Angiotensin receptor/Neprilysin inhibitor effects in CRTd non-responders: From epigenetic to clinical beside

Left bundle branch pacing and cardiac remodeling in HF patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: epigenetic pathways and clinical outcomes

Background

Left bundle branch (LBB) pacing could achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients who cannot be resynchronized via the placement of the left ventricle (LV) lead into the coronary sinus. LBB pacing could improve cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with LBB block who are affected by type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Study hypothesis

LBB pacing could increase the number of CRT responders and lead to the best clinical outcomes in HF patients with T2DM, inducing cardiac remodeling and improving left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) via microRNA (miR) modulation.

Methods

In a multicenter observational study, we enrolled 334 HF patients with LBB block and an indication to receive LBB pacing for CRT. In these patients, we evaluated the CRT responder rate, clinical outcomes, and miR expression at 1 year of follow-up.

Results

At 1 year of follow-up, we had 223 responders (66.8%), 132 hospitalizations for HF (39.5%), 24 cardiac deaths (7.2%), and 37 all-cause deaths (11.1%), with a higher rate of HF hospitalizations (77 (69.4%) vs 55 (24.7%), p < 0.05), and cardiac deaths (13 (11.7% vs 11 (4.9%), p < 0.05) in non-responders vs responders. At the end of follow-up, we found the lowest expression of miR-26, miR-29, miR-30, miR-92, and miR-145 in LBB-pacing non-responders vs responders (p < 0.05), and a direct correlation between miR-30 (0.340, [0.833-1.915]; p 0.001), the 6-minute-walking test (6MWT; 0.168, [0.008-0.060]; p 0.011), angiotensin-receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI; 0.157, [0.183-4.877]; p 0.035), sodium-glucose-transporter-2 inhibitors (0.245, [2.242-7.283]; p 0.001), and LVEF improvements. C reactive protein (CRP) inversely correlated with LVEF improvement (-0.220, [-(0.066-0.263)]; p 0.001). ARNI (1.373, CI 95% [1.007-1.872], p 0.045), miR-30 (2.713, CI 95% [1.543-4.769], p 0.001), and 6MWT (1.288, CI 95% [1.084-1.998], p 0.001) were predictors of LBB pacing responders at 1 year of follow-up.

Conclusion

LBB-pacing responders evidenced miR modulation, which was linked to significant improvement of the cardiac pump. Specifically, miR-30 was linked to cardiac pump improvement and predicted responders at 1 year of follow-up in patients with T2DM.

Trajectory change of left ventricular ejection fraction after rhythm control for atrial fibrillation in heart failure

AIMS

Rhythm control therapy has shown great benefits for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF). However, few studies have evaluated the effects of rhythm control on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) trajectory across the whole HF spectrum. Our study explored the prevalence and predictors of LVEF trajectory changes and their prognostic implications following rhythm control.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Depending on the treatment strategy, the cohort was classified into rhythm and rate control groups. Alterations in HF types and LVEF trajectory were recorded. The observational endpoints were all-cause mortality and HF-related admission. Predictors of LVEF trajectory improvement in the rhythm control group were evaluated. After matching, the two groups had similar age [mean age (years): rhythm/rate control: 63.96/65.13] and gender [male: rhythm/rate control: n = 228 (55.6%)/233 (56.8%)]. Based on baseline LVEF measurement, the post-matched cohort had 490 HF with preserved ejection fraction (rhythm/rate control: n = 260/230; median LVEF: 58.00%/57.00%), 99 HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (rhythm/rate control: n = 50/49; median LVEF: 45.00%/46.00%), and 231 HF with reduced ejection fraction (rhythm/rate control: n = 100/131; median LVEF: 32.50%/33.00%). Trajectory analysis found that the rhythm control group had a greater percentage of LVEF trajectory improvement than the rate control group [80 (53.3%) vs. 71 (39.4%), P = 0.012]. Cox regression analysis also showed that the rhythm control group was more likely to have improved LVEF trajectory compared with the rate control group {hazard ratio [HR] 1.671 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.196-2.335], P = 0.003}. In the survival analysis, the rhythm control group experienced significant lower risks of all-cause mortality [HR 0.600 (95% CI 0.366-0.983), P = 0.043] and HF-related admission [HR 0.611 (95% CI 0.496-0.753), P < 0.001]. In the rhythm control subgroup, E/e' [odds ratio (OR) 0.878 (95% CI 0.792-0.974), P = 0.014], left ventricular end-diastolic diameter [OR 0.874 (95% CI 0.777-0.983), P = 0.024], and CHA2DS2-VASc score (congestive HF, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke or transient ischaemic attack, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, and sex category) [OR 0.647 (95% CI 0.438-0.955), P = 0.028] were identified as three independent predictors of LVEF trajectory improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Rhythm control is associated with improved LVEF trajectory and clinical outcomes and may thus be considered the optimal therapeutic strategy for patients with both HF and AF.

