Prenatal Neurological Diagnosis: Challenges in Neuroimaging, Prognostic Counseling, and Prediction of Neurodevelopmental Outcomes

Fetal Consultation, Delivery Planning, and Perinatal Transition for Congenital Neurologic Disorders

Anomalies of the central nervous system (CNS) are a frequent referral indication for perinatal evaluation and management through fetal neurology consultation. This multidisciplinary field is evolving quickly to provide adequate care throughout the perinatal continuum. In this article, we will highlight current practice standards in fetal neurology as well as unique challenges, important considerations for fetal and postnatal care of infants with congenital neurologic conditions, and future outlooks for improving the care of patients and families impacted by CNS anomalies.

Difficult Conversations in Fetal-Neonatal Neurology: National Survey of Educational Experiences and Needs of Child Neurology Residents

BACKGROUND

Fetal-neonatal neurology (FNN) is a growing subspecialty within child neurology that often involves difficult conversations with families regarding new neurological diagnoses and prognoses. We assessed child neurology residents' educational experiences and needs regarding difficult conversations in FNN.

METHODS

We performed a descriptive survey-based study of the educational experiences of child neurology residents in their neurology training. An anonymous RedCap survey was distributed by e-mail to program directors of all US child neurology programs for distribution to residents for optional, voluntary completion.

RESULTS

Forty-seven child neurology residents in training programs in 12 states participated. Nearly all (92%) spent at least one week during the academic year providing consultations in the neonatal intensive care unit. About half participated in at least one fetal neurology consultation over the course of six months. A majority of respondents (87%) had been part of a difficult conversation in FNN, defined as delivering serious news or discussing neurological prognosis, and 68% led at least one difficult conversation over the course of six months. Respondents were more often comfortable delivering diagnoses and prognoses in neonatal neurology than in fetal neurology. A minority (32%) had communication training specific to FNN, and almost all (96%) were interested in improving their ability to conduct difficult conversations in FNN.

CONCLUSIONS

Child neurology residents were variably exposed to FNN and often actively participated in difficult conversations with families. Most residents had not had communication training specific to FNN and were interested in improving their ability to conduct difficult conversations in FNN.

Communicating neurological prognosis in the prenatal period: a narrative review and practice guidelines

Clinicians may face an array of challenges in conducting fetal neurological consultations including prognostic uncertainty, a lack of training in fetal counseling, and limited opportunity to build rapport with families. In this setting, it is critical to employ high-quality, family-centered care to allow expectant parents to make informed decisions. Despite the challenges and gravity of these consultations, there remains limited data outlining best conduct and communication practices. This narrative review aims to summarize relevant literature around counseling within fetal neurology, focusing on three key themes: (1) discussing neurological prognosis and uncertainty, (2) navigating evolving decision making, (3) recognizing bias and understanding patient context. We provide practical recommendations to clinicians conducting fetal neurological counseling and outline future research priorities. IMPACT: Fetal neurological conditions can have a significant impact on child short- and long-term health outcomes. Prenatal consultations are an important venue to discuss information regarding fetal prognosis and decision making with expectant parents. However, there is limited evidence supporting best communication practices within this setting. This review summarizes current literature around expectant parent prognostic communication preferences and outlines practical recommendations and priorities for future research.

Prenatally Diagnosed Holoprosencephaly: Review of the Literature and Practical Recommendations for Pediatric Neurologists

Holoprosencephaly (HPE) is one of the most common malformations in embryonic development. HPE represents a continuum spectrum that involves the midline cleavage of forebrain structures. Facial malformations of varying degrees of severity are also observed. It is probable that HPE results from a combination of genetic mutations and environmental influences during the initial weeks of pregnancy. Some patients with HPE experience early death, whereas others go on to experience neurodevelopmental impairment. Accurate fetal imaging can facilitate diagnosis and prenatal counseling, although more subtle brain abnormalities can be difficult to diagnose prenatally. Fetal counseling can be complex, given that the etiopathogenesis remains unclear and variable penetrance is prevalent in inherited genetic mutations. The aim of this narrative review is to examine the literature on HPE and to offer recommendations for pediatric neurologists for fetal counseling and postnatal care.

Fetal Cerebral Ventriculomegaly: A Narrative Review and Practical Recommendations for Pediatric Neurologists

Fetal cerebral ventriculomegaly is one of the most common fetal neurological disorders identified prenatally by neuroimaging. The challenges in the evolving landscape of conditions like fetal cerebral ventriculomegaly involve accurate diagnosis and how best to provide prenatal counseling regarding prognosis as well as postnatal management and care of the infant. The purpose of this narrative review is to discuss the literature on fetal ventriculomegaly, including postnatal management and neurodevelopmental outcome, and to provide practice recommendations for pediatric neurologists.

