Intradiskal steroids: a viable treatment for low back pain?

Efficacy of stepped care treatment for chronic discogenic low back pain patients with Modic I and II changes

Objective

This study investigated whether patients with Modic changes (MC) of types I, I/II, and II would respond to an anti-inflammatory-based, stepped care treatment with three treatment steps: first, oral administration of NSAIDs, 2 × 200 mg celecoxib daily for two weeks; second, an intradiscal steroid injection (ID) with dexamethasone and cefazolin; and third, oral treatment with antibiotics (AB), 3 × 1 g amoxicillin daily for 100 days.

Design

This was an observational clinical study based on analyses of categorical data of patient-reported outcome measurements.

Subjects

Subjects were consecutive patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), diagnosed by assessment of anamnestic signs of inflammation; a pain score ≥6 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS); a mechanical assessment; MC I, I/II, or II based on MRI; and lack of response to conservative treatment.

Methods

From January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2021, 833 eligible patients were selected for the stepped care treatment. A total of 332 patients completed requested follow-up questionnaires at baseline and 12 months (optional at 3 and 6 months). Primary outcomes were pain (at least 50 % pain relief) and/or a minimum of 40 % improvement in functionality as measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) or the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODI). Secondary outcome measures were use of pain medication and return to work.

Results

At 1 year of follow-up, 179 (53.6 %) of 332 patients reported improvement according to the responder criteria. Of the 138 patients that had received only NSAIDs, 88 (63.8 %) had improved. In addition, 50 (56.8 %) of the 183 patients that had received ID had improved, and 41 (38.7 %) of the 106 patients treated with AB had improved. None of the patients reported complications. 12.0 % of patients using AB stopped preterm due to undesirable side effects.

Conclusion

Treatment with a stepped care model for inflammatory pain produced clinically relevant, positive reported outcomes on pain and/or function. Our stepped care model appears to be a useful, safe, and cost-saving treatment option that is easily reproducible. Further studies, including randomized controlled trials and analyses of subgroups, may help to develop a more patient-tailored approach and further avoidance of less-effective treatments and costs.

Etiology, Evaluation, and Treatment of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

The study aimed to review the etiology of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) and to propose a treatment algorithm based on a systematic review of the current literature and individual experience. FBSS is a term that groups the conditions with recurring low back pain after spine surgery with or without a radicular component. Since the information on FBSS incidence is limited, data needs to be retrieved from old studies. It is generally accepted that its incidence ranges between 10% and 40% after lumbar laminectomy with or without fusion. Although the etiology of FBSS is not completely understood, it is possibly multifactorial, and the causative factors may be categorized into preoperative, operative, and postoperative factors. The evaluation of patients with FBSS symptoms should ideally initiate with reviewing the patients’ clinical history (observing “red flags”), followed by a detailed clinical examination and imaging (whole-body X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography). FBSS is a complex and difficult pathology, and its accurate diagnosis is of utmost importance. Its management should be multidisciplinary, and special attention should be provided to cases of recurrent disc herniation and postoperative spinal imbalance.