1
|
Winther JB, Holst JJ. Glucagon agonism in the treatment of metabolic diseases including type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity. Diabetes Obes Metab 2024. [PMID: 38853300 DOI: 10.1111/dom.15693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Revised: 05/18/2024] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with obesity and, therefore, it is important to target both overweight and hyperglycaemia. Glucagon plays important roles in glucose, amino acid and fat metabolism and may also regulate appetite and energy expenditure. These physiological properties are currently being exploited therapeutically in several compounds, most often in combination with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonism in the form of dual agonists. With this combination, increases in hepatic glucose production and hyperglycaemia, which would be counterproductive, are largely avoided. In multiple randomized trials, the co-agonists have been demonstrated to lead to significant weight loss and, in participants with T2DM, even improved glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. In addition, significant reductions in hepatic fat content have been observed. Here, we review and discuss the studies so far available. Twenty-six randomized trials of seven different GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R)/glucagon receptor (GCGR) co-agonists were identified and reviewed. GLP-1R/GCGR co-agonists generally provided significant weight loss, reductions in hepatic fat content, improved lipid profiles, insulin secretion and sensitivity, and in some cases, improved HbA1c levels. A higher incidence of adverse effects was present with GLP-1R/GCGR co-agonist treatment than with GLP-1 agonist monotherapy or placebo. Possible additional risks associated with glucagon agonism are also discussed. A delicate balance between GLP-1 and glucagon agonism seems to be of particular importance. Further studies exploring the optimal ratio of GLP-1 and glucagon receptor activation and dosage and titration regimens are needed to ensure a sufficient safety profile while providing clinical benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Brix Winther
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and the NovoNordisk Foundation Centre for Basic Metabolic Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jens Juul Holst
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and the NovoNordisk Foundation Centre for Basic Metabolic Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McGlone ER, Tan TMM. Glucagon-based therapy for people with diabetes and obesity: What is the sweet spot? Peptides 2024; 176:171219. [PMID: 38615717 DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2024.171219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
People with obesity and type 2 diabetes have a high prevalence of metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease, hyperlipidemia and cardiovascular disease. Glucagon increases hepatic glucose production; it also decreases hepatic fat accumulation, improves lipidemia and increases energy expenditure. Pharmaceutical strategies to antagonize the glucagon receptor improve glycemic outcomes in people with diabetes and obesity, but they increase hepatic steatosis and worsen dyslipidemia. Co-agonism of the glucagon and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptors has emerged as a promising strategy to improve glycemia in people with diabetes and obesity. Addition of glucagon receptor agonism enhances weight loss, reduces liver fat and ameliorates dyslipidemia. Prior to clinical use, however, further studies are needed to investigate the safety and efficacy of glucagon and GLP-1 receptor co-agonists in people with diabetes and obesity and related conditions, with specific concerns regarding a higher prevalence of gastrointestinal side effects, loss of muscle mass and increases in heart rate. Furthermore, co-agonists with differing ratios of glucagon:GLP-1 receptor activity vary in their clinical effect; the optimum balance is yet to be identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Rose McGlone
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Tricia M-M Tan
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McGlone ER, Bloom SR, Tan TMM. Glucagon resistance and metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease: a review of the evidence. J Endocrinol 2024; 261:e230365. [PMID: 38579751 PMCID: PMC11067060 DOI: 10.1530/joe-23-0365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
Metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is closely associated with obesity. MASLD affects over 1 billion adults globally but there are few treatment options available. Glucagon is a key metabolic regulator, and its actions include the reduction of liver fat through direct and indirect means. Chronic glucagon signalling deficiency is associated with hyperaminoacidaemia, hyperglucagonaemia and increased circulating levels of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF-21). Reduction in glucagon activity decreases hepatic amino acid and triglyceride catabolism; metabolic effects include improved glucose tolerance, increased plasma cholesterol and increased liver fat. Conversely, glucagon infusion in healthy volunteers leads to increased hepatic glucose output, decreased levels of plasma amino acids and increased urea production, decreased plasma cholesterol and increased energy expenditure. Patients with MASLD share many hormonal and metabolic characteristics with models of glucagon signalling deficiency, suggesting that they could be resistant to glucagon. Although there are few studies of the effects of glucagon infusion in patients with obesity and/or MASLD, there is some evidence that the expected effect of glucagon on amino acid catabolism may be attenuated. Taken together, this evidence supports the notion that glucagon resistance exists in patients with MASLD and may contribute to the pathogenesis of MASLD. Further studies are warranted to investigate the direct effects of glucagon on metabolism in patients with MASLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Rose McGlone
