1
|
Gengeswaran N, Brandwood A, Anderson NN, Ramlakhan JU, Gagliardi AR. Do clinical guidelines support person-centred care for women affected by dementia: A content analysis. DEMENTIA 2024; 23:525-549. [PMID: 38567809 PMCID: PMC11059842 DOI: 10.1177/14713012241244982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dementia disproportionately affects women including persons living with dementia and caregivers. Person-centered care, rather than disease-focused, is recommended to improve care for affected persons including caregivers. General practitioners play a central role in dementia care but find it challenging due to inadequate training. The study aimed to assess if and how dementia guidelines provide clinicians with guidance on person-centred care for women affected by dementia. METHODS We searched for publicly available English-language guidelines on the overall management of dementia in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Guidelines International Network repository. We employed deductive and summative content analysis, and categorized person-centered care guideline content based on established frameworks, and conveyed our results using summary statistics, text, and tables. RESULTS We reviewed 15 guidelines published from 2006 to 2020 in eight countries. Few (4, 23%) involved persons living with dementia or caregivers in guideline development. Regarding general person-centred care, guidelines mostly addressed the domains of exchange information (93%), share decisions (93%), enable self-management (93%) and address emotions (87%), while few offered content on manage uncertainty (33%) or foster a healing relationship (13%). Regarding dementia-specific person-centred care, most guidelines addressed intersectionality (tailoring care for diverse characteristics) (80%), but few included content on the domains of quality of life (67%), dignity (53%) or sex/gender issues (20%). Even when mentioned, the guidance was typically brief. We identified 32 general and 18 dementia-specific strategies to achieve person-centered care by compiling information from these guidelines. CONCLUSIONS This study identified inconsistent and insufficient guideline content on person-centred care for women with dementia. Compiled strategies for achieving person-centred care could be used by developers to enhance existing and future dementia guidelines; and inform the development of policies or programs, education, tools for clinicians, and quality improvement measures for evaluating dementia care. Future research is crucial for promoting person-centred dementia care for women living with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nevetda Gengeswaran
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Canada
| | - Alec Brandwood
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Canada
| | - Natalie N Anderson
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Canada
| | - Jessica U Ramlakhan
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Westerink HJ, Oirbans T, Garvelink MM, van Uden-Kraan CF, Zouitni O, Bart HAJ, van der Wees PJ, van der Nat PB. Barriers and facilitators of meaningful patient participation at the collective level in healthcare organizations: A systematic review. Health Policy 2023; 138:104946. [PMID: 38000333 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Collective patient participation, such as patient participation in policy making, has become increasingly important to achieve high-quality care. However, there is little knowledge on how to let patients participate in a meaningful manner at this level. The aim of this systematic literature review was to provide an overview of barriers, facilitators, and associated impact of collective patient participation. METHODS PubMed and EMBASE were searched until May 2023 for studies that evaluated collective patient participation. Study characteristics, methods for patient participation, barriers and facilitators, and impact (if measured) of patient participation were extracted from the articles. RESULTS We included 59 articles. Identified barriers and facilitators of collective patient participation were grouped into five categories: (1) preconditions for patient participation, (2) strategy for patient participation, (3) preparation of patients and staff for patient participation, (4) support for patients and staff during patient participation, and (5) evaluation of patient participation. Impact of patient participation was reported in 34 included studies at three levels: quality of care and research, the team and organization, and the participants themselves. Only three studies reported quantitative outcomes. CONCLUSION Interestingly, similar challenges were experienced during a period of twenty years, indicating that little progress has been made in structuring patient participation. Our overview of barriers and facilitators will therefore help to improve and structure collective patient participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrike J Westerink
- Department of Value Improvement, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Tom Oirbans
- Department of Value Improvement, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam M Garvelink
- Department of Value Improvement, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ouisam Zouitni
- Client Council, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hans A J Bart
- Independent patient advocate (former policymaker for the Netherlands Patients Federation, now retired)
