Conservative Care for Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

Conservative Treatments in the Management of Acute Painful Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Importance

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) frequently cause substantial pain and reduced mobility, posing a major health problem. Despite the critical need for effective pain management to restore functionality and improve patient outcomes, the value of various conservative treatments for acute VCF has not been systematically investigated.

Objective

To assess and compare different conservative treatment options in managing acute pain related to VCF.

Data Sources

On May 16, 2023, 4 databases-PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL-were searched. In addition, a gray literature search within Scopus and Embase was also conducted.

Study Selection

Included studies were prospective comparative and randomized clinical trials that assessed conservative treatments for acute VCF.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data extraction and synthesis were performed by 2 authors according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Network Meta-Analyses recommendations. A frequentist graph-theoretical model and a random-effects model were applied for the meta-analysis.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcomes were short-term (4 weeks) pain during activity and long-term (latest available follow-up) nonspecified pain in patients with acute VCF.

Results

The study included 20 trials, encompassing 2102 patients, and evaluated various interventions for managing VCF. Calcitonin (standardized mean difference [SMD], -4.86; 95% CI, -6.87 to -2.86) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; SMD, -3.94; 95% CI, -7.30 to -0.58) were beneficial regarding short-term pain during activity compared with placebo. For long-term nonspecific pain management, bisphosphonates were associated with inferior pain outcomes compared with daily (SMD, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.11 to 2.31) or weekly (SMD, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.05 to 2.21) administration of teriparatide, with no treatment being superior to NSAIDs. The qualitative analysis of adverse events highlighted that typical adverse events associated with these medications were observed.

Conclusions and Relevance

NSAIDs and teriparatide may be the preferred treatment options for pain management in acute osteoporotic VCF. Although calcitonin also proved to be beneficial, its safety profile and potential adverse effects restrict its widespread application. The limited evidence on braces and analgesics underscores the urgent need for future research.

Development and validation of a radiomics-based model for predicting osteoporosis in patients with lumbar compression fractures

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis, a metabolic bone disorder, markedly elevates fracture risks, with vertebral compression fractures being predominant. Antiosteoporotic treatments for patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) lessen both the occurrence of subsequent fractures and associated pain. Thus, diagnosing osteoporosis in OVCF patients is vital.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to develop a predictive radiographic model using T1 sequence MRI images to accurately determine whether patients with lumbar spine compression fractures also have osteoporosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients over 45 years of age diagnosed with a fresh lumbar compression fracture.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Diagnostic accuracy of the model (area under the ROC curve).

METHODS

The study retrospectively collected clinical and imaging data (MRI and DEXA) from hospitalized lumbar compression fracture patients (L1-L4) aged 45 years or older between January 2021 and June 2023. Using the pyradiomics package in Python, features from the lumbar compression fracture vertebral region of interest (ROI) were extracted. Downscaling of the extracted features was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test and the least absolute shrinkage selection operator (LASSO) algorithm. Subsequently, six machine learning models (Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine [SVM], Decision Tree, Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting [XGBoost], and Light Gradient Boosting Machine [LightGBM]) were employed to train and validate these features in predicting osteoporosis comorbidity in OVCF patients.

RESULTS

A total of 128 participants, 79 in the osteoporotic group and 49 in the nonosteoporotic group, met the study's inclusion and exclusion criteria. From the T1 sequence MRI images, 1906 imaging features were extracted in both groups. Utilizing the Mann-Whitney U test, 365 radiologic features were selected out of the initial 1,906. Ultimately, the lasso algorithm identified 14 significant radiological features. These features, incorporated into six conventional machine learning algorithms, demonstrated successful prediction of osteoporosis in the validation set. The NaiveBayes model yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.84, sensitivity of 0.87, specificity of 0.70, and accuracy of 0.81.

CONCLUSIONS

A NaiveBayes machine learning algorithm can predict osteoporosis in OVCF patients using t1-sequence MRI images of lumbar compression fractures. This approach aims to obviate the necessity for further osteoporosis assessments, diminish patient exposure to radiation, and bolster the clinical care of patients with OVCF.

Teriparatide alone versus vertebroplasty on pain control and radiographic outcomes after osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture

PURPOSE

To investigate efficacy of 3-month teriparatide(TPD) and compare this treatment with vertebroplasty in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes after osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).

