Calibrating friction coefficients in discrete element method simulations with shear-cell experiments

Evaluating three internal fixation techniques for Pauwels III femoral neck fractures via finite element analysis

The selection of implants for fixing unstable femoral neck fractures (FNF) remains contentious. This study employs finite element analysis to examine the biomechanics of treating Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures using cannulated compression screws (3CS), biplane double-supported screw fixation (BDSF), and the femoral neck system (FNS). A three-dimensional model of the proximal femur was developed using computed tomography scans. Fracture models of the femoral neck were created with 3CS, BDSF, and FNS fixations. Von Mises stress on the proximal femur, fracture ends, internal fixators, and model displacements were assessed and compared across the three fixation methods (3CS, BDSF, and FNS) during the heel strike of normal walking. The maximum Von Mises stress in the proximal fragment was significantly higher with 3CS fixation compared to BDSF and FNS fixations (120.45 MPa vs. 82.44 MPa and 84.54 MPa, respectively). Regarding Von Mises stress distribution at the fracture ends, the highest stress in the 3CS group was 57.32 MPa, while BDSF and FNS groups showed 51.39 MPa and 49.23 MPa, respectively. Concerning implant stress, the FNS model exhibited greater Von Mises stress compared to the 3CS and BDSF models (236.67 MPa vs. 134.86 MPa and 140.69 MPa, respectively). Moreover, BDSF displayed slightly lower total displacement than 3CS fixation (7.19 mm vs. 7.66 mm), but slightly higher displacement than FNS (7.19 mm vs. 7.03 mm). This study concludes that BDSF outperforms 3CS fixation in terms of biomechanical efficacy and demonstrates similar performance to the FNS approach. As a result, BDSF stands as a dependable alternative for treating Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.

Evaluating the effect of glidants on tablet sticking propensity of ketoprofen using powder rheology

Punch sticking has been a leading drawback that has challenged successful tablet manufacturing since its initial conception. Due to the capricious nature of the complication, this can arise during any phase of the development process. Even now, identifying such a problem is a prerequisite during the initial stage of development. The present study evaluated the role of Aerosil®200, talc, and Syloid®244 as glidants in varying amounts ranging from 0.0 percent to 2.0 percent w/w on tablets sticking relatively to five different metal surfaces, with ketoprofen as the model drug. Powder rheology is a predictable technique used to calculate the sticking index. The sticking index of each formulation in comparison to each metal coupon was identified by calculating the kinematic angle of internal friction and the angle of wall friction using the shear cell test and wall friction test, respectively. Interestingly, glidants were found to reduce the sticking propensity of the powder blend in a concentration-dependent manner. In addition, the compression study validated the expected sticking tendency ranking order. According to the research data, the sticking index could effectively be utilized to envisage the possibility of tablet sticking, i.e., by selecting the formulation's excipient and their percentages or selecting appropriate punched metal surfaces in the tableting process.

Calibration of DEM for Cohesive Particles in the SLS Powder Spreading Process

In this paper, a new DEM calibration procedure based on two different types of procedures to compare simulation with experiments is proposed. The aim is to find the values of the interfacial adhesive surface energy and the coefficient of rolling friction between the particles to be used in the simulation. The approach adopted is the so-called Bulk Calibration method. The experimental values of the angle of repose and unconfined yield strength, found with a static testing method and by shear testing, respectively, are compared, respectively, with the angle of repose, found in a simulation reproducing the experimental procedure, and the unconfined yield strength, obtained from an idealized uniaxial testing procedure. The simulated DEM particles are spheres equipped with the Hertz Mindlin with JKR contact model. The results suggest that a bulk calibration approach is not able to provide results that are consistent with two simple bulk property evaluations and, therefore, direct ways to estimate the surface energy based on the evaluation of interparticle forces, for example, should preferably be adopted.