Planning feasibility of extremely hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging guided linear accelerator

Treatment planning comparison of high-dose-rate brachytherapy vs. robotic and conventional stereotactic body radiotherapy for ultrahypofractionated treatment of prostate cancer

Background and purpose

Ultrahypofractionated radiation therapy is increasingly used in the treatment of prostate cancer. High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are representative methods of ultrahypofractionation. This study was performed to compare clinically applied treatment plans for patients who had been treated using HDR-BT vs. conventional or robotic SBRT.

Materials and methods

Calculated dose-volume indices between HDR-BT without a perirectal spacer (n = 20), robotic SBRT without a spacer (n = 40), and conventional (non-robotic) SBRT with a spacer (n = 40) were compared. Percentages against the prescription dose regarding the planning target volume (PTV), bladder, rectum, and urethra were statistically compared.

Results

The D50% of the PTV with HDR-BT (140.5% ± 4.9%) was significantly higher than that with robotic or conventional SBRT (116.2% ± 1.6%, 101.0% ± 0.4%, p < 0.01). The D2cm³ of the bladder with HDR-BT (65.6% ± 6.4%) was significantly lower than those with SBRT (105.3% ± 2.9%, 98.0% ± 1.3%, p < 0.01). The D2cm³ of the rectum with HDR-BT (60.6% ± 6.2%) was also significantly lower than those with SBRT (85.1% ± 8.8%, 70.4% ± 9.6%, p < 0.01). By contrast, the D0.1cm³ of the urethra with HDR-BT (117.1% ± 3.6%) was significantly higher than those with SBRT (100.2% ± 0.7%, 104.5% ± 0.6%, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

HDR-BT could administer a higher dose to the PTV and a lower dose to the bladder and rectum, at the cost of a slightly higher dose to the urethra compared with SBRT.

Dosimetric Uncertainties in Dominant Intraprostatic Lesion Simultaneous Boost Using Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy

Purpose

While intensity modulated proton therapy can deliver simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) with high precision, it is sensitive to anatomic changes. We investigated the dosimetric effects from these changes based on pretreatment cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images and identified the most important factors using a multilayer perceptron neural network (MLPNN).

Methods and Materials

DILs were contoured based on coregistered multiparametric magnetic resonance images for 25 previously treated prostate cancer patients. SIB plans were created with (1) prostate clinical target volume − V70 Gy = 98%; (2) DIL − V98 Gy > 95%; and (3) all organs at risk (OARs)"?> within clinical constraints. SIB plans were applied to daily CBCT-based deformed planning computed tomography (CT)"?>. DIL − V98 Gy, bladder/rectum maximum dose (Dmax) and volume changes, femur shifts, and the distance from DIL to organs at riskOARs"?> in both planning computed tomogramsCT"?> and CBCT were calculated. Wilcoxon signed-ranks tests were used to compare the changes. MLPNNs were used to model the change in ΔDIL − V98 Gy > 10% and bladder/rectum Dmax > 80 Gy, and the relative importance factors for the model were provided. The performances of the models were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curves.

Results

Comparing initial plan to the average from evaluation plans, respectively, DIL − V98 Gy was 89.3% ± 19.9% versus 86.2% ± 21.3% (P = .151); bladder Dmax 71.9 ± 0.6 Gy versus 74.5 ± 2.9 Gy (P < .001); and rectum Dmax 70.1 ± 2.4 Gy versus 74.9 ± 9.1Gy (P = .007). Bladder and rectal volumes were 99.6% ± 39.5% and 112.8% ± 27.2%, respectively, of their initial volume. The femur shift was 3.16 ± 2.52 mm. In the modeling of ΔDIL V98 Gy > 10%, DIL to rectum distance changes, DIL to bladder distance changes, and rectum volume changes ratio are the 3 most important factors. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.89, 1.00, and 0.99 for the modeling of ΔDIL − V98 Gy > 10%, and bladder and rectum Dmax > 80 Gy, respectively.

Conclusions

Dosimetric changes in DIL SIB with intensity modulated proton therapy can be modeled and classified based on anatomic changes on pretreatment images by an MLPNN.

Geometrical imaging accuracy and imaging and plan quality for prostate cancer on a 1.5T MRLinac in patients with a unilateral hip implant

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility of prostate cancer radiotherapy for patients with a hip implant on an 1.5T MRI-Linac (MRL) in terms of geometrical image accuracy, image quality, and plan quality.

METHODS

Pretreatment MRI images on a 1.5T MRL and 3T MRI consisting of a T2-weighted 3D delineation scan and main magnetic field homogeneity (B0) scan were performed in 6 patients with a unilateral hip implant. System specific geometrical errors due to gradient non-linearity were determined for the MRL. Within the prostate and skin contour, B0 inhomogeneity, gradient non-linearity error and the total geometrical error (vector summation of the prior two) was determined. Image quality was determined by visually scoring the extent of implant-born image artifacts. A treatment planning study was performed on 5 patients to quantify the impact of the implant on plan quality, in which conventional MRL IMRT plans were created, as well as plans which avoid radiation through the left or right femur.

