Reference Citation Analysis: Find an Article, Find a Category, Find a Journal, Find a Scholar

For: Ulloa-Ricardez A, Romero-Espinoza L, Estrada-Loza MDJ, González-Cabello HJ, Núñez-Enríquez JC. Risk Factors for Intracardiac Thrombosis in the Right Atrium and Superior Vena Cava in Critically Ill Neonates who Required the Installation of a Central Venous Catheter. Pediatr Neonatol 2016;57:288-94. [PMID: 26747618 DOI: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2015.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2015] [Revised: 09/17/2015] [Accepted: 10/16/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open

For:	Ulloa-Ricardez A, Romero-Espinoza L, Estrada-Loza MDJ, González-Cabello HJ, Núñez-Enríquez JC. Risk Factors for Intracardiac Thrombosis in the Right Atrium and Superior Vena Cava in Critically Ill Neonates who Required the Installation of a Central Venous Catheter. Pediatr Neonatol 2016;57:288-94. [PMID: 26747618 DOI: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2015.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2015] [Revised: 09/17/2015] [Accepted: 10/16/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open

Number

Cited by Other Article(s)

Khizroeva J, Makatsariya A, Vorobev A, Bitsadze V, Elalamy I, Lazarchuk A, Salnikova P, Einullaeva S, Solopova A, Tretykova M, Antonova A, Mashkova T, Grigoreva K, Kvaratskheliia M, Yakubova F, Degtyareva N, Tsibizova V, Gashimova N, Blbulyan D. The Hemostatic System in Newborns and the Risk of Neonatal Thrombosis. Int J Mol Sci 2023;24:13864. [PMID: 37762167 PMCID: PMC10530883 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241813864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open

Affiliation(s)