METHODS

This is a retrospective matched cohort study. Patients who received conservative treatment with at least 3-month TPD treatment for acute OVCF with at least 6 months follow-up were included. Each enrolled TPD case was matched with 2 vertebroplasty cases using age and gender. 30 TPD cases and 60 vertebroplasty cases were enrolled. Patient-reported pain scores were obtained at diagnosis and 1, 3, 6 months after diagnosis. Radiographic parameters including middle body height, posterior body height, wedge angle and kyphotic angle were measured at diagnosis and 6 months after diagnosis. Fracture non-union and subsequent vertebral fracture were evaluated.

RESULTS

TPD treatment showed inferior pain relief to vertebroplasty group at 1 month, but did not show difference at 3 and 6 months after diagnosis. In TPD cases, progression of vertebral body collapse was noted in terms of middle body height and wedge angle at final follow up. Instead, both middle body height and wedge angle increased significantly after operation in the vertebroplasty group. Fracture non-union was confirmed via MRI and 4 TPD patients were diagnosed with non-union (4/30, 13.3%). Subsequent compression fracture within 6 months was significant higher in vertebroplasty group (12/60, 20%) than in TPD group (1/30, 3.3%).

CONCLUSION

In acute OVCFs, 3-month TPD treatment alone showed comparable pain improvement and less subsequent spine fracture than vertebroplasty.

Role of biophysical stimulation in multimodal management of vertebral compression fractures

Raised life expectancy and aging of the general population are associated with an increased concern for fragility fractures due to factors such as osteoporosis, reduced bone density, and an higher risk of falls. Among these, the most frequent are vertebral compression fractures (VCF), which can be clinically occult. Once the diagnosis is made, generally thorough antero-posterior and lateral views of the affected spine at the radiographs, a comprehensive workup to assess the presence of a metabolic bone disease or secondary causes of osteoporosis and bone frailty is required. Treatment uses a multimodal management consisting of a combination of brace, pain management, bone metabolism evaluation, osteoporosis medication and has recently incorporated biophysical stimulation, a noninvasive technique that uses induced electric stimulation to improve bone recovery through the direct and indirect upregulation of bone morphogenic proteins, stimulating bone formation and remodeling. It contributes to the effectiveness of the therapy, promoting accelerated healing, supporting the reduction of bed rest and pain medications, improving patients' quality of life, and reducing the risk to undergo surgery in patients affected by VCFs. Therefore, the aim of this review is to outline the fundamental concepts of multimodal treatment for VCF, as well as the present function and significance of biophysical stimulation in the treatment of VCF patients.

Prediction of Progressive Collapse in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures Using Conventional Statistics and Machine Learning

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine prognostic factors for the progression of osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) following conservative treatment.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Few studies have evaluated factors associated with progressive collapse (PC) of OVFs. Furthermore, machine learning has not been applied in this context.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study involved the PC and non-PC groups based on a compression rate of 15%. Clinical data, fracture site, OVF shape, Cobb angle, and anterior wedge angle of the fractured vertebra were evaluated. The presence of intravertebral cleft and the type of bone marrow signal change were analyzed using magnetic resonance imaging. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors. In machine learning methods, decision tree and random forest models were used.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in clinical data between the groups. The proportion of fracture shape ( P <0.001) and bone marrow signal change ( P =0.01) were significantly different between the groups. Moderate wedge shape was frequently observed in the non-PC group (31.7%), whereas the normative shape was most common in the PC group (54.7%). The Cobb angle and anterior wedge angle at diagnosis of OVFs were higher in the non-PC group (13.2±10.9, P =0.001; 14.3±6.6, P <0.001) than in the PC group (10.3±11.8, 10.4±5.5). The bone marrow signal change at the superior aspect of the vertebra was more frequently found in the PC group (42.5%) than in the non-PC group (34.9%). Machine learning revealed that vertebral shape at initial diagnosis was a main predictor of progressive vertebral collapse.

