Self-Efficacy and Pressure Ulcer Prevention After Spinal Cord Injury-Results From a Nationwide Community Survey in Switzerland (SwiSCI)

Challenges in traumatic spinal cord injury care in developing countries - a scoping review

Objective

To evaluate the leading challenges in developing countries' traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) care.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search in electronic databases of PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library on 16 April 2023. Studies that investigated challenges associated with the management of TSCI in developing countries were eligible for review. We extracted related outcomes and categorized them into four distinct parts: injury prevention, pre-hospital care, in-hospital care, and post-hospital care.

Results

We identified 82 articles that met the eligibility criteria including 13 studies on injury prevention, 25 on pre-hospital care, 32 on in-hospital care, and 61 on post-hospital care. Challenges related to post-hospital problems including the personal, financial, and social consequences of patients' disabilities and the deficiencies in empowering people with TSCI were foremost studied. Lack of trained human resources, insufficient public education and delays in care delivery were barriers in the acute and chronic management of TSCI. A well-defined pre-hospital network and standard guidelines for the management of acute neurotrauma are needed. Critical challenges in injury prevention include deficiencies in infrastructure and supportive legislation.

Conclusion

Studies focusing on injury prevention and pre-hospital care in TSCI management in developing countries warrant further investigation. It is imperative to develop systematic and evidence-based initiatives that are specifically tailored to the unique circumstances of each country to address these challenges effectively. By understanding the primary obstacles, policymakers and healthcare providers can establish goals for improving education, planning, legislation, and resource allocation.

Triangulation of veteran and provider models of preventing community-acquired pressure injuries in spinal cord injury to reveal convergence and divergence of perspectives

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE

Community-acquired pressure injuries (CAPrI) are a common and costly complication of spinal cord injury (SCI). The majority of PrIs occur in the community, but there is little guidance in CAPrI prevention. This study describes how provider and veteran perspectives of CAPrI prevention converge and diverge.

DESIGN

The Farmer triangulation method was used to compare two models from previous qualitative research describing provider and veteran perspectives of CAPrI prevention based on the framework of CAPrI risks, resources, and preventive activities. The previous qualitative research revealed the provider model of CAPrI prevention using semi-structured interviews with interprofessional SCI providers at the Veteran Health Administration (VA) (n = 30). A qualitative descriptive design using photovoice (n = 30) with or without guided tours (n = 15) revealed the Veteran model of CAPrI prevention.

SETTING

The previous qualitative research was conducted at three geographically different VA spinal cord injury/disorder centers in the United States (north, south, west).

PARTICIPANTS

30 interprofessional SCI providers; 30 Veterans living with SCI at three VA SCI Centers in the United States.

INTERVENTIONS

n/a.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Provider-Veteran perspectives of CAPrI prevention that demonstrated agreement, partial agreement, divergence, and silence.

RESULTS

Providers and veterans agreed on what is basic care, and the importance of family, caregiver and health provider/system supports, but they viewed motivation, veteran role, informal supports, and adequacy of supports differently.

CONCLUSION

Understanding how SCI providers and veterans living with SCI view prevention in the community informs how to promote preventive care in the context of veterans' lives.

Veteran model of preventing community-acquired pressure injuries associated with spinal cord injury: A qualitative descriptive study

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE

Pressure injuries (PrIs) are the second leading cause of hospitalization in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). The majority of PrIs occur in the community, but there is little known about prevention of community acquired PrI (CAPrI). The purpose of this study was to better understand risks, resources, and actions associated with CAPrI prevention from the perspective of veterans living with SCI in the community.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive design using photovoice (n = 30) with or without guided tours (n = 15) was conducted with Veterans living with SCI at 3 sites across the United States to determine environmental/lifestyle risks at home, prevention activities, resources used, and challenges in CAPrI prevention. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis, followed by inductive thematic synthesis.

