Effects of Botulinum Toxin Landmark-Guided Intra-articular Injection in Subjects With Knee Osteoarthritis

Efficacy and safety of intra-articular botulinum toxin injection therapy for joint pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies conducted in various animal models of joint pain showed an anti-nociceptive effect of intra-articular botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in humans suggest a potential effect but results are disparate.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of intra-articular BoNT-A for the treatment of joint pain.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of RCTs comparing the effects of intra-articular BoNT-A to other interventions on pain and activity limitations in the short (<3 months), intermediate (3-6 months) and long term (> 6 months), and their adverse effects, in people with joint pain. We performed a meta-analysis when appropriate. MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, CINHAL and ICTRP databases were searched from inception to July 9, 2023. Two independent reviewers selected eligible studies and extracted data in a standardized manner. The results of quantitative synthesis were expressed as the standardized mean difference (SMD) (95 % confidence interval).

RESULTS

We included 14 RCTs: 437 participants received an intra-articular injection of BoNT-A and 551 received another intervention. Overall, 7 RCTs (549 participants) compared intra-articular BoNT-A with an intra-articular treatment in the knee: short-, intermediate-, and long-term SMD were -0.35 (-0.82 to 0.12), -0.27 (-0.61 to 0.08), and -0.43 (-1.12 to 0.26) for pain and -0.44 (-0.96 to 0.07), -0.24 (-0.63 to 0.15) and -0.42 (-1.26 to 0.42) for activity limitations, respectively. Two RCTs (68 participants) in the shoulder and 1 RCT (60 participants) in the base-of-thumb showed reduced pain in the short term. Minor adverse events were not rare, but no serious adverse events related to intra-articular BoNT-A were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-articular BoNT-A may reduce joint pain in the short term for small and medium-sized joints (ie, base-of-thumb and shoulder), but not for large joints (ie, knee).

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42021290157 (Date of first submission: 8 November 2021; Date of registration: 8 December 2021).

Botulinum toxin in the rehabilitation of painful syndromes: multiperspective literature analysis, lexical analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Pain represents a common symptom of several diseases and is often associated with a reduction in rehabilitation outcomes and recovery. The effectiveness of pain alleviation by botulinum toxin has been recently demonstrated. We searched in PubMed the papers about this topic published in the last ten years, and we selected clinical trials, guidelines, meta-analyses, reviews, and systematic reviews. We used different approaches: multiperspective presentation, lexical evaluation, and systematic review. The systematic review was only performed for the randomized controlled trials. We predominantly found reviews and trials about the rehabilitation of stroke/brain injury and epicondylitis. The most common outcome measures were pain, function, and spasticity. Among the common words, pain was the most frequent and the terms were grouped into different families, especially concerning the outcomes. Rehabilitation showed a relatively low frequency. Finally, the systematic review showed moderate-low levels of bias which confirms the effectiveness of botulinum toxin for pain treatment. The current literature about botulinum toxin is wide and globally diffuse but with some limitations in study strategies and clearness in the formal presentation. The evidence justifies the use of botulinum toxin in treating pain in different diseases.

TRPV1+ neurons alter Staphylococcus aureus skin infection outcomes by affecting macrophage polarization and neutrophil recruitment

BACKGROUND

The interaction between the nervous system and the immune system can affect the outcome of a bacterial infection. Staphylococcus aureus skin infection is a common infectious disease, and elucidating the relationship between the nervous system and immune system may help to improve treatment strategies.

RESULTS

In this study, we found that the local release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) increased during S. aureus skin infection, and S. aureus could promote the release of CGRP from transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1 (TRPV1+) neurons in vitro. The existence of TRPV1+ neurons inhibited the recruitment of neutrophils to the infected region and regulated the polarization of macrophages toward M2 while inhibiting polarization toward M1. This reduces the level of inflammation in the infected area, which aggravates the local infection. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that TRPV1 may be a target for the treatment of S. aureus skin infections and that botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A) and BIBN4096 may reverse the inhibited inflammatory effect of CGRP, making them potential therapeutics for the treatment of skin infection in S. aureus.