Role of monocytes and dendritic cells in cardiac reverse remodelling after cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Monocytes and dendritic cells (DC) are both key inflammatory cells, with recognized effects on cardiac repair. However, there are distinct subsets of monocytes with potential for beneficial or detrimental effects on heart failure (HF) pathogenesis. The connection between reverse cardiac remodelling, the potential anti-inflammatory effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and monocytes and DC homeostasis in HF is far from being understood. We hypothesized that monocytes and DC play an important role in cardiac reverse remodelling and CRT response. Therefore, we aimed to assess the potential role of baseline peripheral levels of blood monocytes and DC subsets and their phenotypic and functional activity for CRT response, in HF patients. As a secondary objective, we aimed to evaluate the impact of CRT on peripheral blood monocytes and DC subsets, by comparing baseline and post CRT circulating levels and phenotypic and functional activity.

METHODS

Forty-one patients with advanced HF scheduled for CRT were included in this study. The quantification and phenotypic determination of classical (cMo), intermediate (iMo) and non-classical monocytes (ncMo), as well as of myeloid (mDC) and plasmacytoid DC (pDC) were performed by flow cytometry in a FACSCanto™II (BD) flow cytometer. The functional characterization of total monocytes and mDC was performed by flow cytometry in a FACSCalibur flow cytometer, after in vitro stimulation with lipopolysaccharide from Escherichia coli plus interferon (IFN)-γ, in the presence of Brefeldina A. Comparisons between the control and the patient group, and between responders and non-responders to CRT were performed.

RESULTS

Compared to the control group, HF population presented a significantly lower frequency of pDC at baseline and a higher proportion of monocytes and mDC producing IL-6 and IL-1β, both before and 6-months after CRT (T6). There was a remarkable decrease of cMo and an increase of iMo after CRT, only in responders. The responder group also presented higher ncMo values at T6 compared to the non-responder group. Both responders and non-responders presented a decrease in the expression of CD86 in all monocyte and DC populations after CRT. Moreover, in non-responders, the increased frequency of IL-6-producing DC persisted after CRT.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides new knowledge about the possible contribution of pDC and monocytes subsets to cardiac reverse remodelling and response to CRT. Additionally, CRT is associated with a reduction on CD86 expression by monocytes and DC subsets and in their potential to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines, contributing, at least in part, for the well described anti-inflammatory effects of CRT in HF patients.

The emerging role of sacubitril/valsartan in pulmonary hypertension with heart failure

Pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease (PH-LHD) represents approximately 65%-80% of all patients with PH. The progression, prognosis, and mortality of individuals with left heart failure (LHF) are significantly influenced by PH and right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. Consequently, cardiologists should devote ample attention to the interplay between HF and PH. Patients with PH and HF may not receive optimal benefits from the therapeutic effects of prostaglandins, endothelin receptor antagonists, or phosphodiesterase inhibitors, which are specific drugs for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Sacubitril/valsartan, the angiotensin receptor II blocker-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), was recommended as the first-line therapy for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) by the 2021 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines. Although ARNI is effective in treating left ventricular (LV) enlargement and lower ejection fraction, its efficacy in treating individuals with PH and HF remains underexplored. Considering its vasodilatory effect at the pre-capillary level and a natriuretic drainage role at the post-capillary level, ARNI is believed to have a broad range of potential applications in treating PH-LHD. This review discusses the fundamental pathophysiological connections between PH and HF, emphasizing the latest research and potential benefits of ARNI in PH with various types of LHF and RV dysfunction.

