Clinical experience and cost evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging -only workflow in radiation therapy planning of prostate cancer

The Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Radiation Therapy Treatment Simulation and Planning

Ever since its introduction as a diagnostic imaging tool the potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiation therapy (RT) treatment simulation and planning has been recognized. Recent technical advances have addressed many of the impediments to use of this technology and as a result have resulted in rapid and growing adoption of MRI in RT. The purpose of this article is to provide a broad review of the multiple uses of MR in the RT treatment simulation and planning process, identify several of the most used clinical scenarios in which MR is integral to the simulation and planning process, highlight existing limitations and provide multiple unmet needs thereby highlighting opportunities for the diagnostic MR imaging community to contribute and collaborate with our oncology colleagues. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 5.

Is it possible to automate the discovery of process maps for the time-driven activity-based costing method? A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The main objective of this manuscript was to identify the methods used to create process maps for care pathways that utilized the time-driven activity-based costing method.

METHODS

This is a systematic mapping review. Searches were performed in the Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic literature databases from 2004 to September 25, 2022. The included studies reported practical cases from healthcare institutions in all medical fields as long as the time-driven activity-based costing method was employed. We used the time-driven activity-based costing method and analyzed the created process maps and a qualitative approach to identify the main fields.

RESULTS

A total of 412 studies were retrieved, and 70 articles were included. Most of the articles are related to the fields of orthopedics and childbirth-related to hospital surgical procedures. We also identified various studies in the field of oncology and telemedicine services. The main methods for creating the process maps were direct observational practices, complemented by the involvement of multidisciplinary teams through surveys and interviews. Only 33% of the studies used hospital documents or healthcare data records to integrate with the process maps, and in 67% of the studies, the created maps were not validated by specialists.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of process mining techniques effectively automates models generated through clinical pathways. They are applied to the time-driven activity-based costing method, making the process more agile and contributing to the visualization of high degrees of variations encountered in processes, thereby making it possible to enhance and achieve continual improvements in processes.

Towards simulation-free MR-linac treatment: utilizing male pelvis PSMA-PET/CT and population-based electron density assignments

Objective. This study aimed to investigate the dosimetric impact of using population-based relative electron density (RED) overrides in lieu of simulation computerized tomography (CT) in a magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MRL) workflow for male pelvis patients. Additionally, the feasibility of using prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/CT (PSMA-PET/CT) scans to assess patients' eligibility for this proposed workflow was examined.Approach. In this study, 74 male pelvis patients treated on an Elekta Unity 1.5 T MRL were retrospectively selected. The patients' individual RED values for 8 organs of interest were extracted from their simulation-CT images to establish population-based RED values. These values were used to generate individual (IndD) and population-based (PopD) RED dose plans, representing current and proposed MRL workflows, respectively. Lastly, this study compared RED values obtained from CT and PET-CT scanners in a phantom and a subset of patients.Results. Population-based RED values were mostly within two standard deviations of ICRU Report 46 values. PopD plans were comparable to IndD plans, with the average %difference magnitudes of 0.5%, 0.6%, and 0.6% for mean dose (all organs), D0.1cm3(non-target organs) and D95%/D98% (target organs), respectively. Both phantom and patient PET-CT derived RED values had high agreement with corresponding CT-derived values, with correlation coefficients ≥ 0.9.Significance. Population-based RED values were considered suitable in a simulation-free MRL treatment workflow. Utilizing these RED values resulted in similar dosimetric uncertainties as per the current workflow. Initial findings also suggested that PET-CT scans may be used to assess prospective patients' eligibility for the proposed workflow. Future investigations will evaluate the clinical feasibility of implementing this workflow for prospective patients in the clinical setting. This is aimed to reduce patient burden during radiotherapy and increase department efficiencies.

Clinical feasibility of a commercially available MRI-only method for radiotherapy treatment planning of the brain

BACKGROUND

Advancements in deep-learning based synthetic computed tomography (sCT) image conversion methods have enabled the development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only based radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) of the brain.

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the clinical feasibility of a commercial, deep-learning based MRI-only RTP method with respect to dose calculation and patient positioning verification performance in RTP of the brain.

METHODS

Clinical validation of dose calculation accuracy was performed by a retrospective evaluation for 25 glioma and 25 brain metastasis patients. Dosimetric and image quality of the studied MRI-only RTP method was evaluated by a direct comparison of the sCT-based and computed tomography (CT)-based external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) images and treatment plans. Patient positioning verification accuracy of sCT images was evaluated retrospectively for 10 glioma and 10 brain metastasis patients based on clinical cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.

RESULTS

An average mean dose difference of Dmean = 0.1% for planning target volume (PTV) and 0.6% for normal tissue (NT) structures were obtained for glioma patients. Respective results for brain metastasis patients were Dmean = 0.5% for PTVs and Dmean =1.0% for NTs. Global three-dimensional (3D) gamma pass rates using 2%/2 mm dose difference and distance-to-agreement (DTA) criterion were 98.0% for the glioma subgroup, and 95.2% for the brain metastasis subgroup using 1%/1 mm criterion. Mean distance differences of <1.0 mm were observed in all Cartesian directions between CT-based and sCT-based CBCT patient positioning in both subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of dose calculation and patient positioning accuracy, the studied MRI-only method demonstrated its clinical feasibility for RTP of the brain. The results encourage the use of the studied method as part of a routine clinical workflow.

Synthetic computed tomography based dose calculation in prostate cancer patients with hip prostheses for magnetic resonance imaging-only radiotherapy

Background and purpose

Metallic hip prostheses cause substantial artefacts in both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images used in radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) for prostate cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dose calculation accuracy of a synthetic CT (sCT) generation workflow and the improvement in implant visibility using metal artefact reduction sequences.

Materials and methods

The study included 23 patients with prostate cancer who had hip prostheses, of which 10 patients had bilateral hip implants. An in-house protocol was applied to create sCT images for dose calculation comparison. The study compared prostheses volumes and resulting avoidance sectors against planning target volume (PTV) dose uniformity and organs at risk (OAR) sparing.

Results

Median PTV dose difference between sCT and CT-based dose calculation among all patients was 0.1 % (-0.4 to 0.4%) (median(range)). Bladder and rectum differences (V_50Gy) were 0.2 % (-0.3 to 1.1%) and 0.1 % (-0.9 to 0.5%). The median 3D local gamma pass rate for partial arc cases using a Dixon MR sequence was Γ_20%^2mm/2% = 99.9%. For the bilateral full arc cases, using a metal artefact reconstruction sequence, the pass rate was Γ_20%^2mm/2% = 99.0%.

Conclusions

An in-house protocol for generating sCT images for dose calculation provided clinically feasible dose calculation accuracy for prostate cancer patients with hip implants. PTV median dose difference for uni- and bilateral patients with avoidance sectors remained <0.4%. The Outphase images enhanced implant visibility resulting in smaller avoidance sectors, better OAR sparing, and improved PTV uniformity.