Differences between men and women in the use of preventive medications following a major cardiovascular event: Australian prospective cohort study

Improved adherence to statin treatment and differences in results between men and women after pictorial risk communication-a sub-study of the VIPVIZA RCT

BACKGROUND

People with intermediate CVD risk constitute most of the population. Within this group, the proportion of events is lower compared to the high-risk group, but they contribute with the largest absolute number of events. Atherosclerosis is a dynamic process and progression can be slowed or even reversed with medication and lifestyle changes, but adherence to prescribed treatment is crucial.

AIM

To investigate the long-term effects of interventions with pictorial risk communication of cardiovascular (CVD) risk on average adherence in a group of statin users. Compare response in adherence over time between men and women after intervention.

METHODS

Participants on active statin treatment were followed up to 5 years after being randomly assigned to an intervention program aimed at raising CVD risk awareness among participants and their physicians. Merging prescribed medication databases with VIPVIZA study to study adherence over time. A moving average adherence was used to compare groups.

RESULTS

Generally, the average adherence to statins among the 512 participants was high. Men had a higher average adherence over time, while women had a sharper increase in adherence in conjuncture with the intervention program.

CONCLUSIONS

Both men and women were receptive to pictorial information regarding CVD risk, but the intervention effect was more pronounced in women. Sex differences are important when considering risk communication strategies. Periodically repeating the intervention was beneficial for maintaining the intervention effect over time.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The VIPVIZA study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , May 8, 2013, number NCT01849575.

Factors related to under-treatment of secondary cardiovascular risk, including primary healthcare: Australian National Health Survey linked data analysis

OBJECTIVE

To inform national evidence gaps on cardiovascular disease (CVD) preventive medication use and factors relating to under-treatment - including primary healthcare engagement - among CVD survivors in Australia.

METHODS

Data from 884 participants with self-reported CVD from the 2014-15 National Health Survey were linked to primary care and pharmaceutical dispensing data for 2016 through the Multi-Agency Data Integration Project. Logistic regression quantified the relation of combined blood pressure- and lipid-lowering medication use to participant characteristics.

RESULTS

Overall, 94.8% had visited a general practitioner (GP) and 40.0% were on both blood pressure- and lipid-lowering medications. Medication use was least likely in: women versus men (OR=0.49[95%CI:0.37-0.65]), younger participants (e.g. 45-64y versus 65-85y: OR=0.58[0.42-0.79])and current versus never-smokers (OR=0.73[0.44-1.20]). Treatment was more likely in those with ≥9 versus ≤4 conditions (OR=2.15[1.39-3.31]), with ≥11 versus 0-2 GP visits/year (OR=2.62[1.53-4.48]) and with individual CVD risk factors (e.g. high blood pressure OR=3.13 [2.34-4.19]) versus without); the latter even accounting for GP service-use frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

Younger people, smokers, those with infrequent GP visits or without CVD risk factors were the least likely to be on medication.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH

Substantial under-treatment, even among those using GP services, indicates opportunities to prevent further CVD events in primary care.

Prevalence of Cardioprotective Medication Use in Coronary Heart Disease Patients in South America: Systematic review and Meta-Analysis

Background:

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the most common cause of death globally, and clinical guidelines recommend cardioprotective medications for patients with established CHD. Suboptimal use of these medications has been reported, but information from South America is scarce.

Methods:

We conducted a systematic review on prevalence of secondary prevention medication in South America. We pooled prevalence estimates, analysed time-trends and guideline compliance, and identified factors associated with medication use with meta-regression models.

Results:

73 publications were included. Medication prevalence varied by class: beta-blockers 73.4%(95%CI 66.8%–79.1%), ACEI/ARBs 55.8%(95%CI 49.7%–61.8), antiplatelets 84.6%(95%CI 79.6%–88.5%), aspirin 85.1%(95%CI 79.7%–89.3%) and statins 78.9%(95%CI 71.2%–84.9%). The use of beta-blockers, ACEI/ARBs and statins increased since 1993. Ten publications reported low medication use and nine reported adequate use. Medication use was lower in community, public and rehabilitation settings compared to tertiary centres.

Conclusion:

Cardioprotective medication use has increased, but could be further improved particularly in community settings.

The Allure of Big Data to Improve Stroke Outcomes: Review of Current Literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To critically appraise literature on recent advances and methods using "big data" to evaluate stroke outcomes and associated factors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent big data studies provided new evidence on the incidence of stroke outcomes, and important emerging predictors of these outcomes. Main highlights included the identification of COVID-19 infection and exposure to a low-dose particulate matter as emerging predictors of mortality post-stroke. Demographic (age, sex) and geographical (rural vs. urban) disparities in outcomes were also identified. There was a surge in methodological (e.g., machine learning and validation) studies aimed at maximizing the efficiency of big data for improving the prediction of stroke outcomes. However, considerable delays remain between data generation and publication. Big data are driving rapid innovations in research of stroke outcomes, generating novel evidence for bridging practice gaps. Opportunity exists to harness big data to drive real-time improvements in stroke outcomes.

Non-Persistence with Medication as a Mediator for the Social Inequality in Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Incident Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Aim

Low socioeconomic status is associated with higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among patients with incident acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We examined whether non-persistence with antiplatelet and statin therapy mediated the income- and educational-related inequality in risk of MACE.

Methods

Using national registers, all Danish patients diagnosed with incident ACS from 2010 to 2017 were identified. The primary outcome (MACE) comprised all-cause death, cardiac death and cardiac readmission. Risk of MACE was handled by discrete time analyses using inverse probability of treatment weights. The mediator variable comprised non-persistence to a combined 2-dimensional measure of statin and antiplatelet treatment. The mediation analysis was evaluated by population average effects.

Results

The study population was 45,874 patients, of whom 16,958 (37.0%) were non-persistent with medication and 16,365 (35.7%) suffered MACE during the median follow-up of 3.5 years. Compared to patients with low income, the adjusted hazard ratio of MACE was lowered by 33% (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.61–0.72) in men and by 34% (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.61–0.72) in women with high income, respectively. Similar results were observed according to level of education. A socioeconomic difference in risk of non-persistence was found in men but not women and only in relation to income. The lower risk of non-persistence observed in high-income men mediated the lower risk of MACE by 12.6% (95% CI: 11.1–14.1%) compared with low-income men.

Conclusion

Non-persistence with medication mediated some of the income-related inequality in risk of MACE in men, but not women, with incident ACS.