Sex differences in dominance relationships in Syrian hamsters

Distinguishing neural ensembles in the infralimbic cortex that regulate stress vulnerability and coping behavior

Neural ensembles in the medial prefrontal cortex regulate several types of responses to stress. We used a Syrian hamster model to investigate the role of infralimbic (IL) neurons in coping with social defeat stress and vulnerability to subsequent anxiety-like behavior. We created social dominance relationships in male and female hamsters, used a robust activity marker (RAM) approach to label IL neural ensembles activated during social defeat stress, and employed light-dark (LD), social avoidance (SA), and conditioned defeat (CD) tests to assess anxiety-like behavior. We found that dominant animals were less anxious in LD tests compared to subordinate animals after achieving their higher status. Also, status-dependent differences in anxiety-like behavior were maintained following social defeat in males, but not females. Subordinate males showed greater RAM-mKate2 expression in IL parvalbumin (PV) cells during social defeat exposure compared to dominant males, and submissive behavior during CD testing was correlated with RAM/PV co-expression. In contrast, greater RAM-mKate2 expression in IL neurons was correlated with a longer latency to submit during social defeat in dominant females, although the correlation of RAM/PV co-expression and defeat-induced anxiety in females was mixed. Overall, these findings suggest that activation of IL PV cells during social defeat predicts the development stress vulnerability in males, whereas activation of IL neurons is associated with a proactive response to social defeat exposure in females. Understanding how social dominance generates plasticity in IL PV cells should improve our understanding of the mechanisms by which behavioral treatments prior to stress might promote stress resilience.

Testosterone differentially modulates the display of agonistic behavior and dominance over opponents before and after adolescence in male Syrian hamsters

The current study investigated the influence of testosterone on agonistic behavior and dominance over an opponent before and after adolescence in male Syrian hamsters ( Mesocricetus auratus) . We hypothesized that testosterone-dependent modulation of agonistic behavior would be greater following adolescent development. To test this hypothesis, prepubertal (14 days of age) and adult subjects (52-62 days of age) were gonadectomized and immediately implanted with testosterone or vehicle pellets. Fourteen days later, agonistic behavior was assessed in a neutral arena with age-matched testosterone-treated opponents. Flank marking was also assessed separately in response to male odors alone. Our hypothesis predicted that testosterone would modulate agonistic behavior and dominance over an opponent in adult but not in prepubertal subjects, however, only flank marking behavior followed the predicted data pattern. During both social interaction and scent tests, testosterone increased flank marking behavior in adults, but failed to increase flank marking in prepubertal subjects. Contrary to our predictions, testosterone treatment increased prepubertal subject attacks, decreased submissive tail-up displays, and facilitated prepubertal subject dominance over opponents. In adults, testosterone increased paws-on investigation and flank marking during social interactions. Taken together, these data indicate that some, but not all aspects of agonistic behavior are sensitive to the activational effects of testosterone prior to adolescence, and that activational effects of testosterone differ substantially between prepubertal and adult males. Our results may have implications for early pubertal timing and increased risk for externalizing symptoms and aggressive behavior in humans.

Highlights

Testosterone increased attacks and decreased submissive displays in prepubertal malesTestosterone increased dominance over opponents in prepubertal malesPrepubertal males displayed more attacks and submissive behaviors than adults overallTestosterone increased flank marking behavior only in adult males.

Effects of social dominance and acute social stress on morphology of microglia and structural integrity of the medial prefrontal cortex

Chronic stress increases activity of the brain's innate immune system and impairs function of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). However, whether acute stress triggers similar neuroimmune mechanisms is poorly understood. Across four studies, we used a Syrian hamster model to investigate whether acute stress drives changes in mPFC microglia in a time-, subregion-, and social status-dependent manner. We found that acute social defeat increased expression of ionized calcium binding adapter molecule 1 (Iba1) in the infralimbic (IL) and prelimbic (PL) and altered the morphology Iba1+ cells 1, 2, and 7 days after social defeat. We also investigated whether acute defeat induced tissue degeneration and reductions of synaptic plasticity 2 days post-defeat. We found that while social defeat increased deposition of cellular debris and reduced synaptophysin immunoreactivity in the PL and IL, treatment with minocycline protected against these cellular changes. Finally, we tested whether a reduced conditioned defeat response in dominant compared to subordinate hamsters was associated with changes in microglia reactivity in the IL and PL. We found that while subordinate hamsters and those without an established dominance relationships showed defeat-induced changes in morphology of Iba1+ cells and cellular degeneration, dominant hamsters showed resistance to these effects of social defeat. Taken together, these findings indicate that acute social defeat alters microglial morphology, increases markers of tissue degradation, and impairs structural integrity in the IL and PL, and that experience winning competitive interactions can specifically protect the IL and reduce stress vulnerability.

