Effectiveness of a standardized back school program for patients with chronic low back pain after implementation in routine rehabilitation care

Models of care for managing non-specific low back pain

BACKGROUND

Alternative care models seek to improve the quality or efficiency of care, or both, and thus optimise patient health outcomes. They provide the same health care but change how, when, where, or by whom health care is delivered and co-ordinated. Examples include care delivered via telemedicine versus in-person care or care delivered to groups versus individual patients.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of alternative models of evidenced-based care for people with non-specific low back pain on the quality of care and patient self-reported outcomes and to summarise the availability and principal findings of economic evaluations of these alternative models.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and trial registries up to 14 June 2024, unrestricted by language.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials comparing alternative care models to usual care or other care models. Eligible trials had to investigate care models that changed at least one domain of the Cochrane EPOC delivery arrangement taxonomy and provide the same care as the comparator arm. Participants were individuals with non-specific low back pain, regardless of symptom duration. Main outcomes were quality of care (referral for/receipt of lumbar spine imaging, prescription/use of opioids, referral to a surgeon/lumbar spine surgery, admission to hospital for back pain), patient health outcomes (pain, back-related function), and adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and the certainty of evidence using GRADE. The primary comparison was alternative models of care versus usual care at closest follow-up to 12 months.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty-seven trials (29,578 participants) met our inclusion criteria. Trials were primarily set within primary care (18 trials) or physiotherapy practices (15 trials) in high-income countries (51 trials). Forty-eight trials compared alternative models of care to usual care. There was substantial clinical diversity across alternative care models. Alternative care models most commonly differed from usual care by altering the co-ordination/management of care processes (18 trials), or by utilising information and communication technology (10 trials). Moderate-certainty evidence indicates that alternative care models probably result in little difference in referral for or receipt of any lumbar spine imaging at follow-up closest to 12 months compared to usual care (risk ratio (RR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 0.98; I2 = 2%; 18 trials, 16,157 participants). In usual care, 232/1000 people received lumbar spine imaging compared to 213/1000 people who received alternative care models. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence by one level due to serious indirectness (diversity in outcome measurement). Moderate-certainty evidence suggests that alternative care models probably result in little or no difference in the prescription or use of opioid medication at follow-up closest to 12 months compared to usual care (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.03; I2 = 0%; 15 trials, 13,185 participants). In usual care, 349 out of 1000 people used opioid medication compared to 332 out of 1000 people in alternative care models. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence by one level due to serious indirectness (diversity in outcome measurement). We are uncertain if alternative care models alter referral for or use of lumbar spine surgery at follow-up closest to 12 months compared to usual care as the certainty of the evidence was very low (odds ratio (OR) 1.04, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.37; I2 = 0%; 10 trials, 4189 participants). We downgraded the certainty of the evidence by three levels due to very serious imprecision (wide CIs) and serious indirectness (diversity in outcome measurement). We are uncertain if alternative care models alter hospital admissions for non-specific low back pain at follow-up closest to 12 months compared to usual care as the certainty of evidence was very low (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.11; I2 = 8%; 12 trials, 10,485 participants). We downgraded the certainty of the evidence by three levels due to serious indirectness (diversity in outcome measurement), serious publication bias (asymmetry of results), minor imprecision (wide CIs), and minor risk of bias (blinding of participants/personnel). High-certainty evidence indicates that alternative care models result in a small but clinically unimportant improvement in pain on a 0 to 10 scale (mean difference -0.24, 95% CI -0.43 to -0.05; I2 = 68%; 36 trials, 9403 participants). Mean pain at follow-up closest to 12 months was 2.4 points on a 0 to 10 rating scale (lower score indicates less pain) with usual care compared to 2.2 points with alternative care models, a difference of 0.2 points better (95% CI 0.4 better to 0.0 better; minimal clinically important difference (MCID) 0.5 to 1.5 points). High-certainty evidence indicates that alternative care models result in a small, clinically unimportant improvement in back-related function compared with usual care (standardised mean difference -0.12, 95% CI -0.20 to -0.04; I2 = 66%; 44 trials, 13,688 participants). Mean back-related function at follow-up closest to 12 months was 6.4 points on a 0 to 24 rating scale (lower score indicates less disability) with usual care compared to 5.7 points with alternative care models, a difference of 0.7 points better (95% CI 1.2 better to 0.2 better; MCID 1.5 to 2.5 points). We are uncertain of the effect of alternative care models on adverse events compared to usual care as the certainty of the evidence was very low (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.45; I2 = 43%; 10 trials, 2880 participants). We downgraded the certainty of the evidence by three levels due to serious risk of bias (blinding of participants/personnel), serious indirectness (variation in assumed risk), and serious inconsistency (substantial between-study heterogeneity).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared to usual care, alternative care models for non-specific low back pain probably lead to little or no difference in the quality of care and result in small but clinically unimportant improvements in pain and back-related function. Whether alternative care models result in a difference in total adverse events compared to usual care remains unresolved.