| | - Philip J van der Wees
- Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul B van der Nat
- Department of Value Improvement, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Valentine KD, Shaffer VA, Hauber B. Eliciting preferences for cancer screening tests: Comparison of a discrete choice experiment and the threshold technique. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 115:107898. [PMID: 37467593 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare results of three preference elicitation methods for a cancer screening test. METHODS Participants (undergraduate students) completed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and a threshold technique (TT) task. Accuracy (false positives, false negatives), benefits (lives saved), and cost for a cancer screening test were used as attributes in the DCE and branching logic for the TT. Participants were also asked a direct elicitation question regarding a hypothetical screening test for breast (women) or prostate (men) cancer without mortality benefit. Correlations assessed the relationship between DCE and TT thresholds. Thresholds were standardized and ranked for both methods to compare. A logistic regression used the thresholds to predict results of the direct elicitation. RESULTS DCE and TT estimates were not meaningfully correlated (max ρ = 0.17). Participant rankings of attributes matched only 20% of the time (58/292). Neither method predicted preference for being screened (ps > 0.21). CONCLUSIONS The DCE and TT yielded different preference estimates (and rank orderings) for the same participant. Neither method predicted patients' desires for a screening test. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Clinicians, patients, policy makers, and researchers should be aware that patient preference results may be sensitive to the method of eliciting preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K D Valentine
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 100 Cambridge St, 16th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | | | - Brett Hauber
- Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY 10017, USA; The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98107, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abuwa C, Abbaticchio A, Theodorlis M, Marshall D, MacKay C, Borkhoff CM, Hazlewood GS, Battistella M, Lofters A, Ahluwalia V, Gagliardi AR. Identifying strategies that support equitable person-centred osteoarthritis care for diverse women: content analysis of guidelines. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:734. [PMID: 37710195 PMCID: PMC10500823 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06877-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Women are disproportionately impacted by osteoarthritis (OA) but less likely than men to access early diagnosis and management, or experience OA care tailored through person-centred approaches to their needs and preferences, particularly racialized women. One way to support clinicians in optimizing OA care is through clinical guidelines. We aimed to examine the content of OA guidelines for guidance on providing equitable, person-centred care to disadvantaged groups including women. METHODS We searched indexed databases and websites for English-language OA-relevant guidelines published in 2000 or later by non-profit organizations. We used manifest content analysis to extract data, and summary statistics and text to describe guideline characteristics, person-centred care (PCC) using a six-domain PCC framework, OA prevalence or barriers by intersectional factors, and strategies to improve equitable access to OA care. RESULTS We included 36 OA guidelines published from 2003 to 2021 in 8 regions or countries. Few (39%) development panels included patients. While most (81%) guidelines included at least one PCC domain, guidance was often brief or vague, few addressed exchange information, respond to emotions and manage uncertainty, and none referred to fostering a healing relationship. Few (39%) guidelines acknowledged or described greater prevalence of OA among particular groups; only 3 (8%) noted that socioeconomic status was a barrier to OA care, and only 2 (6%) offered guidance to clinicians on how to improve equitable access to OA care: assess acceptability, availability, accessibility, and affordability of self-management interventions; and employ risk assessment tools to identify patients without means to cope well at home after surgery. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed that OA guidelines do not support clinicians in caring for diverse persons with OA who face disadvantages due to intersectional factors that influence access to and quality of care. Developers could strengthen OA guidelines by incorporating guidance for PCC and for equity that could be drawn from existing frameworks and tools, and by including diverse persons with OA on guideline development panels. Future research is needed to identify multi-level (patient, clinician, system) strategies that could be implemented via guidelines or in other ways to improve equitable, person-centred OA care. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION This study was informed by a team of researchers, collaborators, and thirteen diverse women with lived experience, who contributed to planning, and data collection, analysis and interpretation by reviewing study materials and providing verbal (during meetings) and written (via email) feedback.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chidinma Abuwa