CONCLUSION

The initial shape of the vertebra and bone edema pattern on magnetic resonance imaging appear to be useful prognostic factors for progressive collapse in osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Vertebral Body Decompression Procedure Versus Conservative Treatment for Painful Vertebral Compression Fracture

Background: Traditional treatment modalities for vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) include bed rest, pain medications, muscle relaxants, back braces, and physical therapy. In cases where conservative treatment proves ineffective, a new procedure called core decompression of the vertebral body is explored. Core decompression of the vertebral body has the potential to lower and stabilize the intraosseous pressure, resulting in enhanced blood circulation, which contributes to pain reduction. In this trial, we evaluated the efficacy of core decompression of the vertebral body in patients with painful VCFs compared with conventional conservative treatment. Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary education hospital between June 2017 and May 2020. The participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two treatment groups: the core decompression group and the conservative treatment group. The primary outcome measure was the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score of the back 3 months after the procedure. Secondary outcome measures included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for lumbar disabilities, the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) score for quality of life, and radiographic outcomes such as changes in compression rate. Results: All patients underwent the assigned intervention (48 core decompression and 50 conservative treatments). At both 1 month and 3 months, there were no significant differences between the core decompression group and conservative treatment group in VAS pain score (adjusted treatment effect: -0.1 and 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -7.5 to 7.3 and -5.6 to 9.6; p = 0.970 and p = 0.601, respectively). In addition, there were no significant inter-group differences in ODI and EQ-5D scores throughout the follow-up period (p = 0.917 and 0.704, respectively). Conclusion: Core decompression of the vertebral body did not demonstrate any significant improvement in pain and disability compared to conventional conservative treatment.

Diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and fracture level detection using multitask learning with U-Net in lumbar spine lateral radiographs

Recent studies of automatic diagnosis of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) using deep learning mainly focus on segmentation and vertebral level detection in lumbar spine lateral radiographs (LSLRs). Herein, we developed a model for simultaneous VCF diagnosis and vertebral level detection without using adjacent vertebral bodies. In total, 1102 patients with VCF, 1171 controls were enrolled. The 1865, 208, and 198 LSLRS were divided into training, validation, and test dataset. A ground truth label with a 4-point trapezoidal shape was made based on radiological reports showing normal or VCF at some vertebral level. We applied a modified U-Net architecture, in which decoders were trained to detect VCF and vertebral levels, sharing the same encoder. The multi-task model was significantly better than the single-task model in sensitivity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. In the internal dataset, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of fracture detection per patient or vertebral body were 0.929, 0.944, and 0.917 or 0.947, 0.628, and 0.977, respectively. In external validation, those of fracture detection per patient or vertebral body were 0.713, 0.979, and 0.447 or 0.828, 0.936, and 0.820, respectively. The success rates were 96 % and 94 % for vertebral level detection in internal and external validation, respectively. The multi-task-shared encoder was significantly better than the single-task encoder. Furthermore, both fracture and vertebral level detection was good in internal and external validation. Our deep learning model may help radiologists perform real-life medical examinations.

Absolute Bed Rest Duration of 3 Days for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: A Retrospective Study

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

PURPOSE

To reduce unnecessary absolute bed rest (ABR), this study sought to determine the optimal aimed length of ABR in older patients getting conservative treatment for osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs).

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

OVFs are quite common in elderly patients. ABR is a vital part of conservative treatment for OVFs, although the length of ABR may increase patient. No recommendations regarding how long ABR should last.

METHODS

This study was conducted in 134 patients with OVFs initially treated conservatively. The patients were split into two groups: 3-day and 7-day ABR. From the time of injury to 1, 4, and 12 weeks after injury, compression rate (CR) and local kyphotic angle (LKA) were assessed and compared between the two groups. Any complications such as pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, delirium, and urinary tract infection known to be related to ABR were examined based on the electronic medical record.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients underwent ABR for 3 days and 90 underwent ABR for 7 days. There was no significant difference in CR and LKA between the two groups at the time of injury versus 1, 4, and 12 weeks after injury. The patients were divided into two groups: those who received a 3-day ABR and those who received a 7-day ABR. CR and LKA were measured and compared between the two groups from the time of damage to 1, 4, and 12 weeks after injury. The ABR-related complication rate was 43.4% in the 7-day ABR group and 22.7% in 3-day ABR group (p=0.02). The duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the 3-day ABR group (12.8 days) than in the 7-day group (16 days) (p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Considering radiological outcomes, prognosis, complications, patient convenience, and economic impact, a 3-day ABR period is appropriate for the conservative treatment of OVFs.