Prevention of neck pain in adults with a Back School-Based intervention: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Neck pain is a health problem worldwide. To prevent it, experts recommend exercise and education.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of a Back School-based intervention for the prevention of nonspecific neck pain in a healthy adult population.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial with 58 participants with no history of neck pain within the past six months. The experimental group performed an 8-week Back School-based program. The control group maintained their usual lifestyle. Primary outcomes, which include the number of episodes, days and intensity of neck pain, and the number of medical visits, were recorded in a 1-year follow-up diary and analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test. Secondary outcomes, such as neck flexor, neck extensor, and scapular muscles endurance, were analyzed using the ANOVA test.

RESULTS

In the analysis of the primary outcomes, no significant differences were found in the number of episodes (p = 0.068,d = -0.49), number of days (p = 0.059,d = -0.54), or the average intensity of neck pain (p = 0.061,d = -0.53). There were significant changes in the number of medical visits (p = 0.033,d = -0.57). Moving to secondary outcomes, significant interactions were observed in neck flexor (p = 0.045, ηp2 = 0.036) and neck extensor endurance (p = 0.049, ηp2 = 0.035), but not in scapular muscle endurance (p = 0.536, ηp2 = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The Back School-based program reduced the number of medical visits and increased the endurance of the cervical musculature. Trial registration in ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05260645.

Clarifying the characteristics of interprofessional rehabilitation programs for adults with chronic low back pain: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Interprofessional rehabilitation programs are recommended by practice guidelines based on their effectiveness in improving health-related quality of life, pain, and function for people with chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, the most appropriate program characteristics are poorly described in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aimed to synthesize the characteristics of interprofessional rehabilitation programs for people living with CLBP.

METHODS

The scoping review was guided by the framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley, which has been further enhanced by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Electronic databases, including Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, were searched to identify relevant published studies.

RESULTS

Out of 13370 articles identified through our search, seventy-nine studies fulfilled our eligibility criteria. In the majority of the studies (n = 75), interprofessional rehabilitation programs for people with CLBP consisted of two or more of the following interventions: physical activity and exercise (n = 68), education (n = 61), psychotherapy (n = 52), and vocational support/advice (n = 31). In a few studies describing the underlying theories, the biopsychosocial model, which emphasizes the need to address social, psychological, and physical components in the management of CLBP, was the most often cited theoretical framework.

CONCLUSION

There is substantial variation in how interprofessional rehabilitation programs for people with CLBP are conceptualized and evaluated. A detailed description of the intervention evaluated, and the underlying theoretical frameworks was also lacking in most studies. We recommend the use of a consistent term and components aligned with practice guidelines.

Understanding social determinants of health and physical therapy outcomes in patients with low back pain: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) is the number one cause of disability worldwide; however, it is not clear how social determinants of health (SDOH) impact care management and outcomes related to physical therapy (PT) services for patients with LBP.

OBJECTIVE

The purposes of this scoping review are to examine and assimilate the literature on how SDOH and PT care relate to non-specific LBP outcomes and identify gaps in the literature to target for future research.

METHODS

Data were extracted from eight electronic databases from January 2011 to February 2022. Reviewers independently screened all studies using the PRISMA extension for scoping review guidelines. Data related to study design, type of PT, type of non-specific LBP, patient demographics, PT intervention, SDOH, and PT outcomes were extracted from the articles.

RESULTS

A total of 30,523 studies were screened, with 1961 articles undergoing full text review. Ultimately, 76 articles were identified for inclusion. Sex and age were the most frequent SDOH examined (88% and 78% respectively) followed by education level (18%). Approximately half of the studies that examined age, sex, and education level identified no effect on outcomes. The number of studies examining other factors was small and the types of outcomes evaluated were variable, which limited the ability to pool results.

CONCLUSIONS

Sex and age were the most frequent SDOH examined followed by education level. Other factors were evaluated less frequently, making it difficult to draw conclusions. Study design and heterogeneity of determinants and outcomes were barriers to examining the potential impact on patients with LBP.

