1
|
County Social Vulnerability and Influenza Vaccine Rates: National and Local Estimates for Medicare Recipients. Am J Prev Med 2022; 62:e1-e9. [PMID: 34548222 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Seasonal influenza vaccination among older adults is well below the recommendation of Healthy People 2020. Although geographic disparities in influenza vaccination are well documented, it remains unclear how community attributes correlate with influenza vaccination rates. Social vulnerability measures play an important role in interventions addressing vaccine equity; however, social vulnerability dimensions as corollaries of vaccination are poorly understood. To inform vaccine equity interventions, this analysis investigates spatially varying associations between county social vulnerability and influenza vaccination rate among Medicare recipients. METHODS County-level 2018 data (N=3,105) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Social Vulnerability Index were merged with the percentage of Medicare recipients vaccinated against influenza. Multilevel linear regression and geographically weighted regression generated global and local estimates, adjusted for potential confounders. Analyses were conducted in November 2020-April 2021. RESULTS A 10-percentile point increase in the overall Social Vulnerability Index was associated with an 0.87-point decrease in percentage vaccinated (p<0.001) with substantial variation by Social Vulnerability Index theme and geography. A 10-percentile point increase in socioeconomic vulnerability was associated with a 1.6-point decrease in vaccination (p<0.001) with stronger associations in higher Social Vulnerability Index quartiles and in parts of the Midwest, South, and coastal Northeast. Other Social Vulnerability Index themes had smaller associations with mixed directions: household composition and disability estimates were negative, whereas estimates for minority status and language and housing and transportation were positive. CONCLUSIONS Medicare recipients in socioeconomically vulnerable counties have low influenza vaccination rates, particularly in select regions of the country. Best practices to improve vaccine access and uptake should be targeted and should explicitly consider local socioeconomic vulnerability.
Collapse
|
2
|
Williams SE, Adams LE, Sommer EC. Improving Vaccination for Young Children (IVY): A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial. Acad Pediatr 2021; 21:1151-1160. [PMID: 34118498 DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High childhood vaccination rates are critical for public health. We hypothesized that implementation of a vaccine education and quality improvement (QI) program, Improving Vaccinations for Young Children (IVY), would improve childhood vaccine rates. METHODS Eight pediatric practices (3 academic-based, 5 community-based) were randomized to implement IVY within a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial (SWCRT) in middle Tennessee. Two educational modules on vaccines were developed using best practices in instructional design. Modules were provided electronically and were tailored to providers or office staff. Practices completed in-person QI coaching sessions and selected at least 2 vaccination-related QI changes. Data were collected monthly. The primary analysis examined intervention effect on the primary outcome of Combination 10 vaccination status for children who turned 2 in the previous month. Combination 10 status without influenza vaccine was a secondary outcome, and exploratory analyses assessed intervention effects after adjusting for time and practice type. RESULTS Data from 4041 patients (1788 control; 2253 intervention) were collected. The intervention effect was not significant on the primary outcome (OR = 1.01; 95% CI [0.76, 1.34]; P > .9), however there were positive intervention effects in secondary and exploratory models analyzing Combination10 rates without flu, including models adjusting for variation over time (0.20; 95% CI [0.04,0.35]; P = .01) and practice type (higher vaccination rate in academic practices, 0.23; 95% CI [0.03,0.42]; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS Combination 10 rates were not significantly improved with IVY, yet evidence of beneficial effect on rates without flu vaccine was found. Future studies could evaluate effects over a longer time period and within a larger practice sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Elizabeth Williams
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, Nashville, Tenn.
