Properties of smooth pursuit adaptation induced by theta motion

Effects of smooth pursuit and second-order stimuli on visual motion prediction

The purpose of this study was to determine whether smooth pursuit eye movements affect visual motion prediction using a time‐to‐contact task where observers anticipate the exact instant that a partially occluded target would coincide with a stationary object. Moreover, we attempted to clarify the influence of second‐order motion on visual motion prediction during smooth pursuit. One target object moved to another stationary object (6 deg apart) at constant velocity of 3, 4, and 5 deg/s, and then the two objects disappeared 500 ms after the onset of target motion. The observers estimated the moment the moving object would overlap the stationary object and pressed a button. For the pursuit condition, both a Gaussian window and a random dots texture moved in the same direction at the same speed for the first‐order motion, whereas a Gaussian window moved over a static background composed of random dots texture for the second‐order motion. The results showed that the constant error of the time‐to‐contact shifted to a later response for the pursuit condition compared to the fixation condition, regardless of the object velocity. In addition, during smooth pursuit, the constant error for the second‐order motion shifted to an earlier response compared to the first‐order motion when the object velocity was 3 deg/s, whereas no significant difference was found at 4 and 5 deg/s. Therefore, our results suggest that visual motion prediction using a time‐to‐contact task is affected by both eye movements and motion configuration such as second‐order motion.