Impact of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Circulating microRNA in Patients with Heart Failure

Sacubitril/Valsartan, used for the treatment of heart failure (HF), is a combination of two drugs, an angiotensin receptor inhibitor, and a neprilysin inhibitor, which activates vasoactive peptides. Even though its beneficial effects on cardiac functions have been demonstrated, the mechanisms underpinning these effects remain poorly understood. To achieve more mechanistic insights, we analyzed the profiles of circulating miRNAs in plasma from patients with stable HF with reduced ejection function (HFrEF) and treated with Sacubitril/Valsartan for six months. miRNAs are short (22-24 nt) non-coding RNAs, which are not only emerging as sensitive and stable biomarkers for various diseases but also participate in the regulation of several biological processes. We found that in patients with high levels of miRNAs, specifically miR-29b-3p, miR-221-3p, and miR-503-5p, Sacubitril/Valsartan significantly reduced their levels at follow-up. We also found a significant negative correlation of miR-29b-3p, miR-221-3p, and miR-503-5p with VO2 at peak exercise, whose levels decrease with HF severity. Furthermore, from a functional point of view, miR-29b-3p, miR-221-3p, and miR-503-5p all target Phosphoinositide-3-Kinase Regulatory Subunit 1, which encodes regulatory subunit 1 of phosphoinositide-3-kinase. Our findings support that an additional mechanism through which Sacubitril/Valsartan exerts its functions is the modulation of miRNAs with potentially relevant roles in HFrEF pathophysiology.

Identification of m7G regulator-mediated RNA methylation modification patterns and related immune microenvironment regulation characteristics in heart failure

BACKGROUND

N⁷-methylguanosine (m⁷G) modification has been reported to regulate RNA expression in multiple pathophysiological processes. However, little is known about its role and association with immune microenvironment in heart failure (HF).

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-four HF patients and 135 nonfailing donors (NFDs) from six microarray datasets in the gene expression omnibus (GEO) database were included to evaluate the expression profiles of m⁷G regulators. Results revealed that 14 m⁷G regulators were differentially expressed in heart tissues from HF patients and NFDs. Furthermore, a five-gene m⁷G regulator diagnostic signature, NUDT16, NUDT4, CYFIP1, LARP1, and DCP2, which can easily distinguish HF patients and NFDs, was established by cross-combination of three machine learning methods, including best subset regression, regularization techniques, and random forest algorithm. The diagnostic value of five-gene m⁷G regulator signature was further validated in human samples through quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). In addition, consensus clustering algorithms were used to categorize HF patients into distinct molecular subtypes. We identified two distinct m⁷G subtypes of HF with unique m⁷G modification pattern, functional enrichment, and immune characteristics. Additionally, two gene subgroups based on m⁷G subtype-related genes were further discovered. Single-sample gene-set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) was utilized to assess the alterations of immune microenvironment. Finally, utilizing protein-protein interaction network and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), we identified UQCRC1, NDUFB6, and NDUFA13 as m⁷G methylation-associated hub genes with significant clinical relevance to cardiac functions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study discovered for the first time that m⁷G RNA modification and immune microenvironment are closely correlated in HF development. A five-gene m⁷G regulator diagnostic signature for HF (NUDT16, NUDT4, CYFIP1, LARP1, and DCP2) and three m⁷G methylation-associated hub genes (UQCRC1, NDUFB6, and NDUFA13) were identified, providing new insights into the underlying mechanisms and effective treatments of HF.

