Finnish Parents' Responsibilities for Their Infant's Care When They Stayed in a Single Family Room in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Parents' Experiences With Couplet Care Following Caesarean Section in an Integrated Neonatal and Maternity Unit

BACKGROUND

Couplet Care, which allows mothers and newborns to receive treatment together, has gained prominence in neonatal and maternity care settings. This model supports early bonding, skin-to-skin contact, and breastfeeding, benefiting both preterm and sick newborns.

PURPOSE

The study aims to explore parents' experiences with Couplet Care after a caesarean section in an integrated neonatal and maternity unit, where both mother and newborn required treatment.

METHODS

A qualitative, semi-structured interview approach was employed. Eight mothers and 6 fathers participated, sharing their perspectives on Couplet Care through interviews conducted at a Danish hospital setting providing Couplet Care in 6 family rooms in a level II neonatal intensive care unit. Data were analyzed using content analysis inspired by Graneheim and Lundman.

RESULTS

Parents initially relied heavily on nurses, gradually gaining autonomy as their hospital stay progressed. Fathers played an essential role in caregiving, especially when mothers were immobile post-surgery. The study highlighted the importance of clear communication from nurses, which fostered parental confidence.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH

Couplet Care offers a supportive environment that promotes parental autonomy and emphasizes the critical role fathers play in caregiving. Future research should investigate the long-term effects on family dynamics and the mental health of both mothers and fathers following caesarean sections in similar settings.

Factors Influencing Parents' Perception of Their Infants' Transition From a 6-Bed Pod to Single Family Room in a Mixed-Room Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND

While hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), infants and their families undergo multiple transitions, and these have been found to be a source of stress for families. Although mixed-room NICU designs allow for infants to benefit from different room types as their needs evolve during their stay, these can necessitate a transfer from one room type to another, which represents a transition for families. As some NICUs change to mixed-room designs, there is a need to better understand the factors impacting these particular transitions from the perception of parents.

PURPOSE

Examine parent perceptions of factors affecting the transition from a 6-bed pod to single family room in a mixed-room design NICU.

METHODS

Using a qualitative descriptive design, semistructured interviews were conducted with 17 parents whose infant had transitioned from a 6-bed pod to single family room. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and then analyzed using content analysis.

RESULTS

Four categories of factors were identified: (1) framing, timing, and comprehensiveness of information provided by staff regarding the transition; (2) parents' perception of advantages and disadvantages of the new space; (3) parent's own well-being and quality of support from staff; and (4) parent's previous NICU and parenting experience.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Staff should frame the information they provide about this transition in a positive way to help parents adjust. A family-centered approach should also be used to provide tailored information and support to individual families.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

Future studies are needed into intraunit transfers including sources of support for parents, as well as staff perceptions of these transitions.

Parent Perceptions of Transitioning From a 6-Bed Pod to a Single Family Room in a Mixed-Room Design NICU

BACKGROUND

As some neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) shift toward mixed-room designs, with different room types available throughout family's stays, there is a need to better understand parent perceptions of this transition.

METHODS

This study used a qualitative descriptive design to describe parent perceptions of transitioning from a 6-bed pod to a single family room in a mixed-room design NICU. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 10 mothers and 7 fathers who were regularly present on the unit before and after the transition. Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted a minimum of 2 days after the transition occurred. Interviews were transcribed and then analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis.

FINDINGS

Four themes were identified: going into the unknown; approaching the finish line; becoming comfortable in the new reality and seeing the benefits; and gaining autonomy and confidence in parenting.

CONCLUSION

These results further our understanding of the transition process from a 6-bed pod to a single-family room for parents in the NICU. Staff should be sensitized to this experience to provide tailored information and support for parents throughout the transition.

Family Resilience as an Emerging Concept in Neonatology: Evidence From a Metasummary Review

BACKGROUND

Family resilience can be observed through specific resilience-promoting processes, namely, shared belief systems, communication, and organizational processes, but the concept remains mostly unstudied in neonatology. This metasummary aims to evaluate the frequency of family resilience processes in qualitative scientific literature to illustrate how family resilience is exhibited in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) setting.

METHODS

A search among 4 databases yielded 7029 results, which were reviewed for inclusion. Following Sandelowski and Barroso's qualitative metasummary method, findings from each study were independently coded and frequency effect size was calculated.

RESULTS

Forty-six primary qualitative studies published between 2016 and 2022 conducted with parents of preterm infants who discussed their NICU hospitalization experience were included in this metasummary. All 9 of Walsh's family resilience processes were identified in the literature, and their frequency effect size ranged from 4% to 91%. Four additional themes emerged pertaining to specific family resilience behaviors exhibited by NICU families.

CONCLUSION

This analysis sheds new light on the most recent qualitative evidence of parents' experiences in the NICU by analyzing it through the lens of family resilience and posits family resilience as a promising concept in relation to the predominance of the family-centered care philosophy in neonatal units.

Shared responsibility for decision-making in NICU: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Shared responsibility is an essential part of family-centred care and it characterizes the relationship between parents and healthcare professionals. Despite this, little is known about their shared responsibility for decision-making in neonatal intensive care units.

AIM

The aim of this scoping review was to identify previous studies on the subject and to summarize the knowledge that has been published so far.

METHOD

The review was conducted using electronic searches in the CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus and PsycINFO databases and manual searches of the reference lists of the selected papers. The searches were limited to peer-reviewed papers that had been published in English from 2010 to September 2021. The data were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and the findings were inductively summarized. We identified eight papers that met the inclusion criteria.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

The scoping review was conducted according to good scientific practice by respecting authorship and reporting the study processes accurately, honestly and transparently.

RESULTS

The results showed that shared responsibility for decision-making was based on the parents' intentions, but the degree to which they were willing to take responsibility varied. The facilitating and inhibiting factors for shared responsibility for decision-making were related to the communication between parents and professionals. The impact was related to the parents' emotions.

CONCLUSION

It is essential that parents and professionals negotiate how both parties will contribute to their shared responsibility for decision-making. This will enable them to reach a mutual understanding of what is in the infants' best interests and to mitigate the emotional burden of decisions in neonatal intensive care units. More research is needed to clarify the concept of shared responsibility for decision-making in this intensive care context.

Unintended Consequences of the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Environment: Integrative Review of Single-Family Room Unit Design

BACKGROUND

Recent trends in neonatal intensive care unit design have been directed toward reducing negative stimuli and creating a more developmentally appropriate environment for infants who require intensive care. These efforts have included reconfiguring units to provide private rooms for infants.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this integrative review was to synthesize and critically analyze negative outcomes for patients, families, and staff who have been identified in the literature related to single-family room (SFR) care in the neonatal intensive care unit.

METHODS/SEARCH STRATEGY

The electronic databases of CINAHL, ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health, and PubMed databases were utilized. Inclusion criteria were research studies in English, conducted from 2011 to 2021, in which the focus of the study was related to unit design (SFRs). Based on the inclusion criteria, our search yielded 202 articles, with an additional 2 articles found through reference list searches. After screening, 44 articles met our full inclusion/exclusion criteria. These studies were examined for outcomes related to SFR unit design.

FINDINGS/RESULTS

Our findings revealed both positive and negative outcomes related to SFR unit design when compared with traditional open bay units. These outcomes were grouped into 4 domains: Environmental Outcomes, Infant Outcomes, Parent Outcomes, and Staff Outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH

Although SFR neonatal intensive care unit design improves some outcomes for infants, families, and staff, some unexpected outcomes have been identified. Although these do not negate the positive outcomes, they should be recognized so that steps can be taken to address potential issues and prevent undesired outcomes.