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G2C4, Canada
| | - Angelina Abbaticchio
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G2C4, Canada
| | - Madeline Theodorlis
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G2C4, Canada
| | | | | | - Cornelia M Borkhoff
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Marisa Battistella
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G2C4, Canada
| | - Aisha Lofters
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, M5G2C4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zeng L, Helsingen LM, Bretthauer M, Agoritsas T, Vandvik PO, Mustafa RA, Busse J, Siemieniuk RAC, Lytvyn L, Li SA, Yang M, Yan L, Zhang L, Brignardello-Petersen R, Guyatt GH. A novel framework for incorporating patient values and preferences in making guideline recommendations: guideline panel surveys. J Clin Epidemiol 2023; 161:164-172. [PMID: 37453455 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Universally acknowledged standards for trustworthy guidelines include the necessity to ground recommendations in patient values and preferences. When information is limited-which is typically the case-guideline panels often find it difficult to explicitly integrate patient values and preferences into their recommendations. Our objective was to develop and evaluate a framework for systematically navigating guideline panels in incorporating patient values and preferences in making recommendations. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING In the context of developing a guideline for colorectal cancer screening, we generated an initial framework for creating panel surveys to elicit guideline panelists' views of patient values and preferences and to inform panel discussions on recommendations. With further applications in guidelines of diverse topic areas, we dynamically refined the framework through iterative discussions and consensus. RESULTS The finial framework consists of five steps for creating and implementing panel surveys. The surveys can serve three objectives following from the quantitative information regarding patient values and preferences that guideline panels usually require. An accompanying video provides detailed instructions of the survey. CONCLUSION The framework for creating and implementing panel surveys offers explicit guidance for guideline panels considering transparently and systematically incorporating patient values and preferences into guideline recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linan Zeng
- Evidence-based Pharmacy Centre/Pharmacy Department, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Lise M Helsingen
- Clinical Effectiveness Research, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas Agoritsas
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Division General Internal Medicine & Division of Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Per O Vandvik
- Department of Medicine, Lovisenberg Hospital Trust, Oslo, Norway
| | - Reem A Mustafa
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Jason Busse
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Reed A C Siemieniuk
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lyubov Lytvyn
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shelly-Anne Li
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mengting Yang
- Evidence-based Pharmacy Centre/Pharmacy Department, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
| | - Lijiao Yan
- Centre for Evidence-based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Lingli Zhang
- Evidence-based Pharmacy Centre/Pharmacy Department, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
| | | | - Gordon H Guyatt
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Michaels JA, Maheswaran R. Conflicting perspectives during guidelines development are an important source of implementation failure. Health Policy 2023; 131:104801. [PMID: 36990043 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
In recent years many countries have created national bodies that provide evidence-based guidance and policy relating to the commissioning and provision of healthcare services. However, such guidance often fails to be consistently implemented. The differing perspectives from which guidance is developed is suggested as a significant contributor to these failures. A societal perspective is, necessarily, taken by policy makers, while patients and their healthcare professionals are primarily concerned with an individual perspective. This is particularly likely to impair implementation where national policy objectives, such as cost effectiveness, equity, or the promotion of innovation, are embodied in the guidance, while patients and healthcare professionals may consider it appropriate to over-ride these, based upon individual circumstances and preferences. This paper examines these conflicts with reference to guidance issued by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence in England. Conflicts are identified between the objectives, values, and preferences of those who develop and those who implement such guidance, with consequent difficulties in providing helpful personalised recommendations. The implications of this for the development and implementation of guidance are discussed and recommendations are made regarding the ways in which such guidance is framed and disseminated.
