Prescribing and Administering Opioid Doses Based Solely on Pain Intensity: Update of A Position Statement by the American Society for Pain Management Nursing

Evidence summary on pain management in thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery

Objective

The study aimed to systematically retrieve, evaluate and summarize evidence on perioperative pain management in adults undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery, to assist oncology nurses in improving pain assessment and management.

Methods

The research question was established using PIPOST model and a systematic search was conducted in English and Chinese databases, professional society websites and guideline platforms for literature published between January 2017 and December 2024. Included literature types comprised guidelines, systematic reviews, evidence summaries, expert consensus, and standards. After literature searching and screening in January 2025, the remaining guidelines were evaluated by four investigators, while other literature was assessed by two investigators. Evidence was then extracted and graded.

Results

Eighteen articles were included, comprising 5 systematic reviews, 3 guidelines, 2 clinical decisions, 4 evidence summaries, 3 expert consensus, and 1 standard. Twenty-five pieces of evidence across six topics were summarized, covering organizational management, high-risk patient assessment and preoperative education, pain assessment, intraoperative analgesia, multimodal pharmacological strategies, and non-pharmacological interventions.

Conclusions

This evidence summary highlights effective strategies for perioperative pain management in thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery, which could support oncology nurses in implementing comprehensive pain assessment, identifying high-risk patients, and applying diversified analgesic interventions.

Comparison of Pain Assessment Tools and Numeric Rating Scale Thresholds for Analgesic Administration in the Postanaesthetic Care Unit

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and Verbal Rating Scale (VRS). Additionally, the study aimed to determine NRS threshold values for both mild analgesic administration (= without risk of nausea and vomiting [NV] side effects) and strong analgesic administration (= with risk of NV side effects) in the postanaesthetic care unit (PACU).

DESIGN

Prospective, observational study design.

METHODS

The study was conducted between August 2019 and April 2022. Patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were included. The primary outcome was the correlation between the VAS, NRS, and VRS, assessed at PACU admission and discharge. Secondary outcomes included pain evolution, desire for analgesic administration with or without risk of NV side effects, and preferred tool for pain assessment.

FINDINGS

VAS, NRS, and VRS were significantly correlated (r = 0.82 to 0.94, P < .001) at both PACU admission and discharge. The median VAS scores significantly improved from 32 (interquartile range [IQR]: 9 to 22) at PACU admission to 27 (IQR: 8 to 39) at PACU discharge (P < .001), while the median NRS scores significantly improved from 3 (IQR: 1 to 6) at PACU admission to 3 (IQR: 1 to 4) at PACU discharge (P < .001). At PACU admission, receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis indicated that an optimal NRS threshold value for the administration of a mild analgesic (= without risk of NV side effects) was greater than 2, and greater than 5 for the administration of a strong analgesic (= with risk of NV side effects). At PACU discharge, patients reported a preferred median NRS score of 5 to be treated with a mild analgesic (= without risk of NV side effects), and a preferred median NRS score of 8 to be treated with a strong analgesic (= with risk of NV side effects).

CONCLUSIONS

All three pain assessment tools can be used to evaluate postoperative pain in the PACU setting during the recovery from general anesthesia.

Implementing an Evidence-Based Functional Pain Assessment Scale in an Adult Inpatient Unit

BACKGROUND

The focus on pain assessment using a single, one-dimension pain assessment scale can be problematic. Locally, challenges we faced with this were; a) pain was percieved as not being effectively managed, b) patients with chronic pain were not having their pain adequately controlled, and c) misconceptions and subsequent confusion between health care teams and patients related to what pain intensity scores mean to each individual.

AIMS

The purpose of this paper is to describe an evidence-based practice project aiming at improving pain assessment through the implementation of a Functional Pain Scale (FPS) on an adult inpatient cardiothoracic unit.

DESIGN

The Iowa Model-Revised and the Implementation Strategies for Evidence- Based Practice Guide served as the framework for this project.

SETTING

Over an 18-month period at a academic tertiary medical center in the midwest.

PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS

Staff and patients on an adult inpatient 48-bed medical and surgical cardiothoracic unit.

METHODS

Following a synthesis of the evidence, implementation of the FPS required various strategies, such as, individualized patient and staff education, audit and feedback, a pain policy revision, and creating documentation in the electronic medical record. Evaluation of the FPS consisted of patient and staff surveys pre- and postimplementation to assess knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors.

RESULTS

After the pilot period, over 75% of the patients preferred to use the FPS and almost all the patients found the scale easy to use. Nurses reported an increase in perception that pain documentation was complete, that the FPS allowed them to accurately document their patients' pain experience, and that their patients were well informed of their pain management plan.

CONCLUSIONS

This project supports successful implementation of the FPS within nursing workflow. The goal of using the FPS is to change pain management discussions from an intensity reduction to meeting goals of care, aligning expectations, and creating common language among patients and providers.