Pharmacological options for pain control in patients with vertebral fragility fractures

This review considers the evidence base and current knowledge for pharmacological treatment options that are available for pain control in patients with vertebral fractures sustained after a low trauma incident. Due care needs to be taken when considering prescribed options for pain control. The decision should be based on first establishing whether the presentation is one of acute severe pain at the time of a new vertebral fragility fracture incident or whether the complaint is one of the debilitating, longer term chronic back pain syndrome, accompanied by a clinical suspicion of a possible new fracture. The article also presents currently debated questions in this important area of clinical and patient care and will be of interest to the readership worldwide.

Concurrent use of prescription gabapentinoids with opioids and risk for fall-related injury among older US Medicare beneficiaries with chronic noncancer pain: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Gabapentinoids are increasingly prescribed to manage chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) in older adults. When used concurrently with opioids, gabapentinoids may potentiate central nervous system (CNS) depression and increase the risks for fall. We aimed to investigate whether concurrent use of gabapentinoids with opioids compared with use of opioids alone is associated with an increased risk of fall-related injury among older adults with CNCP.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We conducted a population-based cohort study using a 5% national sample of Medicare beneficiaries in the United States between 2011 and 2018. Study sample consisted of fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries aged ≥65 years with CNCP diagnosis who initiated opioids. We identified concurrent users with gabapentinoids and opioids days' supply overlapping for ≥1 day and designated first day of concurrency as the index date. We created 2 cohorts based on whether concurrent users initiated gabapentinoids on the day of opioid initiation (Cohort 1) or after opioid initiation (Cohort 2). Each concurrent user was matched to up to 4 opioid-only users on opioid initiation date and index date using risk set sampling. We followed patients from index date to first fall-related injury event ascertained using a validated claims-based algorithm, treatment discontinuation or switching, death, Medicare disenrollment, hospitalization or nursing home admission, or end of study, whichever occurred first. In each cohort, we used propensity score (PS) weighted Cox models to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of fall-related injury, adjusting for year of the index date, sociodemographics, types of chronic pain, comorbidities, frailty, polypharmacy, healthcare utilization, use of nonopioid medications, and opioid use on and before the index date. We identified 6,733 concurrent users and 27,092 matched opioid-only users in Cohort 1 and 5,709 concurrent users and 22,388 matched opioid-only users in Cohort 2. The incidence rate of fall-related injury was 24.5 per 100 person-years during follow-up (median, 9 days; interquartile range [IQR], 5 to 18 days) in Cohort 1 and was 18.0 per 100 person-years during follow-up (median, 9 days; IQR, 4 to 22 days) in Cohort 2. Concurrent users had similar risk of fall-related injury as opioid-only users in Cohort 1(aHR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.34, p = 0.874), but had higher risk for fall-related injury than opioid-only users in Cohort 2 (aHR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.44, p = 0.005). Limitations of this study included confounding due to unmeasured factors, unavailable information on gabapentinoids' indication, potential misclassification, and limited generalizability beyond older adults insured by Medicare FFS program.

CONCLUSIONS

In this sample of older Medicare beneficiaries with CNCP, initiating gabapentinoids and opioids simultaneously compared with initiating opioids only was not significantly associated with risk for fall-related injury. However, addition of gabapentinoids to an existing opioid regimen was associated with increased risks for fall. Mechanisms for the observed excess risk, whether pharmacological or because of channeling of combination therapy to high-risk patients, require further investigation. Clinicians should consider the risk-benefit of combination therapy when prescribing gabapentinoids concurrently with opioids.

[Topical issues of rehabilitation of patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures]

The literature review analyzed 20 Russian and 69 foreign publications on the rehabilitation of elderly patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The article deals in detail with the prevalence, medical and social significance of pathological osteoporotic fractures, including vertebral deformities. The data confirming the importance of osteoporosis for physical and rehabilitation medicine specialists are presented. Changes in the quality of life, functional and gate disorders associated with osteoporotic vertebral fractures are described. Based on the available literature data, the principles of rehabilitation of patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures are formulated, including the effectiveness of various methods of physical therapy, mechanotherapy and apparatus physiotherapy. From the standpoint of evidence-based medicine, the role of orthotics in the complex rehabilitation of such patients is described. Based on the analysis of literature data, it was concluded that the problem of osteoporosis is relevant for physicians working in the field of rehabilitation medicine; osteoporotic vertebral fractures are characterized by a high prevalence over the age of 50 years and are associated with a decrease in the quality of life, motor and functional limitations, and an increased risk of death, and well-planned medical rehabilitation programs including physical exercises, physiotherapy and orthotics can significantly improve patient functionality.

