ABCB1 and ABCG2 limit brain penetration and, together with CYP3A4, total plasma exposure of abemaciclib and its active metabolites

Abemaciclib pharmacology and interactions in the treatment of HR+/HER2- breast cancer: a critical review

Abemaciclib (ABE) in combination with endocrine therapy represents the mainstay treatment for either endocrine-resistant metastatic or high-risk early-stage HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients. Hence, an adequate knowledge of this agent pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and of its drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is crucial for an optimal patients management. Additionally, ABE interference with food and complementary/alternative medicines should be taken into account in the clinical practice. Several online tools allow to freely check DDIs and can be easily consulted before prescribing ABE. According to one of this instruments, ABE display the lowest number of interactions among the available cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors. Still, clinicians should be aware that online tools cannot replace the technical datasheet of the drug as well as a comprehensive clinical assessment for each patient. Here we critically review the main pharmacological features of ABE, then focusing on its potential interactions with drugs, food, and alternative medicine, in order to provide a guide for its optimal use in the treatment of HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients.

Predictability of human exposure by human-CYP3A4-transgenic mouse models: A meta-analysis

First-in-human dose predictions are primarily based on no-observed-adverse-effect levels in animal studies. Predictions from these animal models are only as effective as their ability to predict human results. To narrow the gap between human and animals, researchers have, among other things, focused on the replacement of animal cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes with their human counterparts (called humanization), especially in mice. Whereas research in humanized mice is extensive, the emphasis has been particularly on qualitative rather than quantitative predictions. Because the CYP3A4 enzyme is most involved in the metabolism of clinically used drugs, most benefit was expected from CYP3A4 models. There are several applications of these mouse models regarding in vivo CYP3A4 functionality, one of which might be their capacity to help improve first-in-human (FIH) dose predictions for CYP3A4-metabolized drugs. To evaluate whether human-CYP3A4-transgenic mouse models are better predictors of human exposure compared to the wild-type mouse model, we performed a meta-analysis comparing both mouse models in their ability to accurately predict human exposure of small-molecule drugs metabolized by CYP3A4. Results showed that, in general, the human-CYP3A4-transgenic mouse model had similar accuracy in the prediction of human exposure compared to the wild-type mouse model, suggesting that there is limited added value in humanization of the mouse Cyp3a enzymes if the primary aim is to acquire more accurate FIH dose predictions. Despite the results of this meta-analysis, corrections for interspecies differences through extension of human-CYP3A4-transgenic mouse models with pharmacokinetic modeling approaches seems a promising contribution to more accurate quantitative predictions of human pharmacokinetics.

Association of ADME gene polymorphisms on toxicity to CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with HR+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer

A wide interindividual variability in therapeutic response to cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDKis) palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib, among patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer has been reported. This study explored the impact of genetic polymorphisms in ADME genes (responsible for drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination) on CDKis safety profiles in 230 patients. Selected endpoints include grade 3/4 neutropenia at day 14 of the first treatment cycle, early dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and dose reductions within the initial three cycles. Our analysis revealed associations between these endpoints and polymorphisms in CYP3A4, CYP3A5, ABCB1, and ABCG2 genes. Their impact on CDKis plasma concentrations (Ctrough) was also examined. Specifically, ABCB1 c.1236C>T and c.2677C>T polymorphisms correlated significantly with grade 3/4 neutropenia at day 14 (OR 3.94, 95% CI 1.32-11.75; p = 0.014 and OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.12-9.85; p = 0.030). Additionally, ABCB1 c.3435C>T was associated with an elevated risk of early DLTs and dose reductions (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.22-8.84, p = 0.019; OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.20-5.60, p = 0.015). Carriers of the CYP3A4*22 allele also demonstrated in univariate a higher risk of early DLTs (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.01-9.56, p = 0.049). Furthermore, individuals with the ABCB1 1236T-3435T-2677T(A) variant haplotype exhibited significant associations with grade 3/4 neutropenia at day 14 (OR 3.36, 95% CI 1.20-9.41; p = 0.021) and early DLTs in univariate (OR 3.08, 95% CI 1.19-7.95; p = 0.020). Homozygous carriers of the ABCB1 T-T-T(A) haplotype tended to have a higher mean ribociclib Ctrough (934.0 ng/mL vs. 752.0 ng/mL and 668.0 ng/mL). Regardless preliminary, these findings offer promising insights into the role of pharmacogenetic markers in CDKis safety profiles, potentially contributing to address the interindividual variability in CDKis responses.