Position Statement: Range Orders in the Management of Pain

American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) supports safe medication practices and the appropriate use of pro re nata (PRN) range orders for analgesics in the management of pain within the scope of nursing practice. Although range orders may apply to many medications prescribed as PRN, the focus of this ASPMN position statement is on PRN analgesic medication. PRN range orders are commonly used to provide flexibility in dosing to meet the analgesic requirements of an individual patient. There are many patient-specific factors that require professional clinical assessment when administering medications to patients. Unfortunately, several myths persist regarding The Joint Commission's (TJC) standard around the implementation of range orders leading many to assume that range orders are not supported or safe. On the contrary, if utilized in a consistent and appropriate manner, PRN range orders can allow nurses to provide optimal pain management while still providing safe administration (Paquette et al., 2022).

Acute Perioperative Pain Management of the Orthopaedic Patient: Guidance for Operationalizing Evidence Into Practice

Orthopaedic surgery often results in pain, with less than half of patients reporting adequate relief. Unrelieved acute pain occurring after surgery increases the risk of negative sequelae, including delayed healing, increased morbidity, pulmonary complications, limited rehabilitation participation, anxiety, depression, increased length of stay, prolonged duration of opioid use, and the development of chronic pain. Interventions that are individualized, evidence-informed, and applied within an ethical framework improve healthcare delivery for patients, clinicians, and healthcare organizations. Recommendations for using the principles of effective pain management from preoperative assessment through discharge are detailed, including recommendations for addressing barriers and challenges in applying these principles into clinical practice.

The Effect of Using Endorphin Massage for Decreasing Pain at First Stage in Normal Labor

Labor pain is a subjective experience of physical sensations associated with uterine contractions, dilation, thinning cervix and fetal descent during labor. To resolve the pain of labor, it has been implemented in a nonpharmacological method which is endorphin massage, in understanding endorphin massage for pressing pain in the first stage, in an active phase of normal multiparous mothers' deliveries. This research aims to research endorphin massage's influence on suppressing pain during the active phase of normal labor of multiparous mothers. This study is quasi-experimental with a cross-sectional approach. The study population of all women giving birth administered the purposive sampling data capture techniques, and it was obtained 132 multiparous mothers with normal labor in the observation sheet. Data were examined by administering a T-test. The majority of the pain intensity in the first stage of active phase multiparous mothers with normal labor, before the breath relaxation, is severe, with up to 49% experiencing severe pain. The majority of the percentage of moderate pain in the first stage of active phase multiparous mothers with normal labor, after breath relaxation, is as high as 42%. Meanwhile, the pain intensity of the first stage in active phase multiparous mothers with normal labor, prior to endorphin massage, is as high as 73.3%. Pain intensity of the first stage in active phase multiparous mothers normal labor after endorphin massage, the majority of the percentage is moderate pain up to 53.3%. Statistical test results obtained p-value is 0.004 endorphin massage. In conclusion, there is an effect of breath relaxation on the intensity of pain during normal labor in multiparous mothers. Furthermore, researchers can do a combination of endorpine massage with other treatments to treat pain during the I active phase of labor and pain intensity checks can be done by testing cortisol levels.

Pharmacologic Pain Management Trends among Adults Hospitalized with Cellulitis: An Evidence-Based Practice Project

BACKGROUND

Nurses commonly administer opioids, following "as needed" order sets, to patients hospitalized for acute pain conditions like cellulitis. Practice guidelines recommend limiting opioid administration for acute pain management. At two hospitals in the Pacific Northwest, an opioid stewardship committee was formed to align with best practice.

AIMS

The main objective was to describe changes to inpatient rates of opioid and non-opioid administration following implementation of evidence-based opioid stewardship efforts.

DESIGN

Observational, retrospective, evidence-based practice project.

SETTINGS

One 200-bed and one 680-bed hospital in Washington State.

PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS

Data were included from patients aged 18 years or older hospitalized for cellulitis.

METHODS

Demographic and pain-related data were extracted from the electronic health record (n = 4,523 encounters) guided by the symptom management framework. The proportion of patients receiving opioid or non-opioid medications before and after implementation of evidence-based practice opioid stewardship interventions was calculated descriptively. A logistic regression tested factors related to administration of an opioid medication.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients receiving an opioid decreased following opioid stewardship efforts while those receiving non-opioid analgesics remained stable. Factors significantly influencing inpatient opioid administration were: average inpatient pain score, pre-hospital opioid prescription, length of stay, and year of hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Analgesic administration treating painful, acute cellulitis at two hospitals in the Pacific Northwest included opioid and non-opioid medications. The proportion of patients receiving opioids decreased following best practice opioid stewardship actions. Opportunities may exist for nurses to collaborate with providers to improve inpatient analgesic administration practices.

Prescribing and Administering Opioid Doses Based Solely on Pain Intensity: Update of a Position Statement by the American Society for Pain Management NursingⓇ

Prescribing and administering opioid doses based solely on pain intensity is inappropriate and potentially unsafe for many reasons, including that pain intensity ratings are completely subjective, cannot be measured objectively, are dynamic as the experience of pain is dynamic, and may be describing a construct other than intensity (i.e. suffering). Many factors, in addition to pain intensity, influence opioid requirements and subsequent dosing. The American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) holds the position that the practice of prescribing and administering doses of opioid analgesics based solely on a patient's pain intensity should be prohibited because it disregards the relevance of other essential elements of assessment and may contribute to negative patient outcomes.