Influence of health literacy on health-related quality of life after total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Personal knowledge about the own disease, a key component of health literacy (HL), may have a considerable impact on treatment outcomes. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the patients' knowledge about the surgical procedure, risks, and aftercare, as well as the satisfaction with the preoperative level of information, has an influence on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 176 patients (68.3 ± 10.3 years, 60.8% female) were evaluated. HRQoL was assessed prior to surgery as well as one and twelve months after THA using the 12-item Short Form Questionnaire. Following standardized surgical informed consent, HL was assessed preoperatively using a self-constructed quiz score, while information satisfaction was measured with a single-item rating scale. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, including pain (VAS), functionality (WOMAC), and psychological distress (PHQ-4), were also assessed at baseline. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to examine whether HL, satisfaction with information, age, social class, WOMAC, VAS, and PHQ-4 predict HRQoL at one and twelve months post-surgery.

RESULTS

The average HL quiz score was 23 ± 5.1 out of a possible 33 points. Social class index significantly influenced HL (p < 0.001). A weak correlation between HL and age (r = 0.23, p = 0.01) and no correlation between HL and psychological distress (p = 0.868) were observed. One month after THA, physical HRQoL was significantly predicted by the WOMAC index (p = 0.031) and subjective satisfaction with information (p = 0.022), but not by HL. After twelve months, only the WOMAC was a significant predictor (p < 0.001) of physical HRQoL.

CONCLUSION

Although subjective satisfaction with the patient's preoperative level of information had a significant effect on the physical HRQoL at one month after THA, the influence of osteoarthritis severity outweighed this effect after twelve months. HL had no direct influence on HRQoL. These results suggest that patient satisfaction, rather than knowledge, predicts HRQoL.

Effects of a back school-based intervention on non-specific low back pain in adults: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Non-specific low back pain is a common condition with significant global prevalence and socio-economic impact. Back School programs, which combine exercise and educational interventions, have been used to address back pain. This study aimed to investigate the effects of a Back School-based intervention on non-specific low back pain in adults. Secondary objectives included evaluating the impact of the program on disability, quality of life, and kinesiophobia.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was conducted involving 40 participants with non-specific low back pain, who were divided into two groups. The experimental group underwent an 8-week Back School-based program. The program comprised 14 practical sessions focusing on strengthening and flexibility exercises, along with two theoretical sessions covering anatomy and concepts related to a healthy lifestyle. The control group maintained their usual lifestyle. Assessment instruments included the Visual Analogue Scale, Roland Morris disability questionnaire, Short-Form Health Survey-36, and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia.

RESULTS

The experimental group showed significant improvements in the Visual Analogue Scale, Roland Morris disability questionnaire, physical components of the Short-Form Health Survey-36, and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia. However, there were no significant improvements in the psychosocial components of the Short-Form Health Survey-36. In contrast, the control group did not show significant results in any of the study variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The Back School-based program has positive effects on pain, low back disability, physical components of quality of life, and kinesiophobia in adults with non-specific low back pain. However, it does not appear to improve the participants' psychosocial components of quality of life. Healthcare professionals can consider implementing this program to help reduce the significant socio-economic impact of non-specific low back pain worldwide.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05391165 (registered prospectively in ClinicalTrials.gov: 25/05/2022).

Therapist competencies in the context of group-based exercise programs in medical rehabilitation: a qualitative study with patients and exercise therapists from Germany

BACKGROUND

Group-based exercise programs account for nearly half of exercise therapy services provided in German medical rehabilitation facilities. However, information about necessary therapist competencies for the successful execution of these programs is sparse. Thus, the aim of this qualitative study was to explore relevant therapist competencies in the context of group-based exercise programs from the patients' and therapists' perspective.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with five rehabilitation patients following a 3-week inpatient orthopedic rehabilitation program as well as five exercise therapists with work experience in group-based exercise therapy. Data were analyzed using structuring content analysis according to Kuckartz.

RESULTS

From 155 topic-related text passages, collected over 10 interviews, four competency categories with 16 subcategories and respective characteristics were identified. In addition to professional expertise like biomedical knowledge, exercise therapists were expected to possess a multitude of didactic-methodological, personal, and social-communicative abilities.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the psychosocial, behavioral and educational goals of group-based exercise programs necessitate a wide range of therapist competencies. These conform to the multidimensional nature of exercise therapy and should therefore be covered in vocational and continuing education.

