Decision satisfaction among women choosing a method of pregnancy termination in the setting of fetal anomalies and other pregnancy complications: A qualitative study

Association of body mass index on time to fetal expulsion for individuals undergoing medication abortion over 13 weeks gestational duration

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine the association of body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) with time to fetal expulsion for individuals undergoing medication abortion over 13 weeks.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies undergoing medication abortion >13 weeks at a single academic medical center between 2020 and 2024. Our primary outcome was time to fetal expulsion. We categorized BMI into three groups (>25, 25-29.9, and ≥30) and compared median time to fetal expulsion. We used multivariable logistic regression models to assess the association of BMI with time to delivery ≥24hours.

RESULTS

Of the 428 charts reviewed, 382 patients met the inclusion criteria with an average gestational duration of 25.0 weeks. Of these, 162 (42.4%) had a BMI >30 kg/m2; 120 individuals fell into the BMI 25 to 29.9 group (31.4%), and the remaining 100 individuals made up the BMI <25 group (26.2%). The median time to expulsion differed significantly among BMI categories (12 hours for BMI <25 [IQR 8-18], 14 hours for BMI 25-29.9 [IQR 8-22], 20 hours for BMI ≥30 [IQR 12-28], p < 0.001). After adjusting for gestational duration, history of cesarean section, or prior vaginal deliveries, individuals with a BMI ≥30 had 6.62 times the odds (95% CI 3.27-13.44) of having a time to expulsion ≥24 hours compared to BMI <25.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with a BMI >30 had significantly longer second and third trimester time to fetal expulsion. Induction protocols and counseling may need to be adjusted based on body size.

IMPLICATIONS

Individuals with a BMI >30 undergoing a medication abortion >13 weeks have longer time to fetal expulsion than those with a BMI <25. More research is needed to optimize induction protocols and abortion care for high BMI individuals.

Is it an abortion: Classification of pregnancy-ending interventions after 24 weeks in the presence of lethal fetal anomalies

OBJECTIVES

To determine how obstetrician-gynecologists categorize pregnancy-ending interventions in the setting of lethal fetal anomalies.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study of U.S. obstetrician-gynecologists from May to July 2021. We distributed a cross-sectional online survey via email and social media and completed qualitative telephone interviews with a nested group of participants. We assessed institutional classification as induced abortion versus indicated delivery for six scenarios of ending a pregnancy with lethal anomalies after 24 weeks, comparing classification using McNemar chi-square tests with Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons with a false discovery rate of 0.05. We performed the thematic analysis of qualitative data and then performed a mixed-methods analysis.

RESULTS

We included 205 respondents; most were female (84.4%), had provided abortion care (80.2%), and were general OB/GYNs (59.3%), with broad representation across pre-Dobbs state and institutional abortion policies. Twenty-one qualitative participants had similar characteristics to the whole sample. All scenarios were classified as induced abortion by the majority of respondents, ranging from 53.2% for 32-week induction for anencephaly, to 82.9% for feticidal injection with 24-week induction for anencephaly. Mixed-methods analysis revealed the relevance of gestational age (later interventions less likely to be considered induced abortion) and procedure method and setting (dilation and evacuation, feticidal injection, and freestanding facility all increasing classification as induced abortion).

CONCLUSIONS

There is wide variation in the classification of pregnancy-ending interventions for lethal fetal anomalies, even among trained obstetrician-gynecologists. Method, timing, and location of ending a nonviable pregnancy influence classification, though the perinatal outcome is unchanged.

IMPLICATIONS

The classification of pregnancy-ending interventions for lethal fetal anomalies after 24 weeks as indicated delivery versus induced abortion is reflective of sociopolitical regulatory factors as opposed to medical science. The regulatory requirement for classification negatively impacts access to care, especially in environments where induced abortion is legally restricted.

Outpatient medical management of later second trimester abortion (18-23.6 weeks) with procedural evacuation backup: A large case series

Objective

Document the clinical outcomes of an outpatient medical management with procedural evacuation backup procedure for abortions between 18 weeks zero days to 23 weeks six days gestation.

Study design

We conducted a retrospective medical records review of adult patients who received mifepristone and repeated misoprostol for second trimester abortion with procedural evacuation backup at an Arizona clinic between October 2017 and November 2021. We extracted patient demographics; pregnancy and medical history; and preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data. We assessed abortion outcomes, including procedure timing, mode of completion (medication alone or medications and procedural evacuation), and safety.