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen R Bloom
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Tricia M-M Tan
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stangerup I, Kjeldsen SAS, Richter MM, Jensen NJ, Rungby J, Haugaard SB, Georg B, Hannibal J, Møllgård K, Wewer Albrechtsen NJ, Bjørnbak Holst C. Glucagon does not directly stimulate pituitary secretion of ACTH, GH or copeptin. Peptides 2024; 176:171213. [PMID: 38604379 DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2024.171213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
Glucagon is best known for its contribution to glucose regulation through activation of the glucagon receptor (GCGR), primarily located in the liver. However, glucagon's impact on other organs may also contribute to its potent effects in health and disease. Given that glucagon-based medicine is entering the arena of anti-obesity drugs, elucidating extrahepatic actions of glucagon are of increased importance. It has been reported that glucagon may stimulate secretion of arginine-vasopressin (AVP)/copeptin, growth hormone (GH) and adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) from the pituitary gland. Nevertheless, the mechanisms and whether GCGR is present in human pituitary are unknown. In this study we found that intravenous administration of 0.2 mg glucagon to 14 healthy subjects was not associated with increases in plasma concentrations of copeptin, GH, ACTH or cortisol over a 120-min period. GCGR immunoreactivity was present in the anterior pituitary but not in cells containing GH or ACTH. Collectively, glucagon may not directly stimulate secretion of GH, ACTH or AVP/copeptin in humans but may instead be involved in yet unidentified pituitary functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida Stangerup
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital - Nordsjælland, Hillerød, Denmark.
| | - Sasha A S Kjeldsen
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael M Richter
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nicole J Jensen
- Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark; Department of Endocrinology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jørgen Rungby
- Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Steen Bendix Haugaard
- Department of Endocrinology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Birgitte Georg
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jens Hannibal
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kjeld Møllgård
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nicolai J Wewer Albrechtsen
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Camilla Bjørnbak Holst
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Allard C, Cota D, Quarta C. Poly-Agonist Pharmacotherapies for Metabolic Diseases: Hopes and New Challenges. Drugs 2024; 84:127-148. [PMID: 38127286 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-023-01982-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
The use of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor-based multi-agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity holds great promise for improving glycaemic control and weight management. Unimolecular dual and triple agonists targeting multiple gut hormone-related pathways are currently in clinical trials, with recent evidence supporting their efficacy. However, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding the biological mechanisms and potential adverse effects associated with these multi-target agents. The mechanisms underlying the therapeutic efficacy of GLP-1 receptor-based multi-agonists remain somewhat mysterious, and hidden threats may be associated with the use of gut hormone-based polyagonists. In this review, we provide a critical analysis of the benefits and risks associated with the use of these new drugs in the management of obesity and diabetes, while also exploring new potential applications of GLP-1-based pharmacology beyond the field of metabolic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Allard
- University of Bordeaux, INSERM, Neurocentre Magendie, U1215, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Daniela Cota
- University of Bordeaux, INSERM, Neurocentre Magendie, U1215, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Carmelo Quarta
- University of Bordeaux, INSERM, Neurocentre Magendie, U1215, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Naeem M, Imran L, Banatwala UESS. Unleashing the power of retatrutide: A possible triumph over obesity and overweight: A correspondence. Health Sci Rep 2024; 7:e1864. [PMID: 38323122 PMCID: PMC10844714 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.1864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims Overweight and obesity have become global health challenges with increasing prevalence. Several drugs have received Food and Drug Administration approval for nonsyndromic obesity treatment, but most have limitations, including gastrointestinal side effects and limited weight loss efficacy. Body Retatrutide, a novel incretin mimetic agent, has shown promise in clinical trials for significant weight reduction. It has demonstrated dosage-dependent pharmacokinetics with favorable safety profiles. The primary focus of this paper is to explore retatrutide and critically assess its clinical trials to justify its use and feasibility while highlighting its shortcomings. This paper also delves into the subject of obesity and its health manifestations. Conclusion It is expected that the use of retatrutide, a triple agonist, will result in significant weight loss among individuals who are obese or overweight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Naeem