RESULTS

The total maximum geometrical error in the prostate was < 1 mm and the skin contour < 1.7 mm; in all cases the machine-specific gradient error was most dominant. The B0 error for the MRlinac MRI could partly be predicted based on the pre-treatment 3T scan. Image quality for all patients was sufficient at 1.5T MRL. Plan comparison showed that, even with avoidance of the hips, in all cases sufficient target coverage could be obtained with similar D1cc and D5cc to rectum and bladder, while V28Gy was slightly poorer in only the rectum for femur avoidance.

CONCLUSION

We showed that geometrical accuracy, image quality and plan quality for six prostate patients with a hip implant or hip fixation treated on a 1.5T MRL did not show relevant deterioration for the used image settings, which allowed safe treatment.

Quantitative investigation of dose accumulation errors from intra-fraction motion in MRgRT for prostate cancer

Accurate spatial dose delivery in radiotherapy is frequently complicated due to changes in the patient's internal anatomy during and in-between therapy segments. The recent introduction of hybrid MRI radiotherapy systems allows unequaled soft-tissue visualization during radiation delivery and can be used for dose reconstruction to quantify the impact of motion. To this end, knowledge of anatomical deformations obtained from continuous monitoring during treatment has to be combined with information on the spatio-temporal dose delivery to perform motion-compensated dose accumulation (MCDA). Here, the influence of the choice of deformable image registration algorithm, dose warping strategy, and magnetic resonance image resolution and signal-to-noise-ratio on the resulting MCDA is investigated. For a quantitative investigation, four 4D MRI-datasets representing typical patient observed motion patterns are generated using finite element modeling and serve as a gold standard. Energy delivery is simulated intra-fractionally in the deformed image space and, subsequently, MCDA-processed. Finally, the results are substantiated by comparing MCDA strategies on clinically acquired patient data. It is shown that MCDA is needed for correct quantitative dose reconstruction. For prostate treatments, using the energy per mass transfer dose warping strategy has the largest influence on decreasing dose estimation errors.

Clinical experience and workflow challenges with magnetic resonance-only radiation therapy simulation and planning for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Magnetic Resonance (MR)-only planning has been implemented clinically for radiotherapy of prostate cancer. However, fewer studies exist regarding the overall success rate of MR-only workflows. We report on successes and challenges of implementing MR-only workflows for prostate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 585 patients with prostate cancer underwent an MR-only simulation and planning between 06/2016-06/2018. MR simulation included images for contouring, synthetic-CT generation and fiducial identification. Workflow interruptions occurred that required a backup CT, a re-simulation or an update to our current quality assurance (QA) process. The challenges were prospectively evaluated and classified into syn-CT generation, motion/artifacts in the MRs, fiducial QA and bowel preparation guidelines.

RESULTS

MR-only simulation was successful in 544 (93.2 %) patients. . In seventeen patients (2.9%), reconstruction of synthetic-CT failed due to patient size, femur angulation, or failure to determine the body contour. Twenty-four patients (4.1%) underwent a repeat/backup CT scan because of artifacts on the MR such as image blur due to patient motion or biopsy/surgical artifacts that hampered identification of the implanted fiducial markers. In patients requiring large coverage due to nodal involvement, inhomogeneity artifacts were resolved by using a two-stack acquisition and adaptive inhomogeneity correction. Bowel preparation guidelines were modified to address frequent rectum/gas issues due to longer MR scan time.

CONCLUSIONS

MR-only simulation has been successfully implemented for a majority of patients in the clinic. However, MR-CT or CT-only pathway may still be needed for patients where MR-only solution fails or patients with MR contraindications.

Prostate intrafraction motion during the preparation and delivery of MR-guided radiotherapy sessions on a 1.5T MR-Linac

PURPOSE

To evaluate prostate intrafraction motion using MRI during the full course of online adaptive MR-Linac radiotherapy (RT) fractions, in preparation of MR-guided extremely hypofractionated RT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Five low and intermediate risk prostate cancer patients were treated with 20 × 3.1 Gy fractions on a 1.5T MR-Linac. Each fraction, initial MRI (Pre) scans were obtained at the start of every treatment session. Pre-treatment planning MRI contours were propagated and adapted to this Pre scan after which plan re-optimization was started in the treatment planning system followed by dose delivery. 3D Cine-MR imaging was started simultaneously with beam-on and acquired over the full beam-on period. Prostate intrafraction motion in this cine-MR was determined with a previously validated soft-tissue contrast based tracking algorithm. In addition, absolute accuracy of the method was determined using a 4D phantom.

