[Comparison of home-based and outpatient, hospital-based, pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic respiratory diseases]

Impact of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Comorbidities on Long-term Outcomes of Home-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation in COPD

Background

Cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are associated with higher symptoms burden. Few center-based studies have evaluated the impact of these comorbidities on short-term pulmonary rehabilitation outcomes with contrasting results.

Research Question

This study aimed to determine whether cardiovascular diseases and metabolic comorbidities impacted long-term outcomes of a home-based PR program in COPD patients.

Study Design and methods

Data of 419 consecutive COPD patients addressed to our pulmonary rehabilitation program between January 2010 and June 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Our program consisted of once-weekly supervised home sessions, including therapeutic education and self-management support, with unsupervised retraining exercises and physical activities the other days for 8 weeks. Exercise capacity (6-min stepper test [6MST]), quality of life (visual simplified respiratory questionnaire), and anxiety and depression (hospital anxiety and depression scale) were assessed respectively, before (M0) and at the end (M2) of the pulmonary rehabilitation program, and at 6 (M8) and 12 months (M14) after its achievement.

Results

Patients (mean age 64.1±11.2 years, 67% males, mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) 39.2±17.0% predicted) were classified as having cardiovascular comorbidities (n=195), only metabolic disorders (n=122) or none of these comorbidities (n=102). After adjustment, all outcomes appeared similar between groups at baseline and improved after pulmonary rehabilitation with a greater effect at M14 for patients with only metabolic disorders on anxiety and depression score (-5.0±0.7 vs -2.9±0.8 and -2.6±0.6, p=0.021). Quality of life and exercise capacity improvements were not significantly different between the three groups at M2 and M14.

Conclusion

Cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities do not preclude COPD patients from obtaining clinically meaningful improvements in exercise capacity, quality of life and anxiety-depression up to 1 year after a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation.

A comparative study of the effectiveness of hospital-based versus home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in candidates for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction

BACKGROUND

The Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction (BLVR) is recommended in patients with severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) who are still symptomatic and have hyperinflation despite having received optimal medical therapy and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR). However, the small number of PR centers is insufficient to compensate for the need for existing hospital-based PR programs.

OBJECTIVE

This article aimed to compare between hospital-based and home-based PR programs in terms of effectiveness on BLVR candidates.

METHODS

This study is a prospective, controlled, nonrandomized clinical trial. Stable COPD patients who were referred to our PR clinic prior to BLVR were recruited consecutively. Patients were evaluated in two groups, hospital-based PR (Group 1) or home-based PR (Group 2). Both groups were admitted to the recommended PR for eight weeks. Pulmonary function tests, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale, COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the 6-min walk distance (6MWD) were assessed for each patient before and after PR.

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients were enrolled in the study. The max. age was 79 years and min. age was 49 years, with 65(±7.45) as a mean ±SD. Improvements in the mMRC and CAT scores after PR in both groups were significant and a similar level. Whereas, 6MWD was only significantly increased in Group 1.

CONCLUSIONS

This study, demonstrated that both home-based and hospital-based PR provided significant and similar improvements in the mMRC and CAT scores but 6MWD was only significantly increased in the hospital-based PR. Since 6MWD after PR plays a major role in BLVR eligibility, our findings suggest that hospital-based PR may be the most appropriate method for BLVR candidates.

Convergent Validity and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Maugeri Foundation Respiratory Failure Questionnaire (MRF-28) and the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-Specific Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire (VQ11)

Purpose

Short and easy questionnaires have been developed to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), such as the Maugeri Foundation Respiratory Failure Questionnaire (MRF-28) and the COPD-specific HRQoL Questionnaire (VQ11). Both are valid, reliable, and sensitive, but their minimal clinically important differences (MCID) are unknown. Consequently, this study aimed to confirm the convergent validities of the MRF-28 and VQ11 and establish their MCID. A retrospective design was used to evaluate the effect of individual home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in 400 COPD patients.

Patients and methods

Exercise tolerance, anxiety and depression based on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and HRQoL using three questionnaires (MRF-28, VQ11, and the Visual Simplified Respiratory Questionnaire: VSRQ) were assessed before and after an individualized home-based PR program (5 sessions of 30–45 mins/week for 8 weeks, including a weekly session supervised by a team member).