CONCLUSIONS

In S. aureus skin infection, TRPV1+ neurons inhibit neutrophil recruitment and regulate macrophage polarization by releasing CGRP. BoNT/A and BIBN4096 may be potential therapeutic agents for S. aureus skin infection.

The efficacy and safety of intra-articular botulinum toxin type A injection for knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of intra-articular Botulinum Toxin type A (BTA) injection in the management of patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The literature retrieval was conducted based on PRISMA guidelines. Databases including Pubmed, Web of science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify RCTs that comparing the effects of intra-articular BTA injection with control interventions on patients with KOA. The primary outcomes involved pain and function improvements as well as the occurrence of adverse events. Seven RCTs comprising 548 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the control group, BTA injection exhibited greater pain reduction at 4 weeks posttreatment (SMD = -0.86, 95% CI [-1.52, -0.19], p = 0.011), but not 8-24 weeks posttreatment (wk 8, SMD = -0.53, 95% CI [-1.21, 0.15], p = 0.127; wk 12, SMD = -0.34, 95% CI [-0.73, 0.04], p = 0.081; wk 24, SMD = -0.65, 95% CI [-1.52, 0.22], p = 0.144). Additionally, no differences were found between BTA injection versus control intervention on functional improvement at all time points assessed (wk 4, WMD = -5.16, 95% CI [-12.31, 2.00], p = 0.158; wk 8, WMD = -0.98, 95% CI [-5.66, 3.71], p = 0.683; wk 12, WMD = -2.52, 95% CI [-7.54, 2.50], p = 0.325); wk 24, WMD = -3.66, 95% CI [-14.09, 6.76], p = 0.491). There was no significant difference in adverse event rate between the BTA and control group (OR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.24, 3.18], p = 0.843). This meta-analysis suggests that intra-articular BTA injection could be an efficious and safe strategy for analgesic treatment of KOA. However, evidence is limited due to the small number and heterogeneity of included studies, this urges further and stronger trials to confirm our findings.

Intra-Articular Injection of Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

The purpose of the present paper was to review the available evidence on intra-articular botulinum toxin (BTX) injection in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis and to compare it to other conservative treatment options. A systematic review of the literature was performed on the PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Pedro and Research Gate databases with the following inclusion criteria: (1) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), (2) written in the English language, and (3) published on indexed journals in the last 20 years (2001-2021) dealing with the use of BTX intra-articular injection for the treatment of knee OA. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for RCTs. Nine studies involving 811 patients in total were included. Patients in the control groups received different treatments: conventional physiotherapy, hyaluronic acid injection or prolotherapy or a combination thereof in 5 studies, steroid infiltrative therapy (triamcinolone) in 1 study, placebo in 2, and local anesthetic treatment in 1 study. Looking at the quality of the available literature, two of the included studies reached "Good quality" standard, three were ranked as "Fair", and the rest were considered "Poor". No major complications or serious adverse events were reported following intra-articular BTX, which provided encouraging pain relief, improved motor function, and quality of life. Based on the available data, no clear indication emerged from the comparison of BTX with other established treatments for knee OA. The analysis of the available RCTs on BTX intra-articular injection for the treatment of knee OA revealed modest methodological quality. However, based on the data retrieved, botulinum toxin has been proven to provide good short-term outcomes, especially in patients with pain sensitization, by modulating neurotransmitter release, peripheral nociceptive transduction, and acting on the control of chronic pain from central sensitization.