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen TT, Chueh KH, Chen KC, Chou CL, Yang JJ. The Satisfaction With Care of Patients With Schizophrenia in Taiwan: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Patient-Centered Care Domains. J Nurs Res 2023; 31:e268. [PMID: 36976539 DOI: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacological interventions combined with nonpharmacological treatments such as patient-centered care (PCC)-related activities are widely used to enhance outcomes in patients with schizophrenia. However, few studies have examined and identified the PCC factors essential to achieving better outcomes in patients with schizophrenia. PURPOSE This study was designed to identify the Picker-Institute-identified PCC domains associated with satisfaction and to determine which of these domains are most important in the context of schizophrenia care. METHODS Data were collected using patient surveys in outpatient settings and record reviews at two hospitals in northern Taiwan between November and December 2016. PCC data were collected in five domains: (a) support of patient autonomy; (b) goal setting; (c) collaboration and integration of healthcare services; (d) information, education, and communication; and (e) emotional support. The outcome measure was patient satisfaction. The study controlled for demographic factors, including age, gender, education, occupation, marriage, and urbanization level in the respondent's area of residence. Clinical characteristics included the Clinical Global Impressions severity and improvement index scores, previous admission, previous emergency department visit, and readmission within 1 year. Methods were adopted to prevent common method variance bias. Multivariable linear regression with stepwise selection and the generalized estimating equation were used to analyze the data. RESULTS After controlling for confounding factors, the generalized estimating equation model found only three PCC factors significantly associated with patient satisfaction, which differed slightly from the results of the multivariable linear regression. These three factors are as follows, in order of importance: information, education, and communication (parameter = 0.65 [0.37, 0.92], p < .001); emotional support (parameter = 0.52 [0.22, 0.81], p < .001); and goal setting (parameter = 0.31 [0.10, 0.51], p = .004). CONCLUSIONS The three critical PCC-related factors were evaluated in terms of enhancing patient satisfaction in patients with schizophrenia. Practicable strategies related to these three factors should also be developed for implementation in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsung-Tai Chen
- PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ke-Hsin Chueh
- PhD, RN, Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kao-Chen Chen
- MS, Case Manager Supervisor, Department of Health, New Taipei City Government, New Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Ling Chou
- BSN, RN, Head Nurse, Department of Community Psychiatry & Addition Psychiatry, Bali Psychiatric Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, New Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jing-Jung Yang
- MS, MD, Attending Physician, Department of Psychiatry, Cardinal Tien Hospital, and Adjunct Instructor, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Veronese S, Bertocchi E, Lissoni B, Rudà R, Silvani A, Simonetti G, Pisanello A, Ieraci S, Salmaggi A, Merli R, Verza M, De Panfilis L, Solari A, Pace A. Patient and carer involvement in the formulation of research questions: findings from the Italian guideline on palliative care in adults with glioma. Neurol Sci 2023:10.1007/s10072-023-06687-y. [PMID: 36809422 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-023-06687-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2017, the European Association for Neuro-Oncology (EANO) published the guideline for palliative care (PC) in adults with glioma. The Italian Society of Neurology (SIN), the Italian Association for Neuro-Oncology (AINO), and the Italian Society for Palliative Care (SICP) joined forces to update and adapt this guideline to the Italian context and aimed to involve patients and carers in the formulation of the clinical questions. METHODS During semi-structured interviews with glioma patients and focus group meetings (FGMs) with family carers of deceased patients, participants rated the importance of a set of pre-specified intervention topics, shared their experience, and suggested additional topics. Interviews and FGMs were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed (framework and content analysis). RESULTS We held 20 interviews and five FGMs (28 carers). Both parties considered the pre-specified topics as important, chiefly information/communication, psychological support, symptoms management, and rehabilitation. Patients aired the impact of focal neurological and cognitive deficits. Carers reported difficulties in dealing with patient's behavior and personality changes and appreciated the preservation of patient's functioning via rehabilitation. Both affirmed the importance of a dedicated healthcare path and patient's involvement in the decision-making process. Carers expressed the need to be educated and supported in their caregiving role. CONCLUSIONS Interviews and FGMs were well informative and emotionally challenging. Both parties confirmed the importance of the pre-specified topics, and carers suggested one additional topic: education/support to caregivers. Our findings strengthen the importance of a comprehensive care approach and of addressing the needs of both patients and their family carers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Veronese
- Palliative Care and Research Department, Fondazione FARO, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Barbara Lissoni
- Hospice and Palliative Care Unit, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Dept of Neuroscience, City of Health and Science and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Antonio Silvani
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgia Simonetti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Pisanello
- Unit of Neuro-Oncology, Azienda USL - IRCCS Di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Sonia Ieraci
- Psychology Unit, IRCCS-Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Salmaggi
- Unit of Neurology, Presidio A. Manzoni, ASST Lecco, Lecco, Italy
| | - Rossella Merli
- Unit of Neurosurgery, ASST Papa Giovanni 23, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | | | - Alessandra Solari
- Unit of Neuroepidemiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Via Celoria 11, 20133, Milan, Italy.