Results

PR improved all measured variables (p < 0.0001). The correlations were significant (p < 0.0001) between VSRQ and MRF-28 (r = −0.685 at baseline and r = −0.686 after the PR program), and between VSRQ and VQ11 (r = −0.691 at baseline and r = −0.753 after the PR program). Moreover, changes in score (delta between after and before PR program) of VSRQ were also significantly correlated (p < 0.0001) to changes in score of MRF-28 (r = −0.372) and VQ11 (r = −0.423). Last, we calculated MCID of −5.2 and −2.0 units for MRF-28 and VQ11, respectively.

Conclusion

The MRF-28 and VQ11 can be used in routine practice to evaluate the effects of PR on the HRQoL of COPD patients, with MCID of −5.2 and −2.0, respectively.

Comparison of Compliance Rates and Treatment Efficiency in Home-Based with Hospital-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation in COPD

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to compare the home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) with the hospital-based PR with respect to exercise compliance rates and efficiency of therapy in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with stable severe and very severe COPD who were admitted consequently to our PR clinic were prospectively included in the study. Patients who completed the home-based PR for at least 4 days/week for 2 months as recommended were classified as the study group. Patients who completed the hospital-based PR in our clinic before the present study were classified as the control group.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were included in the home-based PR, but 10 patients were incompatible with the exercise training, and four patients were out of follow-up. Twenty-one patients successfully completed the home-based PR (study group), and compliance rate was 60%. Thirty-seven patients previously underwent the hospital-based PR, and 25 patients completed the exercise program (control group); thus, their compliance rate was 67%. There was no difference between the two groups with respect to treatment compliance rates. The significant improvement in six-minute walking distance, modified Medical Research Council dyspnea, and COPD Assessment Test scores were observed after PR in both groups, and there was no difference with respect to the levels of improvement.

CONCLUSION

The present study showed that approximately two-thirds of patients with COPD successfully completed the home-based PR, and that this program also provided similar benefits with respect to the quality of life and exercise capacity compared with the hospital-based PR.

[The DISC tool improves communication and results in pulmonary rehabilitation]

INTRODUCTION

Competence in personal relationships is essential for a caregiver, especially in pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Considering the behavioral profile of patients might help to optimize their management and the results of PR.

METHODS

We evaluated eight hundred and thirty-two consecutive patients with chronic respiratory disease who received eight weeks of home-based PR. Their exercise tolerance (six-minute stepper test, 6MST), mood (HAD), and quality of life (VSRQ, MRF28) were evaluated at the beginning and end of PR. For six hundred and ninety patients, a behavioral approach was implemented at the beginning of PR by using the DISC tool to identify four behavioral profiles: dominance, influence, steadiness, conscientiousness. The remaining 142 patients served as the control group.

RESULTS

Subjectively, the therapeutic alliance was more easily established with the behavioral approach. Compared with the control group, patients with the "steadiness" profile were younger (60.7±12 years) and mostly female (52.8%), whereas patients with the "conscientiousness" profile were older (67.5±10.6 years) and mostly male (85.5%). The four behaviorally profiled groups showed no differences in exercise tolerance, mood, or quality of life scores at baseline. Globally, all patients improved their exercise tolerance, mood and quality of life. The percentage of responders to 6MST and VSRQ (>MCID) was 7.5% and 5.3% higher with the behavioral approach. For non-responders to 6MST and VSRQ (<MCID), only patients benefiting from the behavioral approach improved the other parameters studied, patients from control group having exhibited no improvement at all.

CONCLUSIONS

The DISC-guided behavioral approach improves the patient-caregiver relationship and achieves better results at the end of PR.