The effect of intraarticular botulinum toxin-A injection on symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorder

INTRODUCTION

Application of arthrocentesis in temporomandibular joint disorders preferred and suggested therapeutic treatment option in recent years. This study was designed to investigate and compare the effect of intra-articular injection of botulinum toxin-A (Btx-A) on pain and mouth opening after arthrocentesis in nonreduction disc displacement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This restrospective study was conducted on 30 patients with a visual analogue scale is higher than five and limited mouth opening. Patients were divided into 2 groups as conventional arthrocentesis group (group A) and intra-articular Btx-A injection following arthrocentesis group (group B). Maximum mouth openining and temporomandibular joint pain were measured in preoperative (t0) and at postoperative 1^st-week (t1), 1^st-month (t2) and 6^th-month (t3).

RESULTS

When VAS scores of group A and group B were examined, no statistical difference was observed at t0 and t1 time intervals; an increased in mouth opening values and decreased VAS score values were observed in both groups in the 1^st month (t2) and 6^{th (}t3) months, mostly in group A.

CONCLUSION

İntra-articular injection of Btx-A following arthrocentesis can induce mouth opening and reduce the pain and dysfunction in patients with anterior disc displacement.

Toxicology and pharmacology of botulinum and tetanus neurotoxins: an update

Tetanus and botulinum neurotoxins cause the neuroparalytic syndromes of tetanus and botulism, respectively, by delivering inside different types of neurons, metalloproteases specifically cleaving the SNARE proteins that are essential for the release of neurotransmitters. Research on their mechanism of action is intensively carried out in order to devise improved therapies based on antibodies and chemical drugs. Recently, major results have been obtained with human monoclonal antibodies and with single chain antibodies that have allowed one to neutralize the metalloprotease activity of botulinum neurotoxin type A1 inside neurons. In addition, a method has been devised to induce a rapid molecular evolution of the metalloprotease domain of botulinum neurotoxin followed by selection driven to re-target the metalloprotease activity versus novel targets with respect to the SNARE proteins. At the same time, an intense and wide spectrum clinical research on novel therapeutics based on botulinum neurotoxins is carried out, which are also reviewed here.

Physical therapy, intra-articular dextrose prolotherapy, botulinum neurotoxin, and hyaluronic acid for knee osteoarthritis: randomized clinical trial

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of four treatments in the management of knee osteoarthritis. We carried out a randomized clinical trial with four study arms in an outpatient Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at a University Hospital. In total, 120 patients with knee osteoarthritis ≥50 years of age were randomly allocated to four groups. The primary outcome was knee pain in visual analog scale and the secondary outcome was the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. The exercise was prescribed daily for all participants throughout the study. For physical therapy (group 1), participants received superficial heat, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and pulsed ultrasound. We administered a single intra-articular injection of botulinum neurotoxin type A (group 2) and three injections of hyaluronic acid (group 3) or 20% dextrose (group 4) to patients in the corresponding groups. Mixed analysis of variance showed that there was statistically significant difference between the groups in pain (P < 0.001), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (P < 0.001). Pairwise between- and within-group comparisons showed that botulinum neurotoxin and dextrose prolotherapy were the most, and hyaluronic acid was the least efficient treatments for controlling pain and recovering function in patients. An intra-articular injection of botulinum toxin type A or dextrose prolotherapy is effective first-line treatments. In the next place stands physical therapy particularly if the patient is not willing to continue regular exercise programs. Our study was not very supportive of intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid as an effective treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Lack of standardization among clinical trials of injection therapies for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review