Image classification of osteoporotic vertebral fracture with endplate-disc complex Injury

Background

The purpose of this study was to use MRI and CT to observe osteoporosis vertebral fracture (OVF) combined with endplate-disc complex (EDC) injury and to classify the degree of EDC injury according to the changes in EDC signal intensity and morphology on the images.

Methods

We investigated the incidence of EDC injury, observed the morphology and signal intensity changes of EDC injury using MRI and CT, and graded the injuries from 0 to 4 according to their severity. We compared whether there were differences in the degree of EDC injury among different vertebral fractures, bone mineral density(BMD), and severity of vertebral fractures.

Results

A total of 479 patients were included in this study, of whom 321 had EDC injury adjacent to the fractured vertebral body. Among those, 158 cases were grade 0, 66 cases were grade 1, 72 cases were grade 2, 78 cases were grade 3, and 92 cases were grade 4. The degree of EDC injury associated with thoracolumbar vertebral fractures was more serious than that of EDC injuries associated with thoracic and lumbar vertebral body fractures. Vertebral fractures with severe osteoporosis were associated with more severe EDC injury. Additionally, the more severe the vertebral fracture, the more severe was the combined EDC injury.

Conclusion

This study found that the incidence rate of EDC injury reached 67.0%. Among patients with OVF, severe osteoporosis and severe fractures in the thoracolumbar segments were often associated with more severe EDC injury.

Review of Current Spinal Robotic Orthoses

Osteoporotic spine fractures (OSF) are common sequelae of osteoporosis. OSF are directly correlated with increasing age and incidence of osteoporosis. OSF are treated conservatively or surgically. Associated acute pain, chronic disabilities, and progressive deformities are well documented. Conservative measures include a combination of initial bed rest, analgesia, early physiotherapy, and a spinal brace (orthosis), with the aim for early rehabilitation to prevent complications of immobile state. Spinal bracing is commonly used for symptomatic management of OSF. While traditional spinal braces aim to maintain the neutral spinal alignment and reduce the axial loading on the fractured vertebrae, they are well known for complications including discomfort with reduced compliance, atrophy of paraspinal muscles, and restriction of chest expansion leading to chest infections. Exoskeletons have been developed to passively assist and actively augment human movements with different types of actuators. Flexible, versatile spinal exoskeletons are designed to better support the spine. As new technologies enable the development of motorized wearable exoskeletons, several types have been introduced into the medical field application. We have provided a thorough review of the current spinal robotic technologies in this paper. The shortcomings in the current spinal exoskeletons were identified. Their limitations on the use for patients with OSF with potential improvement strategies were discussed. With our current knowledge of spinal orthosis for conservatively managed OSF, a semi-rigid backpack style thoracolumbar spinal robotic orthosis will reduce spinal bone stress and improve back muscle support. This will lead to back pain reduction, improved posture, and overall mobility. Early mobilization is an important part of management of patients with OSF as it reduces the chance of developing complications related to their immobile state for patients with OSF, which will be helpful for their recovery.

Factors Predicting the Surgical Risk of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

The aim of our study was to investigate the association between global spinal alignment, spinopelvic parameters, and outcomes of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF). Patients with vertebral compression fractures seen at our hospital between October 2017 and November of 2018 with a bone mineral density (BMD) T-score < -2.5 were recruited for the study. Surgical intervention was performed after eight weeks of conservative treatment depending on clinical symptoms and the willingness of patients. Spinopelvic and sagittal alignment parameters were compared between patients who had surgery and those that did not. Seventy-nine patients were included in the study. Twenty-five patients (31.6%, mean age: 73.28 ± 9.78 years) received surgery, and 54 (68.3%, mean age: 73 ± 8.58 years) conservative treatment only. Pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, and local kyphotic angle were statistically different between the groups (all p < 0.05). A sagittal vertical axis ≥ 50 mm, distance between the C7 plumb line and the center of the fractured vertebra (DSVA) ≥ 60 mm, pelvic incidence outside of the range of 44 to 62°), and pelvic tilt ≥ 27° were associted with the need for surgical intervention. Measurement of spinopelvic parameters can predict the need for surgery in patients with OVCF.

