Prevalence of Bleeding Complications Following Ultrasound-Guided Botulinum Toxin Injections in Patients on Anticoagulation or Antiplatelet Therapy

Perioperative Management of Oral Antithrombotics in Dentistry and Oral Surgery: Part 2

Part 1 of "Perioperative Management of Oral Antithrombotics in Dentistry and Oral Surgery" covered the physiological process of hemostasis and the pharmacology of both traditional and novel oral antiplatelets and anticoagulants. Part 2 of this review discusses various factors that are considered when developing a perioperative management plan for patients on oral antithrombotic therapy in consultation with dental professionals and managing physicians. Additionally included are how thrombotic and thromboembolic risks are assessed as well as how patient- and procedure-specific bleeding risks are evaluated. Special attention is given to the bleeding risks associated with procedures encountered when providing sedation and general anesthesia within the office-based dental environment.

The risk of intramuscular haematoma is low following injection of benzathine penicillin G in patients receiving concomitant anticoagulant therapy

The use of intramuscular injections is widely recommended to be avoided in patients who are prescribed anticoagulant agents, both oral and parenteral due to concerns of haematoma. Benzathine penicillin G (BPG), administered via intramuscular injection, is a vital treatment component for patients with rheumatic heart disease. BPG must be administered long term (for at least a decade) as part of treatment and alternative options to intramuscular injection are currently limited. Many of these patients with rheumatic heart disease will also require long term or lifelong anticoagulation. Our retrospective, single centre study of 48 adult and paediatric hospitalised patients, 29 of which were receiving concomitant anticoagulants, demonstrates no significant bleeding complications from intramuscular administration of BPG on the day of intramuscular injection and for 7 days post injection or until hospital discharge. In the absence of practical alternatives for patients with rheumatic heart disease, our local data supports continuing intramuscular injection of BPG in patients with rheumatic heart disease receiving anticoagulant medication.Letter to the editor.

Botulinum Toxin Injection and Electromyography in Patients Receiving Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To identify the different practice patterns of botulinum toxin injection (BTX) and electromyography (EMG) in patients receiving anticoagulation and to evaluate the incidence, reporting, and management of bleeding complications and compartment syndrome from BTX and EMG.

LITERATURE SURVEY

Systematic review of relevant clinical studies in PubMed/Medline and Embase databases using key terms from inception to 31 May 2020. All publications in the English language were included without demographic limits.

METHODOLOGY

A comprehensive search was performed to identify all studies addressing BTX and EMG in patients receiving anticoagulants. Two reviewers independently screened the titles, abstracts, and full texts and extracted data based on a set of predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. All studies that met the inclusion criteria were assigned their respective levels of evidence using the Joanne Briggs Institute (JBI) Level of Evidence for Effectiveness.

SYNTHESIS

Eighteen studies were included in this review of which there were nine studies each on BTX and EMG. The results indicated heterogeneity in the practice patterns of BTX and EMG in patients taking anticoagulants. These included the decision for continuation of anticoagulant, international normalized ratio (INR) results acceptable to practitioners, the modality for procedure guidance, and surveillance of bleeding complications. In addition, there were variations in the description of targeted muscles and description of needle sizes. The overall incidence of bleeding complications and compartment syndrome rates were low.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the varied practice in anticoagulated patients undergoing BTX or EMG, practitioners should allow periprocedural continuation of anticoagulants, targeting an INR of 2 to 3 while using the smallest needle (25 gauge or smaller) of appropriate length. Some of the evidence on procedural guidance and complication surveillance were weak and more research in these areas is required.

Challenges in the management of anticoagulated patients with focal spasticity

INTRODUCTION

In patients taking warfarin, the level of anticoagulation status using the International Normalized Ratio (INR) is one consideration before botulinum toxin type-A (BoNTA) injections; however, there is wide diversity in physician approaches and preferences in using INR status and the INR cut-off values to determine suitability of anticoagulated patients for BoNTA injections. There is no standard approach for treating spasticity with BoNTA injections in patients who are on warfarin or direct anticoagulants (DOACs).

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to review the challenges in the use of BoNTA in patients who are receiving anticoagulants and to present highlights of the Canadian Delphi Study on the management of anticoagulated patients with limb spasticity.

METHODS

We present a hypothetical case of a patient with focal spasticity who is also receiving anticoagulants.

RESULTS

The results when injecting BoNTA in anticoagulated patients were as follows: 1) BoNTA injections should not be withheld purely because a patient is anticoagulated and other factors need to be considered. 2) A 25G (or higher) needle should be used when injecting into the deepleg compartment muscles. 3) The INR level ≤3.5 should be used when injecting the deep posterior leg compartment muscles. 4) The concern regarding bleeding when using DOACs remain the same as with warfarin when INR is in the therapeutic range. 6) The dose and scheduling of DOACs need not be altered prior to BoNTA injections.

CONCLUSIONS

The Canadian consensus statements assist clinicians by providing a framework for consideration to navigate the challenges when injecting BoNTA in anticoagulated patients with spasticity.

Pharmacologic Treatment Tools: Systemic Medications and Toxins, Opportunities, and Pitfalls

Treatment of pathologic muscle overactivity associated with upper motor neuron syndrome can be multifaceted. One of the initial decisions to be made when formulating an overarching treatment plan is selecting a combination of strategies that is most applicable. Strategies may include physical interventions, such as stretching or splinting modalities, or surgery, whereas pharmacotherapeutic strategies encompass oral/systemic medications as well as agents, such as toxins and alcohols, used for focal chemodenervation. This article reviews the oral/systemic therapies as well as toxins that are used focally. Although medication can also be administered via intrathecal pumps, this treatment approach is discussed elsewhere.

A Delphi-Based Consensus Statement on the Management of Anticoagulated Patients With Botulinum Toxin for Limb Spasticity

OBJECTIVE

To create a consensus statement on the considerations for treatment of anticoagulated patients with botulinum toxin A (BoNTA) intramuscular injections for limb spasticity.

DESIGN

We used the Delphi method.

SETTING

A multiquestion electronic survey.

PARTICIPANTS

Canadian physicians (N=39) who use BoNTA injections for spasticity management in their practice.

INTERVENTIONS

After the survey was sent, there were e-mail discussions to facilitate an understanding of the issues underlying the responses. Consensus for each question was reached when agreement level was ≥75%.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Not applicable.

RESULTS

When injecting BoNTA in anticoagulated patients: (1) BoNTA injections should not be withheld regardless of muscles injected; (2) a 25G or smaller size needle should be used when injecting into the deep leg compartment muscles; (3) international normalized ratio (INR) level should be ≤3.5 when injecting the deep leg compartment muscles; (4) if there are clinical concerns such as history of a fluctuating INR, recent bleeding, excessive or new bruising, then an INR value on the day of injection with point-of-care testing or within the preceding 2-3 days should be taken into consideration when injecting deep compartment muscles; (5) the concern regarding bleeding when using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) should be the same as with warfarin (when INR is in the therapeutic range); (6) the dose and scheduling of DOACs should not be altered for the purpose of minimizing the risk of bleeding prior to BoNTA injections.

CONCLUSIONS

These consensus statements provide a framework for physicians to consider when injecting BoNTA for spasticity in anticoagulated patients. These consensus statements are not strict guidelines or decision-making steps, but rather an effort to generate common understanding in the absence of evidence in the literature.