Purpose: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a debilitating, expensive, and prevalent disease, and interest in the non-surgical management of knee OA has grown recently. Our objective was to systematically assess the level of heterogeneity among all clinical trials and published studies regarding injections for knee osteoarthritis, in terms of treatment of interest, outcomes evaluated, and time points of outcome assessment. Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were utilized to review all published studies and publically available clinical trials from 1 January 2013 to 3 May 2019evaluating intra-articular injections to treat knee OA. Their treatment group and specifics of methodology were scrutinized and compared. Results: 84 published studies and 114 clinical trials were included. Within the 84 published studies, the most common injection treatment studied was hyaluronic acid [N = 22; 26.2%]. In total, 29 different injection treatment groups were utilized. The most common time point for patient evaluation post-injection was 6 months (N = 33 studies; 50.0%), and ranged from 1 week (N = 9 studies; 13.6%) to 7 years (N = 1 study; 1.5%). The most common patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure assessed in the included studies was Western Ontario and McMaster's University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) [N = 44 studies; 66.7%]. For the 114 clinical trials identified, the most common injection treatment studied is platelet-rich plasma in isolation (N = 19; 16.7%). Forty-two different injection treatment types/groups are utilized. The most common PRO measure assessed was WOMAC (N = 77 trials; 67.5%). Overall there were 34 different patient-reported outcome measures used. Conclusions: Research efforts to find the most effective injection therapy for knee OA continue with a tremendous number of injection therapies still being evaluated. Substantial heterogeneity exists in these completed and ongoing trials in terms of patient demographics, OA grades, outcome scores and relatively short-term timing of assessments, with no clear standardization of testing protocol despite proposing to answer the same clinical question. We recommend that studies of this genre going forward be standardized in terms of outcome measures and longer-term follow-up time points, and should incorporate functional assessment evaluations and imaging studies.

Utilization of Botulinum Toxin for Musculoskeletal Disorders

Rehabilitation from musculoskeletal injuries is challenging with multiple intrinsic and extrinsic factors influencing athletes, conditions, and length of recovery. Multidisciplinary treatment strategies aim to address pathophysiology, mechanical, and psychosocial factors of injuries. An essential element in the recovery from musculoskeletal injuries is pain control and the return of physiologic function. There have been significant advancements in the understanding of pain and, therefore, new techniques and management strategies are being used. Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) has demonstrated valuable biopharmaceutical properties to provide neuromuscular blockade, which, in some cases, can help to return biomechanical and functional physiologic loss. There is developing literature in BoNT's ability to block pain in the treatment of painful musculoskeletal conditions. Critical analysis of the literature is necessary given the paucity of high-quality, evidence-based literature in the treatment of these conditions. This article reviews the utilization of BoNT in chronic exertional compartment syndrome, osteoarthritis, lateral epicondylosis, plantar fasciopathy, and myofascial pain syndrome.

The Use of Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Chronic Joint Pain: Clinical and Experimental Evidence

Chronic osteoarthritis pain is an increasing worldwide problem. Treatment for osteoarthritis pain is generally inadequate or fraught with potential toxicities. Botulinum toxins (BoNTs) are potent inhibitors of neuropeptide release. Paralytic toxicity is due to inhibition at the neuromuscular junction, and this effect has been utilized for treatments of painful dystonias. Pain relief following BoNT muscle injection has been noted to be more significant than muscle weakness and hypothesized to occur because of the inhibition of peripheral neuropeptide release and reduction of peripheral sensitization. Because of this observation, BoNT has been studied as an intra-articular (IA) analgesic for chronic joint pain. In clinical trials, BoNT appears to be effective for nociceptive joint pain. No toxicity has been reported. In preclinical models of joint pain, BoNT is similarly effective. Examination of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and the central nervous system has shown that catalytically active BoNT is retrogradely transported by neurons and then transcytosed to afferent synapses in the brain. This suggests that pain relief may also be due to the central effects of the drug. In summary, BoNT appears to be safe and effective for the treatment of chronic joint pain. The long-term effects of IA BoNT are still being determined.

The efficacy and safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A in painful knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A in painful knee osteoarthritis.

Methods

The EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Botulinum Toxin Type A in the treatment of painful knee osteoarthritis. The references of included literature were also searched.

Results

Five articles involving 5 RCTs including 314 patients were included in this analysis. There was a significant difference between Botulinum Toxin Type A and placebo in the visual analog scale (VAS) pain scale and Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire score in both the short-term (≤4 weeks) and long-term (≥8 weeks) treatment period. There were no serious adverse events in the Botulinum Toxin Type A groups.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis suggests that Botulinum Toxin Type A is effective and safe in the painful knee OA treatment. However, high-quality randomized controlled studies are still needed to further confirm our findings.