Predictors of presarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults: A 5-year longitudinal study

Objectives: Sarcopenia is an aging-induced decrease in muscle mass that increases frailty and fall in elderly people. Presarcopenia corresponds to the preliminary stage of sarcopenia. The purpose of this prospective study is to examine predictors of presarcopenia in health screening.Methods: The subjects were 124 community residents aged ≥60 years (55 males, 69 females, average age 70.2 years) who attended local government health checkups in 2010 and 2015, as part of the Yakumo study, and did not have presarcopenia in 2010. Body mass index (BMI), waist and hip circumferences, grip strength, bone mineral density (BMD), 10-m gait time, back muscle strength, and stride length were measured. Presarcopenia was defined using the appendicular skeletal muscle index (arm and leg skeletal muscle mass/height²).Results: The prevalences of presarcopenia in 2015 in males and females were 21.8% (12/55) and 30.4% (21/69), respectively. BMI, grip strength, BMD, back muscle strength, and osteoporosis deteriorated significantly more in the pre-sarcopenia group (n = 33) compared with controls (n = 91; no presarcopenia in 2015). In multivariate analysis, osteoporosis (OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.07-9.09; p < .05) was significantly associated with presarcopenia after 5 years.Conclusions: Establishment of risk factors for future pre-sarcopenia may allow development of evidence-based prevention strategies for this condition.

Decision Making: Osteoplasty, Ablation, or Combined Therapy for Spinal Metastases

Metastatic disease involving the spine and pelvis is common, often resulting in significant pain and disability. Several percutaneous interventions have been described, including osteoplasty, ablation, and screw fixation, that when used alone or in combination can significantly reduce pain and disability from metastatic bone disease. Although it is possible to make a significant impact in patient care with basic principles and techniques, certain advanced techniques can extend the application of percutaneous interventions while minimizing morbidity.

Treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with intraosseous vacuum phenomena using high-viscosity bone cement via bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with intraosseous vacuum phenomena could cause persistent back pains in patients, even after receiving conservative treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of using high-viscosity bone cement via bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty in treating patients who have osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with intraosseous vacuum phenomena.Twenty osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture patients with intraosseous vacuum phenomena, who received at least 2 months of conservative treatment, were further treated by injecting high-viscosity bone cement via bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty due to failure of conservative treatment. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by determining the anterior vertebral compression rates, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores at 1 day before the operation, on the first day of postoperation, at 1-month postoperation, and at 1-year postoperation.Three of 20 patients had asymptomatic bone cement leakage when treated via percutaneous vertebroplasty; however, no serious complications related to these treatments were observed during the 1-year follow-up period. A statistically significant improvement on the anterior vertebral compression rates, VAS scores, and ODI scores were achieved after percutaneous vertebroplasty. However, differences in the anterior vertebral compression rate, VAS score, and ODI score in the different time points during the 1-year follow-up period was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).Within the limitations of this study, the injection of high-viscosity bone cement via bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty for patients who have osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with intraosseous vacuum phenomena significantly relieved their back pains and improved their daily life activities shortly after the operation, thereby improving their life quality. In this study, the use of high-viscosity bone cement reduced the leakage rate and contributed to their successful treatment, as observed in patients during the 1-year follow-up period.

Spinal Orthoses for Vertebral Osteoporosis and Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the evidence of effectiveness of spinal orthoses for adults with vertebral osteoporosis.

DATA SOURCES

We conducted a systematic literature search using the databases of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, PEDro, and the Cochrane Library from January 1995 to October 2014.

STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers evaluated eligibility. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), pilot RCTs, and prospective nonrandomized controlled studies of spinal orthoses for people with vertebral osteoporosis or osteopenia with and without osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) that examined outcomes related to fracture consolidation, pain, strength, posture, balance, physical function, quality of life, and complications were eligible.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently extracted data and evaluated methodological quality using a domain-based risk-of-bias approach.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Twelve studies were included: 8 RCTs or pilot RCTs and 4 nonrandomized studies involving 626 participants. Three studies (n=153) evaluated orthoses after acute OVF; none were of high quality. Complications were highest with rigid orthoses. Evidence that orthoses could affect vertebral deformity was lacking. Nine studies (n=473) of varying quality considered orthoses in subacute and longer rehabilitation. Three suggested a semirigid backpack thoracolumbar orthosis (TLO) could benefit strength, pain, posture, and quality of life. One found a weighted kypho-orthosis (WKO) improved balance.