Effects of back school-based intervention on non-specific neck pain in adults: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Neck pain has a high prevalence and socioeconomic impact worldwide. The Back School consists of programs that include exercises and educational interventions to treat back pain. Accordingly, the main objective was to evaluate the effects of an intervention based on Back School on non-specific neck pain in an adult population. The secondary objectives were to analyze the effects on disability, quality of life and kinesiophobia.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 58 participants with non-specific neck pain divided into two groups. The experimental group (EG) carried out the 8-week programme based on the Back School, (two sessions per week, for a total of 16 sessions, lasting 45 min). Of all the classes, 14 had a practical focus (strengthening and flexibility exercises) and the other two had a theoretical focus (concepts of anatomy and healthy lifestyle). The control group (CG) stated that they did not vary their lifestyle. The assessment instruments were: Visual Analogue Scale, Neck Disability Index, Short-Form Health Survey-36 and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia.

RESULTS

The EG reduced pain (-40 points, CI95% [-42 to -37], g = -1.03, p < 0.001), EG had less disability (-9.3 points, CI95% [-10.8 to -7.8], g = -1.22, p < 0.001), EG improved the physical dimension of the survey Short-Form Health Survey-36 (4.8 points, CI95% [4.1 to 5.5], g = 0.55, p = 0.01) but had not significant change in psychosocial dimension of the survey Short-Form Health Survey-36 and EG reduced Kinesiophobia (-10.8 points, CI95% [-12.3 to -9.3], g = -1.84, p < 0.001). The CG did not obtain significant results in any variable of the study. Significant differences in change between both groups were found on pain (-11 points, CI95% [5.6 to 16.6], p < 0.001, g = 1.04), disability (-4 points, CI95% [2.5 to 6.2], p < 0.001, g = 1.23), physical dimension of the survey Short-Form Health Survey-36 (3 points, CI95% [-4-4 to -2-5], p = 0.01, g = -1.88), and kinesiophobia ( 7 points, CI95%[-8.3 to -5.4], p < 0.001, g = 2.04), while no significant differences were found on psychosocial dimension of the survey Short-Form Health Survey-36 (-0.02, CI95% [-1.7 to 1.8], g = 0.01, p = 0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

The back school-based programme has beneficial effects on pain, neck disability, the physical dimension of quality of life and kinesiophobia in an adult population with non-specific neck pain. However, it did not lead to improvements in the psychosocial dimension of the participants' quality of life. This programme could be applied by health care providers with the aim of reducing the severe socio-economic impact of non-specific neck pain worldwide. TRIAL REGISTRATION IN CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT05244876 (registered prospectively, date of registration: 17/02/2022).

[Debora: Long-Term Effectiveness of an Inpatient Combined Pain Competence and Depression Prevention Training for Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain and Depressive Symptoms]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of an intervention for pain competence and depression prevention for multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation of non-specific chronic low back pain on psychological and work-related outcomes over a 2-year period.

METHODS

This prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial evaluated the effects of pain competence training with and without depression prevention on depressive symptoms (General Depression Scale; ADS; primary outcome), anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), pain self-efficacy (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire) and subjective prognosis of gainful employment (SPE; secondary outcomes) in n=422 patients aged 32-64 years from four rehabilitation clinics. Per protocol analyses were conducted. In the three-factorial design with a repeated-measures factor, patients were stratified by treatment condition; the control group (CG) received only pain management training but the intervention group (IG) was additionally treated with depression prevention training (Debora). Based on the ADS, patients were assigned to without or low depressive symptoms (ADS<23; n=208) and medium or high depressive symptoms (ADS≥23; n=214). The fivefold repeated-measures factor included the following sample points: admission, immediately after and 6, 12, and 24 months after rehabilitation. Per protocol results of univariate 2×2×5 analyses of variance were validated by n=1225 multiple imputed data.

RESULTS

No significant effects of treatment condition over the 2-year period were yielded in the primary outcome "depressive symptoms", but only patients with the combined training Debora benefited in pain self-efficacy in the long term. Intention-to-treat analyses suggest incremental effects of Debora on pain self-efficacy and anxiety at 24-month follow-up. In the long term, patients with high levels of depressive symptoms improved exclusively in depressive symptoms or they benefited more than patients with low depression in anxiety. However, favorable effects receded in general from post rehabilitation to 24-month follow-up.

DISCUSSION

 The results support that a disorder-specific depression prevention training is needed for the long-term improvement in pain self-efficacy, which is considered a crucial psychological protective factor in pain chronification. Findings on depressive symptoms support the effectiveness of multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation in high depression, but also the great importance of early treatment of depressive symptoms.