Results

All 359 patients had a complete abortion with 63.5% of patients completing with medication alone and 36.5% with procedural evacuation backup. The median time from first dose of misoprostol to fetal expulsion was six hours, among those who completed the abortion with medications alone. Of those who received procedural evacuation as backup, the median time for procedural evacuation was 10 minutes. The vast majority of patients (99.4%) did not have any adverse events. Two safety incidents (0.6%) occurred, a broad right ligament tear and a uterine rupture.

Conclusion

Patients in one outpatient setting safely and effectively received medical management of second trimester abortion with procedural evacuation backup, and two thirds completed with medications alone.

Implications

Outpatient settings may consider medical management of abortion between 18 and 24 weeks with procedural evacuation back-up as a safe, effective, and manageable second trimester abortion option. Additional research is needed on patient experience and satisfaction.

Classification of periviable pregnancy-ending interventions for maternal life endangerment as induced abortion

OBJECTIVES

To explore how US obstetrician-gynecologists (OB/GYNs) classify periviable pregnancy-ending interventions for maternal life endangerment.

STUDY DESIGN

From May to July 2021, we performed an explanatory sequential mixed methods study of US OB/GYNs, recruited through social media and professional listservs. We administered a cross-sectional survey requesting institutional classification of labor induction or surgical evacuation of a 22-week pregnancy affected by intrauterine infection, using chi-square tests and logistic regression to compare determinations by physician and institutional factors. We then conducted semistructured interviews in a diverse nested sample to explore decision-making, merging quantitative and qualitative data in a mixed methods analysis.

RESULTS

We received 209 completed survey responses, with 101 (48.3%) current abortion providers and 48 (20.1%) never-providers, and completed 21 qualitative interviews. Fewer than half of respondents reported that pregnancy-ending intervention for 22-week intrauterine infection would be classified as induced abortion at their institution (induction: 21.1%, dilation & evacuation: 42.6%, p < 0.001). In addition to procedure method, decision-making factors for classification as abortion included personal experience with abortion (with more experienced participants more likely to identify care as abortion) and state and institutional abortion regulations ("I have to call it a medical [induction]… I'm not allowed to use the word abortion").

CONCLUSIONS

Most OB/GYNs do not classify periviable pregnancy-ending interventions for life-threatening maternal complications as induced abortion, especially when physicians and institutions have less abortion expertise. Differential classification of pregnancy-ending care may lead to undercounting of later abortion procedures, masking the impact of abortion restrictions.

IMPLICATIONS

Under unclear legal definitions, legislative interference, and administrative overreach, subjectivity in classification creates inconsistency in care for pregnancy complications. Failure to classify life-saving care as abortion contributes to stigma and facilitates restrictions, with increased danger and less autonomy for pregnant people.

Needs for supporting women undergoing termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: A phenomenological study based on the cognitive-emotional-behavioral framework

OBJECTIVE

To determine and describe the needs of women undergoing termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (TOPFA) in China.

STUDY DESIGN

Qualitative study with semi-structured interviews. Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies checklist was used for reporting.

SETTING

Three general hospitals and one special hospital in Changsha, Hunan, China.

PARTICIPANTS

12 women who had undergone TOPFA and 12 healthcare providers who had experienced in caring for these women.

METHODS

This study was based on the cognitive-emotional-behavioral framework (CEBF) of women who had to undergo TOPFA. Twenty-four participants (12 women and 12 healthcare providers) were recruited from two hospitals in China. Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted based on interview guides. ATLAS.ti software was used to encode and analyze data. Qualitative content analysis was also applied.

FINDINGS

Four themes emerged: information, emotional, professional psychological, and social supports. Each theme was subdivided into four phases for a detailed description of the temporal order (denial, confirmation, decision-making, and recovery phases) within the framework.

KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Our study analyzes the four needs of women who underwent TOPFA and the specifics of each need at different phases based on the CEBF. The importance of offering professional psychological support, detailed information, timely emotional support, and comprehensive social support for these women is illustrated. This study contributes to the understanding of women's needs, hence providing a theoretical basis for the construction of supportive programs.

Internal Medicine Residents' Experience Performing Routine Assessment of What Matters Most to Patients Upon Hospital Admission

PROBLEM

Failure to elicit patients' values, goals, and priorities can result in missed opportunities to provide patient-centered care. Little is known about resident physicians' direct experience of eliciting patients' values, goals, and priorities and integrating them into routine hospital care.