| | - Andrea Pace
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, IRCCS-Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dong K, Gagliardi AR. Person-centered care for diverse women: Narrative review of foundational research. WOMEN'S HEALTH (LONDON, ENGLAND) 2023; 19:17455057231192317. [PMID: 37596928 PMCID: PMC10440084 DOI: 10.1177/17455057231192317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/21/2023]
Abstract
Despite advocacy and recommendations to improve health care and health for persons who identify as women, women continue to face inequities in access to and quality of care. Person-centered care for women is one approach that could reduce gendered inequities. We conducted a series of studies to understand what constitutes person-centered care for women and how to achieve it. The overall aim of this article is to highlight the key findings of those studies that can inform policy, practice, and ongoing research. We conducted a narrative review of all studies related to person-centered care for women conducted in our group starting in 2018 over a 5-year period, which was general at the outset, and increasingly focused on racialized immigrant women who constitute a large proportion of the Canadian population. We organized study summaries by research phase: synthesis of person-centered care for women research, exploration of existing person-centered care for women guidance, consultation with key informants, consensus survey of key informants to prioritize strategies to achieve person-centered care for women, and consensus meeting with key informants to prioritize future research. We conducted the reported research in collaboration with an advisory group of diverse women and managers of community agencies. Our research revealed that little prior research had fully established what constitutes person-centered care for women, and in particular, how to achieve it. We also found little acknowledgment of person-centered care for women or strategies to support it in medical curriculum, clinical guidelines, or healthcare policies. We subsequently consulted women who differed by age, ethno-cultural group, health issue, education and geography, and clinicians of different specialties, who offered considerable insight on strategies to support person-centered care for women. Other diverse women, clinicians, healthcare managers, and researchers prioritized issues that warrant future research. We hope that by compiling a summary of our completed research, we draw attention to the need for person-centered care for women and motivate others to pursue it through policy, practice, and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Dong
- Division of General Surgery and Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Anna R Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Peters S, Sukumar K, Blanchard S, Ramasamy A, Malinowski J, Ginex P, Senerth E, Corremans M, Munn Z, Kredo T, Remon LP, Ngeh E, Kalman L, Alhabib S, Amer YS, Gagliardi A. Trends in guideline implementation: an updated scoping review. Implement Sci 2022; 17:50. [PMID: 35870974 PMCID: PMC9308215 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-022-01223-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Guidelines aim to support evidence-informed practice but are inconsistently used without implementation strategies. Our prior scoping review revealed that guideline implementation interventions were not selected and tailored based on processes known to enhance guideline uptake and impact. The purpose of this study was to update the prior scoping review. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for studies published from 2014 to January 2021 that evaluated guideline implementation interventions. We screened studies in triplicate and extracted data in duplicate. We reported study and intervention characteristics and studies that achieved impact with summary statistics. Results We included 118 studies that implemented guidelines on 16 clinical topics. With regard to implementation planning, 21% of studies referred to theories or frameworks, 50% pre-identified implementation barriers, and 36% engaged stakeholders in selecting or tailoring interventions. Studies that employed frameworks (n=25) most often used the theoretical domains framework (28%) or social cognitive theory (28%). Those that pre-identified barriers (n=59) most often consulted literature (60%). Those that engaged stakeholders (n=42) most often consulted healthcare professionals (79%). Common interventions included educating professionals about guidelines (44%) and information systems/technology (41%). Most studies employed multi-faceted interventions (75%). A total of 97 (82%) studies achieved impact (improvements in one or more reported outcomes) including 10 (40% of 25) studies that employed frameworks, 28 (47.45% of 59) studies that pre-identified barriers, 22 (52.38% of 42) studies that engaged stakeholders, and 21 (70% of 30) studies that employed single interventions. Conclusions Compared to our prior review, this review found that more studies used processes to select and tailor interventions, and a wider array of types of interventions across the Mazza taxonomy. Given that most studies achieved impact, this might reinforce the need for implementation planning. However, even studies that did not plan implementation achieved impact. Similarly, even single interventions achieved impact. Thus, a future systematic review based on this data is warranted to establish if the use of frameworks, barrier identification, stakeholder engagement, and multi-faceted interventions are associated with impact. Trial registration The protocol was registered with Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/4nxpr) and published in JBI Evidence Synthesis. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-022-01223-6.
