Treatment strategies for infraoccluded dental implants

Congenitally Missing Lateral Incisors: Prioritizing Space Closure Whenever Feasible

Congenital missing teeth are among the most prevalent dental malformations. Maxillary lateral incisors are particularly prone to agenesis, often missing bilaterally. This condition presented complex challenges for both patients and clinicians. The etiology of maxillary lateral incisor agenesis is multifactorial, involving genetic and environmental factors. The management is also inherently complex, necessitating an interdisciplinary approach. Treatment options include orthodontic space closure, resin-bonded bridges, implants, removable partial dentures, and autotransplantation. Among these, implant placement and orthodontic space closure are most commonly preferred by clinicians. The selection of an appropriate treatment modality depends on multiple factors, such as patient growth, available space, condition of adjacent teeth, and initial malocclusion. This review aimed to evaluate and compare various treatment options for maxillary lateral incisor agenesis, providing a comprehensive analysis of the latest evidence and highlighting the benefits and limitations of each approach to inform clinical decision-making.

Restoring the functionality of implant-supported prostheses with a reloading technique: A clinical report

The prevalence of infraocclusion and/or loss of interproximal contact areas with implant-supported restorations is high, and replacement of these prostheses has been advocated for the treatment of mild or moderate infraocclusion; however, replacement is complicated if the manufacturer of the implant is unknown. A technique is presented for correcting the infraocclusion of posterior prostheses that are directly connected to the implant. Advantages include possibly preventing marginal bone loss secondary to the removal and reconnection of the prosthetic attachments and reducing the number of appointments.

Interdisciplinary Management of Bilateral Congenital Lateral Incisor Agenesis

Management of lateral incisor agenesis is a real challenge and needs a strong collaboration between surgical, aesthetic, and orthodontic dentistry. This case report managed upper lateral incisor agenesis with an orthodontic treatment leading to open spaces and placement of cuspids in lateral incisor area to avoid implant placement in maxillary anterior region. Temporary rehabilitation phase, using resin injected tray and removable partial denture, has been placed to maintain mesiodistal dimensions and restore aesthetic during pre-implant analysis and osseointegration. Once osseointegration was fully obtained, keratinized tissue augmentation has been obtained using connective tissue graft. Then, temporary implant fixed crowns allowed soft tissue modeling during interim rehabilitation. Finally, screw-retained permanent crowns were placed to fully restore aesthetic and function. This case goal was to optimize final results and reach patient complete satisfaction using orthodontic treatment combined with implant rehabilitation, and coupled with interdisciplinary management and well-time sequencing treatment.

Bonding Performance of Surface-Treated Zirconia Cantilevered Resin-Bonded Fixed Dental Prostheses: In Vitro Evaluation and Finite Element Analysis

Debonding of zirconia cantilevered resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) remains the main treatment complication, therefore, the present in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of different surface pretreatments on the bonding of zirconia RBFDPs. Eighty milled zirconia maxillary central incisors, with complementary zirconia cantilevered RBFDPs, were randomly subjected to four different surface pretreatments (n = 20): as-machined (AM); airborne-particle abraded (APA); coated with nanostructured alumina coating (NAC); incisor air-abraded and RBFDP coated (NAC_APA). After bonding, half of each group (n = 10) was stored in deionized water (150 days/37 °C), thermocycled (37,500 cycles, 5-55 °C), and cyclically loaded (50 N/1.2 × 10⁶). Load-bearing capacity (LBC) was determined using a quasi-static test. Additionally, finite element analysis (FEA) and fractography were performed. t-test and one-way ANOVA were used for statistical-analysis. Before aging, the NAC group provided superior LBC to other groups (p < 0.05). After aging, the AM specimens debonded spontaneously, while other groups exhibited comparable LBC (p ˃ 0.05). The FEA results correlated with the in vitro experiment and fractography, showing highly stressed areas in the bonding interface, cement layer, and in RBFDP's retainer wing and connector. The NAC RBFDPs exhibited comparable long-term bonding performance to APA and should be regarded as a zirconia pretreatment alternative to APA.

