Bond strength of soft liners to denture base resins and the influence of different surface treatments and thermocycling: A systematic review

Effect of various surface treatments on relining bond strength of CAD-CAM denture base materials

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of various surface treatments and production methods on the shear bond strength (SBS) between reline material and denture base resins.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One-hundred-twenty specimens were produced using conventional heat-polymerization, subtractive, and additive techniques. Each group consisted of 40 specimens. The specimens were divided into four subgroups, each with 10 samples, for surface treatments. These subgroups were: (1) Control-only monomer application, (2) 50 μm airborne-particle abrasion, (3) 110 μm airborne-particle abrasion, and (4) Roughening with tungsten carbide bur. Representative specimens from each subgroup were examined under SEM. Then, auto-polymerized resin was condensed in the center of the specimens. Specimens were subjected to thermal aging (5000 cycles at 5-55°C). The SBS test was conducted and failure loads were recorded. The data were evaluated by two-way ANOVA and Tukey pairwise multiple comparisons method (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

The additively produced group showed significantly lower SBS than conventional and subtractive groups (p < 0.001), with no significant differences between the subtractive and conventional groups. Specimens that underwent monomer application only showed the lowest SBS among surface treatments, while 50 μm airborne-particle abrasion showed the highest SBS. Based on the partial eta-squared analysis results, the surface treatment mainly impacted SBS.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the surface treatment methods, treating denture bases with 50 μm airborne-particle abrasion is more effective for maintaining adhesion, especially in the additive technique.

Effect of soft denture liners on complete denture treatments: A systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review examined the effectiveness of soft denture relining (SDR) materials.

STUDY SELECTION

A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and ICHUSHI was conducted up to July 26, 2020. Target outcomes were patient satisfaction, oral health-related quality of life (OHRQOL), masticatory ability (MA), denture functional duration, residual ridge resorption (RRR), and microbial contamination. An organization specializing in literature searches performed the reference searches, and two reviewers independently selected the literature sources, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. The reviewers resolved any disagreements concerning the assortment of literature sources through discussion. SDR included acrylic- and silicone-based materials, which were evaluated separately.

RESULTS

Reviewers selected 7, 5, 11, 1, 4, and 6 studies to assess patient satisfaction, OHRQOL, MA, functional duration, RRR, and microbial contamination, respectively. The results confirmed that SDR improved patient satisfaction, OHRQOL, MA, and RRR. However, the functional duration of SDR material is shorter than that of hard denture relining (HDR) or acrylic resin material. Furthermore, SDR material is more susceptible to microbial contamination in the long term. The risk of bias for the included studies tended to be high because of specific issues (difficulty in blinding SDR versus HDR).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients who wear complete dentures, SDR often provides beneficial outcomes such as pain reduction and recovery from MA. However, caution should be exercised regarding their use owing to insufficient functional duration and the possibility of microbial contamination during long-term use.

Effect of adhesives and mechanical surface treatments on the hard relining of CAD-CAM denture bases

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of mechanical roughening, adhesive applications, and aging on the bonding between CAD-CAM denture base materials with distinct chemical contents and hard relining material.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 300 denture base specimens were produced by additive, subtractive, and conventional heat-polymerization techniques (N = 100). The specimens have been classified into five subgroups based on the particular surface treatments administered (n = 20): (1) Hard relining material's adhesive application (control); (2) Tungsten carbide bur application for 1 min, and hard reline material's adhesive application; (3) Airborne-particle abrasion (APA) with 110 μm Al2O3, and hard reline material's adhesive application; (4) Scotchbond Universal application; and (5) Visio.link application. Representative specimens from each subgroup were examined under a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Subsequently, self-cure hard relining material was condensed in the center of the specimens. Half of the specimens were thermally aged with 5000 cycles at 5°C-55°C. The shear bond strength (SBS) test was performed, and failure loads were recorded. The data was evaluated by Robust ANOVA and Bonferroni test (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was obtained between the production techniques (p = 0.051). The lowest SBS was observed in the control group among surface treatments, while mechanical surface treatments and universal adhesive showed the highest SBS for both aged and non-aged groups. Aging caused a significant decrease for all test groups (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanical surface treatments and universal adhesive applications are more effective for maintaining adhesion across all production techniques.