Activation of androgen receptor-expressing neurons in the posterior medial amygdala is associated with stress resistance in dominant male hamsters

Social stress is a negative emotional experience that can increase fear and anxiety. Dominance status can alter the way individuals react to and cope with stressful events. The underlying neurobiology of how social dominance produces stress resistance remains elusive, although experience-dependent changes in androgen receptor (AR) expression is thought to play an essential role. Using a Syrian hamster (Mesocricetus auratus) model, we investigated whether dominant individuals activate more AR-expressing neurons in the posterior dorsal and posterior ventral regions of the medial amygdala (MePD, MePV), and display less social anxiety-like behavior following social defeat stress compared to subordinate counterparts. We allowed male hamsters to form and maintain a dyadic dominance relationship for 12 days, exposed them to social defeat stress, and then tested their approach-avoidance behavior using a social avoidance test. During social defeat stress, dominant subjects showed a longer latency to submit and greater c-Fos expression in AR+ cells in the MePD/MePV compared to subordinates. We found that social defeat exposure reduced the amount of time animals spent interacting with a novel conspecific 24 h later, although there was no effect of dominance status. The amount of social vigilance shown by dominants during social avoidance testing was positively correlated with c-Fos expression in AR+ cells in the MePV. These findings indicate that dominant hamsters show greater neural activity in AR+ cells in the MePV during social defeat compared to their subordinate counterparts, and this pattern of neural activity correlates with their proactive coping response. Consistent with the central role of androgens in experience-dependent changes in aggression, activation of AR+ cells in the MePD/MePV contributes to experience-dependent changes in stress-related behavior.

Animal play and evolution: Seven timely research issues about enigmatic phenomena

The nature of play in animals has been long debated, but progress is being made in characterizing play and its variants, documenting its distribution across vertebrate and invertebrate taxa, describing its mechanisms and development, and proposing testable theories about its origins, evolution, and adaptive functions. To achieve a deeper understanding of the functions and evolution of play, integrative and conceptual advances are needed in neuroscience, computer modeling, phylogenetics, experimental techniques, behavior development, and inter- and intra-specific variation. The special issue contains papers documenting many of these advances. Here, we describe seven timely areas where further research is needed to understand this still enigmatic class of phenomena more fully. Growing empirical and theoretical evidence reveals that play has been crucial in the evolution of behavior and psychology but has been underestimated, if not ignored, in both empirical and theoretical areas of evolutionary biology and neuroscience. Play research has important ramifications for understanding the evolution of cognition, emotion, and culture, and research on animals can be both informative and transformative.

Aggressiveness predicts dominance rank in greylag geese: mirror tests and agonistic interactions

Individual differences in aggressiveness, if consistent across time and contexts, may contribute to the long-term maintenance of social hierarchies in complex animal societies. Although agonistic interactions have previously been used to calculate individuals' positions within a dominance hierarchy, to date the repeatability of agonistic behaviour has not been tested when calculating social rank. Here, we examined the consistency and social relevance of aggressiveness as a personality trait in a free-flying population of greylag geese (Anser anser). For each individual, we quantified (i) aggressiveness using a standardized mirror stimulation test and (ii) dominance ranking based on the number of agonistic interactions won and lost in a feeding context. We found that individual differences in aggressiveness were significantly repeatable and that individuals' aggressiveness predicted their dominance rank position. The flock showed a robust and intermediately steep dominance hierarchy. Social rank was higher in paired birds, males and older birds, and most agonistic interactions occurred between individuals with moderate rank differences. We suggest that selection favours aggressiveness as a personality trait associated with resource acquisition and social rank, whereby a dominance hierarchy may increase the benefits of group living and reduce costs over conflict within dyads.