CONCLUSIONS

The limited evidence about orthoses after acute OVF is inconclusive; better evidence of efficacy is needed, particularly when considering complications. The promising evidence regarding the backpack TLO and WKO needs to be explored further in studies of sufficient size and quality that include men.

Acupuncture in patients with a vertebral compression fracture: a protocol for a randomized, controlled, pilot clinical trial

Objectives:

A vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is characterized by back pain and fracture of a vertebral body on spinal radiography. VCFs of the thoraco lumbar spine are common in the elderly. In general, appropriate analgesics should be prescribed to reduce pain and, thus, promote early mobilization. The ideal treatment approach for VCFs has not been determined. In Korea, acupuncture and herbal medication have been used to treat VCFs for many years. There is empirical evidence that acupuncture might benefit patients with a VCF. However, no randomized, controlled, clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and the safety of acupuncture for treating a VCF have been published. Therefore, we designed a randomized, controlled, pilot, clinical trial to obtain information for the design of a further full scale trial.

Methods:

A five week protocol for a randomized, controlled, pilot, clinical trial is presented. Fourteen patients will be recruited and randomly allocated to two groups: a control group receiving interlaminar epidural steroid injections once a week for three weeks, and an experimental group receiving interlaminar epidural steroid injections plus acupuncture treatment (three acupuncture sessions per week for three weeks, nine sessions in total). The primary outcomes will be the pain intensity (visual analogue scale and PainVision^TM system). The secondary outcome measurements will be the answers on the short form McGill pain questionnaire and the oswestry disability index. Assessments will be made at baseline and at one, three, and five weeks. The last assessment (week five) will take place two weeks after treatment cessation. This study will provide both an indication of feasibility and a clinical foundation for a future large scale trial. The outcomes will provide additional resources for incorporating acupuncture into existing treatments, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications, narcotics and vertebral augmentation. This article describes the protocol.

Comparative study of the treatment outcomes of osteoporotic compression fractures without neurologic injury using a rigid brace, a soft brace, and no brace: a prospective randomized controlled non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of brace application for the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment outcomes in patients with osteoporotic compression fractures with regard to whether the patients had no braces, rigid braces, or soft braces.

METHODS

We randomly assigned sixty patients with acute one-level osteoporotic compression fractures within three days of injury to the no-brace, soft-brace, and rigid-brace groups through 1:1:1 allocation. The primary outcome was the baseline adjusted Oswestry Disability Index score at twelve weeks after compression fracture. The non-inferior margin of the Oswestry Disability Index was set at an average of 10 points.

RESULTS

The baseline adjusted Oswestry Disability Index score at twelve weeks after compression fracture in the no-brace group was not inferior to that in the soft-brace or rigid-brace groups. The mean adjusted Oswestry Disability Index score was 35.95 points (95% confidence interval, 25.42 to 46.47 points) in the no-brace group and 37.83 points (95% confidence interval, 26.77 to 48.90 points) in the soft-brace group, with a difference of -1.88 points (95% confidence interval, -7.02 to 9.38 points) between the groups. Similarly, the mean adjusted Oswestry Disability Index score was 35.95 points (95% confidence interval, 25.42 to 46.47 points) in the no-brace group and 33.54 points (95% confidence interval, 23.79 to 43.29 points) in the rigid-brace group, with a difference of 2.41 points (95% confidence interval, -7.86 to 9.27 points) between the groups. During the follow-up assessment period, there was no significant difference among the groups for the overall Oswestry Disability Index scores (p = 0.260), visual analog scale for pain scores for back pain (p = 0.292), and anterior body compression ratios (p = 0.237). However, the Oswestry Disability Index scores and the visual analog scale scores for back pain significantly improved with time after the fractures (p < 0.001), and the body compression ratios significantly decreased with time in all three groups (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The Oswestry Disability Index scores for the treatment of compression fractures without a brace were not inferior to those with soft or rigid braces. Moreover, the improvement in back pain and progression of anterior body compression were similar among the three groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures: current concepts of conservative care

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are a growing public health problem with important socio-economic effects in western countries. In the USA, 10 million people over 50 suffer from osteoporosis. In these patients, 1.5 million annual fractures have been registered, and 50% of these are vertebral compression.