RESULTS

Qualitative analyses revealed a model describing veteran's perspective of preventing CAPrIs associated with SCI. The model included 3 themes and 9 subthemes: Factors that Lead to Risk for Pressure Injury (Challenges and Barriers), Factors that Affect Chosen Actions (Veteran Motivators, Veteran Values, Veteran Satisfaction with Provider Relationships, and Veteran Supports), and Preventive Activities within Context of Life (Physical Care, Coping, Advocacy).

CONCLUSION

Incorporating the veteran model of prevention within the context of life into clinical care could support provider-veteran collaboration to identify and integrate successful strategies that prevent CAPrIs while also improving veteran quality of life.

Development of a decision support tool to prevent community acquired pressure injuries for use in the spinal cord injury clinic using the delphi technique

STUDY DESIGN

Delphi Technique.

OBJECTIVES

Describe the development of a decision support tool to prevent community-acquired pressure injuries (CAPrIs) in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) for use in SCI clinics, called the Community-Acquired Pressure Injury Prevention-Field Implementation Tool (CAPP-FIT).

SETTING

Veteran Health Administration Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

METHODS

Concept mapping of current pressure injury (PrI) guidelines and qualitative research describing risks, actions, and resources needed to prevent CAPrIs associated with SCI were used to develop 40 veteran checklist items (Items) along with 37 associated provider actions (Actions) for the tool. The Delphi technique was used to refine Items and Actions with a panel of interprofessional SCI providers (n = 15), veterans with SCI (n = 4), and caregivers (n = 3) to determine consensus on a 4-point Likert scale (strongly agree-strongly disagree) for each Item and Action. A 75% agreement was set for responses rated as strongly agree or agree.

RESULTS

Panelists were 60% female, 62% White, 33% veterans with SCI or caregivers, 33% wound care certified with a mean age of 59 years. Two survey rounds were required for consensus for 41 Item and 38 Action CAPP-FIT. Response rate was 95% for both rounds. Delphi round 1 showed all but two Actions affirming agreement above 75%. Substantive comments from panelists required revision to 5 Items and 9 Actions and one additional Item/Actions related to coping, meeting threshold percent agreement in Round 2.

CONCLUSIONS

The CAPP-FIT could become a useful tool for Veterans living with SCI, caregivers, and SCI providers.

Preventing Community-Acquired Pressure Injuries in Spinal Cord Injury: Online Healthcare Provider Curriculum

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to develop and pilot an educational curriculum for healthcare providers to better understand community-acquired pressure injury (CAPrI) prevention in veterans living with spinal cord injury (SCI).

METHODS

The Thomas six-step process model guided curricular development and evaluation. Curriculum development followed six steps: (1) problem identification and general needs assessment from a literature review and qualitative research triangulating provider and veteran perspectives of CAPrI prevention in SCI, (2) target needs assessment using a focus group with 14 experienced practicing interprofessional SCI providers, (3) creation of module goals and objectives with content review from experts ( n = 8), (4) development of curriculum content and educational strategies, (5) implementation of a pilot ( n = 4), and (6) evaluation of satisfaction and curriculum content via survey and focus group.

RESULTS

A five-module online curriculum was evaluated positively and is available publicly. Modules include (1) CAPrI Prevention Clinical Guidelines for the Provider, (2) CAPrI Prevention from the Veteran Perspective, (3) Building Collaborative Relationships, (4) Accessing Resources, and (5) Team Approach. Pilot participants stated objectives were met; they were satisfied with the module. The participants did recommend some changes.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Understanding CAPrI prevention can inform rehabilitation nursing care.

CONCLUSIONS

An asynchronous educational curriculum can support nurses in integrating preventive care in community-dwelling veterans living with SCI.

Psychosocial factors impacting community-based pressure ulcer prevention: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Pressure ulcers are a major health concern. They have a significant impact on the healthcare system and individuals, reducing quality of life across several domains. In community settings, self-management behaviours are central to their prevention. However, adherence with pressure ulcer prevention guidelines remains low, with little evidence guiding the relationship between patients and healthcare professionals to establish a concordant partnership.