INTERVENTION

In 2017, we asked resident physicians on general internal medicine wards rotations to elicit and document a "Personal History" from patients upon hospital admission, in addition to a traditional social history. We defined a Personal History as documenting "what matters most to the patient and why." The purpose of the Personal History was to understand and consider patients' values, goals, and priorities. We then conducted qualitative interviews of the resident physicians to understand their experiences eliciting and integrating patients' values, goals, and priorities in routine hospital care.

CONTEXT

We performed this exploratory intervention at a large high-volume urban hospital. Two teams from general medicine wards participated in the Personal History intervention. We conducted voluntary interviews of eligible residents (n = 14/15; 93%) about their experience after they completed their general wards rotations. Using the coproduction model, our aim was to explore how patients' self-expertise can be combined with physicians' medical expertise to achieve patient-centered care.

IMPACT

Four major themes were identified: 1) Taking a Personal History had value, and eliciting patients' self-expertise had the potential to change medical decision making, 2) Situational and relational factors created barriers to obtaining a Personal History, 3) Variability in buy-in with the proposed intervention affected effort, and 4) Meaningful Personal History taking could be an adaptive and longitudinal process. Perceived benefits included improved rapport with patients, helpful for patients with complex medical history, and improved physician-patient communication. Barriers included patient distress, lack of rapport, and responses from patients which did not add new insights. Accountability from attending physicians affected resident effort. Suggested future applications were for patients with serious illness, integration into electronic health records, and skills taught in medical education.

LESSONS LEARNED

Resident physicians had generally positive views of eliciting a Personal History from patients upon admission to the hospital. Overall, many residents conveyed the perceived ability to elicit and consider patient's values, goals, and priorities in certain situations (e.g., patient not in distress, adequate rapport, lack of competing priorities such as medical emergencies or overwhelming workloads). External factors, such as electronic health record design and accountability from attending physicians, may further promote residents' efforts to routinely incorporate patients' values, goals, and priorities in clinical care. Increasing familiarity among both resident physicians and patients in routinely discussing patients' values, goals, and priorities may facilitate patient-centered practice.

Effect of a family planning program on documented emotional support and reproductive goals counseling after previable pregnancy loss

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of the Ryan Program for family planning training on patient counseling surrounding previable pregnancy loss.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with first- and second-trimester miscarriages, therapeutic abortions, ectopic and molar pregnancies, from years before and after establishing a Ryan Program. We compared documentation of coping and future reproductive goals by patient factors, using chi square testing and logistic regression.

RESULTS

We included 285 pregnancies: 138 pre-Ryan, 147 post-Ryan. Documentation of coping and future goals was greater post-Ryan than pre-Ryan (57.8% vs. 26.8% for coping, 72.8% vs. 50.7% for goals; both p < 0.001). Coping was less likely to be documented for adolescents (aOR 0.02), patients of Asian race (aOR 0.08), those diagnosed in the emergency department (aOR 0.22), and those with ectopic or molar pregnancy (aOR 0.14) (all p < 0.005). Coping documentation increased with second-trimester loss (aOR 6.19) and outpatient follow-up (aOR 3.41) (all p < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Establishment of a Ryan Program was associated with greater attention to patient coping and goals after previable pregnancy loss. Patients experiencing medically-dangerous pregnancy losses receive less attention to their coping.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Comprehensive family planning training and outpatient access may improve patient-centeredness of care for previable pregnancy loss.

Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: a systematic review of the healthcare experiences and needs of parents

BACKGROUND

Improved technology and advances in clinical testing have resulted in increased detection rates of congenital anomalies during pregnancy, resulting in more parents being confronted with the possibility of terminating a pregnancy for this reason. There is a large body of research on the psychological experience and impact of terminating a pregnancy for fetal anomaly. However, there remains a lack of evidence on the holistic healthcare experience of parents in this situation. To develop a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare experiences and needs of parents, this systematic review sought to summarise and appraise the literature on parents' experiences following a termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly.

REVIEW QUESTION

What are the healthcare experiences and needs of parents who undergo a termination of pregnancy following an antenatal diagnosis of a fetal anomaly?