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhu H, Li M, Pan B, Yang Q, Cao X, Wang Q, Chen Y, Ding G, Tian J, Ge L. A critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on insomnia using the RIGHT statement and AGREE II instrument. Sleep Med 2022; 100:244-253. [PMID: 36116294 DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2022.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) have an indispensable role in guiding the selection of various treatments for insomnia, however, little is known about the quality of released insomnia CPGs. This study aims to critically appraise the quality of existing insomnia CPGs and identify quality limitations. METHODS PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, China Biology Medicine disc, and 6 databases of international guideline developing institutions were systematically searched. CPGs on the diagnosis or treatment of insomnia were included. Reviewers independently extracted basic information and development methods, and assessed methodological quality and reporting quality using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool and Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) checklist respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to measure the agreement among reviewers and assess inter-rater reliability. RESULTS Twenty-six CPGs were identified that focused on adults, children, or children with autistic spectrum disorder, patients in the intensive care unit, patients with cancer and pregnant, lactating or menopausal women. Twenty-two CPGs used nine grading systems to rate the level of evidence and strength of recommendation. 53.85% CPGs were classified as "recommended with modification" according to the AGREE II scores (ICC from 0.64 to 0.90), and 2 CPGs were "recommended". The "clarity of presentation" domain achieved the highest mean score (67.9% ± 11.04%) but the "applicability" domain (37.1% ± 12.67%) achieved the lowest. The average reporting rate of RIGHT items in all guidelines was 67.87%. CONCLUSIONS The quality of guidelines varied substantially. Guideline developers should realize the importance of guideline applicability, patients' preferences and values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongfei Zhu
- Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Evidence Based Social Science Research Centre, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Mengting Li
- Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Evidence Based Social Science Research Centre, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Bei Pan
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Qiuyu Yang
- Evidence Based Nursing Centre, School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiao Cao
- Evidence Based Nursing Centre, School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Qi Wang
- Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Evidence Based Social Science Research Centre, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yaolong Chen
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; WHO Collaborating Center for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China; Chinese GRADE Centre, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Guowu Ding
- Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
| | - Jinhui Tian
- Evidence Based Social Science Research Centre, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China.
| | - Long Ge
- Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; Evidence Based Social Science Research Centre, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China; WHO Collaborating Center for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation, Lanzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China; Chinese GRADE Centre, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mikdashi J. The Meaningful Role of Patients, and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Practice Guideline Development. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2022; 48:691-703. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rdc.2022.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
13
|
Synnot A, Hill S, Jauré A, Merner B, Hill K, Bates P, Liacos A, Turner T. Broadening the diversity of consumers engaged in guidelines: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e058326. [PMID: 35710237 PMCID: PMC9204430 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guideline developers are encouraged to engage patients, carers and their representatives ('consumers') from diverse backgrounds in guideline development to produce more widely applicable guidelines. However, consumers from diverse backgrounds are infrequently included in guidelines and there is scant research to support guideline developers to do this. OBJECTIVES To identify principles and approaches to broaden the diversity of consumers engaged in guideline development. DESIGN Scoping review and semi-structured interviews. METHODS We conducted comprehensive searches to March 2020 for studies, reports and guidance documents. Inclusion criteria included the terms 'consumer' (patients, carers and their representatives), 'diversity' (defined using the PROGRESS-PLUS mnemonic) and 'consumer engagement' (the active involvement of consumers at any stage of guideline development). We also conducted four interviews with consumers and guideline developers. We used descriptive synthesis to identify themes, and summarised information about implemented approaches used to broaden diversity of consumers in guidelines. RESULTS From 10 included documents, we identified eight themes. Themes covered general engagement concepts (Respectful partnerships; Recruitment; Expectations, process and review); specific concepts about guideline development group (GDG) engagement (Characteristics of guideline personnel; Consumers' role, characteristics and prominence; Preparing and supporting consumers); and other (non-GDG) approaches (Online methods; Consultations and research-based approaches). The most commonly included PROGRESS-PLUS categories were Disability, Race/culture/ethnicity/language, Place of residence and Other vulnerable (eg, 'disadvantaged groups'). Each theme included the views of both consumers and guideline developers. We found descriptions of 12 implemented engagement approaches to broaden diversity of consumers in guidelines. CONCLUSIONS Relationship-building, mitigating power imbalances and meeting consumers where they are at underpin our findings. Engaging with diverse groups may require greater attention to building formal, respectful partnerships and employing inclusive engagement methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneliese Synnot