SOURCES OF DATA

We performed a comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, CINAHL and Embase databases using various combinations of the keywords 'osteoporosis', 'vertebral compression fractures', 'brace', 'bracing', 'orthosis', 'conservative management' and 'rehabilitation' over the years 1966-2011. All articles relevant to the subject were retrieved, and their bibliographies were hand searched for further references in the context of conservative management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Conservative management for patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures includes bed rest, pain medication, physiotherapy and bracing.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

A conservative management for patients with osteoporotic VCFs s has not been standardized. The utility of vertebral augmentation techniques has been questioned by recent randomized controlled trials.

GROWING POINTS

Randomized controlled trials are being performed worldwide on vertebral augmentation techniques.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Although spinal orthoses are commonly used for the management of patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures, in the literature there is only one randomized controlled trial on bracing for this condition. While the best conservative management for subjects with osteoporotic VCFs s is not defined and standardized, no conclusions on the superiority of vertebral augmentation techniques over conservative management can be drawn.

Conservative management of patients with an osteoporotic vertebral fracture

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are an increasing public health problem. Recently, randomised controlled trials on the use of kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in the treatment of these fractures have been published, but no definitive conclusions have been reached on the role of these interventions. The major problem encountered when trying to perform a meta-analysis of the available studies for the use of cementoplasty in patients with a VCF is that conservative management has not been standardised. Forms of conservative treatment commonly used in these patients include bed rest, analgesic medication, physiotherapy and bracing.

In this review, we report the best evidence available on the conservative care of patients with osteoporotic VCFs and associated back pain, focusing on the role of the most commonly used spinal orthoses. Although orthoses are used for the management of these patients, to date, there has been only one randomised controlled trial published evaluating their value. Until the best conservative management for patients with VCFs is defined and standardised, no conclusions can be drawn on the superiority or otherwise of cementoplasty techniques over conservative management.

Treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a brief review of the evidence for percutaneous vertebroplasty

Vertebral compression fractures are the most prevalent complication of osteoporosis and percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) has emerged as a promising addition to the methods of treating the debilitating pain they may cause. Since PVP was first reported in the literature in 1987, more than 600 clinical papers have been published on the subject. Most report excellent improvements in pain relief and quality of life. However, these papers have been based mostly on uncontrolled cohort studies with a wide variety of inclusion and exclusion criteria. In 2009, two high-profile randomised controlled trials were published in the New England Journal of Medicine which led care providers throughout the world to question the value of PVP. After more than two decades a number of important questions about the mechanism and the effectiveness of this procedure remain unanswered.

The development of a clinical decision making algorithm for detection of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture or wedge deformity

The clinical diagnosis of an osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) is challenging and requires detailed assessment using comprehensive imaging methods. Further complicating matter is that the clinical sequelae associated with OVCF typically involves asymptomatic findings and variable pain patterns. The purpose of this study was to identify clinical characteristics and assessment findings that were associated with a diagnosis of OVCF. The study evaluated routine clinical findings in over 1400 subjects seen at an adult spine surgery clinic for thoracolumbar spine-related conditions within the years 2005-2009. All patients underwent a standardized clinical examination that included a self-report, observational, physical examination and imaging assessment. The diagnosis of OVCF was made after assessment of radiographic findings in sagittal alignment, vertebral body compression, and spinal canal dimensions. Data from the patient history and observational findings were then statistically analyzed and compared between those patients with a diagnosis of OVCF and those with an alternative diagnosis. Based on the results, a diagnostic support tool was created to predict the likelihood of OVCF. The most diagnostic combination included a cluster of: (1) age > 52 years; (2) no presence of leg pain; (3) body mass index ⩽ 22; (4) does not exercise regularly; and (5) female gender. A finding of two of five positive tests or less demonstrated high sensitivity of 0.95 (95% CI  =  0.83-0.99) and low negative likelihood ratio of 0.16 (95% CI  =  0.04-0.51), providing moderate value to rule out OVCF. Four of five yielded a positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 9.6 (95% CI  =  3.7-14.9) providing moderate value in ruling in the diagnosis of OVCF. Further validation is necessary prospectively to determine the value of these findings on a disparate sample of patients in other unique environments.