Adenosine A1 receptor agonist induces visceral antinociception via 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A, dopamine D1 or cannabinoid CB1 receptors, and the opioid system in the central nervous system

Adenosine signaling mediate pain transmission in the central nervous system

Pain is a common clinical symptom that seriously affects the quality of life in a variety of patient populations. In recent years, research on the role of adenosine signaling in pain modulation has made great progress. Adenosine is a purine nucleoside and a neuromodulator, and regulates multiple physiological and pathophysiological functions through the activation of four G protein-coupled receptors, which are classified as A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃ adenosine receptors (ARs). Adenosine and its receptors that are widespread in the central nervous system (CNS) play an important role in the processing of nociceptive sensory signals in different pain models. A₁Rs have the highest affinity to adenosine, and the role in analgesia has been well investigated. The roles of A_2ARs and A_2BRs in the modulation of pain are controversial because they have both analgesic and pronociceptive effects. The analgesic effects of A₃Rs are primarily manifested in neuropathic pain. In this article, we have reviewed the recent studies on ARs in the modulation of neuropathic pain, inflammatory pain, postoperative pain, and visceral pain in the CNS. Furthermore, we have outlined the pathways through which ARs contribute to pain regulation, thereby shedding light on how this mechanism can be targeted to provide effective pain relief.

The Agonist of Adenosine A1 Receptor Induced Desensitization of delta Opioid receptor-mediated Raf-1/MEK/ERK Signaling by Feedback Phosphorylation of Raf-1-Ser289/296/301

Our previous study found that activation of adenosine A1 receptor (A₁R) induced phosphorylation of delta opioid receptor (DOR) and desensitization of its downstream signaling molecules, cAMP and Akt. To further investigate the effect of A₁R agonist on DOR signaling and the underlying mechanism, we examined the effect of A₁R activation upon binding of its agonist N6-cyclohexyl-adenosine (CHA) on DOR-mediated Raf-1/MEK/ERK activation, and found that prolonged CHA exposure resulted in downregulation of DOR-mediated Raf-1/MEK/ERK signaling pathway. CHA-treatment time dependently attenuated Raf-1-Ser338 phosphorylation induced by [D-Pen2,5] enkephalin (DPDPE), a specific agonist of DOR, and further caused downregulation of the Raf-1/MEK/ERK signaling pathway activated by DOR agonist. Moreover, CHA exposure time-dependently induced the phosphorylation of Raf-1-Ser289/296/301, the inhibitory phosphorylation sites that were regulated by negative feedback, thereby inhibiting activation of the MEK/ERK pathway, and this effect could be blocked by MEK inhibitor U0126. Finally, we proved that the heterologous desensitization of the Raf-1/MEK/ERK cascade was essential in the regulation of anti-nociceptive effect of DOR agonists by confirming that such effect was inhibited by pretreatment of CHA. Therefore, we conclude that the activation of A₁R inhibits DOR-mediated MAPK signaling pathway via heterologous desensitization of the Raf-1/MEK/ERK cascade, which is a result of ERK-mediated Raf-1-Ser289/296/301 phosphorylation mediated by activation of A₁R.

A1 Adenosine Receptor Activation Inhibits P2X3 Receptor-Mediated ATP Currents in Rat Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons

Purinergic signaling is involved in multiple pain processes. P2X3 receptor is a key target in pain therapeutics, while A1 adenosine receptor signaling plays a role in analgesia. However, it remains unclear whether there is a link between them in pain. The present results showed that the A1 adenosine receptor agonist N⁶-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) concentration dependently suppressed P2X3 receptor-mediated and α,β-methylene-ATP (α,β-meATP)-evoked inward currents in rat dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons. CPA significantly decreased the maximal current response to α,β-meATP, as shown a downward shift of the concentration-response curve for α,β-meATP. CPA suppressed ATP currents in a voltage-independent manner. Inhibition of ATP currents by CPA was completely prevented by the A1 adenosine receptor antagonist KW-3902, and disappeared after the intracellular dialysis of either the G_i/o protein inhibitor pertussis toxin, the adenylate cyclase activator forskolin, or the cAMP analog 8-Br-cAMP. Moreover, CPA suppressed the membrane potential depolarization and action potential bursts, which were induced by α,β-meATP in DRG neurons. Finally, CPA relieved α,β-meATP-induced nociceptive behaviors in rats by activating peripheral A1 adenosine receptors. These results indicated that CPA inhibited the activity of P2X3 receptors in rat primary sensory neurons by activating A1 adenosine receptors and its downstream cAMP signaling pathway, revealing a novel peripheral mechanism underlying its analgesic effect.