Management of Hypodontia Patient Using a Transitional Implant: A Case Report

Background

Children with missing anterior teeth have physiological and psychological problems. Out of the many treatment options available, dental implants have advantages in replacing teeth. But, conventional implants in growing individuals are contraindicated due to their osseointegration property. Newer literature suggests transitional implants in growing individuals, which may allow easy removal of requirements in the future.

Case description

A 12-year-old female patient visited the department with esthetic concerns. The orthodontic treatment was carried out to correct the malocclusion. An MS transitional implant was used to rehabilitate the missing maxillary left lateral incisor. After 24 months of follow-up, the transitional implant provided optimal esthetic and patient compliance.

Conclusion

Transitional implant is a possible mode of rehabilitation in children and adolescents with missing teeth. Systematic planning of treatment can lead to desired esthetic and functional results.

How to cite this article

Rathi NV, Baliga S, Thosar NR, et al. Management of Hypodontia Patient Using a Transitional Implant: A Case Report. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(1):186-189.

Impact of maxillofacial growth on implants placed in adults: A narrative review

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of lifetime maxillofacial changes on dental implants placed in adults, analyze the clinical implications of these changes, identify prognostic factors, and offer possible solutions.

OVERVIEW

The relationship between implant placement and maxillofacial changes, occurring during not only the active growth period but also the entire span of adulthood, has not been extensively examined. Vertical differences between implants and adjacent teeth due to the ankylotic behavior of the former might be observed at any age and endanger restoration biologically, functionally, and esthetically. Regarding interproximal contacts, firm contact loss may occur within a few months after restoration, resulting in food impaction. Many prognostic factors have been reported, but most do not exhibit a statistically significant association with implant infraocclusion and interproximal contact loss. Incorporation of alternative solutions, accurate treatment planning, strict recall protocols, and retrievability of implant-supported restorations can facilitate efficient management of complications.

CONCLUSION

Maxillomandibular changes throughout adulthood may lead to complications such as implant infraocclusion and interproximal contact loss. Rehabilitation of edentulism should be characterized by well-designed and flexible treatment plans to resolve long-term complications efficiently. Further long-term clinical studies are needed to identify other risk factors.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Treatment plans for implant therapy should be reconsidered for adults. Careful patient monitoring and early intervention are essential for securing treatment outcomes.

Maxillary space closure using a digital manufactured Mesialslider in a single appointment workflow

New digital technologies, many involving three-dimensional printing, bring benefits for clinical applications. This article reports on the clinical procedure and fabrication of a skeletally anchored mesialization appliance (Mesialslider) using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) for space closure of a congenitally missing lateral incisor in a 12-year-old female patient. The insertion of the mini-implants and appliance was performed in a single appointment. Bodily movement of the molars was achieved using the Mesialslider. Anchorage loss, such as deviation of the anterior midline or palatal tilting of the anterior teeth, was completely avoided. CAD/CAM facilitates safe and precise insertion of mini-implants. Further, mini-implants can improve patient comfort by reducing the number of office visits and eliminating the need for orthodontic bands and physical impressions.

The application of orthodontic bone stretching for correcting malpositioned dental implants

Background

Dental implants are sometimes initially placed in a wrong position leading to esthetic damage, which is difficult to solve with prosthetics. Moreover, implants placed in the anterior sector, like ankylosed teeth, are frequently found in a wrong position over time with infraocclusion because of continuous anterior alveolar growth. Different treatments have been proposed to manage the consequences of malpositioned dental implants.

Case presentation

This paper describes a surgical and orthodontic new procedure that can be used to relocate an implant in a wrong position: the Orthodontic Bone Stretching technique (OBS), which involves deep partial osteotomies combined with heavy orthodontic forces. The applied force facilitates esthetic rehabilitation with a movement towards the occlusal plane and can modify the implant axis and the gingival line alignment. This relocation is made possible thanks to a bone stretching phenomenon in the surgical area without immediate mobilization or repositioning of an alveolar segment. Three cases with the need for implant repositioning are presented here and were treated with the OBS technique.

Conclusion

In the three cases presented, implant relocation was successfully performed with the OBS technique and the prosthetic crown was modified to improve esthetic results.

Influence of nanostructured alumina coating on the clinical performance of zirconia cantilevered resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses: Up to 3-year results of a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The debonding of zirconia cantilevered resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses remains a technical complication because zirconia's chemical inertness impedes adequate surface preparation for bonding. Limited clinical evidence on the performance of various pretreatment methods for the bonding surface of zirconia resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses is available.