Chondroprotective Factors in Osteoarthritis: a Joint Affair

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Osteoarthritis is widely regarded as a spectrum of conditions that affect all joint tissues, typified by a common entity: cartilage loss. Here, we review recent progress and challenges in chondroprotection and discuss new strategies to prevent cartilage loss in osteoarthritis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in clinical, molecular, and cellular characterization are enabling improved stratification of osteoarthritis subtypes. Integration of next-generation sequencing and "omics" approaches with clinically relevant readouts shows promise in delineating both subtypes of disease and meaningful trial end points. Novel delivery strategies are enabling joint-specific delivery. Chondroprotection requires a whole joint approach, stratification of patient groups, and use of patient-relevant end points. Drug development should continue to explore new targets, while using modern technologies and recent knowledge to re-visit unsuccessful therapeutics from the past. The overarching goal for chondroprotection is to provide the right treatment(s) for the right patient at the right time.

Efficacy of Intra-Articular Botulinum Toxin in Osteoarticular Joint Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the efficacy of intra-articular injections of botulinum toxin type A (BT-A) into the painful joint diseases through a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis of controlled randomized trials. Intra-articular therapies (corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid) have limited efficacy and run a risk of toxicity in patients with joint pain. New therapeutic options are needed to treat painful osteoarticular disease.

METHODS

We searched via Pubmed, American College of Rheumatology, and European League Against Rheumatism congresses, and gray literature for the studies reported until June 2016 and addressing the issue of BT intra-articular injections in patients with refractory joint pain. Randomized trials were included. For the meta-analysis, we compared a numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10 before treatment and at 1 or 2 months and 6 months after in the BT-A and the control groups for each study. We also compared separately low dose and high dose of BT at 1 or 2 months' evaluation.

RESULTS

In a total of 269 selected articles, 8 were analyzed and 6 studies were included in the meta-analysis involving a total of 382 patients. On comparing the NRS rating for 5 trials, at 1 or 2 months irrespective of the dose of BT, 4 trials showed a positive effect of BT compared with the control on the NRS and 1 found no effect; the overall weighted mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)] was -1.10 (-1.62, -0.58) (P<0.0001, I=63%). Among the 4 trials with a low dose of BT (100 U), comparing NRS at 1 or 2 months, 3 trials showed significant results with a positive effect of BT-A injection compared with the control on the NRS; the fourth study failed to find any effect. The overall weighted mean difference (95% CI) was -0.95 (-0.02, -1.88) (P=0.05, I=67%). In the 2 trials using a high dose of BT (200 U) comparing NRS at 1 or 2 months, there was an almost zero effect of BT, with an overall weighted mean difference (95% CI) of 0.13 (-0.55, 0.81) (P=0.71, I=0%). In the 3 trials comparing NRS at 6 months there was an overall weighted mean difference (95% CI) of -0.57 (-1.98, 0.83) (P=0.42, I=73%).

CONCLUSIONS

BT-A intra-articular injections have short-term benefits with a statistically significant decrease in the NRS pain score of around 1 point in patients with refractory joint pain. A decrease in the pain score was also observed at 6 months but with a nonsignificant result.

Intra-articular botulinum toxin type A for treatment of knee osteoarthritis: Clinical trial