CONCLUSION

 Overall, the results strengthen the need to implement psychotherapeutic treatment elements and, in particular, cognitive-behavioral methods and, moreover, a systematic allocation of patients to needs-based treatments in order to improve long-term effects.

Long-term effects of rehabilitation and prevention of further chronification of pain among patients with non-specific low back pain

BACKGROUND

Psychological factors influence the development and persistence of chronic low back pain (CLBP) and may impair the psychosocial rehabilitation success.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of a combined pain competence and depression prevention training compared to the pain competence training alone and as well as the patients' stages of pain on the long-term psychosocial rehabilitation success.

METHODS

In this controlled multicentre study with cluster-block randomization, patients with CLBP in different stages of pain (I-III) received either pain competence training (control group, CG; n= 255) or combined pain competence and depression prevention training (intervention group, IG; n= 271; per protocol). Depressive symptoms (primary outcome), anxiety, somatization, health status, and average pain intensity (secondary outcomes) were assessed up to 12 months of follow-up. Standardised questionnaires were used to record the outcomes, which were filled out by the patients themselves. Analyses after multiple imputation (N= 1225) were conducted to validate multi- and univariate analyses of variance.

RESULTS

Patients in stage of pain I and II showed significant improvements in depressive symptoms, anxiety, mental health, and average pain intensity at the 12-month follow-up, irrespective from treatment condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation seems to be appropriate for patients with CLBP in stage of pain I and II. However, patients in stage of pain III need more psychological treatments to manage their mental comorbidities.

Does m-health-based exercise (guidance plus education) improve efficacy in patients with chronic low-back pain? A preliminary report on the intervention's significance

BACKGROUND

The utilization of mobile health (m-health) has rapidly expanded during the COVID-19 pandemic, and there is still a lack of relevant clinical data pertaining to chronic low-back pain (CLBP) management. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of m-health-based exercise (via guidance plus education) versus exercise (via guidance) during CLBP management.

METHODS

Participants (n = 40) were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. The intervention group received m-health-based exercise (via guidance plus education), whereas the control group received m-health-based exercise (via guidance). The exercise prescription video and educational content were sent to participants by the application (app), Ding Talk. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to test the baseline's intervention effects, 6-week follow-up, and 18-week follow-up. We selected function (Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire) and pain intensity (current, mean, and most severe Numeric Rating Scale in the last 2 weeks) as the primary outcomes, changes of negative emotion (depression, anxious), and quality of life as the secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Time's significant effect was found in pain, function, and health-related quality of life in both groups, but time did not show significant interaction effects. Participants were able to use m-based education with their anxiety and depression after treatment, but the relief only lasted until week 6. No differences were found on the aspect of mental health-related quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary findings suggest that m-health-based exercise (via guidance) may be a convenient and effective method to treat CLBP. However, additional health education didn't help more. More rigorous controlled trials are needed to improve the therapeutic effect in future studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trials Registry Number ChiCTR2000041459 . Registered on December 26, 2020.

Prevention of Low Back Pain in Adults with a Back School-Based Intervention

BACKGROUND

Low back pain is highly prevalent and has a major socio-economic impact worldwide. Among the rehabilitation options is the Back School, which consists of programmes that include exercise and educational interventions to treat and prevent back pain. The effects of this type of programme are usually evaluated in patients with low back pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects on low back functionality and the prevention of medical visits due to low back pain during one year of follow-up in a healthy adult population.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 56 healthy participants who were divided into an experimental group (n = 30), who underwent the programme consisting of a total of 16 sessions, and a control group (n = 26), who did not undergo the intervention. All participants were administered the Partial Curl-up Test, Biering Sorense Test, Modified Schöber Test, and Toe Touch Test, and they completed the Short Form 36 Health Survey before and after the intervention. In addition, a telephone call was made to ask whether they attended a doctor for low back pain in the following year post-intervention.

RESULTS

In the experimental group, statistically significant improvements were observed in trunk muscle strength, spinal flexion joint range of motion, and hamstring flexibility, and they had fewer visits to the doctor for low back pain in the following year.

CONCLUSIONS

The theoretical-practical programme based on the Back School seems to have beneficial effects on low back functionality by increasing its strength and flexibility in an adult population. In addition, this programme reduced the number of medical visits due to low back pain during the following year after the intervention.

Patients' experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care - a qualitative interview study

Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe patient experiences of received primary care for low back pain (LBP) according to the BetterBack Model of Care (MoC) with a focus on illness beliefs and self-management enablement.