Acute effects of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) combining laser diodes, light-emitting diodes, and magnetic field in exercise capacity assessed by 6MST in patients with COPD: a crossover, randomized, and triple-blinded clinical trial

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by dyspnea, as well as musculoskeletal and systemic manifestations. Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) with use of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and/or light-emitting diode therapy (LEDT) is an electrophysical intervention that has been found to minimize or delay muscle fatigue. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute effect of PBMT with combined use of lasers diodes, light-emitting diodes (LEDs), magnetic field on muscle performance, exercise tolerance, and metabolic variables during the 6-minute stepper test (6MST) in patients with COPD. Twenty-one patients with COPD (FEV₁ 46.3% predicted) completed the 6MST protocol over 2 weeks, with one session per week. PBMT/magnetic field or placebo (PL) was performed before each 6MST (17 sites on each lower limb, with a dose of 30 J per site, using a cluster of 12 diodes 4 × 905 nm super-pulsed laser diodes, 4 × 875 nm infrared LEDs, and 4 × 640 nm red LEDs; Multi Radiance Medical™, Solon, OH, USA). Patients were randomized into two groups before the test according to the treatment they would receive. Assessments were performed before the start of each protocol. The primary outcomes were oxygen uptake and number of steps, and the secondary outcome was perceived exertion (dyspnea and fatigue in the lower limbs). PBMT/magnetic field applied before 6MST significantly increased the number of steps during the cardiopulmonary exercise test when compared to the results with placebo (129.8 ± 10.6 vs 116.1 ± 11.5, p = 0.000). PBMT/magnetic field treatment also led to a lower score for the perception of breathlessness (3.0 [1.0-7.0] vs 4.0 [2.0-8.0], p = 0.000) and lower limb fatigue (2.0 [0.0-5.0] vs 4.0 [0.0-7.0], p = 0.001) compared to that with placebo treatment. This study showed that the combined application of PBMT and magnetic field increased the number of steps during the 6MST and decreased the sensation of dyspnea and lower limb fatigue in patients with COPD.

Real-life feasibility of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in chemotherapy-treated patients with thoracic cancers: a pilot study

Background

Patients with advanced lung cancer (LC) or malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) exhibit limitation of exercise capacities and alteration of quality of life (QoL) induced by cancer and its treatment. Few studies assessed pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in these chemotherapy-treated patients, and none evaluated a home-based PR program.

Methods

In this prospective uncontrolled observational pilot study, patients treated by chemotherapy for LC or MPM were screened for a home-based PR program combining exercise training with global cares including therapeutic education and psychosocial management. Feasibility and safety were evaluated by attendance and adherence to PR program. Various exercise tolerance tests, including 6-min walk test (6MWT) and 6-min stepper test (6MST), were performed before and after PR associated with, QoL and psychological assessment (VSRQ and HAD, respectively).

Results

243 patients were considered eligible but only 71 (60.6 ± 8.8 years) started a PR and 47 completed the program. Refusals to participate were mostly related to lack of motivation whereas withdrawals to PR were related to cancer-related medical issues. No adverse event related to PR was observed. Baseline 6MWT distance was associated with performance status (r = − 0.45, p = 0.001) and mMRC dyspnea scale (r = − 0.49, p < 0.001) but not with lung cancer stage. Post-PR reassessment showed 6MWT stability and 6MST improvement in patients who completed the program. Daily physical activity (p = 0.007) and anxiety (p = 0.02) scores were significantly improved.

Conclusions

Home-based PR was feasible and safe in patients with advanced LC or MPM. Exercise capacities stability in patients who completed the PR program suggests that PR might be beneficial. Further studies are warranted to confirm and to improve the potential value of PR in these patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4102-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves exercise tolerance and health-related quality of life in patients with COPD

Background

This retrospective, observational study of a routine clinical practice reports the feasibility and efficiency of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), including transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) or usual endurance physical exercise (UEPE), on exercise tolerance, anxiety/depression, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with COPD.

Methods

Seventy-one patients with COPD participated in home-based PR with NMES (Group NMES [G_NMES]), while 117 patients participated in home-based PR with the UEPEs (Group UEPE [G_UEPE]). NMES was applied for 30 minutes twice a day, every day. The endurance exercises in G_UEPE began with a minimum 10-minute session at least 5 days a week, with the goal being 30–45 minutes per session. Three upper and lower limb muscle strengthening exercises lasting 10–15 minutes were also proposed to both the groups for daily practice. Moreover, PR in both the groups included a weekly 90-minute session based on an educational needs assessment. The sessions comprised endurance physical exercise for G_UEPE, NMES for G_NMES, resumption of physical daily living activities, therapeutic patient education, and psychosocial support to facilitate health behavior changes. Before and after PR, functional mobility and physical exercise capacity, anxiety, depression, and HRQoL were evaluated at home.