PURPOSE

The present prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial aimed at evaluating the performance of zirconia resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses prepared with nanostructured alumina coating.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study adopted a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind (patients, operator) design to compare the performance of nanostructured alumina coating with that of conventional airborne-particle abrasion. Twenty-seven healthy patients needing a replacement of a missing maxillary or mandibular central or lateral incisor were screened and rated to be eligible, and 31 zirconia cantilevered resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses were randomly allocated into 1 of 2 groups. The first group (n=15), where the restoration bonding surface was airborne-particle abraded with 50-μm alumina, served as a control group. In the second group (n=16), the restorations were pretreated with nanostructured alumina coating. Treatment and data collection were standardized. The primary outcome evaluated was the survival of the RBFDPs as defined by the restoration not debonding. The Kaplan-Meier analysis of cumulative survival was performed, and nonparametric tests were used to determine patient-specific differences between both study groups (age, sex, restored arch, tooth replaced, bonding surface area) (α=.05). Retainer wing surfaces of debonded resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses were inspected under a scanning electron microscope.

RESULTS

Within a mean ±standard deviation observation period of 22.4 ±7.7 months (minimum, 8.3; maximum, 37.9 months), 3 debondings occurred, and the survival rate was 90.3%. The survival rate was 93.8% for the nanostructured alumina coating and 86.7% for the control group, with no statistically significant differences (log-rank, P=.54). No patient-specific differences were found between study groups (P>.05). As per the scanning electron micrographs, the majority of the nanostructured alumina-coated surfaces had large areas of nanostructured alumina residue, whereas the airborne-particle abraded surfaces exhibited predominantly adhesive failure with less cement residue.

CONCLUSIONS

Over a mean observation period of 2 years, both zirconia pretreatments showed promising and comparable clinical results; therefore, nanostructured alumina coating could be regarded as a viable alternative pretreatment method to airborne-particle abrasion.

Anterior Esthetic Rehabilitation of an Alveolar Cleft Using Novel Minimally Invasive Prosthodontic Techniques: A Case Report

Missing lateral incisors are the most frequent dental disorder associated with cleft alveolus. When orthodontic closure of the edentulous space is not possible, more aggressive prosthodontic treatments are required. Contemporary resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) represent a promising, time-efficient alternative treatment with fewer biological complications. This clinical report proposes a modified approach to the esthetic rehabilitation of a patient with a complete unilateral cleft lip and palate on the left side and an incomplete cleft lip and alveolar cleft on the right side. Digital diagnostics, treatment planning, and clinical procedures involved in the fabrication of facially bonded RBFDPs are presented. This modified technique enables the concurrent replacement of lateral incisors and correction of the malformed central incisors as well as increasing the retention of the restorations.

Clinical outcome of metal- and all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate the long-term outcome of metal- and all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prosthesis (RBFDP) up to 17 years, and to evaluate potential factors influencing the risk for complications.

METHODS

Patients who were treated with RBFDP to replace teeth in the anterior or first premolar region in an university setting were identified from electronic records. Data collection comprised dental and periodontal parameters, periapical radiographs, and assessment of the RBFDP. Patient-reported satisfaction was evaluated on visual analog scales (VAS), and 5-year cumulative survival and success rates were calculated. Cox regression models were used to compare metal- versus all-ceramic RBFDPs.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients with RBFDP replacing 65 anterior teeth and 6 premolars were included with a mean observation period of 56.1 (±42.7) months. RBFDP cumulative survival rate was 86.7% and cumulative success rate 71.7% after 5 years, with no significant difference between metal-and all-ceramic RBFDPs. The risk for RBFDP failure was significantly higher with more than one pontic (OR 6.1; p=0.033), or negative pulp vitality testing of abutments (OR 7.3; p=0.042), while complications tended to be increased with two-wings compared to one-wing RBFDP (OR 5.4; p=0.054).

CONCLUSIONS

Metal- and all-ceramic RBFDPs facilitated good long-term results, particularly with one-wing, one-cantilever, and vital abutment teeth.

