Is There a Role for Limited Echocardiography During the Preparticipation Physical Examination?

Screening Electrocardiograms Have Low Utility in Medical Clearance Before Pediatric Inpatient Psychiatric Admission

OBJECTIVES

Children presenting to the emergency department (ED) requiring psychiatric admission often undergo screening electrocardiograms (ECG) as part of the medical clearance process. The diagnostic yield of screening ECGs for this purpose has not been reported. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical utility of screening ECGs in children and adolescents requiring acute inpatient psychiatric admission.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study of patients aged 5 to 18 years who did not have documented indications for ECG and underwent screening ECG before psychiatric inpatient admission over a 2-year period was conducted. Abnormal ECGs were identified via chart review and were reinterpreted by a pediatric cardiologist to determine potential significance to psychiatric care. Impact on treatment and disposition was examined.

RESULTS

From January 2018 through December 2019, 252 eligible pediatric patients had a screening ECG in the ED before psychiatric admission. Twenty-one (8.3%) of these ECGs were interpreted as abnormal, and 6 (2.4%) were determined to be potentially relevant to psychiatric care in the setting of specific medication use. The abnormal ECG interpretations resulted in additional workup and/or cardiology consultation for 7 (2.7%) patients but had no impact on psychiatric admission.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of concerning individual or family history or cardiac symptoms, routine screening ECGs as part of medical clearance for psychiatric admission are not warranted given the low yield of meaningful findings. The decision to obtain an ECG should be made with careful consideration of medical history and in the presence of specific indications.

Parameters of cardiac symptoms in young athletes using the Heartbytes database

Introduction: To determine clinical parameters that are related to abnormal cardiac symptoms in physically active youth. Methods: We used Simon's Heart Heartbytes National Youth Cardiac Registry to collect data from adolescent athletes in southeastern Pennsylvania. We collected age, race/ethnicity, abnormal cardiac symptoms, medical history, medication use, caffeine intake, and family history. We obtained height, weight, blood pressure, cardiac murmur findings, and ECGs. Echocardiogram was obtained if necessary. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent associations between abnormal cardiac symptoms and collected variables. The odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (95% CI), and p-values were used as statistical values. Results: Of the 887 athletes (543 males and 344 females, age = 16.9 ± 2.1 years, height = 166.9 ± 11.4 cm, weight = 62.0 ± 16.0 kg), 186 (21%) had abnormal cardiac symptoms including chest pain, passing out, difficulty breathing, extreme fatigue, and heart race. There was an independent association between abnormal symptoms and a past medical history (OR: 4.77, 95%CI: 3.18, 7.17, p = 0.001) and medication use (OR: 1.74, 95%CI: 1.08, 2.79, p = 0.022). In medical history, young athletes with asthma showed a greater propensity of abnormal cardiac symptoms (48.9%) compared to young athletes without (14.0%, p = 0.001). Additionally, young athletes with anxiety or depression demonstrated a higher proportion of abnormal cardiac symptoms (48.9%) than those without (19.5%, p = 0.001). Although the association between the presence of abnormal symptoms and African-American race (OR: 2.04, 95%CI: 0.96, 4.35, p = 0.065) and average daily consumption of at least 2 caffeine drinks (OR: 2.08, 95%CI: 0.86, 5.02, p = 0.103) were not significant, there was a trend to reach the a priori significance level. Conclusions: This study identified several clinical parameters that are associated with symptoms suggestive of abnormal cardiac conditions. Larger studies need to be done to better sort out the clinical history that may contribute to false positives to further reduce false positives at heart screenings.

The use of focused cardiac ultrasound to screen for occult heart disease in asymptomatic cats

Background

Focused cardiac ultrasound (FCU) helps detect occult heart disease in human patients.

Hypothesis

Focused cardiac ultrasound by a nonspecialist practitioner (NSP) will increase the detection of occult heart disease in asymptomatic cats compared with physical examination and ECG.

Animals

Three hundred forty‐three client‐owned cats: 54 excluded and 289 analyzed.

Methods

Multicenter prospective cohort study. Twenty‐two NSPs were trained to perform FCU. Cats without clinical signs of heart disease were recruited, and NSPs performed the following in sequential order: physical examination, ECG, FCU, and point‐of‐care N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide assay (POC‐BNP). After each step, NSPs indicated yes, no, or equivocal as to whether they believed heart disease was present. The level of agreement between the NSP diagnosis and a blinded cardiologist's diagnosis after echocardiogram was evaluated using Cohen's kappa test.

Results

Cardiologist diagnoses included 148 normal cats, 102 with heart disease, and 39 equivocal ones. Agreement between NSP and cardiologist was slight after physical examination (kappa 0.253 [95% CI, 0.172‐0.340]), did not increase after ECG (0.256 [0.161‐0.345]; P = .96), increased after FCU (0.468 [0.376‐0.558]; P = .002), and the level of agreement was similar after POC‐BNP (0.498 [0.419‐0.580]; P = .67). In cats with mild, moderate, and marked occult heart disease, the proportion of cats having a NSP diagnosis of heart disease after FCU was 45.6%, 93.1%, and 100%, respectively.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Focused cardiac ultrasound performed by NSPs increased the detection of occult heart disease, especially in cats with moderate to marked disease. Focused cardiac ultrasound appears to be a feasible and useful tool to assist NSPs in the detection of heart disease in cats.

Focused Cardiac Ultrasonography: Current Applications and Future Directions

Focused cardiac ultrasonography is performed by clinicians at the bedside and is used in time-sensitive scenarios to evaluate a patient's cardiovascular status when comprehensive echocardiography is not immediately available. This simplified cardiac ultrasonography is often performed by noncardiologists using small, portable devices to augment the physical examination, triage patients, and direct management in both critical care and outpatient settings. However, as the use of focused cardiac ultrasonography continues to expand, careful consideration is required regarding training, scope of practice, impact on patient outcomes, and medicolegal implications. In this review, we examine some of the challenges with rapid uptake of this technique and explore the benefits and potential risk of focused cardiac ultrasonography. We propose possible mechanisms for cross-specialty collaboration, quality improvement, and oversight.

Cardiac screening to prevent sudden death in young athletes

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a sudden and unexpected death caused by loss of heart of function. SCD may occur in any population, but when it occurs on the playing field in a young individual, communities worldwide are affected. Although these events are rare, media coverage of sudden cardiac arrests in young athletes have created the impression that these events are far more common than they appear. With a heightened awareness of SCD in young athletes, screening methods have been developed to try and prevent these events from occurring. The American Heart Associations (AHA) currently employs history and physical examination alone during the preparticipation physical exam (PPE), which clears a young athlete for participation in sports. There has been recent discussion on whether to include screening electrocardiogram (ECG) in the PPE especially after one study in Italy by Corrado et al. found that using routine ECG reduced the annual incidence of SCD by 90%. In this article we will discuss how effective the current screening recommendations are, whether routine ECG use should be included in the PPE and if it is cost effective, and review other screening modalities that may be useful in the detection of young athletes at risk for SCD.