RESULTS

Prostate motion was completely automatically determined over the full on-couch period (approx. 45 min) with no identified mis-registrations. The translation 95% confidence intervals are within clinically applied margins of 5 mm, and plan adaption for intrafraction motion was required in only 4 out of 100 fractions.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to investigate prostate intrafraction motions during entire MR-guided RT sessions on an MR-Linac. We have shown that high quality 3D cine-MR imaging and prostate tracking during RT is feasible with beam-on. The clinically applied margins of 5 mm have proven to be sufficient for these treatments and may potentially be further reduced using intrafraction plan adaptation guided by cine-MR imaging.

Delivered dose quantification in prostate radiotherapy using online 3D cine imaging and treatment log files on a combined 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging and linear accelerator system

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Monitoring the intrafraction motion and its impact on the planned dose distribution is of crucial importance in radiotherapy. In this work we quantify the delivered dose for the first prostate patients treated on a combined 1.5T Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and linear accelerator system in our clinic based on online 3D cine-MR and treatment log files.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prostate intrafraction motion trace was obtained with a soft-tissue based rigid registration method with six degrees of freedom from 3D cine-MR dynamics with a temporal resolution of 8.5-16.9 s. For each fraction, all dynamics were also registered to the daily MR image used during the online treatment planning, enabling the mapping to this reference point. Moreover, each fraction's treatment log file was used to extract the timestamped machine parameters during delivery and assign it to the appropriate dynamic volume. These partial plans to dynamic volume combinations were calculated and summed to yield the delivered fraction dose. The planned and delivered dose distributions were compared among all patients for a total of 100 fractions.

RESULTS

The clinical target volume underwent on average a decrease of 2.2% ± 2.9% in terms of D99% coverage while bladder V62Gy was increased by 1.6% ± 2.3% and rectum V62Gy decreased by 0.2% ± 2.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The first MR-linac dose reconstruction results based on prostate tracking from intrafraction 3D cine-MR and treatment log files are presented. Such a pipeline is essential for online adaptation especially as we progress to MRI-guided extremely hypofractionated treatments.

A study of the clinical, treatment planning and dosimetric feasibility of dose painting in external beam radiotherapy of prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiotherapy dose painting is a promising technique which enables dose escalation to areas of higher tumour cell density within the prostate which are associated with radioresistance, known as dominant intraprostatic lesions (DILs). The aim of this study was to determine factors affecting the feasibility of radiotherapy dose painting in patients with high and intermediate risk prostate cancer.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Twenty patients were recruited into the study for imaging using a 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. Identified DILs were outlined and the scan registered with the planning computed tomography (CT) dataset. Intensity-modulated plans were produced and evaluated to determine the effect of the organ-at-risk constraints on the dose that could be delivered to the DILs. Measurements were made to verify that the distribution could be safely delivered.

RESULTS

MRI scans were obtained for nineteen patients. Fourteen patients had one to two DILs with ten overlapping the urethra and/or rectum. The target boost of 86 Gy was achieved in seven plans but was limited to 80 Gy for five patients whose boost volume overlapped or abutted the urethra. Dosimetric measurements gave a satisfactory gamma pass rate at 3%/3 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

It was feasible to produce dose-painted plans for a boost of 86 Gy for approximately half the patients with DILs. The main limiting factor was the proximity of the urethra to the boost volumes. For a small proportion of patients, rigid registration between CT and MRI images was not adequate for planning purposes.

Dosimetric impact of soft-tissue based intrafraction motion from 3D cine-MR in prostate SBRT

To investigate the dosimetric impact of intrafraction translation and rotation motion of the prostate, as extracted from daily acquired post-treatment 3D cine-MR based on soft-tissue contrast, in extremely hypofractionated (SBRT) prostate patients. Accurate dose reconstruction is performed by using a prostate intrafraction motion trace which is obtained with a soft-tissue based rigid registration method on 3D cine-MR dynamics with a temporal resolution of 11 s. The recorded motion of each time-point was applied to the planning CT, resulting in the respective dynamic volume used for dose calculation. For each treatment fraction, the treatment delivery record was generated by proportionally splitting the plan into 11 s intervals based on the delivered monitor units. For each fraction the doses of all partial plan/dynamic volume combinations were calculated and were summed to lead to the motion-affected fraction dose. Finally, for each patient the five fraction doses were summed, yielding the total treatment dose. Both daily and total doses were compared to the original reference dose of the respective patient to assess the impact of the intrafraction motion. Depending on the underlying motion of the prostate, different types of motion-affected dose distributions were observed. The planning target volumes (PTVs) ensured CTV_30 (seminal vesicles) D99% coverage for all patients, CTV_35 (prostate corpus) coverage for 97% of the patients and GTV_50 (local boost) for 83% of the patients when compared against the strict planning target D99% value. The dosimetric impact due to prostate intrafraction motion in extremely hypofractionated treatments was determined. The presented study is an essential step towards establishing the actual delivered dose to the patient during radiotherapy fractions.