A randomized controlled trial assessing behavioral, cognitive, emotional and physiological changes resulting from a communication skills training in physicians caring for cancer patients

Enhancing proactive life-sustaining treatment preference documentation in advanced cancer care: barriers and recommendations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite guidelines, life-sustaining treatment preferences (LSTP) documentation for advanced cancer patients remains limited and reactive to clinical events. As proactive documentation is a core component of early palliative care (EPC), addressing barriers to EPC can in parallel facilitate LSTP documentation. This narrative review examines barriers to both processes and proposes recommendations to overcome them.

RECENT FINDINGS

Barriers stem from patients, oncologists, and the healthcare system. Patients and oncologists face communication challenges. For patients, knowledge gaps on illness and LSTP documentation, family dynamics prioritizing informal over formal discussions, and limited intercultural considerations, compound these challenges. For oncologists, a curative-focused medical culture reinforces them. In the healthcare system, this culture contributes to deprioritizing LSTP documentation.

SUMMARY

Addressing these barriers requires multilevel recommendations. For patients: interventions to enhance illness understanding, foster culturally sensitive oncologist communication, and optimize care organization. For oncologists: integrating communication training and palliative care (PC) knowledge into oncology fellowships while cultivating a supportive medical culture for LSTP documentation through role modeling and intervision. For healthcare systems: LSTP documentation benchmarks, proactive EPC integration through automated reminders, telehealth, standardized medical records, and reimbursement codes. Assessing the implementation and sustainability of these recommendations is crucial to enhancing proactive LSTP documentation in advanced cancer care.

Education modalities for serious illness communication training: A scoping review on the impact on clinician behavior and patient outcomes

BACKGROUND

Several clinician training interventions have been developed in the past decade to address serious illness communication. While numerous studies report on clinician attitudes and confidence, little is reported on individual education modalities and their impact on actual behavior change and patient outcomes.

AIM

To examine what is known about the education modalities used in serious illness communication training and their impact on clinician behaviors and patient outcomes.

DESIGN

A scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Methods Manual for Scoping Reviews was conducted to examine studies measuring clinician behaviors or patient outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for English-language studies published between January 2011 and March 2023.

RESULTS

The search identified 1317 articles: 76 met inclusion criteria describing 64 unique interventions. Common education modalities used were: single workshop (n = 29), multiple workshops (n = 11), single workshop with coaching (n = 7), and multiple workshops with coaching (n = 5); though they were inconsistently structured. Studies reporting improved clinician skills tended to be in simulation settings with neither clinical practice nor patient outcomes explored. While some studies reported behavior changes or improved patient outcomes, they did not necessarily confirm improvements in clinician skills. As multiple modalities were commonly used and often embedded within quality improvement initiatives, the impact of individual modalities could not be determined.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review of serious illness communication interventions found heterogeneity among education modalities used and limited evidence supporting their effectiveness in impacting patient-centered outcomes and long-term clinician skill acquisition. Well-defined educational modalities and consistent measures of behavior change and standard patient-centered outcomes are needed.

OPERA: perception of information in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on lanreotide autogel

IMPORTANCE

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) can affect patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Appropriate information may improve their adherence to treatment and quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the change in patient's perceptions of the level of information at lanreotide (LAN) treatment initiation for GEP-NETs vs after 6 months.

DESIGN

OPERA (NCT03562091) was a prospective, longitudinal, noninterventional study.

SETTING

Thirty-one centers in France specialized in the management of patients with NETs.

INTERVENTION

Planned clinical visits at enrollment and end-of-study visits at month 6, with completion of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 25-item Quality of Life Questionnaire-Information Module (QLQ-INFO25) and 30-item Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core.

MAIN OUTCOME

Absolute change in the patient's perception of the information between baseline and month 6, using the relevant domains of the QLQ-INFO25. Endpoints measured at baseline and month 6 for at least 1 of the 3 targeted QLQ-INFO25 dimensions of the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

Ninety-three of the 115 patients enrolled completed ≥1 primary endpoint information dimension. Mean (SD) scores for the primary endpoint information dimensions were high at baseline (disease, 63.41 [20.71]; treatment, 58.85 [19.00]; supportive care, 26.53 [24.69]; maximum 100). There were no significant changes between baseline (98.34% CI) and 6 months (disease, -2.84 [-8.69, 3.01; P = .24]; treatment, -4.37 [-11.26, 2.52; P = .13]; supportive care, 0.46 [-6.78, 7.70; P = .88]), and in HRQoL between baseline and 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The lack of change in patient's perceptions of the disease, treatment, and supportive care information provided over the first 6 months of LAN treatment may suggest that physicians provided adequate information at the treatment initiation.

Advance care planning in oncology: a scoping review and some recommendations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cancer patients' communication with their relatives and healthcare professionals (HCPs) is essential for advance care planning (ACP). The purpose of this scoping review was to synthesize recent research findings about factors enabling cancer patients', their relatives', and physicians' communication about ACP, and to propose recommendations for future ACP implementation in cancer care.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review confirmed the importance of aspects of the cancer care context (i.e., culture) as ACP uptake-predisposing and -enabling factors. It highlighted the difficulty of determining who should initiate ACP discussion, with which patients and at what time-points. It also highlighted a lack of consideration for socioemotional processes in the study of ACP uptake despite evidence that cancer patients', relatives' and physicians' discomforts that arise from communication about end-of-life and the wish to safeguard each other are main obstacles to ACP implementation.

SUMMARY

Based on these recent findings, we propose an ACP communication model, developed with the consideration of factors reported to influence ACP uptake and communication in healthcare, and integrating socioemotional processes. The testing of the model may yield suggestions for innovative interventions that can support communication about ACP and promote a better uptake in clinical practice.