Adhesive strength of 3 long-term resilient liners to CAD-CAM denture base polymers and heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate with thermocycling

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technologies have become popular for manufacturing complete dentures. However, the adhesive strength of resilient liners to the polymers used to fabricate CAD-CAM complete dentures is unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the adhesive strength of 3 long-term resilient liners to CAD-CAM denture base polymers and heat-polymerized PMMA with thermocycling.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 90 specimens were fabricated, 30 per group of denture base material (Lucitone 199, Ivo Base CAD, Denture Base LP). For each denture base polymer, 10 specimens were relined with 1 of 3 resilient liners (Permasoft, Mucopren Soft, Molloplast-B). Five specimens of each group were thermocycled, and the other 5 specimens were stored in distilled water. Subsequently, the adhesive strength of the specimens was assessed by tensile testing. The resulting data were analyzed by using a 3-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (α=.05).

RESULTS

After thermocycling, the adhesive strengths of all the resilient liners were found to be statistically different from each other for the same denture base polymer (P≤.012). Mucopren Soft displayed a high mean ±standard deviation adhesive strength to Lucitone 199 (1.78 ±0.32 MPa), followed by Molloplast-B (1.27 ±0.21 MPa) and Permasoft (0.66 ±0.06 MPa). For Ivo Base CAD, Molloplast-B exhibited a high mean ±standard deviation adhesive strength (1.70 ±0.36 MPa), followed by Mucopren Soft (1.11 ±0.16 MPa) and Permasoft (0.53 ±0.04 MPa). Molloplast-B displayed high mean ±standard deviation adhesive strength to Denture Base LP (1.37 ±0.08 MPa), followed by Mucopren Soft (0.68 ±0.20 MPa) and Permasoft (0.32 ±0.04 MPa). The adhesive strength of the majority of resilient liners not exposed to thermocycling was statistically different from each other for the same type of denture base polymer (P<.001). The only exception was the difference between the adhesive strength of Molloplast-B and Mucopren Soft to Lucitone 199 with mean ±standard deviation values of 1.42 ±0.18 and 1.66 ±0.40 MPa, respectively, (P=.067). Without thermocycling, the mean ±standard deviation adhesive strength to Lucitone 199 of Permasoft (0.57 ±0.02 MPa) was statistically different from that of Molloplast-B and Mucopren Soft (P<.001). Molloplast-B displayed a high mean ±standard deviation adhesive strength to Ivo Base CAD (1.83 ±0.25 MPa), followed by Mucopren Soft (1.26 ±0.19 MPa) and Permasoft (0.58 ±0.08 MPa). Molloplast-B displayed a high mean ±standard deviation adhesion to Denture Base LP (1.76 ±0.23 MPa), followed by Mucopren Soft (0.88 ±0.14 MPa) and Permasoft (0.25 ±0.06 MPa). Only Molloplast-B was significantly adversely affected by thermocycling (P=.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Molloplast-B displayed high adhesive strength to both CAD-CAM denture base polymers regardless of the storage conditions. Mucopren Soft displayed high adhesion to Lucitone 199. Permasoft presented moderate adhesion to PMMA-based denture bases and low adhesion to DBLP. Combining Permasoft with Denture Base LP should be considered carefully and limited to short-term use. Thermocycling had a detrimental effect on the adhesive strength of Molloplast-B.

Effect of repair and surface treatments on the strength of digitally fabricated resin-based dental prostheses: A systematic review of in vitro studies

OBJECTIVE

This review investigated the current literature pertaining to the repairability of computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) milled and three-dimensional (3D) printed resin-based dental prostheses (RBDPs) as well as the appropriate surface treatment for each repair material that will produce adequate repair bond strength.

DATA/SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched for published articles involving repair of CAD-CAM RBDPs between January 2010 and June 2023. Data were collected and analyzed to reveal the surface treatment effects, suggested repair materials, and strength of repaired RBDPs.

STUDY SELECTION

Out of 164 retrieved titles, 11 studies were included, of which five investigated the repair of 3D-printed RBDPs, three investigated the repair of CAD-CAM milled resins, and three investigated both materials. Additionally, of the included studies, seven investigated denture base resins, three studied provisional restoration resins, and one evaluated 3D-printed intraoral splints. Various surface treatments were suggested, with air-abrasive methods being the most commonly used. Different materials for resin repair were proposed and used, including auto-polymerized, reline, and composite resins. For 3D-printed resins, repair with Bis-acrylic/Bis-GMA composites improved repair strength.

CONCLUSION

Surface treatments positively affected the repair strength of conventional and milled RBDPs. However, challenges remain relevant to the repair of 3D-printed resins owing to composition mismatches and fabrication techniques. Therefore, further investigation is required to develop new 3D-printed resins.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

CAD-CAM milled resins have satisfactory repair strength, which increases with surface treatment. The repair of 3D-printed resins has proven challenging even with surface treatments. However, composite resins are the materials of choice.