| | - Laura E Adams
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, Nashville, Tenn
| | - Evan C Sommer
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, Nashville, Tenn
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Norman DA, Barnes R, Pavlos R, Bhuiyan M, Alene KA, Danchin M, Seale H, Moore HC, Blyth CC. Improving Influenza Vaccination in Children With Comorbidities: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics 2021; 147:peds.2020-1433. [PMID: 33558309 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-1433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Children with medical comorbidities are at greater risk for severe influenza and poorer clinical outcomes. Despite recommendations and funding, influenza vaccine coverage remains inadequate in these children. OBJECTIVE We aimed to systematically review literature assessing interventions targeting influenza vaccine coverage in children with comorbidities and assess the impact on influenza vaccine coverage. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, and Web of Science databases were searched. STUDY SELECTION Interventions targeting influenza vaccine coverage in children with medical comorbidities. DATA EXTRACTION Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracting studies' methods, interventions, settings, populations, and results. Four reviewers independently assessed risk of bias. RESULTS From 961 screened articles, 35 met inclusion criteria. Published studies revealed that influenza vaccine coverage was significantly improved through vaccination reminders and education directed at either patients' parents or providers, as well as by vaccination-related clinic process changes. Interventions improved influenza vaccine coverage by an average 60%, but no significant differences between intervention types were detected. Significant bias and study heterogeneity were also identified, limiting confidence in this effect estimate. LIMITATIONS A high risk of bias and overall low quality of evidence limited our capacity to assess intervention types and methods. CONCLUSIONS Interventions were shown to consistently improve influenza vaccine coverage; however, no significant differences in coverage between different intervention types were observed. Future well-designed studies evaluating the effectiveness of different intervention are required to inform future optimal interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel A Norman
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Western Australia, Australia; .,School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Rosanne Barnes
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Rebecca Pavlos
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Mejbah Bhuiyan
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kefyalew Addis Alene
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Western Australia, Australia.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Margie Danchin
- Department of General Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Vaccine Hesitancy, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Victoria, Australia
| | - Holly Seale
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hannah C Moore
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Christopher C Blyth
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Western Australia, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Western Australia, Australia.,Department of Infectious Diseases, Perth Children's Hospital, Western Australia, Australia; and.,Department of Microbiology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wautlet AJ, Patel PD, Chavez P, Codispoti CD. Influenza epidemics: The role of allergists-immunologists. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2020; 126:350-356. [PMID: 33259922 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 11/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review influenza epidemics and pandemics for practicing allergists-immunologists. DATA SOURCES English-language articles published in PubMed from 1990 to present with relevance to allergic disorders and articles cited by or similar to these articles. STUDY SELECTIONS A total of 472 articles were identified from PubMed. Two independent reviewers appraised the titles for relevance. RESULTS A total of 212 relevant articles were selected. Additional articles and government websites increased the number to 295 relevant citations. CONCLUSION Influenza epidemics and pandemics have recurred throughout history. Patients with asthma and immunodeficiency are at an increased risk. Nonpharmaceutical interventions, vaccination, and neuraminidase inhibitors are key strategies for the prevention and treatment of influenza epidemics/pandemics. Allergists play a vital role in protecting high-risk groups and increasing influenza vaccination coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud J Wautlet
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Payal D Patel
- Division of Allergy/Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Patricia Chavez
- Library of Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Christopher D Codispoti
- Division of Allergy/Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vaccinating in the Emergency Department, a Novel Approach to Improve Influenza Vaccination Rates via a Quality Improvement Initiative. Pediatr Qual Saf 2020; 5:e322. [PMID: 32766495 PMCID: PMC7351463 DOI: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Introduction: Annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all US children 6 months and older to prevent morbidity and mortality. Despite these recommendations, only ~50% of US children are vaccinated annually. Influenza vaccine administration in the pediatric emergency department (ED) is an innovative solution to improve vaccination rates. However, during the 2017–2018 influenza season, only 75 influenza vaccinations were given in this tertiary care ED. We aimed to increase the number of influenza vaccines administered to ED patients from 75 to 1,000 between August 2018 and March 2019.s Methods: Process mapping identified potential barriers and solutions. Key interventions included mandatory vaccine screening, creation of a vaccine administration protocol, education for family, provider, and nursing, a revised pharmacy workflow, and weekly staff feedback. Interventions were tested using plan-do-study-act cycles. The process measure was the percent of patients screened for vaccine status. The primary outcome was the number of influenza vaccines administered. The balancing measures were ED length of stay (LOS), wasted vaccines, and financial impact on the institution. Results: We included 33,311 children in this study. Screening for vaccine status improved from 0% to 90%. Of those screened, 58% were eligible for vaccination, and 8.5% of eligible patients were vaccinated in the ED. In total, 1,323 vaccines were administered with no significant change in ED LOS (139 min) and no lost revenue to the hospital. Conclusions: We implemented an efficient, cost-effective, influenza vaccination program in the pediatric ED and successfully increased vaccinations in a population that might not otherwise receive the vaccine.