Results

The study revealed that NMES significantly improved functional mobility (−18.8% in GNMES and −20.6% in G_UEPE), exercise capacity (+20.8% in G_NMES and +21.8% in G_UEPE), depression (−15.8% in G_NMES and −30.1% in G_UEPE), and overall HRQoL (−7.0% in G_NMES and −18.5% in G_UEPE) in the patients with COPD, regardless of the group (G_NMES or G_UEPE) or severity of airflow obstruction. Moreover, no significant difference was observed between the groups with respect to these data (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Home-based PR including self-monitored NMES seems feasible and effective for severely disabled COPD patients with severe exercise intolerance.

Six-minute stepper test: a valid clinical exercise tolerance test for COPD patients

Introduction

Exercise tolerance testing is an integral part of the pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The 6-minute stepper test (6MST) is a new, well-tolerated, reproducible exercise test, which can be performed without any spatial constraints.

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the results of the 6MST to those obtained during a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in a cohort of COPD patients.

Methods

Ninety-one COPD patients managed by outpatient PR and assessed by 6MST, 6MWT, and CPET were retrospectively included in this study. Correlations between the number of steps on the 6MST, the distance covered on the 6MWT, oxygen consumption, and power at the ventilatory threshold and at maximum effort during CPET were analyzed before starting PR, and the improvement on the 6MST and 6MWT was compared after PR.

Results

The number of steps on the 6MST was significantly correlated with the distance covered on the 6MWT (r=0.56; P<0.0001), the power at maximum effort (r=0.46; P<0.0001), and oxygen consumption at maximum effort (r=0.39; P<0.005). Performances on the 6MST and 6MWT were significantly improved after PR (570 vs 488 steps, P=0.001 and 448 vs 406 m, respectively; P<0.0001). Improvements of the 6MST and 6MWT after PR were significantly correlated (r=0.34; P=0.03).

Conclusion

The results of this study show that the 6MST is a valid test to evaluate exercise tolerance in COPD patients. The use of this test in clinical practice appears to be particularly relevant for the assessment of patients managed by home PR.

Long-term evaluation of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD

Introduction

Personalized, global pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) management of patients with COPD is effective, regardless of the place in which this rehabilitation is provided. The objective of this retrospective observational study was to study the long-term outcome of exercise capacity and quality of life during management of patients with COPD treated by home-based PR.

Methods

Home-based PR was administered to 211 patients with COPD (mean age, 62.3±11.1 years; mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second, 41.5%±17.7%). Home-based PR was chosen because of the distance of the patient’s home from the PR center and the patient’s preference. Each patient was individually managed by a team member once a week for 8 weeks with unsupervised continuation of physical exercises on the other days of the week according to an individual action plan. Exercise conditioning, therapeutic patient education, and self-management were included in the PR program. The home assessment comprised evaluation of the patient’s exercise capacity by a 6-minute stepper test, Timed Up and Go test, ten times sit-to-stand test, Hospital Anxiety and Depression score, and quality of life (Visual Simplified Respiratory Questionnaire, VQ11, Maugeri Respiratory Failure 28).

Results

No incidents or accidents were observed during the course of home-based PR. The 6-minute stepper test was significantly improved after completion of the program, at 6 months and 12 months, whereas the Timed Up and Go and ten times sit-to-stand test were improved after PR and at 6 months but not at 12 months. Hospital Anxiety and Depression and quality of life scores improved after PR, and this improvement persisted at 6 months and 12 months.

Conclusion

Home-based PR for unselected patients with COPD is effective in the short term, and this effectiveness is maintained in the medium term (6 months) and long term (12 months). Home-based PR is an alternative to outpatient management provided all activities, such as exercise conditioning, therapeutic education, and self-management are performed.