The most important needs and preferences of patients for support from health care professionals: A reflective practice on (transitional) care for young adults with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Design of a Rheumatology Transition Clinic for a Resource-Constrained Setting

OBJECTIVES

To describe the design process of a medical care program for adolescents with pediatric onset rheumatic diseases (PRD) during the transition from pediatric to adult care in a resource-constrained hospital.

METHODS

The model of attention was developed in three steps: 1) the selection of a multidisciplinary team, 2) the evaluation of the state of readiness of patients and caregivers for the transition, and 3) the design of a strategy of attention according to local needs. The results of the first two steps were used in order to develop the strategy of attention.

RESULTS

The transition process was structured in three stages: pretransition (at pediatric rheumatology clinic), Transition Clinic for Adolescents with Rheumatic Diseases (TCARD, the main intervention), and post-transition (at adult rheumatology clinic). Each stage was divided, in turn, into a variable number of phases (8 in total), which included activities and goals that patients and caregivers were to accomplish during the process. A multidisciplinary approach was planned by pediatric and adult rheumatologists, nutritionists, physiatrists, psychiatrist, psychologist, nurse, and social worker. During TCARD, counseling, education, nutritional, physical, and mental health interventions were considered.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed transition model for patients with rheumatic diseases can be a useful tool in developing countries.

How healthcare professionals experience patient participation in designing healthcare services and products. A qualitative study in the field of spinal cord injury in Switzerland

OBJECTIVES

This study explored healthcare professionals' accounts of patient participation, focusing particularly on aspects related to patients' contributions to the planning and design of healthcare services and products. It aimed to determine (1) how healthcare professionals experience patient participation, (2) what factors, in their view, may inhibit or promote it; and (3) through what channels they think it can take place.

METHODS

This study adopted a pragmatic epistemological approach. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals at four specialized centers for spinal cord injury in Switzerland.

RESULTS

Healthcare professionals who participated in this study were generally open to patient participation in the healthcare innovation process, highlighting several factors that may influence this process. Participants referred to three types of patient contributions that would usually emerge from informal exchange: (1) bringing in information unknown to staff; (2) reporting problems; and (3) providing concrete suggestions for improvement.

CONCLUSION & PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Healthcare professionals' positive view on and experiences with patient participation in the healthcare innovation process provide a fertile ground to further explore ways of fostering this new form of collaboration. Ultimately, it will be important to demonstrate its positive impact on both patients' as well as healthcare professionals' experiences.