The dark side of the treadmill walking test

Treadmill training and physiotherapy similarly improve dual task gait performance: a randomized-controlled trial in Parkinson's disease

Motor-cognitive dual tasks are used to investigate the interplay between gait and cognition. Dual task walking in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) results in decreased gait speed and more importantly in an increased fall risk. There is evidence that physical training may improve gait during dual task challenge. Physiotherapy and treadmill walking are known to improve single task gait. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of individualized physiotherapy or treadmill training on gait during dual task performance. 105 PD patients were randomly assigned to an intervention group (physiotherapy or treadmill). Both groups received 10 individual interventional sessions of 25 min each and additional group therapy sessions for 14 days. Primary outcome measure was the dual task gait speed. Secondary outcomes were additional gait parameters during dual task walking, UPDRS-III, BBS and walking capacity. All gait parameters were recorded using sensor-based gait analysis. Gait speed improved significantly by 4.2% (treadmill) and 8.3% (physiotherapy). Almost all secondary gait parameters, UPDRS-III, BBS, and walking capacity improved significantly and similarly in both groups. However, interaction effects were not observed. Both interventions significantly improved gait in patients with mild to moderate PD. However, treadmill walking did not show significant benefits compared to individualized physiotherapy. Our data suggest that both interventions improve dual task walking and therefore support safe and independent walking. This result may lead to more tailored therapeutic preferences.

Immersive virtual reality during gait rehabilitation increases walking speed and motivation: a usability evaluation with healthy participants and patients with multiple sclerosis and stroke

Background

The rehabilitation of gait disorders in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and stroke is often based on conventional treadmill training. Virtual reality (VR)-based treadmill training can increase motivation and improve therapy outcomes. The present study evaluated an immersive virtual reality application (using a head-mounted display, HMD) for gait rehabilitation with patients to (1) demonstrate its feasibility and acceptance and to (2) compare its short-term effects to a semi-immersive presentation (using a monitor) and a conventional treadmill training without VR to assess the usability of both systems and estimate the effects on walking speed and motivation.

Methods

In a within-subjects study design, 36 healthy participants and 14 persons with MS or stroke participated in each of the three experimental conditions (VR via HMD, VR via monitor, treadmill training without VR).

Results

For both groups, the walking speed in the HMD condition was higher than in treadmill training without VR and in the monitor condition. Healthy participants reported a higher motivation after the HMD condition as compared with the other conditions. Importantly, no side effects in the sense of simulator sickness occurred and usability ratings were high. No increases in heart rate were observed following the VR conditions. Presence ratings were higher for the HMD condition compared with the monitor condition for both user groups. Most of the healthy study participants (89%) and patients (71%) preferred the HMD-based training among the three conditions and most patients could imagine using it more frequently.

Conclusions

For the first time, the present study evaluated the usability of an immersive VR system for gait rehabilitation in a direct comparison with a semi-immersive system and a conventional training without VR with healthy participants and patients. The study demonstrated the feasibility of combining a treadmill training with immersive VR. Due to its high usability and low side effects, it might be particularly suited for patients to improve training motivation and training outcome e. g. the walking speed compared with treadmill training using no or only semi-immersive VR. Immersive VR systems still require specific technical setup procedures. This should be taken into account for specific clinical use-cases during a cost–benefit assessment.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-021-00848-w.