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken with searches completed across six multi-disciplinary electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane). Eligible articles were qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods studies, published between January 2010 and August 2021, reporting the results of primary data on the healthcare experiences or healthcare needs in relation to termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly for either, or both parents. Findings were synthesised using Thematic Analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 30 articles were selected for inclusion in this review of which 24 were qualitative, five quantitative and one mixed-methods. Five overarching themes emerged from the synthesis of findings: (1) Contextual impact on access to and perception of care, (2) Organisation of care, (3) Information to inform decision making, (4) Compassionate care, and (5) Partner experience.

CONCLUSION

Compassionate healthcare professionals who provide non-judgemental and sensitive care can impact positively on parents' satisfaction with the care they receive. A well organised and co-ordinated healthcare system is needed to provide an effective and high-quality service.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020175970 .

The emotional responses of women when terminating a pregnancy for medical reasons: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

In most countries of the world the only basis for considering a termination of pregnancy is for medical reasons. Depending on the circumstances and determinants of each case, the emotional responses to this event vary greatly. The aim of this study is to map the emotional responses of women when their pregnancy is terminated for medical reasons.

METHODS

A scoping review was carried out. This covered all types of qualitative and quantitative studies published in English or Spanish since 2014 which included first-person accounts of women's emotional responses when they had a termination. A bibliographic search was made of four databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Pubmed) along with an additional manual search and backward and forward citation chaining of the studies included. The data were reported in narrative form and the results grouped according to the descriptive characteristics of the study and the emotions involved.

FINDINGS

The review process resulted in the inclusion of thirty-four studies. nineteen of these followed a qualitative approach and fifteen used quantitative methodology, with six of them being intervention studies. The emotions found ranged from anxiety and depression to guilt and thankfulness, so various authors stressed the need to improve training for health professionals to provide information, advice and support to the women during the entire process of the termination of pregnancy for medical reasons.

CONCLUSIONS

The available studies cannot be compared given the variety of designs. The predominant emotions underlying the termination for medical reasons were stress, anxiety and depression. Future research should be carried out using samples of participants covering all causes of termination for medical reasons in a particular context so that an intervention can be designed to help lessen the impact of the process on women's mental health.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #55: Counseling women at increased risk of maternal morbidity and mortality

Women should be provided with evidence-based information when considering options for contraception and pregnancy management. When counseling about health conditions and available treatments, healthcare practitioners should employ strategies that encourage the incorporation of informed patient preferences into a shared decision-making process with the patient. To optimize the health of women at risk of experiencing adverse health outcomes during or after pregnancy, counseling should be a continuous process throughout the reproductive life course. The purpose of this Consult is to provide guidance for all healthcare practitioners about counseling reproductive-aged women who may be at high risk of experiencing maternal morbidity or mortality.

Comparison of surgical versus medical termination of pregnancy between 13-20 weeks of gestation in Ethiopia: A quasi-experimental study

Background

Dilation and evacuation is a method of second trimester pregnancy termination introduced recently in Ethiopia. However, little is known about the safety and effectiveness of this method in an Ethiopian setting. Therefore, the study is intended to determine the safety and effectiveness of dilation and evacuation for surgical abortion as compared to medical abortion between 13–20 weeks’ gestational age.

Methods

This is a quasi-experimental study of women receiving second trimester termination of pregnancy between 13–20 weeks. Patients were allocated to either medical or surgical abortion based on their preference. A structured questionnaire was used to collect demographic information and clinical data upon admission. Procedure related information was collected after the procedure was completed and before the patient was discharged. Additionally, women were contacted 2 weeks after the procedure to evaluate for post-procedural complications. The primary outcome of the study was a composite complication rate. Data were collected using Open Data Kit and then analyzed using Stata version 14.2. Univariate analyses were performed using means (standard deviation), or medians (interquartile range) when the distribution was not normal. Multiple logistic regression was also performed to control for confounders.

Results

Two hundred nineteen women chose medical abortion and 60 chose surgical abortion. The composite complication rate is not significantly different among medical and surgical abortion patients (15% versus 10%; p = 0.52). Nine patients (4.1%) in the medical arm required additional intervention to complete the abortion, while none of the surgical abortion patients required additional intervention. Median (IQR) hospital stay was significantly longer in the medical group at 24 (12–24) hours versus 6(4–6) hours in the surgical group p<0.001.