In recent years, there is a growing interest in new medical applications of botulinum toxin, including pain control, osteoarthritis treatment, and wound healing. While clinical applications of botulinum toxin seem promising, existing evidence regarding the therapeutic effects is still inadequate. The aim was to assess the efficacy of a single injection of abobotulinumtoxin A into the knee joint cavity to reduce pain in elderly people. We carried out a single group clinical trial in a University Hospital. Thirty participants (24 women) more than 50 years of age with knee osteoarthritis were included. Diagnosis of osteoarthritis was based on clinical and radiologic findings. We gave a single injection containing 250 units of Dysport (= 100 units of botulinum neurotoxin type A) diluted with 5 ml of normal saline. The primary outcome measure was knee pain. The secondary outcome was the patients' opinion about their knee and associated problems measured with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. The outcomes were measured at the baseline and at 4 weeks after the intervention. Within-group comparisons based on the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores showed favorable results for joint pain and stiffness, sports, severity of symptoms, quality of life, and daily activities (all p-values < 0.001). Also, pain intensity, joint effusion, knee clicking and locking, and flexion-extension scores showed significant beneficial results (all p-values ≤ 0.005). We concluded that botulinum neurotoxin type A is an effective and safe initial treatment of knee osteoarthritis with clear clinical advantages. Patients' satisfaction, minimum adverse effects in addition to single-dose prescription make the toxin as a choice for the first-line therapy of osteoarthritis at least at the short-term in elderly people. The symptom relief increases the patient's compliance and willing to participate in other therapeutic programs. REGISTRATION: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) website http://www.irct.ir/, a WHO Primary Register setup, with registration code: Irct ID: IRCT20180416039323N1.

Intra-articular botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A) for pain management in dogs with osteoarthritis secondary to hip dysplasia: A randomized controlled clinical trial

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the intra-articular (IA) injection of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) to the management of chronic pain in dogs. In a randomized, controlled, double-blinded study sixteen dogs with osteoarthritis secondary to hip dysplasia were distributed into two groups: 25 IU BoNT/A (BoNT) or saline solution (Control) was administered IA in each affected joint. All dogs received oral supplements (90 days) and carprofen (15 days). The dogs were assessed by a veterinarian on five occasions and the owner completed an assessment form at the same time (baseline to 90 days). The data were analyzed using unpaired-t test, Fisher's exact test, analysis of variance and the Tukey's test (P<0.05). There were no differences between groups in the veterinarian and owner assessments. Lower scores were observed in both groups during 90 days after IA therapy in the owner assessments (P<0.001). Compared with baseline, the Vet score was lower from 15-90 days after IA injection in the BoNT group, and at 15 and 30 days in the Control group (P<0.001). Both treatments were safe and reduced the clinical signs associated with hip osteoarthritis. However, IA BoNT/A (25 IU) did not provide better pain relief than the control treatment.

Intra-articular injection of botulinum toxin type A for shoulder pain in glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a case series summary and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Shoulder pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal diseases, and can be due to glenohumeral osteoarthritis, rotator cuff tear, impingement, tendinitis, adhesive capsulitis, and subacromial bursitis. Several therapies have been proposed, including steroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, intra-articular injections, and physical therapies. Many published studies have reported on the employment of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) to reduce pain in subjects with neurological and musculoskeletal diseases by inhibiting substance P release and other inflammatory factors.

METHODS

In the present article, we briefly update current knowledge regarding intra-articular BoNT therapy, reviewing existing literature on intra-articular use of BoNT-A, including nonrandomized and randomized prospective and retrospective cohort studies and case series published from December 1989 to November 2017. We also describe a case series of six subjects treated with intra-articular injection of incobotulinumtoxin A for the treatment of pain deriving from osteoarthritis.

CONCLUSION

Intra-articular BoNT-A is effective and minimally invasive. Pain reduction with an increase in shoulder articular range of motion in our experience confirms the effectiveness of BoNT-A injection for the management of this syndrome.

The Expanding Therapeutic Utility of Botulinum Neurotoxins

Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is a major therapeutic agent that is licensed in neurological indications, such as dystonia and spasticity. The BoNT family, which is produced in nature by clostridial bacteria, comprises several pharmacologically distinct proteins with distinct properties. In this review, we present an overview of the current therapeutic landscape and explore the diversity of BoNT proteins as future therapeutics. In recent years, novel indications have emerged in the fields of pain, migraine, overactive bladder, osteoarthritis, and wound healing. The study of biological effects distal to the injection site could provide future opportunities for disease-tailored BoNT therapies. However, there are some challenges in the pharmaceutical development of BoNTs, such as liquid and slow-release BoNT formulations; and, transdermal, transurothelial, and transepithelial delivery. Innovative approaches in the areas of formulation and delivery, together with highly sensitive analytical tools, will be key for the success of next generation BoNT clinical products.