Methods: Individual interviews were conducted with 15 adults 4–14 months after receiving treatment according to the BetterBack MoC for LBP in primary care in Sweden. Data were analysed using content analysis.

Results: When analysing the data, the following theme emerged; “Participant understanding of their treatment for low back pain and self-management strategies—a matter of support systems”, comprising the following categories: “Knowledge translation”, “Interaction and dialogue”, “The health care professional support” and “Form organization”. Participants experienced that they had better knowledge about their LBP and received tools to better manage their health condition. The participants expressed good communication with the treating physiotherapist and provided suggestions to further improve the treatment of LBP.

Conclusions: Participants experienced that they had gained new knowledge about their health problems and after the treatment they had the tools to handle their back problems. This suggests that the BetterBack MoC may be used as a basis for a support system to provide valuable tools for self-management for patients with low back pain.

What Influences Outcomes From Inpatient Multidisciplinary Pain Management Programs?: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Although inpatient multidisciplinary pain management programs (PMPs) are effective for chronic pain, not all patients benefit equally and there is limited evidence regarding predictors of outcome. This meta-analysis aimed to identify patient or program characteristics associated with outcomes from inpatient PMPs, and to examine the time course of effects following discharge.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medline, EBSCO, and Scopus were searched to identify articles reporting outcomes from inpatient multidisciplinary PMPs. Information was extracted on study design, participant and program characteristics, and outcomes. Effect sizes were computed for pain, physical function, depression, anxiety, and mental health outcomes. Study-level predictors of outcome were investigated with moderator analyses and meta-regression. A risk of bias assessment and sensitivity analyses were conducted and the GRADE criteria for prognostic studies were applied to assess confidence in findings.

RESULTS

In all, 85 studies (111 cohorts; 15,255 participants) were included. Three quarters of studies demonstrated low risk of bias. Larger effect sizes (for at least 1 outcome measure) occurred in studies where participants had more severe pain (greater intensity/longer duration), participants with alcohol or drug problems were not excluded, samples comprised mixed pain conditions, and programs included a cognitive component and/or a passive therapy component. Effect sizes for pain and physical function were maintained at follow-up, but effect sizes for depression and anxiety declined over time.

DISCUSSION

Inpatient multidisciplinary PMPs may be well suited to patients with severe or long-lasting pain. Programs should adopt broad patient inclusion criteria, and outcomes were similar for programs based on cognitive-behavioral versus mindfulness/acceptance-based therapies.

Rehabilitation access and effectiveness for persons with back pain: the protocol of a cohort study (REHAB-BP, DRKS00011554)

BACKGROUND

Back pain is one of the most common chronic diseases in Germany and has a major impact on work ability and social participation. The German Pension Insurance (GPI) is the main provider of medical rehabilitation to improve work ability and prevent disability pensions in Germany. However, over half of the persons granted a disability pension have never used a medical rehabilitation service. Furthermore, evidence on the effects of medical rehabilitation in Germany is inconclusive. Consequently, this study has two aims: first, to determine barriers to using rehabilitation services, and second, to examine the effectiveness of medical rehabilitation in German residents with chronic back pain.

METHODS

In 2017 a postal questionnaire will be sent to 45,000 persons aged 45 to 59 years whose pension insurance contributions are managed by the GPI North or the GPI Central Germany. In 2019 respondents who report back pain in the first survey (n = 5760 expected) will be sent a second questionnaire. Individuals will be eligible for the first survey if they are employed, have neither used nor applied for a rehabilitation programme during the last 4 years and neither received nor applied for a disability pension. The sample will be drawn randomly from the registers of the GPI North (n = 22,500) and the GPI Central Germany (n = 22,500) and stratified by sex and duration of sickness absence benefits. Barriers to rehabilitation services will be related to socio-demographic and social characteristics, pain and attitudes to pain, health and health behaviour, healthcare utilisation, experiences and cognitions about rehabilitation services and job conditions. Propensity score matched analyses will be used to examine the effectiveness of rehabilitation services. Data on use of medical rehabilitation will be extracted from administrative records. The primary outcome is pain disability. Secondary outcomes are pain intensity and days of disability, pain self-efficacy, fear avoidance beliefs, self-rated health, depression, healthcare utilisation, self-rated work ability and subjective prognosis of employability, sickness absence benefits, and disability pensions.

DISCUSSION

This study identifies barriers to use of rehabilitation services and determines the effectiveness of medical rehabilitation for patients with chronic back pain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register ( DRKS00011554 , January 26, 2017).