Conclusion

From the current study findings, we concluded that there is no difference in safety between surgical and medical methods of abortion. This study demonstrates that surgical abortion can be used as a safe and effective alternative to medical abortion and should be offered equivalently with medical abortion, per the patient’s preference.

Cervical priming before surgical abortion between 14 and 24 weeks: a systematic review and meta-analyses for the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence-new clinical guidelines for England

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the optimal cervical priming regimen before surgical abortion between 14⁺⁰ and 24⁺⁰ weeks' gestation.

DATA SOURCES

Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for publications up to February 2020. Experts were consulted for any ongoing or missed trials.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials, published in English after 1985, that compared (1) mifepristone, misoprostol, and osmotic dilators against each other, alone or in combination; (2) different doses of mifepristone and misoprostol; (3) different intervals between priming and abortion; or (4) different routes of administration of misoprostol were included.

METHODS

Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration checklist for randomized controlled trials, and data were meta-analyzed in Review Manager 5.3. Dichotomous outcomes were analyzed as risk ratios using the Mantel-Haenszel method, and continuous outcomes were analyzed as mean differences using the inverse variance method. Fixed effects models were used when there was no significant heterogeneity (I²<50%), random effects models were used for moderate heterogeneity (I²≤50% and <80%), and evidence was not pooled when there was high heterogeneity (I²≥80%). Subgroup analyses were undertaken based on parity where available. The overall quality of the evidence was assessed using Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.

RESULTS

A total of 15 randomized controlled trials (N=2454) were included and showed decreased difficulty of procedure and/or increased cervical dilation and decreased patient acceptability with regimens that included dilators compared with those that did not include dilators; increased preoperative expulsion of the pregnancy with sublingual misoprostol and mifepristone compared with sublingual misoprostol alone; increased difficulty of procedure with dilators and misoprostol compared with dilators and mifepristone; decreased difficulty of procedure with dilators and mifepristone compared with dilators alone; and increased cervical dilation when dilators were placed the day before abortion compared with the same day.

CONCLUSION

Considered alongside clinical expertise, the published data support the use of osmotic dilators, misoprostol, or mifepristone before abortion for pregnancies at 14⁺⁰ to 16⁺⁰ weeks' gestation; osmotic dilators or misoprostol for pregnancies at 16⁺¹ to 19⁺⁰ weeks' gestation; and osmotic dilators alone or with mifepristone for pregnancies at 19⁺¹ to 24⁺⁰ weeks' gestation. The effectiveness of pharmacologic agents alone beyond 16⁺⁰ weeks' gestation and the optimal timing of dilator placement remain important questions for future research.

Complication rates of dilation and evacuation and labor induction in second-trimester abortion for fetal indications: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare complication rates of dilation and evacuation (D&E) to mifepristone and misoprostol labor induction for second trimester abortion for fetal indications.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective cohort study comparing complication rates with D&E and labor induction abortion for fetal indications at 14 weeks 0 days through 23 weeks and 6 days gestation between January 1, 2009, and August 31, 2017. We extracted demographic, procedural, and outcome data, focusing specifically on complications of maternal hemorrhage, infection, emergency department visit, hospital readmission, retained tissue requiring dilation and curettage (D&C), manual placental removal, or thromboembolism. We compared complication rates between the D&E and induction groups using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

We included outcomes from 75 (48%) D&E and 81 (52%) labor induction abortions. We identified any complication in 1 (1%) and 7 (7%) of patients, respectively (p = 0.12). The only complication in the D&E group was hemorrhage with an estimated blood loss of 1000 mL not requiring transfusion. Labor induction complications included retained tissue requiring manual removal (n = 2) or D&C (n = 1) and hemorrhage (n = 2).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in complication rates between the D&E group and the labor induction group.

IMPLICATIONS

This study compared outcomes between D&E and labor induction using mifepristone and misoprostol for second trimester abortion. Our complication rate for labor induction using mifepristone and misoprostol, and particularly our rate of retained placenta requiring D&C, was lower than what has been previously reported for second trimester labor induction termination using other methods. This study suggests there is a benefit for the routine use of mifepristone with misoprostol for second trimester labor induction. Additionally, the low rate of major complications in this study for both D&E and labor induction further validates the safety of both procedures for second trimester abortion.

