Circulating Activin A is elevated at 36 weeks' gestation preceding a diagnosis of preeclampsia

Maternal Serum Activin A, Inhibin A and Follistatin-Related Proteins across Preeclampsia: Insights into Their Role in Pathogenesis and Prediction

BACKGROUND

Within the endocrine-paracrine signalling network at the maternal-foetal interface, the activin-inhibin-follistatin system modulates extravillous trophoblast invasion, suggesting a potential role in preeclampsia pathogenesis. This study aimed to compile the evidence published in the last decade regarding the variation in maternal serum activins, inhibin- and follistatin-related proteins in preeclamptic pregnancies compared to healthy pregnancies, and to discuss their role in predicting and understanding the pathophysiology of preeclampsia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A scoping review was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS databases to identify studies published within the last ten years (2012-2022).

RESULTS

Thirty studies were included. None of the studies addressed maternal serum changes of isoforms different from activin A, inhibin A, follistatin, and follistatin-like 3. Sixteen studies evaluated the potential of these isoforms in predicting preeclampsia through the area under the curve from a receiver operating characteristic curve.

CONCLUSIONS

In preeclampsia, inhibin A is upregulated in all trimesters, whereas activin A increases exclusively in the late second and third trimesters. Serum follistatin levels are reduced in women with preeclampsia during the late second and third trimesters. However, changes in follistatin-like 3 remain inconclusive. Inhibin A and activin A can potentially serve as biomarkers of early-onset preeclampsia based on the outcomes of the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Further investigations are encouraged to explore the feasibility of quantifying maternal serum levels of activin A and inhibin A as a clinical tool in early preeclampsia prediction.

Potential biomarkers for late-onset and term preeclampsia: A scoping review

Preeclampsia is a progressive, multisystem pregnancy disorder. According to the time of onset or delivery, preeclampsia has been subclassified into early-onset (<34 weeks) and late-onset (≥34 weeks), or preterm (<37 weeks) and term (≥37 weeks). Preterm preeclampsia can be effectively predicted at 11–13 weeks well before onset, and its incidence can be reduced by preventively using low-dose aspirin. However, late-onset and term preeclampsia are more prevalent than early forms and still lack effective predictive and preventive measures. This scoping review aims to systematically identify the evidence of predictive biomarkers reported in late-onset and term preeclampsia. This study was conducted based on the guidance of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was used to guide the study. The following databases were searched for related studies: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest. Search terms contain “preeclampsia,” “late-onset,” “term,” “biomarker,” or “marker,” and other synonyms combined as appropriate using the Boolean operators “AND” and “OR.” The search was restricted to articles published in English from 2012 to August 2022. Publications were selected if study participants were pregnant women and biomarkers were detected in maternal blood or urine samples before late-onset or term preeclampsia diagnosis. The search retrieved 4,257 records, of which 125 studies were included in the final assessment. The results demonstrate that no single molecular biomarker presents sufficient clinical sensitivity and specificity for screening late-onset and term preeclampsia. Multivariable models combining maternal risk factors with biochemical and/or biophysical markers generate higher detection rates, but they need more effective biomarkers and validation data for clinical utility. This review proposes that further research into novel biomarkers for late-onset and term preeclampsia is warranted and important to find strategies to predict this complication. Other critical factors to help identify candidate markers should be considered, such as a consensus on defining preeclampsia subtypes, optimal testing time, and sample types.

Hypertension in Pregnancy: What We Now Know

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy remain a highly morbid condition that affects both the mother and fetus, complicate approximately 10% of pregnancies worldwide, and contribute to immediate and long-term cardiovascular outcomes. There is still much to learn regarding pathogenesis and treatment goals.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is updated information on the pathogenesis of preeclampsia and treatment thresholds for HTN in pregnancy. l-Kynurenine, a metabolite of the essential amino acid l-tryptophan, has been implicated in preeclampsia as decreased levels were found in a uninephrectomized pregnant mouse model of preeclampsia, where replacement of l-kynurenine rescued the preeclamptic state. Further, data from CHIPS (The Control of HTN in Pregnancy Study) and CHAP (Chronic HTN and Pregnancy) trials demonstrate not only the safety of lowering blood pressure to either a diastolic goal of 85 mmHg (CHIPS) or less than 160/105 mmHg (CHAP) without detriment to the fetus but the CHAPS trial has also shown a decrease in the rate of preeclampsia in the treatment group.

SUMMARY

We will summarize the different types of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, updates on the pathogenesis of preeclampsia, and appropriate HTN management based on the latest evidence in order to better care for mother and child.