Duloxetine treatment of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder: case reports

Daily symptom ratings for studying premenstrual dysphoric disorder: A review

BACKGROUND

To review how daily symptom ratings have been used in research into premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD), and to discuss opportunities for the future.

METHODS

PsycINFO and Medline were systematically searched, resulting in the inclusion of 75 studies in which (1) participants met the diagnostic criteria for late luteal phase dysphoric disorder (LLPDD) or PMDD and (2) diaries were used to study LLPDD/PMDD.

RESULTS

To date, diaries have been used to gain insight into the aetiology and phenomenology of PMDD, to examine associated biological factors, and to assess treatment efficacy. We found low consistency among the diaries used, and often only part of the menstrual cycle was analysed instead of the whole menstrual cycle. We also observed that there was substantial variability in diagnostic procedures and criteria.

LIMITATIONS

This review excluded diary studies conducted in women with premenstrual syndrome, women seeking help for premenstrual complaints without a clear diagnosis, and women without premenstrual complaints.

CONCLUSIONS

Prospective daily ratings of symptoms and related variables provide a valuable and important tool in the study of PMDD. This paper addresses some options for improving the use of diaries and proposes the use of experience sampling and ecological momentary assessment to investigate within-person variability in symptoms in more detail.

Duloxetine treatment for women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder: a single-blind trial

Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) affects 3-8% of women of reproductive age and is characterized by severe mood symptoms that cause important functional impairment. Serotonergic antidepressants appear to be an effective treatment for this disorder. The purpose of this study was to collect evidence on the efficacy and tolerability of duloxetine, a dual reuptake inhibitor of serotonin and norepinephrine, in the treatment of PMDD. We conducted a pilot, single-blind, non-controlled, fixed-dose trial. After two cycles for diagnosis confirmation, including a single-blind placebo cycle, 20 women with PMDD were treated continuously for three menstrual cycles with 60 mg/d duloxetine. The primary measure of the efficacy of treatment with duloxetine was the significant reduction in premenstrual symptoms demonstrated by the comparison between the mean Daily Record of Severity of Problems (DRSP) scores at baseline to endpoint (p=0.0002). Statistically significant symptom reduction was observed in the first treatment cycle and throughout all the treatment phase. Clinical response, defined as a reduction 50% of baseline premenstrual symptoms, occurred in 65% of subjects (intention-to-treat population). Significant improvements were demonstrated by secondary measures, including reduction in self-rated functional impairment (p=0.01) and improvement in quality of life (p=0.04). The main side-effects associated with duloxetine were dry mouth, nausea, drowsiness, insomnia, decreased appetite, decreased libido, and sweating. Duloxetine was effective and generally well tolerated in the treatment of PMDD. Further large-scale, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies are needed to evaluate duloxetine as an additional treatment strategy for the management of PMDD.