Exploring young women's reasons for adopting intrauterine or oral emergency contraception in the United States: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

The recent focus on increasing access to long-acting reversible contraceptive methods has often overlooked the diverse reasons why women may choose less effective methods even when significant access barriers have been removed. While the copper intrauterine device (IUD) is considered an acceptable alternative to emergency contraception pills (ECPs), it is unclear to what extent low rates of provision and use are due to patient preferences versus structural access barriers. This study explores factors that influence patients' choice between ECPs and the copper IUD as EC, including prior experiences with contraception and attitudes toward EC methods, in settings where both options are available at no cost.

METHODS

We telephone-interviewed 17 patients seeking EC from three San Francisco Bay Area youth-serving clinics that offered the IUD as EC and ECPs as standard practice, regarding their experiences choosing an EC method. We thematically coded all interview transcripts, then summarized the themes related to reasons for choosing ECPs or the IUD as EC.

RESULTS

Ten participants left their EC visit with ECPs and seven with the IUD as EC option. Women chose ECPs because they were familiar and easily accessible. Reasons for not adopting the copper IUD included having had prior negative experiences with the IUD, concerns about its side effects and the placement procedure, and lack of awareness about the copper IUD. Women who chose the IUD as EC did so primarily because of its long-term efficacy, invisibility, lack of hormones, longer window of post-coital utility, and a desire to not rely on ECPs. Women who chose the IUD as EC had not had prior negative experiences with the IUD, had already been interested in the IUD, and were ready and able to have it placed that day.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights that women have varied and well-considered reasons for choosing each EC method. Both ECPs and the copper IUD are important and acceptable EC options, each with their own features offering benefits to patients. Efforts to destigmatize repeated use of ECPs and validate women's choice of either EC method are needed to support women in their EC method decision-making.

Receiving a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome by phone: a qualitative study of the experiences of pregnant couples

OBJECTIVES

To examine how pregnant couples experience receiving a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome (DS) by phone-a practice that has been routine care in the Central Denmark Region for years.

DESIGN

Qualitative interview study.

SETTING

Participants were recruited from hospitals in Central Denmark Region, Denmark.

PARTICIPANTS

Couples who had received a prenatal diagnosis of DS by phone and decided to terminate the pregnancy. They were recruited from the obstetric department where the termination was undertaken. During the study period (February 2016 to July 2017), 21 semistructured, audio-recorded interviews were conducted by an experienced anthropologist. Interviews were conducted 4-22 weeks after the diagnosis and analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

A prearranged phone call was considered an acceptable practice. However, the first theme 'Expected but unexpected' shows how the call often came earlier than expected. Consequently, most women were not with their partner and were thus initially alone with their grief and furthermore responsible for informing their partner, which some considered difficult. The second theme 'Now what?' shows how during the phone calls, physicians were quick to enquire about the couples' agendas. As the majority had already decided to seek termination of pregnancy, the dialogue focused on related questions and arrangements. Only half of the couples received additional counselling.

CONCLUSION

A prearranged phone call was considered an acceptable and appropriate practice. However, some aspects of this practice (particularly related to the context of the call) showed to be less than optimal for the couples. To make sure that a diagnostic result is delivered in accordance with the couples' needs and requests, the context of the call could be addressed and agreed on in advance by physicians and couples.

Role of Social and Informational Support while Deciding on Pregnancy Termination for Medical Reasons

Background: Poland is a country with restrictive laws concerning abortion, which is only allowed if the mother’s life and health are in danger, in case of rape, and severe defects in the fetus. This paper specifies the forms of support expected by women considering termination from their family, people in their surroundings and professional medical personnel. Methods: Between June 2014 and May 2016 patients eligible to terminate a pregnancy for medical reasons were asked to complete an anonymous survey consisting of sixty questions to determine patient profile and forms of support expected from the society, family and professional medical personnel as well as to assess informational support provided. Results: Women do not take into consideration society’s opinion on pregnancy termination (95%). The majority of the respondents think that financial support from the state is not sufficient to provide for sick children (81%). Despite claiming to have a medium standard of life (75%), nearly half of the respondents (45%) say that they do not have the financial resources to take care of a sick child. The women have informed their partner (97%) and closest family members (82%) and a low percentage have informed friends (32%). Nearly one third (31%) have not talked to the attending gynecologist about their decision. Conclusions: The decision to terminate a pregnancy is made by mature women with a stable life situation—supported by their partner and close family. They do not expect systemic support, as they believe it is marginal, and only seek emotional support from their closest family. They appreciate support provided by professional medical personnel if it is personal.