- Department of MedicineDow University of Health SciencesKarachiPakistan
| | - Laiba Imran
- Department of MedicineDow University of Health SciencesKarachiPakistan
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ahrén B. Paradigm Shift in the Management of Metabolic Diseases-Next-Generation Incretin Therapy. Endocrinology 2023; 164:bqad166. [PMID: 37951841 DOI: 10.1210/endocr/bqad166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
Recently impressive weight loss has been reported for novel incretin therapies based on dual-and triple-hormone receptor coagonists. These agents have potential as being positioned as early therapeutics for metabolic diseases for which weight loss is preferred, such as type 2 diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular diseases, and nonalcoholic liver disease. This development will change the landscape of future therapy and also place weight reduction at the centerpiece for therapy of metabolic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Ahrén
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, SE-22184 Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rosenstock J, Frias J, Jastreboff AM, Du Y, Lou J, Gurbuz S, Thomas MK, Hartman ML, Haupt A, Milicevic Z, Coskun T. Retatrutide, a GIP, GLP-1 and glucagon receptor agonist, for people with type 2 diabetes: a randomised, double-blind, placebo and active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2 trial conducted in the USA. Lancet 2023; 402:529-544. [PMID: 37385280 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01053-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 79.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to current consensus guidelines for type 2 diabetes management, bodyweight management is as important as attaining glycaemic targets. Retatrutide, a single peptide with agonist activity at the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), GLP-1, and glucagon receptors, showed clinically meaningful glucose-lowering and bodyweight-lowering efficacy in a phase 1 study. We aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of retatrutide in people with type 2 diabetes across a range of doses. METHODS In this randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled and active comparator-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2 trial, participants were recruited from 42 research and health-care centres in the USA. Adults aged 18-75 years with type 2 diabetes, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of 7·0-10·5% (53·0-91·3 mmol/mol), and BMI of 25-50 kg/m2 were eligible for enrolment. Eligible participants were treated with diet and exercise alone or with a stable dose of metformin (≥1000 mg once daily) for at least 3 months before the screening visit. Participants were randomly assigned (2:2:2:1:1:1:1:2) using an interactive web-response system, with stratification for baseline HbA1c and BMI, to receive once-weekly injections of placebo, 1·5 mg dulaglutide, or retatrutide maintenance doses of 0·5 mg, 4 mg (starting dose 2 mg), 4 mg (no escalation), 8 mg (starting dose 2 mg), 8 mg (starting dose 4 mg), or 12 mg (starting dose 2 mg). Participants, study site personnel, and investigators were masked to treatment allocation until after study end. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to 24 weeks, and secondary endpoints included change in HbA1c and bodyweight at 36 weeks. Efficacy was analysed in all randomly assigned, except inadvertently enrolled, participants, and safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04867785. FINDINGS Between May 13, 2021, and June 13, 2022, 281 participants (mean age 56·2 years [SD 9·7], mean duration of diabetes 8·1 years [7·0], 156 [56%] female, and 235 [84%] White) were randomly assigned and included in the safety analysis (45 in the placebo group, 46 in the 1·5 mg dulaglutide group, and 47 in the retatrutide 0·5 mg group, 23 in the 4 mg escalation group, 24 in the 4 mg group, 26 in the 8 mg slow escalation group, 24 in the 8 mg fast escalation group, and 46 in the 12 mg escalation group). 275 participants were included in the efficacy analyses (one each in the retatrutide 0·5 mg group, 4 mg escalation group, and 8 mg slow escalation group, and three in the 12 mg escalation group were inadvertently enrolled). 