Collapse
|
6
|
Hempel S, O’Hanlon C, Lim YW, Danz M, Larkin J, Rubenstein L. Spread tools: a systematic review of components, uptake, and effectiveness of quality improvement toolkits. Implement Sci 2019; 14:83. [PMID: 31426825 PMCID: PMC6701087 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0929-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective was to conduct a systematic review of toolkit evaluations intended to spread interventions to improve healthcare quality. We aimed to determine the components, uptake, and effectiveness of publicly available toolkits. METHODS We searched PubMed, CINAHL, and the Web of Science from 2005 to May 2018 for evaluations of publicly available toolkits, used a forward search of known toolkits, screened references, and contacted topic experts. Two independent reviewers screened publications for inclusion. One reviewer abstracted data and appraised the studies, checked by a second reviewer; reviewers resolved disagreements through discussion. Findings, summarized in comprehensive evidence tables and narrative synthesis addressed the uptake and utility, procedural and organizational outcomes, provider outcomes, and patient outcomes. RESULTS In total, 77 studies evaluating 72 toolkits met inclusion criteria. Toolkits addressed a variety of quality improvement approaches and focused on clinical topics such as weight management, fall prevention, vaccination, hospital-acquired infections, pain management, and patient safety. Most toolkits included introductory and implementation material (e.g., research summaries) and healthcare provider tools (e.g., care plans), and two-thirds included material for patients (e.g., information leaflets). Pre-post studies were most common (55%); 10% were single hospital evaluations and the number of participating staff ranged from 17 to 704. Uptake data were limited and toolkit uptake was highly variable. Studies generally indicated high satisfaction with toolkits, but the perceived usefulness of individual tools varied. Across studies, 57% reported on adherence to clinical procedures and toolkit effects were positive. Provider data were reported in 40% of studies but were primarily self-reported changes. Only 29% reported patient data and, overall, results from robust study designs are missing from the evidence base. CONCLUSIONS The review documents publicly available toolkits and their components. Available uptake data are limited but indicate variability. High satisfaction with toolkits can be achieved but the usefulness of individual tools may vary. The existing evidence base on the effectiveness of toolkits remains limited. While emerging evidence indicates positive effects on clinical processes, more research on toolkit value and what affects it is needed, including linking toolkits to objective provider behavior measures and patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration number: PROSPERO 2014: CRD42014013930 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Hempel
- Southern California Evidence-based Practice Center, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, USA
- Southern California Evidence Review Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | | | - Yee Wei Lim
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Margie Danz
- Southern California Evidence-based Practice Center, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, USA
- Southern California Evidence Review Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Jody Larkin
- Knowledge Services, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schwarze J, Openshaw P, Jha A, Giacco SR, Firinu D, Tsilochristou O, Roberts G, Selby A, Akdis C, Agache I, Custovic A, Heffler E, Pinna G, Khaitov M, Nikonova A, Papadopoulos N, Akhlaq A, Nurmatov U, Renz H, Sheikh A, Skevaki C. Influenza burden, prevention, and treatment in asthma-A scoping review by the EAACI Influenza in asthma task force. Allergy 2018; 73:1151-1181. [PMID: 29105786 DOI: 10.1111/all.13333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
To address uncertainties in the prevention and management of influenza in people with asthma, we performed a scoping review of the published literature on influenza burden; current vaccine recommendations; vaccination coverage; immunogenicity, efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of influenza vaccines; and the benefits of antiviral drugs in people with asthma. We found significant variation in the reported rates of influenza detection in individuals with acute asthma exacerbations making it unclear to what degree influenza causes exacerbations of underlying asthma. The strongest evidence of an association was seen in studies of children. Countries in the European Union currently recommend influenza vaccination of adults with asthma; however, coverage varied between regions. Coverage was lower among children with asthma. Limited data suggest that good seroprotection and seroconversion can be achieved in both children and adults with asthma and that vaccination confers a degree of protection against influenza illness and asthma-related morbidity to children with asthma. There were insufficient data to determine efficacy in adults. Overall, influenza vaccines appeared to be safe for people with asthma. We identify knowledge gaps and make recommendations on future research needs in relation to influenza in patients with asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Schwarze
- Centre for Inflammation Research The Queens Medical Research Institute University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
| | - P. Openshaw
- Respiratory Sciences National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
| | - A. Jha
- Respiratory Sciences National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
| | - S. R. Giacco
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health “M. Aresu” University of Cagliari Cagliari Italy
| | - D. Firinu
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health “M. Aresu” University of Cagliari Cagliari Italy
| | | | - G. Roberts
- Faculty of Medicine Southampton and David Hide Asthma and Allergy Centre St Mary's Hospital University of Southampton Newport Isle of Wight UK
| | - A. Selby
- Faculty of Medicine Southampton and David Hide Asthma and Allergy Centre St Mary's Hospital University of Southampton Newport Isle of Wight UK
| | - C. Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research University of Zurich Davos Switzerland
| | - I. Agache
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Faculty of Medicine Transylvania University Brasov Brasov Romania
| | - A. Custovic
- Department of Paediatrics Imperial College London London UK
| | - E. Heffler
- Personalized Medicine Asthma and Allergy Clinic Department of Biomedical Sciences Humanitas University Milan Italy
| | - G. Pinna
- Department of Medical Microbiology National Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece
| | - M. Khaitov
- National Research Center Institute of Immunology of Federal Medicobiological Agency Moscow Russia
| | - A. Nikonova
- National Research Center Institute of Immunology of Federal Medicobiological Agency Moscow Russia
| | - N. Papadopoulos
- Division of Infection, Inflammation & Respiratory Medicine The University of Manchester Manchester UK
- Allergy Department 2nd Paediatric Clinic National Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens Greece
| | - A. Akhlaq
- Department of Health and Hospital Management Institute of Business Management Korangi Creek Karachi 75190 Pakistan
| | - U. Nurmatov
- Division of Population Medicine School of Medicine Cardiff University the National Centre for Population Health and Wellbeing Research Wales UK
| | - H. Renz
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiochemistry Molecular Diagnostics Philipps University Marburg University Hospital Giessen & Marburg Marburg Germany
| | - A. Sheikh
- Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics The University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
| | - C. Skevaki
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiochemistry Molecular Diagnostics Philipps University Marburg University Hospital Giessen & Marburg Marburg Germany
| |
Collapse
|