Jamilya Khizroeva Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatal Medicine, N.F. Filatov Clinical Institute of Children’s Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya Str. 8-2, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (A.M.); (A.V.); (V.B.); (I.E.); (A.L.); (P.S.); (S.E.); (A.S.); (M.T.); (A.A.); (T.M.); (K.G.); (M.K.); (F.Y.); (N.D.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
Alexander Makatsariya Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatal Medicine, N.F. Filatov Clinical Institute of Children’s Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya Str. 8-2, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (A.M.); (A.V.); (V.B.); (I.E.); (A.L.); (P.S.); (S.E.); (A.S.); (M.T.); (A.A.); (T.M.); (K.G.); (M.K.); (F.Y.); (N.D.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
Alexander Vorobev Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatal Medicine, N.F. Filatov Clinical Institute of Children’s Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya Str. 8-2, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (A.M.); (A.V.); (V.B.); (I.E.); (A.L.); (P.S.); (S.E.); (A.S.); (M.T.); (A.A.); (T.M.); (K.G.); (M.K.); (F.Y.); (N.D.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
Victoria Bitsadze Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatal Medicine, N.F. Filatov Clinical Institute of Children’s Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya Str. 8-2, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (A.M.); (A.V.); (V.B.); (I.E.); (A.L.); (P.S.); (S.E.); (A.S.); (M.T.); (A.A.); (T.M.); (K.G.); (M.K.); (F.Y.); (N.D.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
Ismail Elalamy Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatal Medicine, N.F. Filatov Clinical Institute of Children’s Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya Str. 8-2, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (A.M.); (A.V.); (V.B.); (I.E.); (A.L.); (P.S.); (S.E.); (A.S.); (M.T.); (A.A.); (T.M.); (K.G.); (M.K.); (F.Y.); (N.D.); (N.G.); (D.B.) Hematology and Thrombosis Center, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, 4 Rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
Arina Lazarchuk Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatal Medicine, N.F. Filatov Clinical Institute of Children’s Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya Str. 8-2, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (A.M.); (A.V.); (V.B.); (I.E.); (A.L.); (P.S.); (S.E.); (A.S.); (M.T.); (A.A.); (T.M.); (K.G.); (M.K.); (F.Y.); (N.D.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
Polina Salnikova Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatal Medicine, N.F. Filatov Clinical Institute of Children’s Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya Str. 8-2, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (A.M.); (A.V.); (V.B.); (I.E.); (A.L.); (P.S.); (S.E.); (A.S.); (M.T.); (A.A.); (T.M.); (K.G.); (M.K.); (F.Y.); (N.D.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
Sabina Einullaeva Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatal Medicine, N.F. Filatov Clinical Institute of Children’s Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya Str. 8-2, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (A.M.); (A.V.); (V.B.); (I.E.); (A.L.); (P.S.); (S.E.); (A.S.); (M.T.); (A.A.); (T.M.); (K.G.); (M.K.); (F.Y.); (N.D.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
Antonina Solopova Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatal Medicine, N.F. Filatov Clinical Institute of Children’s Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya Str. 8-2, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (A.M.); (A.V.); (V.B.); (I.E.); (A.L.); (P.S.); (S.E.); (A.S.); (M.T.); (A.A.); (T.M.); (K.G.); (M.K.); (F.Y.); (N.D.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
Maria Tretykova Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatal Medicine, N.F. Filatov Clinical Institute of Children’s Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya Str. 8-2, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (A.M.); (A.V.); (V.B.); (I.E.); (A.L.); (P.S.); (S.E.); (A.S.); (M.T.); (A.A.); (T.M.); (K.G.); (M.K.); (F.Y.); (N.D.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
Alexandra Antonova Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatal Medicine, N.F. Filatov Clinical Institute of Children’s Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya Str. 8-2, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (A.M.); (A.V.); (V.B.); (I.E.); (A.L.); (P.S.); (S.E.); (A.S.); (M.T.); (A.A.); (T.M.); (K.G.); (M.K.); (F.Y.); (N.D.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
Tamara Mashkova Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatal Medicine, N.F. Filatov Clinical Institute of Children’s Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya Str. 8-2, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (A.M.); (A.V.); (V.B.); (I.E.); (A.L.); (P.S.); (S.E.); (A.S.); (M.T.); (A.A.); (T.M.); (K.G.); (M.K.); (F.Y.); (N.D.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
Kristina Grigoreva Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatal Medicine, N.F. Filatov Clinical Institute of Children’s Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya Str. 8-2, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (A.M.); (A.V.); (V.B.); (I.E.); (A.L.); (P.S.); (S.E.); (A.S.); (M.T.); (A.A.); (T.M.); (K.G.); (M.K.); (F.Y.); (N.D.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
Margaret Kvaratskheliia Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatal Medicine, N.F. Filatov Clinical Institute of Children’s Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya Str. 8-2, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (A.M.); (A.V.); (V.B.); (I.E.); (A.L.); (P.S.); (S.E.); (A.S.); (M.T.); (A.A.); (T.M.); (K.G.); (M.K.); (F.Y.); (N.D.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
Fidan Yakubova Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatal Medicine, N.F. Filatov Clinical Institute of Children’s Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya Str. 8-2, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (A.M.); (A.V.); (V.B.); (I.E.); (A.L.); (P.S.); (S.E.); (A.S.); (M.T.); (A.A.); (T.M.); (K.G.); (M.K.); (F.Y.); (N.D.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
Natalia Degtyareva Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatal Medicine, N.F. Filatov Clinical Institute of Children’s Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya Str. 8-2, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (A.M.); (A.V.); (V.B.); (I.E.); (A.L.); (P.S.); (S.E.); (A.S.); (M.T.); (A.A.); (T.M.); (K.G.); (M.K.); (F.Y.); (N.D.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
Valentina Tsibizova Almazov National Medical Research Centre, Health Ministry of Russian Federation, 2 Akkuratova Str., 197341 Saint Petersburg, Russia;
Nilufar Gashimova Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatal Medicine, N.F. Filatov Clinical Institute of Children’s Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya Str. 8-2, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (A.M.); (A.V.); (V.B.); (I.E.); (A.L.); (P.S.); (S.E.); (A.S.); (M.T.); (A.A.); (T.M.); (K.G.); (M.K.); (F.Y.); (N.D.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
David Blbulyan Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatal Medicine, N.F. Filatov Clinical Institute of Children’s Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya Str. 8-2, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (A.M.); (A.V.); (V.B.); (I.E.); (A.L.); (P.S.); (S.E.); (A.S.); (M.T.); (A.A.); (T.M.); (K.G.); (M.K.); (F.Y.); (N.D.); (N.G.); (D.B.)

Collapse

Song S, Li Z, Zhao G, Li X, Wang R, Li B, Liu Q. Epidemiology and risk factors for thrombosis in children and newborns: systematic evaluation and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr 2023;23:292. [PMID: 37322473 PMCID: PMC10267552 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-023-04122-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Thrombosis is a serious condition in children and neonates. However, the risk factors for thrombosis have not been conclusively determined. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for thrombosis in children and neonates in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) through a meta-analysis to better guide clinical treatment.

METHODS

A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, WOS, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP) was conducted to retrieve studies from creation on 23 May 2022. Data on the year of publication, study design, country of origin, number of patients/controls, ethnicity, and type of thrombus were extracted. The publication bias and heterogeneity between studies were assessed, and pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed or random effects models.

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of thrombosis in children was 2% per year (95% CI 1%-2%, P < 0.01). Infection and sepsis (OR = 1.95, P < 0.01), CVC (OR = 3.66, [95%CL 1.78-7.51], P < 0.01), mechanical ventilation (OR = 2.1, [95%CL1.47-3.01], P < 0.01), surgery (OR = 2.25, [95%CL1.2-4.22], P < 0.01), respiratory distress (OR = 1.39, [95%CL0.42-4.63], P < 0.01), ethnicities (OR = 0.88, [95%CL 0.79-0.98], P = 0.78), gestational age (OR = 1.5, [95%CL1.34-1.68], P = 0.65)were identified as risk factors for thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that CVC, Surgery, mechanical ventilation, Infection/sepsis, gestational age, Respiratory distress, and different ethnicities are risk factors for thrombosis in children and neonates in ICU. These findings may help clinicians to identify high-risk patients and develop appropriate prevention strategies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD 42022333449).