Interdisciplinary fetal neurology care: Current practice, challenges, and future directions

As the field of fetal-neonatal neurology has expanded over the past 2 decades with increasingly complex diagnoses, multidisciplinary collaboration with many subspecialties including genetics, neonatology, obstetrics, maternal fetal medicine, surgical sub-specialties, cardiology, radiology, palliative care, and ethics has needed to evolve to strive to offer optimal patient care. While comprehensive care delivery with an inter-disciplinary approach is preferred, there are often barriers based on numerous health disparities especially in resource limited settings. Even in the context of comprehensive care, diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty lead to challenges for providers during fetal neurology consultations. We present a case that highlights advantages of a comprehensive multi-disciplinary team in caring for the medical and social challenges of patients faced with a fetal neurologic diagnosis. Inter-disciplinary training focusing on maternal, fetal, neonatal, and childhood neurodevelopmental course and collaboration among the numerous stakeholders that contribute to fetal neurology practice is needed to provide optimal counseling and care for families faced with a fetal neurological diagnosis.

The science of uncertainty guides fetal-neonatal neurology principles and practice: diagnostic-prognostic opportunities and challenges

Fetal-neonatal neurologists (FNNs) consider diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic decisions strengthened by interdisciplinary collaborations. Bio-social perspectives of the woman's health influence evaluations of maternal-placental-fetal (MPF) triad, neonate, and child. A dual cognitive process integrates "fast thinking-slow thinking" to reach shared decisions that minimize bias and maintain trust. Assessing the science of uncertainty with uncertainties in science improves diagnostic choices across the developmental-aging continuum. Three case vignettes highlight challenges that illustrate this approach. The first maternal-fetal dyad involved a woman who had been recommended to terminate her pregnancy based on an incorrect diagnosis of an encephalocele. A meningocele was subsequently identified when she sought a second opinion with normal outcome for her child. The second vignette involved two pregnancies during which fetal cardiac rhabdomyoma was identified, suggesting tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). One woman sought an out-of-state termination without confirmation using fetal brain MRI or postmortem examination. The second woman requested pregnancy care with postnatal evaluations. Her adult child experiences challenges associated with TSC sequelae. The third vignette involved a prenatal diagnosis of an open neural tube defect with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. The family requested prenatal surgical closure of the defect at another institution at their personal expense despite receiving a grave prognosis. The subsequent Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) would not have recommended this procedure. Their adult child requires medical care for global developmental delay, intractable epilepsy, and autism. These three evaluations involved uncertainties requiring shared clinical decisions among all stakeholders. Falsely negative or misleading positive interpretation of results reduced chances for optimal outcomes. FNN diagnostic skills require an understanding of dynamic gene-environment interactions affecting reproductive followed by pregnancy exposomes that influence the MPF triad health with fetal neuroplasticity consequences. Toxic stressor interplay can impair the neural exposome, expressed as anomalous and/or destructive fetal brain lesions. Functional improvements or permanent sequelae may be expressed across the lifespan. Equitable and compassionate healthcare for women and families require shared decisions that preserve pregnancy health, guided by person-specific racial-ethnic, religious, and bio-social perspectives. Applying developmental origins theory to neurologic principles and practice supports a brain health capital strategy for all persons across each generation.

Fetal Neurology Practice Survey: Current Practice and the Future Directions

BACKGROUND

Fetal neurology is a rapidly evolving field. Consultations aim to diagnose, prognosticate, and coordinate prenatal and perinatal management along with other specialists and counsel expectant parents. Practice parameters and guidelines are limited.

METHODS

A 48-question online survey was administered to child neurologists. Questions targeted current care practices and perceived priorities for the field.

RESULTS

Representatives from 43 institutions in the United States responded; 83% had prenatal diagnosis centers, and the majority performed on-site neuroimaging. The earliest gestational age for fetal magnetic resonance imaging was variable. Annual consultations ranged from <20 to >100 patients. Fewer than half (n = 17.40%) were subspecialty trained. Most respondents (n = 39.91%) were interested in participating in a collaborative registry and educational initiatives.

CONCLUSIONS

The survey highlights heterogeneity in clinical practice. Large multisite and multidisciplinary collaborations are essential to gather data that inform outcomes for fetuses evaluated across institutions through registries as well as creation of guidelines and educational material.

Role of palliative care in fetal neurological consultations: Guiding through uncertainty and hope

Fetal neurology is a rapidly evolving and expanding field. Discussions about diagnosis, prognosis, treatment options, and goals of care often begin in the antenatal period. However, there are inherent challenges to fetal counseling of neurological diagnoses due to limitations of fetal imaging, prognostic uncertainty, and variability in neurodevelopmental outcomes. In the midst of uncertainty, families are challenged with preparing a care plan for their baby while simultaneously experiencing profound grief. The paradigms of perinatal palliative care can assist with the grieving process and help frame diagnostic testing and complex decision-making within the context of a family's spiritual, cultural, and social belief system. This ultimately leads to a shared decision-making process and value driven medical care. While perinatal palliative care programs have expanded, many families faced with such diagnoses never meet with a palliative care team prior to delivery. Moreover, there is significant variability in the availability of palliative care services throughout the country. Using an illustrative vignette of a patient with a prenatally diagnosed encephalocele, this review aims to provide a basic framework of perinatal palliative care for fetal neurology diagnoses that emphasizes 1) importance of clear, consistent, and transparent communication among all subspecialists and families, 2) creation of a palliative care birth plan, 3) importance of consistent care providers and longitudinal points of contact prenatally and post-delivery, 4) close communication between the prenatal and post-natal providers to allow for optimal continuity of care, and 5) recognize that information, care plans, and goals of care often evolve over time.