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Cochrane Australia, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sophie Hill
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Allison Jauré
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bronwen Merner
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kelvin Hill
- Stroke Foundation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peta Bates
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Tari Turner
- Cochrane Australia, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dawson A, Assifi A, Turkmani S. Woman and girl-centred care for those affected by female genital mutilation: a scoping review of provider tools and guidelines. Reprod Health 2022; 19:50. [PMID: 35193606 PMCID: PMC8862274 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-022-01356-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A woman and girl centred, rights-based approach to health care is critical to achieving sexual and reproductive health. However, women with female genital mutilation in high-income countries have been found to receive sub-optimal care. This study examined documents guiding clinicians in health and community service settings in English-speaking high-income countries to identify approaches to ensure quality women and girl-centred care for those with or at risk of female genital mutilation. METHOD We undertook a scoping review using the integrative model of patient-centredness to identify principles, enablers, and activities to facilitate woman and girl-centred care interactions. We developed an inclusion criterion to identify documents such as guidance statements and tools and technical guidelines, procedural documents and clinical practice guidelines. We searched the databases and websites of health professional associations, ministries of health, hospitals, national, state and local government and non-government organisations working in female genital mutilation in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Canada, The United States, New Zealand, and Australia. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation tool was used to appraise screened documents. FINDINGS One-hundred and twenty-four documents were included in this scoping review; 88 were developed in the United Kingdom, 20 in Australia, nine in the United States, three in Canada, two in New Zealand and two in Ireland. The focus of documents from the United Kingdom on multi-professional safeguarding (62), while those retrieved from Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand and the US focused on clinical practice. Twelve percent of the included documents contained references to all principles of patient-centred care, and only one document spoke to all principles, enablers and activities. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates the need to improve the female genital mutilation-related guidance provided to professionals to care for and protect women and girls. Professionals need to involve women and girls with or at risk of female genital mutilation in the co-design of guidelines and tools and evaluation of them and the co-production of health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Dawson
- Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Anisa Assifi
- Department of General Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sabera Turkmani
- Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Merker VL, Knight P, Radtke HB, Yohay K, Ullrich NJ, Plotkin SR, Jordan JT. Awareness and agreement with neurofibromatosis care guidelines among U.S. neurofibromatosis specialists. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2022; 17:44. [PMID: 35144646 PMCID: PMC8832755 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-022-02196-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The neurofibromatoses (NF) are a group of rare, genetic diseases sharing a predisposition to develop multiple benign nervous system tumors. Given the wide range of NF symptoms and medical specialties involved in NF care, we sought to evaluate the level of awareness of, and agreement with, published NF clinical guidelines among NF specialists in the United States. Methods An anonymous, cross-sectional, online survey was distributed to U.S.-based NF clinicians. Respondents self-reported demographics, practice characteristics, awareness of seven NF guideline publications, and level of agreement with up to 40 individual recommendations using a 5-point Likert scale. We calculated the proportion of recommendations that each clinician rated “strongly agree”, and assessed for differences in guideline awareness and agreement by respondent characteristics. Results Sixty-three clinicians (49% female; 80% academic practice) across > 8 medical specialties completed the survey. Awareness of each guideline publication ranged from 53%-79% of respondents; specialists had higher awareness of publications endorsed by their medical professional organization (p < 0.05). The proportion of respondents who “strongly agree” with individual recommendations ranged from 17%-83%; for 16 guidelines, less than 50% of respondents “strongly agree”. There were no significant differences in overall agreement with recommendations based on clinicians’ gender, race, specialty, years in practice, practice type (academic/private practice/other), practice location (urban/suburban/rural), or involvement in NF research (p > 0.05 for all). Conclusions We identified wide variability in both awareness of, and agreement with, published NF care guidelines among NF experts. Future quality improvement efforts should focus on evidence-based, consensus-driven methods to update and disseminate guidelines across this multi-specialty group of providers. Patients and caregivers should also be consulted to proactively anticipate barriers to accessing and implementing guideline-driven care. These recommendations for improving guideline knowledge and adoption may also be useful for other rare diseases requiring multi-specialty care coordination. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-022-02196-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa L Merker