Alternatives to Biologics in Management of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common condition encountered by physicians. KOA is addressed by a wide array of modalities including a number of nonbiological treatments.

METHODS

PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus were searched for level 1 to 4 studies published from inception to August 2017.

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies were evaluated and results demonstrated moderate supporting evidence for prolotherapy and limited evidence for botulinum toxin type A, sodium bicarbonate and calcium gluconate, and low-molecular weight fraction of 5% human serum albumin. Evidence for local anesthetic agents was conflicting.

CONCLUSION

There is moderate supportive evidence for the effectiveness of prolotherapy in improving pain and function in both, short-term and long-term. Limited supporting evidence found for botulinum toxin type A, sodium bicarbonate and calcium gluconate, and low-molecular weight fraction of 5% human serum albumin in improving pain and function. There is conflicting evidence for the use of local anesthetic agents in patients with KOA.

Assessing adverse effects of intra-articular botulinum toxin A in healthy Beagle dogs: A placebo-controlled, blinded, randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical, cytological, and histopathological adverse effects of intra-articularly injected botulinum toxin A in dogs and to study whether the toxin spreads from the joint after the injection.

METHODS

A longitudinal, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted with six healthy laboratory Beagle dogs. Stifle joints were randomized to receive either 30 IU of onabotulinum toxin A or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Adverse effects and spread of the toxin were examined by evaluating dynamic and static weight-bearing of the injected limbs, by assessing painless range of motion and pain on palpation of joints, and by performing synovial fluid analysis, neurological examination, and electrophysiological recordings at different examination time-points in a 12-week period after the injections. The dogs were then euthanized and autopsy and histopathological examination of joint structures and adjacent muscles and nerves were performed.

RESULTS

Intra-articular botulinum toxin A did not cause local weakness or injection site pain. Instead, static weight-bearing and painless range of motion of stifle joints decreased in the placebo limbs. No clinically significant abnormalities associated with intra-articular botulinum toxin A were detected in the neurological examinations. Electrophysiological recordings showed low compound muscle action potentials in two dogs in the botulinum toxin A-injected limb. No significant changes were detected in the synovial fluid. Autopsy and histopathological examination of the joint and adjacent muscles and nerves did not reveal histopathological adverse effects of the toxin.

CONCLUSION

Intra-articular botulinum toxin A does not produce significant clinical, cytological, or histopathological adverse effects in healthy dogs. Based on the electrophysiological recordings, the toxin may spread from the joint, but its clinical impact seems to be low.

The safety of intra-articular injections for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a critical narrative review

INTRODUCTION

International guidelines recommend that the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA) combine both nonpharmacological and pharmacological interventions. Intra-articular (IA) therapies are considered part of this multimodal approach and are well-established Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved treatments. Areas covered: Safety data for knee OA, including IA corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid, platelet-rich plasma and botulinum toxin are critically reviewed, and evidence- and pratice-based measures to improve safety of IA therapies are discussed. Expert opinion: The incidence of AEs attributable to IA therapies across clinical trials in knee OA is very low, and barely reaches significance when compared to the incidence of AEs in the comparator group. These events are exceptionally serious. Mild differences between products have been inconsistently reported mainly for IA HA. One can distinguish self-limited AEs such as post-injection pain and swelling that are the most frequently reported AEs, from AEs that are not self-limited but rare such as septic arthritis. The safety of IA therapies can be improved by applying simple measures designed to prevent AEs. However, even though no specific safety concerns have been raised to date about IA therapies, the quality of evidence is low, and there is a need to improve the monitoring and reporting of safety data from clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance.