The oxygen cost of rehabilitation interventions in mechanically ventilated patients: an observational study

Metabolic cost of physical rehabilitation in mechanically ventilated patients in critical care: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Physical rehabilitation is advocated to improve muscle strength and function after critical illness, yet interventional studies have reported inconsistent benefits. A greater insight into patients' physiological response to exercise may provide an option to prescribe individualised, targeted rehabilitation, yet there is limited data measuring oxygen consumption (VO2) during physical rehabilitation. We aimed to test the feasibility of measuring VO2 during seated and standing exercise using the Beacon Caresystem and quantify within- and between-patient variability of VO2 percentage change.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study on patients mechanically ventilated for ≥72 hours and able to participate in physical rehabilitation in critical care. Oxygen consumption was measured continuously using indirect calorimetry. A total of 29 measurements were taken from ten participants performing active sitting and standing exercise.

RESULTS

Median (IQR) first session baseline VO2 was 3.54 (2.9-3.9) mL/kg/min, increasing significantly to 4.37 (3.96-5.14) mL/kg/min during exercise (p=0.005). The median (IQR) coefficient of variation of VO2 percentage change in participants (n=7) who completed more than one rehabilitation session (range 2-7 sessions) was 43 (34-61)% in 26 measurements. The median (IQR) coefficient of variation of VO2 percentage change was 46 (26-63)% in participants performing >1 sitting exercise session (six participants, 19 sessions).

CONCLUSIONS

VO2 increases significantly with exercise but is highly variable between participants, and in the same participant on separate occasions, performing the same functional activity. These data suggest that simplified measures of function do not necessarily relate to oxygen consumption.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05101850.

Metabolic load during morning care and active bed exercises in critically ill patients: An explorative study

BACKGROUND

To avoid overexertion in critically ill patients, information on the physical demand, i.e., metabolic load, of daily care and active exercises is warranted.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was toassess the metabolic load during morning care activities and active bed exercises in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.

METHODS

This study incorporated an explorative observational study executed in a university hospital intensive care unit. Oxygen consumption (VO2) was measured in mechanically ventilated (≥48 h) critically ill patients during rest, routine morning care, and active bed exercises. We aimed to describe and compare VO2 in terms of absolute VO2 (mL) defined as the VO2 attributable to the activity and relative VO2 in mL per kilogram bodyweight, per minute (mL/kg/min). Additional outcomes achieved during the activity were perceived exertion, respiratory variables, and the highest VO2 values. Changes in VO2 and activity duration were tested using paired tests.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were included with a mean (standard deviation) age of 59 y (12). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) durations of morning care and active bed exercises were 26 min (21-29) and 7 min (5-12), respectively. Absolute VO2 of morning care was significantly higher than that of active bed exercises (p = 0,009). Median (IQR) relative VO2 was 2.9 (2.6-3.8) mL/kg/min during rest; 3.1 (2.8-3.7) mL/kg/min during morning care; and 3.2 (2.7-4) mL/kg/min during active bed exercises. The highest VO2 value was 4.9 (4.2-5.7) mL/kg/min during morning care and 3.7 (3.2-5.3) mL/kg/min during active bed exercises. Median (IQR) perceived exertion on the 6-20 Borg scale was 12 (10.3-14.5) during morning care (n = 8) and 13.5 (11-15) during active bed exercises (n = 6).

CONCLUSION

Absolute VO2 in mechanically ventilated patients may be higher during morning care than during active bed exercises due to the longer duration of the activity. Intensive care unit clinicians should be aware that daily-care activities may cause intervals of high metabolic load and high ratings of perceived exertion.

The metabolic cost of inspiratory muscle training in mechanically ventilated patients in critical care

BACKGROUND

Diaphragmatic dysfunction is well documented in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) has been used to facilitate weaning by strengthening the inspiratory muscles, yet the optimal approach remains uncertain. Whilst some data on the metabolic response to whole body exercise in critical care exist, the metabolic response to IMT in critical care is yet to be investigated. This study aimed to quantify the metabolic response to IMT in critical care and its relationship to physiological variables.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study on mechanically ventilated patients ventilated for ≥ 72 h and able to participate in IMT in a medical, surgical, and cardiothoracic intensive care unit. 76 measurements were taken on 26 patients performing IMT using an inspiratory threshold loading device at 4 cmH₂O, and at 30, 50 and 80% of their negative inspiratory force (NIF). Oxygen consumption (VO₂) was measured continuously using indirect calorimetry.

RESULTS

First session mean (SD) VO₂ was 276 (86) ml/min at baseline, significantly increasing to 321 (93) ml/min, 333 (92) ml/min, 351(101) ml/min and 388 (98) ml/min after IMT at 4 cmH₂O and 30, 50 and 80% NIF, respectively (p = 0.003). Post hoc comparisons revealed significant differences in VO₂ between baseline and 50% NIF and baseline and 80% NIF (p = 0.048 and p = 0.001, respectively). VO₂ increased by 9.3 ml/min for every 1 cmH₂O increase in inspiratory load from IMT. Every increase in P/F ratio of 1 decreased the intercept VO₂ by 0.41 ml/min (CI - 0.58 to - 0.24 p < 0.001). NIF had a significant effect on the intercept and slope, with every 1 cmH₂O increase in NIF increasing intercept VO₂ by 3.28 ml/min (CI 1.98-4.59 p < 0.001) and decreasing the dose-response slope by 0.15 ml/min/cmH₂O (CI - 0.24 to - 0.05 p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

IMT causes a significant load-dependent increase in VO₂. P/F ratio and NIF impact baseline VO₂. The dose-response relationship of the applied respiratory load during IMT is modulated by respiratory strength. These data may offer a novel approach to prescription of IMT.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

The optimal approach to IMT in ICU is uncertain; we measured VO₂ at different applied respiratory loads to assess whether VO₂ increased proportionally with load and found VO₂ increased by 9.3 ml/min for every 1 cmH₂O increase in inspiratory load from IMT. Baseline NIF has a significant effect on the intercept and slope, participants with a higher baseline NIF have a higher resting VO₂ but a less pronounced increase in VO₂ as the inspiratory load increases; this may offer a novel approach to IMT prescription. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT05101850. Registered on 28 September 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05101850.

Attenuating Muscle Mass Loss in Critical Illness: the Role of Nutrition and Exercise

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Impaired recovery following an intensive care unit (ICU) admission is thought related to muscle wasting. Nutrition and physical activity are considered potential avenues to attenuate muscle wasting. The aim of this review was to present evidence for these interventions in attenuating muscle loss or improving strength and function.

RECENT FINDINGS

Randomised controlled trials on the impact of nutrition or physical activity interventions in critically ill adult patients on muscle mass, strength or function are presented. No nutrition intervention has shown an effect on strength or function, and the effect on muscle mass is conflicting. RCTs on the effect of physical activity demonstrate conflicting results; yet, there is a signal for improved strength and function with higher levels of physical activity, particularly when commenced early. Further research is needed to elucidate the impact of nutrition and physical activity on muscle mass, strength and function, particularly in combination.

Cardiorespiratory response to early rehabilitation in critically ill adults: A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Early rehabilitation is indicated in critically ill adults to counter functional complications. However, the physiological response to rehabilitation is poorly understood. This study aimed to determine the cardiorespiratory response to rehabilitation and to investigate the effect of explanatory variables on physiological changes during rehabilitation and recovery.

METHODS

In a prospectively planned, secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial conducted in a tertiary, mixed intensive care unit (ICU), we analysed the 716 physiotherapy-led, pragmatic rehabilitation sessions (including exercise, cycling and mobilisation). Participants were previously functionally independent, mechanically ventilated, critically ill adults (n = 108). Physiological data (2-minute medians) were collected with standard ICU monitoring and indirect calorimetry, and their medians calculated for baseline (30min before), training (during physiotherapy) and recovery (15min after). We visualised physiological trajectories and investigated explanatory variables on their estimated effect with mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