Collapse

Falay D, Schindler E, Mikus M, Boulos A, Sylvia S, Alina S, Torsten B. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular cannulation of left brachiocephalic versus right internal jugular vein: Comparative analysis of central venous catheter-associated complications. Paediatr Anaesth 2023;33:219-228. [PMID: 36350095 DOI: 10.1111/pan.14600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]

Abstract

AIMS

Central venous catheters are essential for the management of pediatric cardiac surgery patients. Recently, an ultrasound-guided access via a supraclavicular approach to the brachiocephalic vein has been described. Central venous catheters are associated with a relevant number of complications in pediatric patients. In this study, we evaluated the frequency of complications of left brachiocephalic vein access compared with right internal jugular vein standard access in children undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all pediatric cases at our tertiary care university hospital over a two-year period receiving central venous catheters for cardiac surgery.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

Frequency of complications associated with central venous catheters inserted via the left brachiocephalic vein vs. right internal jugular vein. Complications were defined as: chylothorax, deep vein thrombosis, sepsis, or delayed chest closure. Secondary endpoints: Evaluation of the insertion depth of the catheter using a height-based formula without adjustment for side used.

RESULTS

Initially, 504 placed catheters were identified. Following inclusion and exclusion criteria, 480 placed catheters remained for final analysis. Overall complications were reported in 68/480 (14.2%) cases. There was no difference in the frequency of all complications in the left brachiocephalic vein vs. the right internal jugular vein group (15.49% vs. 13.65%; OR = 1.16 [0.64; 2.07]), nor was there any difference considering the most relevant complications chylothorax (7.7% vs. 8.6%; OR = 0.89 [0.39; 1.91]) and thrombosis (5.6% vs. 4.5%; OR = 1.28 [0.46; 3.31]). The mean deviation from the optimal insertion depth was left brachiocephalic vein vs. right internal jugular vein 5.38 ± 13.6 mm and 4.94 ± 15.1 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Among children undergoing cardiac surgery, there is no significant difference between the supraclavicular approach to the left brachiocephalic vein and the right internal jugular vein regarding complications. For both approaches, a universal formula can be used to determine the correct insertion depth.

Collapse

Odaman Al I, Oymak Y, Erdem M, Tahta N, Okur Acar S, Mese T, Yilmazer MM, Gözmen S, Zihni C, Calkavur S, Karapinar TH. Assessment of clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of pediatric patients with intracardiac thrombosis: a single-center experience. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2022;33:34-41. [PMID: 34799505 DOI: 10.1097/mbc.0000000000001100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]

Abstract

The prevalence of intracardiac thrombus (ICT) is gradually increasing, though it is rare among children. Data related to the occurrence of ICT among children are limited, and treatment recommendations have been made utilizing adult guidelines. The primary objective of this study is to determine associated factors, management, and outcomes of intracardiac thrombosis in children. Between January 2013 and January 2020, patients diagnosed with ICT at the Pediatric Hematology-Oncology and Pediatric Cardiology departments in our hospital were included in the study. Demographic characteristics, clinical and laboratory findings, treatment protocols, and outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. The median age at diagnosis was 10.5 months (2 days to 14.5 years), and the median follow-up period was 6.5 months (1 month to 3.1 years). The most common primary diagnoses of the patients, in order of frequency, were heart disease (n: 8), metabolic disease (n: 3), prematurity and RDS (n: 3), burns (n: 2), pneumonia (n: 2), and asphyxia (n: 2). CVC was present in 19/23 of the patients. The reasons for CVC insertion were the need for plasmapheresis in one patient with a diagnosis of HUS and the need for well tolerated vascular access because of long-term hospitalization in others. LMWH was administered to all patients as first-line therapy. Complete response was achieved in 19 (79%) of 24 patients and 4 patients (16.6%) were unresponsive to medical treatment. It was found out that the thrombus location, type, sepsis, and hemoculture positivity, as well as the presence of CVC, had no impact on treatment response (chi-square P = 0.16, 0.12, 0.3, 0.49, 0.56). Moreover, no correlation was determined between thrombus size and treatment response (Mann Whitney U test P = 0.47). The mortality rate was determined to be 12.5% (3/24). Spontaneous occurrence of ICT is rare in childhood, without any underlying primary disease or associated factor. The presence of CVC, sepsis, and heart disease are factors associated with ICT. The success rate is increased with medical treatment. There was no significant difference in treatment response between the newborn and 1 month to 18-year-old patient group. It has been demonstrated that thrombus size, type, localization; sepsis, and hemoculture positivity had no impact on the treatment response.

Collapse