Distress facing increased genetic risk of cancer: The role of social support and emotional suppression

Latent profile analysis of emotional inhibition in older adults with gastrointestinal tumors: A cross-sectional study

Objective

This study aimed to explore the current status of emotional inhibition in older adults with gastrointestinal tumors and to analyse its influencing factors.

Methods

From September to November 2024, 362 older adults with gastrointestinal tumors completed a self-designed questionnaire on demographic and clinical characteristics, an emotional inhibition scale, a self-esteem scale, and a multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Latent profile analysis was used to classify emotional inhibition in the participants, and multiple logistic regression was used to analyse the factors influencing each subgroup.

Results

Based on the level of emotional inhibition, older adults with gastrointestinal cancer were divided into three subgroups: "low emotional inhibition-active disclosure" (40.0%), "medium emotional inhibition" (41.2%), and "high emotional inhibition-disguise feelings group" (18.8%). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that sex, living conditions, disease stage, self-esteem level, and perceived social support were factors influencing participants' emotional inhibition (P ​< 0.05).

Conclusions

Emotional inhibition levels vary among older adults with gastrointestinal cancer. Medical staff should consider the characteristics, self-esteem, and perceived social support of the patients. Additionally, more targeted interventions, such as cognitive-behavioural group therapy or mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, should be developed to reduce patients' emotional inhibition.

Predictors of knowledge and knowledge gain after decision aid use among women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors contributing to baseline knowledge in women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) and knowledge gain after decision aid (DA) use.

METHODS

Women with PVs in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes were randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG) receiving DAs or a control group (CG). Of the total sample, 417 completed the baseline survey and were included in this analysis. Two multiple regression analyses were conducted: baseline data on socio-demographic, medical, decision-related and psychological variables were used to identify predictors for (1) baseline knowledge within the total group and (2) knowledge gain within the IG after DA use three months post study inclusion.

RESULTS

At baseline, higher education status, no breast cancer history, and lower decisional conflict related to higher knowledge within the total group. After DA use within the IG, higher baseline scores for decisional conflict predicted higher knowledge gain, and higher baseline scores for depression and intrusion predicted lower knowledge gain.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified predictors of baseline knowledge and knowledge gain after DA use in women with BRCA1/2 PVs.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Awareness of facilitating and hindering factors on these women's knowledge can improve understanding of their health literacy and enable further targeted support interventions.