Endothelial Dysfunction Drives CRTd Outcome at 1-Year Follow-Up: A Novel Role as Biomarker for miR-130a-5p

Endothelial dysfunction (ED) causes worse prognoses in heart failure (HF) patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRTd). ED triggers the downregulation of microRNA-130 (miR-130a-5p), which targets endothelin-1 (ET-1). Thus, we evaluated ED and the response to CRTd by assessing miR-130a-5p and ET-1 serum levels. We designed a prospective multi-center study with a 1-year follow-up to evaluate ED, ET-1, and miR-130a-5p in CRTd patients with ED (ED-CRTd) vs. patients without ED (NED-CRTd). Clinical outcomes were CRTd response, HF hospitalization, cardiac death, and all-cause death. At 1-year follow-up, NED-CRTd (n = 541) vs. ED-CRTd (n = 326) patients showed better clinical statuses, lower serum values of B type natriuretic peptide (BNP: 266.25 ± 10.8 vs. 297.43 ± 16.22 pg/mL; p < 0.05) and ET-1 (4.57 ± 0.17 vs. 5.41 ± 0.24 pmol/L; p < 0.05), and higher values of miR-130a-5p (0.51 ± 0.029 vs. 0.41 ± 0.034 A.U; p < 0.05). Compared with NED-CRTd patients, ED-CRTd patients were less likely to be CRTd responders (189 (58%) vs. 380 (70.2%); p < 0.05) and had higher rates of HF hospitalization (115 (35.3%) vs. 154 (28.5%); p < 0.05) and cardiac deaths (30 (9.2%) vs. 21 (3.9%); p < 0.05). Higher miR-130a-5p levels (HR 1.490, CI 95% [1.014−2.188]) significantly predicted CRTd response; the presence of hypertension (HR 0.818, CI 95% [0.669−0.999]), and displaying higher levels of ET-1 (HR 0.859, CI 98% [0.839−0.979]), lymphocytes (HR 0.820, CI 95% [0.758−0.987]), LVEF (HR 0.876, CI 95% [0.760−0.992]), and ED (HR 0.751, CI 95% [0.624−0.905]) predicted CRTd non-response. Higher serum miR-130a-5p levels (HR 0.332, CI 95% [0.347−0.804]) and use of ARNI (HR 0.319, CI 95% [0.310−0.572]) predicted lower risk of HF hospitalization, whereas hypertension (HR 1.818, CI 95% [1.720−2.907]), higher BNP levels (HR 1.210, CI 95% [1.000−1.401]), and presence of ED (HR 1.905, CI 95% [1.238−2.241]) predicted a higher risk of HF hospitalization. Hence, serum miR-130a-5p could identify different stages of ED and independently predict CRTd response, therefore representing a novel prognostic HF biomarker.

Effects of sacubitril-valsartan on heart failure patients with mid-range ejection fractions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim: The effect of sacubitril-valsartan (ARNI) in heart failure (HF) patients with mid-range ejection fractions (HFmrEF) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effects of ARNI in HFmrEF patients. Methods: From inception to 15 February 2022, articles were searched via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Whip, and Wanfang databases. Left ventricular functions, indicators related to HF, quality of life score, 6-Minute Walk Test, total effective rate, mortality, readmission rate, and adverse events were the outcomes. Relative risk (RR), weighted mean difference (WMD), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the outcomes. The heterogeneity test was conducted for each indicator and measured by I2 statistics. Subgroup analysis was performed regarding the type of study and duration of treatment. Results: Sixteen studies involving 1,937 patients were included in this study. Our results showed ARNI was likely to improve left ventricular function by increasing the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (WMD: 2.36, 95%CI: 1.09-3.62), stroke volume (WMD: 16.800, 95%CI: 11.385-22.215), and left ventricular short-axis shortening rate (WMD: 2.05, 95%CI: 0.25-3.86), decreasing left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (WMD: -2.48, 95%CI: -3.83 to -1.13), left atrial diameter (WMD: -2.23, 95%CI: -2.83 to -1.63), C-reactive protein level (WMD: -1.40, 95%CI: -2.62 to -0.18), and N-terminal-pro B-type natriuretic peptide level (WMD: -494.92, 95%CI: -641.34 to -348.50). ARNI has a higher total effective rate (RR: 1.15, 95%CI: 1.08-1.21), Kansas City cardiomyopathy questionnaire (WMD: 4.13, 95%CI: 3.46-4.81), and 6-Minute Walk Test (WMD: 51.35, 95%CI: 26.99-75.71) compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). In addition, ARNI decreased the readmission rate (RR: 0.54, 95%CI: 0.43-0.68) (all p < 0.05). Nevertheless, there were no significant differences in the adverse outcomes. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests ARNI may be an effective strategy with which to improve the left ventricular function, and quality of life, and reduce the readmission rate in HFmrEF patients. However, long-term clinical studies with large samples are still needed to further explore the efficacy and safety of ARNI compared with ACEI or ARB in the HFmrEF population.