OBJECTIVE

To synthesise evidence on factors contributing to community-based pressure ulcer prevention using the Theoretical Domains Framework and the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B) model of behaviour.

DESIGN

Mixed methods systematic review and narrative synthesis.

METHOD

Systematic searches were conducted in the CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases on 14th December 2022. Studies were eligible if they contained data on the factors associated with adherence and concordance with pressure ulcer prevention guidelines in the community for patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals. Methodological quality was assessed using the Hawker tool. Findings were synthesised using the Theoretical Domains Framework. The resulting themes were mapped onto the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B) model.

RESULTS

Thirty studies were included in the review, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research. The synthesis identified 12 of the 14 Theoretical Domains Framework domains, with knowledge, social influences, beliefs about consequences, and beliefs about capabilities the most prevalent. Although knowledge appears to be an important contributor to adherence with prevention guidelines, knowledge alone does not appear sufficient to achieve concordance. A concordant relationship was facilitated by healthcare professionals' knowledge, motivation to work alongside patients and their priorities, and interpersonal skills to build rapport and trust, whilst barriers included lack of healthcare professional skills to navigate sensitive issues, paternalistic views of patient compliance and organisational processes that impact building rapport.

CONCLUSIONS

Several psychosocial factors may affect the ability to achieve concordance between individuals, caregivers and healthcare professionals with pressure ulcer prevention guidelines in the community. However, data regarding the efficacy of behaviour change interventions targeting these constructs is limited, with further research required to guide intervention development in this area.

Skin self-management of community-dwelling patients with spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

community-acquired pressure injury is one of the most common and troublesome complications of discharged patients with spinal cord injury. Previous studies have shown that pressure injury can not only increase the financial burden and care burden of patients, but also seriously affect their quality of life.

AIM

To evaluate the skin self-management of community-dwelling patients with spinal cord injury and to explore the related independent influencing factors.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional survey study. A convenience sample of 110 community-dwelling patients with spinal cord injury recruited from three rehabilitation centers in Guangzhou and Chengdu in China completed the survey from September 2020 to June 2021. They were asked about their demographic data, skin self-management, knowledge about skin self-management, attitude to skin self-management, self-efficacy, and functional independence. Univariate analysis and multiple linear regression were performed to isolate the most important relationships.

RESULTS

The skin self-management of community-dwelling patients with spinal cord injury was relatively low, and they also performed poorly in the three categories of: skin check, preventing pressure ulcer, and preventing wounds. Skin self-management was found to be most often associated with level of knowledge about skin self-management, higher reimbursement and self-efficacy.

CONCLUSION

Community-dwelling patients with spinal cord injury with lower level of knowledge about skin self-management, with lower self-efficacy, and those with higher reimbursement have worse skin self-management.

Staying Pressure Injury Free: The Role of Modifiable Behaviors

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of behavioral factors with retrospective reports of staying free from pressure injuries (PIs) during a 12-month period for people with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

Data collection was completed at an academic medical center in the Southeastern United States in collaboration with a specialized treatment center and 2 public health registries that use population-based approaches to identify all incident cases of SCI within the state.

PARTICIPANTS

The participant cohort was composed of 3817 adults (N=3817) with traumatic SCI of at least 1-year duration.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Self-reported recall of staying PI-free for 12 months vs having 1 or more PIs.

RESULTS

Among the 3817 participants, 74% were male, 76% were non-Hispanic White, and mean age was 48 years, with an average of 12 years post SCI. Based on self-report assessment, 67% reported being PI-free in the past year. After controlling for the demographic and injury characteristics, we found that those in the clinical cohort and those who reported healthy diets and planned exercise at least once a week were more likely to be PI-free; being underweight and high frequency of prescription medication use for spasticity, pain, and depression were negatively associated with being PI-free. Smoking, alcohol use, nonmedical substance use, and prescription medication misuse were not statistically significant in the multivariate model.