Differences in metabolic transport and resistance mechanisms of Abemaciclib, Palbociclib, and Ribociclib

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) play a crucial role in cancer treatment, particularly in breast cancer, and their mechanism of drug resistance is a topic of global interest in research. Hence, it is vital to comprehend the distinctions between various CDK4/6i, including their mechanisms of action and resistance mechanisms. This article aims to summarize the metabolic and transport variations as well as the differences in resistance among the three FDA-approved CDK4/6 inhibitors: Abemaciclib, Palbociclib, and Ribociclib. It also aims to discuss how these differences impact the effectiveness and safety of anticancer drugs. It was conducted in March 2023 to search PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for literature related to this topic. Despite all being CDK4/6i, differences in their metabolism and transport were found, which are related to their chemical structure. Moreover, there are variations in preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical safety and efficacy of the different inhibitors. Genetic mutations, drug tolerance, and other factors may influence CDK4/6 resistance mechanisms. Currently, the resistance mechanisms differences of the three drugs remain largely unknown, and there are differences in the resistance mechanisms among them, necessitating further exploration and research.

Pharmacokinetic study on the co-administration of abemaciclib and astragaloside IV in rats

CONTEXT

The co-administration of abemaciclib and astragaloside IV might occur in the treatment of breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the interaction between abemaciclib and astragaloside IV in rats and describes the potential mechanism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Male Sprague Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups: single dose of abemaciclib (control), abemaciclib + 50 mg/kg/d astragaloside IV, abemaciclib + 100 mg/kg/d astragaloside IV, and abemaciclib + 150 mg/kg/d astragaloside IV. Abemaciclib and astragaloside IV were orally administrated, and astragaloside IV was pre-administrated for 7 d in the co-administrated groups. The pharmacokinetics and transport of abemaciclib were assessed in the absence or presence of astragaloside IV. In mechanism, the activity of CYP3A4 was estimated in human liver microsomes in the presence of astragaloside IV.

RESULTS

Astragaloside IV significantly increased the C_max (from 991.5 ± 116.99 up to 2308.5 ± 55.29 μg/L) and AUC (from 24.49 ± 2.86 up to 66.14 ± 1.17 μg/mL × h) and prolonged the t_1/2 (from 19.85 ± 4.65 up to 66.17 ± 28.73 h) of abemaciclib, and the effect was enhanced with the increasing astragaloside IV concentration. Astragaloside IV also suppressed the transport of abemaciclib with the efflux ratio decreasing to 1.35. Astragaloside IV suppressed the activity of CYP3A4 with an IC₅₀ value of 21.78 μM.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The co-administration of abemaciclib and astragaloside IV induced the increasing systemic exposure of abemaciclib through the inhibition of CYP3A4. Further clinical validations could be carried out according to the study design of the present investigation.

Effects of ABCB1 and ABCG2 polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of abemaciclib

PURPOSE

Adverse events after the use of the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib are dose-dependent. However, its pharmacokinetics varies among individuals. Abemaciclib is reportedly transported by P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein. Therefore, we evaluated whether ABCB1 and ABCG2 polymorphisms are pharmacokinetic predictive factors of abemaciclib.

METHODS

A total of 45 patients with breast cancer taking abemaciclib (150 mg twice per day) for 2 weeks were evaluated to determine the associations among abemaciclib concentration; adverse events; and ABCB1 1236 T > C, 2677G > T/A, 3435C > T, and ABCG2 421C > A gene polymorphisms.

RESULTS

The trough concentration of abemaciclib was significantly higher in the group with grade 2 or greater neutropenia and thrombocytopenia than in those with grades 0 or 1. For ABCB1 2677G > T/A polymorphisms, the concentration of abemaciclib tended to be higher in the homozygous group (TT + AT) than in the wild-type + heterozygous group (GG + GA + GT) (median [range], 222.8 [80.5-295.8] ng/mL vs. 113.5 [23.6-355.2] ng/mL, P = 0.09), Moreover, the ABCB1 2677G > T/A homozygous group had a higher tendency of abemaciclib withdrawal or dose reduction within 4 weeks than the wild-type + heterozygous group (odds ratio, 4.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-20.7; P = 0.08). No significant association was observed among abemaciclib concentration; adverse reactions; and ABCB1 1236 T > C, 3435C > T, and ABCG2 421C > A polymorphisms.

CONCLUSION

ABCB1 2677G > T/A polymorphism might be a predictor of the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of abemaciclib.