling proportion (114/269 eligible). All PC clinicians at study sites were invited to participate; all 45 participated. CONCLUSIONS Epidemiologic study of patient-family-clinician communication in palliative care settings is feasible and acceptable to patients, proxies and clinicians. We detail the successful PCCRI methods for enrollment, direct observation and data collection for this complex "field" environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Gramling
- Family Medicine Research Programs, University of Rochester, 1381 South Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14620, USA.
| | - Elizabeth Gajary-Coots
- Family Medicine Research Programs, University of Rochester, 1381 South Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14620, USA.
| | - Susan Stanek
- School of Nursing, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box SON, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
| | - Nathalie Dougoud
- School of Nursing, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box SON, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
| | - Heather Pyke
- School of Nursing, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box SON, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
| | - Marie Thomas
- Family Medicine Research Programs, University of Rochester, 1381 South Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14620, USA.
| | - Jenica Cimino
- Division of Hospital Medicine and Palliative Care Program, University of California, Clinical Sciences Building Suite C-126, 521 Parnassus Ave, Box 0131, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0131, USA.
| | - Mechelle Sanders
- Family Medicine Research Programs, University of Rochester, 1381 South Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14620, USA.
| | - Stewart C Alexander
- Purdue University, Matthews Hall, 812 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907-2060, USA.
| | - Ronald Epstein
- Family Medicine Research Programs, University of Rochester, 1381 South Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14620, USA.
| | - Kevin Fiscella
- Family Medicine Research Programs, University of Rochester, 1381 South Avenue, Rochester, NY, 14620, USA.
| | - David Gramling
- University of Arizona, 301 Learning Services Building, 1512 East First St., Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
| | - Susan Ladwig
- Palliative Care Program, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 687, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
| | - Wendy Anderson
- Division of Hospital Medicine and Palliative Care Program, University of California, Clinical Sciences Building Suite C-126, 521 Parnassus Ave, Box 0131, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0131, USA.
| | - Stephen Pantilat
- Division of Hospital Medicine and Palliative Care Program, University of California, Clinical Sciences Building Suite C-126, 521 Parnassus Ave, Box 0131, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0131, USA.
| | - Sally A Norton
- School of Nursing, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box SON, Rochester, NY, 14642, USA.
| |
Collapse
|