- Department of Neurology and Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Yawkey 9E, Boston, MA, 02144, USA.,Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, 01730, USA
| | - Pamela Knight
- Children's Tumor Foundation, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| | - Heather B Radtke
- Children's Tumor Foundation, New York, NY, 10017, USA.,Division of Genetics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Kaleb Yohay
- Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| | - Nicole J Ullrich
- Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Scott R Plotkin
- Department of Neurology and Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Yawkey 9E, Boston, MA, 02144, USA
| | - Justin T Jordan
- Department of Neurology and Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Yawkey 9E, Boston, MA, 02144, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Survivors' preferences for the organization and delivery of supportive care after treatment: An integrative review. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2021; 54:102040. [PMID: 34571444 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.102040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Quality supportive care during cancer survivorship contributes to positive physical and psychosocial health. However, the potential positive impacts are influenced by survivors' perceptions of and ability to access the supportive care services that they deem important to their well-being. The purpose of this integrative review was to examine cancer survivors' preferences for the organization and delivery of supportive care services in the post-treatment period. METHODS We conducted a systematic search for relevant quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies. Included studies were analyzed using directed content analysis, focused on models of care and type of provider, site of care, specialized services, structural supports through transitions, and sources of information. RESULTS Sixty-nine studies were included. Overall, survivors' preferences are not static and fluctuate over time based on their perceived health needs, concerns and points of transition in care. While specialist supportive care led by consultant oncologists is often identified as the preferred model of care, survivors' also express preferences for integrated and shared models of care, involving oncology nurses, primary care and multidisciplinary professionals to optimise coordination and impact of supportive care. Flexibility in care delivery, leveraging technology and expertise, was preferred to ensure convenient and timely access to supportive care. CONCLUSIONS Cancer survivors express preferences for the organization and delivery of supportive care in the post-treatment phase that fluctuate based on their perceived health needs. The development of novel survivorship health services must consider survivors' preferences and allow flexibility in care delivery to facilitate engagement, uptake, and effectiveness.
Collapse
|
17
|
Li SA, Yousefi-Nooraie R, Guyatt G, Talwar G, Wang Q, Zhu Y, Hozo I, Djulbegovic B. A few panel members dominated guideline development meeting discussions: Social network analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2021; 141:1-10. [PMID: 34555427 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Revised: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify patterns of interactions that may influence guideline panels' decision-making. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Social network analysis (SNA) to describe the conversation network in a guideline development meeting in United States. RESULTS We analyzed one two-day guideline panel meeting that included 20 members who developed a guideline using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. The conversation pattern of the guideline panel indicated a well-connected network (density=0.59, clustering coefficient=0.82). GRADE topics on quality of evidence and benefits versus harms accounted for 46%; non-GRADE factors accounted for 30% of discussion. The chair, co-chair and methodologist initiated 53% and received 60% of all communications in the meeting; 42% of their communications occurred among themselves. SNA metrics (eigenvector, betweenness and closeness) indicated that these individuals also exerted highest influence on discussion, controlled information flow and were at the center of all communications. Members were more likely to continue previous discussion with the same individuals after both morning breaks (r=0.54, P<0.005; r=0.17, P=0.04), and after the last break on day 2 (r=0.44, P=0.015). CONCLUSION Non-GRADE factors such as breaks, and the members' roles, affect guideline development more than previously recognized. Collectively, the chair, co-chair and methodologist dominated the discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelly-Anne Li
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | - Gordon Guyatt
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gaurav Talwar
- Michael G DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
| | - Qi Wang
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ying Zhu
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada
| | - Iztok Hozo
- Department of Mathematics, Indiana University, IN, USA
| | - Benjamin Djulbegovic
- Department of Computational & Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Makoul G. Patient-centered innovation: Lessons learned. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:677-678. [PMID: 33766403 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Makoul
- NRC Health, Madison CT and Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|