237 (84%) participants completed the study and 222 (79%) completed study treatment. At 24 weeks, least-squares mean changes from baseline in HbA1c with retatrutide were -0·43% (SE 0·20; -4·68 mmol/mol [2·15]) for the 0·5 mg group, -1·39% (0·14; -15·24 mmol/mol [1·56]) for the 4 mg escalation group, -1·30% (0·22; -14·20 mmol/mol [2·44]) for the 4 mg group, -1·99% (0·15; -21·78 mmol/mol [1·60]) for the 8 mg slow escalation group, -1·88% (0·21; -20·52 mmol/mol [2·34]) for the 8 mg fast escalation group, and -2·02% (0·11; -22·07 mmol/mol [1·21]) for the 12 mg escalation group, versus -0·01% (0·21; -0·12 mmol/mol [2·27]) for the placebo group and -1·41% (0·12; -15·40 mmol/mol [1·29]) for the 1·5 mg dulaglutide group. HbA1c reductions with retatrutide were significantly greater (p<0·0001) than placebo in all but the 0·5 mg group and greater than 1·5 mg dulaglutide in the 8 mg slow escalation group (p=0·0019) and 12 mg escalation group (p=0·0002). Findings were consistent at 36 weeks. Bodyweight decreased dose dependently with retatrutide at 36 weeks by 3·19% (SE 0·61) for the 0·5 mg group, 7·92% (1·28) for the 4 mg escalation group, 10·37% (1·56) for the 4 mg group, 16·81% (1·59) for the 8 mg slow escalation group, 16·34% (1·65) for the 8 mg fast escalation group, and 16·94% (1·30) for the 12 mg escalation group, versus 3·00% (0·86) with placebo and 2·02% (0·72) with 1·5 mg dulaglutide. For retatrutide doses of 4 mg and greater, decreases in weight were significantly greater than with placebo (p=0·0017 for the 4 mg escalation group and p<0·0001 for others) and 1·5 mg dulaglutide (all p<0·0001). Mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal adverse events, including nausea, diarrhoea, vomiting, and constipation, were reported in 67 (35%) of 190 participants in the retatrutide groups (from six [13%] of 47 in the 0·5 mg group to 12 [50%] of 24 in the 8 mg fast escalation group), six (13%) of 45 participants in the placebo group, and 16 (35%) of 46 participants in the 1·5 mg dulaglutide group. There were no reports of severe hypoglycaemia and no deaths during the study. INTERPRETATION In people with type 2 diabetes, retatrutide showed clinically meaningful improvements in glycaemic control and robust reductions in bodyweight, with a safety profile consistent with GLP-1 receptor agonists and GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonists. These phase 2 data also informed dose selection for the phase 3 programme. FUNDING Eli Lilly and Company.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Juan Frias
- Velocity Clinical Research, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ania M Jastreboff
- Department of Medicine (Endocrinology & Metabolism) and Department of Pediatrics (Pediatric Endocrinology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Yu Du
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Jitong Lou
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | | | | - Axel Haupt
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jastreboff AM, Kaplan LM, Frías JP, Wu Q, Du Y, Gurbuz S, Coskun T, Haupt A, Milicevic Z, Hartman ML. Triple-Hormone-Receptor Agonist Retatrutide for Obesity - A Phase 2 Trial. N Engl J Med 2023; 389:514-526. [PMID: 37366315 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2301972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 164] [Impact Index Per Article: 164.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Retatrutide (LY3437943) is an agonist of the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, glucagon-like peptide 1, and glucagon receptors. Its dose-response relationships with respect to side effects, safety, and efficacy for the treatment of obesity are not known. METHODS We conducted a phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving adults who had a body-mass index (BMI, the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) of 30 or higher or who had a BMI of 27 to less than 30 plus at least one weight-related condition. Participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1:1:1:1:2:2 ratio to receive subcutaneous retatrutide (1 mg, 4 mg [initial dose, 2 mg], 4 mg [initial dose, 4 mg], 8 mg [initial dose, 2 mg], 8 mg [initial dose, 4 mg], or 12 mg [initial dose, 2 mg]) or placebo once weekly for 48 weeks. The primary end point was the percentage change in body weight from baseline to 24 weeks. Secondary end points included the percentage change in body weight from baseline to 48 weeks and a weight reduction of 5% or more, 10% or more, or 15% or more. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS We enrolled 338 adults, 51.8% of whom were men. The least-squares mean percentage change in body weight at 24 weeks in the retatrutide groups was -7.2% in the 1-mg group, -12.9% in the combined 4-mg group, -17.3% in the combined 8-mg group, and -17.5% in the 12-mg group, as compared with -1.6% in the placebo group. At 48 weeks, the least-squares mean percentage change in the retatrutide groups was -8.7% in the 1-mg group, -17.1% in the combined 4-mg group, -22.8% in the combined 8-mg group, and -24.2% in the 12-mg group, as compared with -2.1% in the placebo group. At 48 weeks, a weight reduction of 5% or more, 10% or more, and 15% or more had occurred in 92%, 75%, and 60%, respectively, of the participants who received 4 mg of retatrutide; 100%, 91%, and 75% of those who received 8 mg; 100%, 93%, and 83% of those who received 12 mg; and 27%, 9%, and 2% of those who received placebo. The most common adverse events in the retatrutide groups were gastrointestinal; these events were dose-related, were mostly mild to moderate in severity, and were partially mitigated with a lower starting dose (2 mg vs. 4 mg). Dose-dependent increases in heart rate peaked at 24 weeks and declined thereafter. CONCLUSIONS In adults with obesity, retatrutide treatment for 48 weeks resulted in substantial reductions in body weight. (Funded by Eli Lilly; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04881760.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ania M Jastreboff
- From the Departments of Medicine (Endocrinology and Metabolism) and Pediatrics (Pediatric Endocrinology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.M.J.); the Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.K.); Velocity Clinical Research, Los Angeles (J.P.F.); and Eli Lilly, Indianapolis (Q.W., Y.D., S.G., T.C., A.H., Z.M., M.L.H.)