This study found a large range of variation within and across participants' sessions with clinically relevant variations (>10%) occurring in more than 1 out of 4 sessions in mean arterial pressure, minute ventilation (MV) and oxygen consumption (VO2), although early rehabilitation did not generally affect physiological values from baseline to training or recovery. Active patient participation increased MV (mean difference 0.7l/min [0.4-1.0, p<0.001]) and VO2 (23ml/min [95%CI: 13-34, p<0.001]) during training when compared to passive participation. Similarly, session type 'mobilisation' increased heart rate (6.6bpm [2.1-11.2, p = 0.006]) during recovery when compared to 'exercise'. Other modifiable explanatory variables included session duration, mobilisation level and daily medication, while non-modifiable variables were age, gender, body mass index and the daily Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

A large range of variation during rehabilitation and recovery mirrors the heterogenous interventions and patient reactions. This warrants close monitoring and individual tailoring, whereby the best option to stimulate a cardiorespiratory response seems to be active patient participation, shorter session durations and mobilisation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) identification number: DRKS00004347, registered on 10 September 2012.

Respiratory Support Adjustments and Monitoring of Mechanically Ventilated Patients Performing Early Mobilization: A Scoping Review

This scoping review is aimed to summarize current knowledge on respiratory support adjustments and monitoring of metabolic and respiratory variables in mechanically ventilated adult patients performing early mobilization.

DATA SOURCES

Eight electronic databases were searched from inception to February 2021, using a predefined search strategy.

STUDY SELECTION

Two blinded reviewers performed document selection by title, abstract, and full text according to the following criteria: mechanically ventilated adult patients performing any mobilization intervention, respiratory support adjustments, and/or monitoring of metabolic/respiratory real-time variables.

DATA EXTRACTION

Four physiotherapists extracted relevant information using a prespecified template.

DATA SYNTHESIS

From 1,208 references screened, 35 documents were selected for analysis, where 20 (57%) were published between 2016 and 2020. Respiratory support settings (ventilatory modes or respiratory variables) were reported in 21 documents (60%). Reported modes were assisted (n = 11) and assist-control (n = 9). Adjustment of variables and modes were identified in only seven documents (20%). The most frequent respiratory variable was the Fio2, and only four studies modified the level of ventilatory support. Mechanical ventilator brand/model used was not specified in 26 documents (74%). Monitoring of respiratory, metabolic, and both variables were reported in 22 documents (63%), four documents (11%) and 10 documents (29%), respectively. These variables were reported to assess the physiologic response (n = 21) or safety (n = 13). Monitored variables were mostly respiratory rate (n = 26), pulse oximetry (n = 22), and oxygen consumption (n = 9). Remarkably, no study assessed the work of breathing or effort during mobilization.

CONCLUSIONS

Little information on respiratory support adjustments during mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients was identified. Monitoring of metabolic and respiratory variables is also scant. More studies on the effects of adjustments of the level/mode of ventilatory support on exercise performance and respiratory muscle activity monitoring for safe and efficient implementation of early mobilization in mechanically ventilated patients are needed.

The validity of the 'General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire' against accelerometery in patients with chronic kidney disease

Background: The majority of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are physically inactive. Simple yet accurate assessment of physical activity is important in identifying those in need of intervention. The 'General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire' (GPPAQ) is a well-used clinical and research tool, but has not been validated.Methods: Forty individuals with CKD (age 62.5 (SD: 11.1) years, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 33.2 (SD:19.1) ml/min/1.73 m²) completed the GPPAQ and objective physical activity was measured using a GENEActiv accelerometer for 7 days. Physical activity status was grouped as 'Active' (i.e. meeting current physical activity UK guidelines) or 'Inactive.' Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Accuracy was defined as the probability the GPPAQ could correctly classify a patient as either 'Active' or 'Inactive' (based on accelerometery).Results: Using accelerometery, 18% of participants met the current UK guidelines, whereas 27% were classed as 'Active' according to GPPAQ. Sensitivity of the GPPAQ was 54.6% and specificity was 96.6%. The 'accuracy' of the GPPAQ was 85.0%. The accuracy of the GPPAQ was greater in males and those not in employment/retired, although these differences were not statistically significant.Conclusions: The GPPAQ may be a useful tool to identify CKD patients who would benefit most from a physical activity intervention. In particular, the GPPAQ can accurately identify those not sufficiently active.