Suppression of ASIC activity by the activation of A1 adenosine receptors in rat primary sensory neurons

Peripheral A1 adenosine receptor signaling has been shown to have analgesic effects in a variety of pain conditions. However, it is not yet fully elucidated for the precise molecular mechanisms. Acid sensing ion channels (ASICs) are expressed predominantly in nociceptive sensory neurons responding to protons. Given that both A1 adenosine receptors and ASICs are present in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons, we therefore investigated whether there was a cross-talk between the two types of receptors. Herein, electrophysiological recordings showed that the A1 adenosine receptor agonist N⁶-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) suppressed acid-induced currents and action potentials, which were mediated by ASICs, in rat DRG neurons. CPA inhibited the maximum response to protons, as shown a downward shift of concentration-response curve for protons. The CPA-induced suppression of ASIC currents was blocked by the A1 adenosine receptor antagonist KW-3902 and also prevented by intracellular application of the G_i/o-protein inhibitor pertussis toxin, the adenylate cyclase activator forskolin, and the cAMP analog 8-Br-cAMP. Finally, intraplantar pretreatment of CPA dose-dependently relieved acid-induced nociceptive responses in rats through peripheral A1 adenosine receptors. These results suggested that CPA suppressed ASICs via A1 adenosine receptors and intracellular G_i/o-proteins and cAMP signaling cascades in rat DRG neurons, which was a novel potential mechanism underlying analgesia of peripheral A1 adenosine receptors.

Centrally administered butyrate improves gut barrier function, visceral sensation and septic lethality in rats

Short chain fatty acids readily crosses the gut-blood and blood-brain barrier and acts centrally to influence neuronal signaling. We hypothesized that butyrate, a short-chain fatty acid produced by bacterial fermentation, in the central nervous system may play a role in the regulation of intestinal functions. Colonic permeability and visceral sensation was evaluated in rats. Septic lethality was evaluated in a sepsis model induced by subcutaneous administration of both lipopolysaccharide and colchicine. Intracisternal butyrate dose-dependently improved colonic hyperpermeability and visceral nociception. In contrast, subcutaneous injection of butyrate failed to change it. Intracisternal orexin 1 receptor antagonist or surgical vagotomy blocked the central butyrate-induced improvement of colonic hyperpermeability. The improvement of intestinal hyperpermeability by central butyrate or intracisternal orexin-A was blocked by cannabinoid 1 or 2 receptor antagonist. Intracisternal butyrate significantly improved survival period in septic rats. These results suggest that butyrate acts in the central nervous system to improve gut permeability and visceral nociception through cannabinoid signaling. Endogenous orexin in the brain may mediate the reduction of intestinal hyperpermeability by central butyrate through the vagus nerve. We would suggest that improvement of leaky gut by central butyrate may induce visceral antinociception and protection from septic lethality.

Central regulatory mechanisms of visceral sensation in response to colonic distension with special reference to brain orexin

Visceral hypersensitivity is a major pathophysiology in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Although brain-gut interaction is considered to be involved in the regulation of visceral sensation, little had been known how brain controls visceral sensation. To improve therapeutic strategy in IBS, we should develop a novel approach to control visceral hypersensitivity. Here, we summarized recent data on central control of visceral sensation by neuropeptides in rats. Orexin, ghrelin or oxytocin in the brain is capable of inducing visceral antinociception. Dopamine, cannabinoid, adenosine, serotonin or opioid in the central nervous system (CNS) plays a role in the visceral hyposensitivity. Central ghrelin, levodopa or morphine could induce visceral antinociception via the orexinergic signaling. Orexin induces visceral antinociception through dopamine, cannabinoid, adenosine or oxytocin. Orexin nerve fibers are identified widely throughout the CNS and orexins are implicated in a number of functions. With regard to gastrointestinal functions, in addition to its visceral antinociception, orexin acts centrally to stimulate gastrointestinal motility and improve intestinal barrier function. Brain orexin is also involved in regulation of sleep/awake cycle and anti-depressive action. From these evidence, we would like to make a hypothesis that decreased orexin signaling in the brain may play a role in the pathophysiology in a part of patients with IBS who are frequently accompanied with sleep disturbance, depressive state and disturbed gut functions such as gut motility disturbance, leaky gut and visceral hypersensitivity.

Targeting Adenosine Receptors: A Potential Pharmacological Avenue for Acute and Chronic Pain

Adenosine is a purine nucleoside, responsible for the regulation of multiple physiological and pathological cellular and tissue functions by activation of four G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), namely A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃ adenosine receptors (ARs). In recent years, extensive progress has been made to elucidate the role of adenosine in pain regulation. Most of the antinociceptive effects of adenosine are dependent upon A₁AR activation located at peripheral, spinal, and supraspinal sites. The role of A_2AAR and A_2BAR is more controversial since their activation has both pro- and anti-nociceptive effects. A₃AR agonists are emerging as promising candidates for neuropathic pain. Although their therapeutic potential has been demonstrated in diverse preclinical studies, no AR ligands have so far reached the market. To date, novel pharmacological approaches such as adenosine regulating agents and allosteric modulators have been proposed to improve efficacy and limit side effects enhancing the effect of endogenous adenosine. This review aims to provide an overview of the therapeutic potential of ligands interacting with ARs and the adenosinergic system for the treatment of acute and chronic pain.