Adverse Effects of Implants in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To determine the evidence on the adverse effects of placing dental implants in healthy growing children.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic search was conducted in five electronic databases: PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane, EBSCO host, ProQuest. Studies on implants placed in children below the age of 19 years, with loss of tooth either due to trauma or caries were included, whereas, studies on mini implants and implants placed due to congenital absence of teeth were excluded. The articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were analyzed based on the predetermined criteria of success.

RESULTS

A total of 8 publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All the included articles were case reports/series, involving a total of 16 implants (15 maxillary, one mandibular) in 11 adolescents (7 boys and 4 girls). The age of implant placement ranged between ten to 17 years with a mean age of 13.4 years and the follow up period, 4.5 months to 13 years. Pain, paresthesia, mobility or peri-implant radiolucency was not reported in any case report, indicating good integration. Radiographic crestal bone loss, probing depth and implant esthetics were not mentioned. The infraocclusion was not reported in 5 cases (age: 11-17 years, follow up: 4.5 months-two years), however, it was an adverse effect in 6 cases (age: ten-17 years, follow up: three-13 years).

CONCLUSION

There is insufficient evidence to contradict the placement of dental implants in healthy growing children; the only reported adverse event is infraocclusion, the management of which too is discussed. However, as all the data is from case reports, the result should be interpreted with caution. Therefore, well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to address this gap in the literature.

The treatment dilemma of missing maxillary lateral incisors-Part II: Implant restoration

OBJECTIVE

This second of a two-part series reviews the single dental implant as the most current treatment alternative for replacement of a missing or lost maxillary lateral incisor. Assessments of dental maturity for implant placement, implant space requirements, surgical and restorative influence on soft tissue profiles, and implant success are reviewed.

OVERVIEW

Recent data indicates that implant success rates are high, and esthetics and soft tissue profiles appear to be stable for maxillary lateral incisor implants. Implant placement should be assessed by dental maturity of the specific patient as opposed to chronological age, and implant spacing should be developed and assessed by all team members.

CONCLUSIONS

Implant replacement of a missing lateral incisor is a predictable treatment mode if implant placement is deferred until dental maturity and then accurately placed in a well-developed site. Treatment involves more complicated planning and execution from team members than other alternatives, but innovations in techniques and materials render it a favorable alternative for lateral incisor replacement.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Implant restoration of a missing or lost maxillary lateral incisor is surgically and restoratively more complex than space closure or a resin-bonded fixed dental prosthesis but demonstrates high success rates and high esthetic potential when team members follow strict treatment protocols.

Esthetic Rehabilitation of Maxillary Anterior Teeth, Including an Immediate Provisionalization with an Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prosthesis

This report describes the case of a patient who required rehabilitation of their maxillary anterior teeth following a traumatic injury through a physical altercation. The decision was made to extract the maxillary central incisors and maxillary right lateral incisor, perform immediate implantation on the maxillary right lateral incisor and left central incisor areas, and place a three-unit immediate provisional restoration. Predesigned virtual teeth enabled efficient fabrication of the immediate provisional restoration following the implant placement. After a sufficient healing period with periodic check-ups, final impressions were made using a digital approach, with meticulous care taken to preserve the gingival architecture around the sites of rehabilitation. Thus, the custom abutments and definitive restoration were placed without eliciting an uncomfortable feeling in the patient. Both esthetic and functional outcomes were satisfactory. Reduced soft tissue volume around the implant restoration was observed, primarily within the two months post-extraction/implantation, based on superimposition of the serial scan data. Soft tissue volume changes in the present case suggest the need for controlled clinical studies of three-dimensional changes of gingival contours after extraction and/or implantation.

[Growth and dental implants: assessment and prevention of the long-term aesthetic risk]

Using implant to replace a tooth is a well known treatment. However, the practitioner must keep in mind that osteointegrated implants behave like ankylosed teeth, and their evolution does not follow the alveolar processes of the adjacent teeth during growth. This growth decreases after 20 years, but remains present. This can lead to infraposition functionally and aesthetically failure for the implant therapy. Risk factors, like patient's age, sex and shape of the face must be evaluated. Most palatal implant positioning and use of screwed prosthetic tooth can permit the infraposition treatment during years of aging.