| | - Lee M Kaplan
- From the Departments of Medicine (Endocrinology and Metabolism) and Pediatrics (Pediatric Endocrinology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.M.J.); the Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.K.); Velocity Clinical Research, Los Angeles (J.P.F.); and Eli Lilly, Indianapolis (Q.W., Y.D., S.G., T.C., A.H., Z.M., M.L.H.)
| | - Juan P Frías
- From the Departments of Medicine (Endocrinology and Metabolism) and Pediatrics (Pediatric Endocrinology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.M.J.); the Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.K.); Velocity Clinical Research, Los Angeles (J.P.F.); and Eli Lilly, Indianapolis (Q.W., Y.D., S.G., T.C., A.H., Z.M., M.L.H.)
| | - Qiwei Wu
- From the Departments of Medicine (Endocrinology and Metabolism) and Pediatrics (Pediatric Endocrinology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.M.J.); the Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.K.); Velocity Clinical Research, Los Angeles (J.P.F.); and Eli Lilly, Indianapolis (Q.W., Y.D., S.G., T.C., A.H., Z.M., M.L.H.)
| | - Yu Du
- From the Departments of Medicine (Endocrinology and Metabolism) and Pediatrics (Pediatric Endocrinology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.M.J.); the Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.K.); Velocity Clinical Research, Los Angeles (J.P.F.); and Eli Lilly, Indianapolis (Q.W., Y.D., S.G., T.C., A.H., Z.M., M.L.H.)
| | - Sirel Gurbuz
- From the Departments of Medicine (Endocrinology and Metabolism) and Pediatrics (Pediatric Endocrinology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.M.J.); the Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.K.); Velocity Clinical Research, Los Angeles (J.P.F.); and Eli Lilly, Indianapolis (Q.W., Y.D., S.G., T.C., A.H., Z.M., M.L.H.)
| | - Tamer Coskun
- From the Departments of Medicine (Endocrinology and Metabolism) and Pediatrics (Pediatric Endocrinology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.M.J.); the Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.K.); Velocity Clinical Research, Los Angeles (J.P.F.); and Eli Lilly, Indianapolis (Q.W., Y.D., S.G., T.C., A.H., Z.M., M.L.H.)
| | - Axel Haupt
- From the Departments of Medicine (Endocrinology and Metabolism) and Pediatrics (Pediatric Endocrinology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.M.J.); the Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.K.); Velocity Clinical Research, Los Angeles (J.P.F.); and Eli Lilly, Indianapolis (Q.W., Y.D., S.G., T.C., A.H., Z.M., M.L.H.)
| | - Zvonko Milicevic
- From the Departments of Medicine (Endocrinology and Metabolism) and Pediatrics (Pediatric Endocrinology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.M.J.); the Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.K.); Velocity Clinical Research, Los Angeles (J.P.F.); and Eli Lilly, Indianapolis (Q.W., Y.D., S.G., T.C., A.H., Z.M., M.L.H.)
| | - Mark L Hartman
- From the Departments of Medicine (Endocrinology and Metabolism) and Pediatrics (Pediatric Endocrinology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (A.M.J.); the Obesity and Metabolism Institute and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston (L.M.K.); Velocity Clinical Research, Los Angeles (J.P.F.); and Eli Lilly, Indianapolis (Q.W., Y.D., S.G., T.C., A.H., Z.M., M.L.H.)
| |
Collapse
|