Reviewing the Modern Therapeutical Options and the Outcomes of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Heart Failure

Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) is a pharmaceutical strategy that increases natriuretic peptide levels by inhibiting neprilysin and regulating the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone pathway, blocking AT1 receptors. The data for this innovative medication are mainly based on the PARADIGM-HF study, which included heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)-diagnosed patients and indicated a major improvement in morbidity and mortality when S/V is administrated compared to enalapril. A large part of the observed favorable results is related to significant reverse cardiac remodeling confirmed in two prospective trials, PROVE-HF and EVALUATE-HF. Furthermore, according to a subgroup analysis from the PARAGON-HF research, S/V shows benefits in HFrEF and in many subjects having preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which indicated a decrease in HF hospitalizations among those with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 57%. This review examines the proven benefits of S/V and highlights continuing research in treating individuals with varied HF characteristics. The article analyses published data regarding both the safeness and efficacy of S/V in patients with HF, including decreases in mortality and hospitalization, increased quality of life, and reversible heart remodeling. These benefits led to the HF guidelines recommendations updating and inclusion of S/V combinations a key component of HFrEF treatment.

Nomogram based on multimodal echocardiography for assessing the evolution of diabetic cardiomyopathy in diabetic patients with normal cardiac function

Background

Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) remains asymptomatic for many years until progression to asymptomatic left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (ALVDD), a subclinical cardiac abnormality present in early-stage DCM. Because LV function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may be subtly altered long before the onset of ALVDD, quantitative assessment of the risk of progression to early-stage DCM in T2DM patients with normal hearts is critical for delaying or even reversing DCM.

Objective

This study aimed to establish a nomogram with the aid of DCM characteristics revealed by multimodal echocardiography to assess the likelihood of the progression to early-stage DCM in T2DM patients with normal cardiac function.

Methods

Of the 423 T2DM patients enrolled, 302 were included in the training cohort and 121 in the validation cohort. The clinical characteristics, biochemical data, and multimodal echocardiographic parameters were collected. In the training cohort, the screened correlates of ALVDD were utilized to develop a nomogram for estimating the risk coefficient for early-stage DCM. This model was validated both in the training and validation cohorts.

Results

ALVDD was independently correlated with the number of comorbidities [with one comorbidity: odds ratio (OR) = 3.009; with two comorbidities: OR = 4.026], HbA1c (OR = 1.773), myocardial blood flow (OR = 0.841), and global longitudinal strain (OR = 0.856) (all P < 0.05). They constituted a nomogram to visualize the likelihood of DCM development in T2DM patients with normal cardiac function. The model was validated to present strong discrimination and calibration, and obtained clinical net benefits both in the training and validation cohorts.

Conclusion

We constructed and validated a nomogram to estimate the likelihood of developing early-stage DCM in T2DM patients with normal cardiac function. The alteration of the nomogram-predicted risk coefficient is expected to be proposed as a therapeutic target to slow or stop DCM progression.

The roles and mechanisms of epigenetic regulation in pathological myocardial remodeling

Pathological myocardial remodeling was still one of the leading causes of death worldwide with an unmet therapeutic need. A growing number of researchers have addressed the role of epigenome changes in cardiovascular diseases, paving the way for the clinical application of novel cardiovascular-related epigenetic targets in the future. In this review, we summarized the emerged advances of epigenetic regulation, including DNA methylation, Histone posttranslational modification, Adenosine disodium triphosphate (ATP)-dependent chromatin remodeling, Non-coding RNA, and RNA modification, in pathological myocardial remodeling. Also, we provided an overview of the mechanisms that potentially involve the participation of these epigenetic regulation.