CONCLUSIONS

There are several significant behavioral predictors of being PI-free, and consideration of these factors may be used to develop tailored strategies to promote healthy skin maintenance and the prevention of multiple, severe, and recurrent PI.

Telemedicine for Preventing and Treating Pressure Injury after Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (Preprint)

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Incidence of Pressure Injury in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review and quantitative analysis of pooled data was to assess the global incidence of pressure injury (PI), across time frames and countries, in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were systematically searched for studies published from database inception to January 2019, with only English language studies that reported the incidence of PIs in individuals with SCI were included. Study quality was assessed by a 14-item standardized checklist. We calculated the incidence of PIs as the number of new PIs in individuals with SCI and the total number of individuals with SCI during the study period. Findings are presented as incidence rate with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

The search yielded 1652 studies; after studies were reviewed for inclusion criteria, 29 studies representing N = 82,722 patients were retained for data extraction. The global incidence of PIs was 0.23 (95% CI, 0.20-0.26). Data for regional distribution by country showed a pooled incidence of 0.43 (95% CI, 0.28-0.57) in individuals with SCI in South American countries, 0.36 (95% CI, 0.16-0.56) in African countries, 0.25 (95% CI, 0.14-0.37) in European countries, 0.23 (95% CI, 0.19-0.27) in North American countries, and 0.16 (95% CI, 0.06-0.25) in Asian countries. The incidence was 0.22 (95% CI, 0.19-0.26) in developing countries versus 0.27 (95% CI, 0.17-0.37) in developed countries. From 2000 to 2009, the incidence of PIs in individuals with SCI was 0.28 (95% CI, 0.09-0.47). The incidence rate of PIs before 2000 and after 2009 was 0.23. The hospital- and community-acquired PI incidence was 0.22 (95% CI, 0.19-0.26) and 0.26 (95% CI, 0.20-0.32), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Study findings indicate that more than 1 in 5 individuals with SCI will develop a PI. Individuals with SCI are at high risk of developing PI, especially in community settings or low- and middle-income developing countries. The findings highlight the importance of further investigation of risk factors and prevention and management strategies for PIs in individuals with SCI.

Development and validation of the pressure ulcer management self-efficacy scale for nurses

BACKGROUND

Pressure ulcers (PUs) represent a current issue for healthcare delivery. Nurse self-efficacy in managing PUs could predict patients' outcome, being a proxy assessment of their overall competency to managing PUs. However, a valid and reliable scale of this task-specific self-efficacy has not yet been developed.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a valid and reliable scale to assess nurses' self-efficacy in managing PUs, that is, the pressure ulcer management self-efficacy scale for nurses (PUM-SES).

METHODS

This study had a multi-method and multi-phase design, where study reporting was supported by the STROBE checklist (File S1). Phase 1 referred to the scale development, consisting in the items' generation, mainly based on themes emerged from the literature and discussed within a panel of experts. Phase 2 focused on a three-step validation process: the first step aimed to assess face and content validity of the pool of items previously generated (initial version of the PUM-SES); the second aimed to assess psychometrics properties through exploratory factorial analysis; the third step assessed construct validity through confirmative factorial analysis, while concurrent validity was evaluated describing the relationships between PUM-SES and an established general self-efficacy measurement. Reliability was assessed through the evaluation of stability and internal consistency.

RESULTS

PUM-SES showed evidence of face and content validity, adequate construct and concurrent validity, internal consistency and stability. Specifically, PUM-SES had four domains, labelled as follows: assessment, planning, supervision and decision-making. These domains were predicted by the same second-order factor, labelled as PU management self-efficacy.

CONCLUSION

PUM-SES is a 10-item scale to measure nurses' self-efficacy in PU management. A standardised 0-100 scoring is suggested for computing each domain and the overall scale. PUM-SES might be used in clinical and educational research.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Optimising nurses' self-efficacy in PU management might enhance clinical assessment, determining better outcomes in patients with PUs.