Flexural Strength Analysis of Different Complete Denture Resin-Based Materials Obtained by Conventional and Digital Manufacturing

PMMA (Polymethylmethacrylate) is the material of choice to fabricate denture bases. Recently, with the introduction of CAD-CAM and 3D printers in dentistry, new materials have been proposed for complete denture manufacturing.

AIM

This study compared the flexural strength of different resins fabricated using different technologies (conventional, CAD-CAM-milled, and 3D-printed) and polymerization techniques.

METHODS

A total of 11 different resins were tested: six PMMA conventional (Acrypol R, Acrypol LL, Acrypol HI, Acrypol Fast, Acryself and Acryslef P), two milled obtained from UDMA PMMA disks (Ivotion disk and Aadva disk, control groups), two 3D-printed PMMA resins (NextDent Denture 3D+, and SprintRayEU Denture Base), and one 3D-printed composite resin (GC Temp Print). Flexural strength was measured using a universal testing machine. One-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc tests were performed; the p-value was set at 0.05 to consider statistically significant differences among the groups. Spearman test was used to evaluate the correlation between polymerization technique and the flexural strength of 3D-printed resins.

RESULTS

CAD-CAM-milled specimens showed the highest flexural strength (107.87 MPa for UDMA) followed by 3D-printed composite resins (102.96 MPa). Furthermore, 3D-printed resins polymerized for 40 min with the BB cure unit showed no statistically significant differences with conventional resin groups. Moreover, in all the 3D-printed specimens, a high correlation between polymerization technique and flexural strength was found.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of flexural strength, the polymerization technique is a determinant for both acrylic and composite resins. Temp Print can be a potential alternative to fabricating removable dentures and showed promising results when used in combination with pink color resin powder.

CAD-CAM complete denture resins: Effect of relining on the shear bond strength

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of relined CAD-CAM complete removable dental prosthesis (CRDP) resins with conventional heat-polymerized polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) resin.

METHODS

A total of 96 resin specimens in identical dimensions of 10 mm × 10 mm × 11 mm were fabricated for four study groups [#1- Conventional heat-polymerized group: n=24 (ProBase); #2- Milled#1: n=24 (Ivobase); #3- Milled#2: n=24 (Ivotion); #4- 3D-printed: n=24, (NextDent Denture 3D+)]. Twelve specimens in each group were sectioned in the middle to produce a 3 mm defect and then were relined using a conventional denture relining material. All specimens underwent thermocycling (5-55°C) for 10,000 cycles. The shear bond tests were carried out in a universal testing machine. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's test were used for statistical analysis (p<0.05). The two-parameter Weibull distribution values were calculated.

RESULTS

Relined 3D-printed specimens had a significantly lower shear bond strength when compared with conventional (p=0.0003) and milled groups (Milled#1: p=0.0004; Milled#2: p<0.0001). There were no differences in the shear bond strengths between the milled and conventional groups. Weibull distribution presented the highest shape value for the non-relined Milled#1 (22.83) group and the lowest values for the 3D-printed relined group (4.001).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study conclude that the shear bond strength of the conventionally-relined 3D-printed resins used for fabricating CRDPs was inferior to the shear bond strength of conventionally-relined resins employed for manufacturing CRDPs using CAD-CAM milling and conventional heat-polymerization techniques.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

When considering 3D-printing for the fabrication of CRDPs, it is recommended to employ it in clinical situations where a frequent need for denture relining is not expected.

Soft Denture Liner Adhesion to Conventional and CAD/CAM Processed Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Acrylic Denture Resins-An In-Vitro Study

This study aimed to evaluate the airborne-particle abrasion surface treatment effects on the tensile bond strength (TBS) between resilient denture liner and CAD/CAM or conventional heat polymerized poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) acrylic denture resins. A total of 48 dumbbell-shaped specimens (70 mm in total length, and 12 mm and 7 mm in diameter at the thickest and thinnest section, respectively) were prepared from CAD/CAM and conventional acrylic resins. Before relining with denture liner, 12 specimens from each material were surface-treated by 110 µm Al₂O₃ airborne-particle abrasion, and the remaining specimens served as control (no treatment). Following relining, all the specimens were aged by thermal cycling (1000 cycles, 5–55 °C). The TBS of denture liner to acrylic denture resins was tested in a universal testing apparatus at a 5 mm/min crosshead speed. The debonded surfaces were visually examined for the failure modes. ANOVA and multiple comparisons posthoc analysis tests were applied to determine the significant difference in TBS between the study groups (α = 0.05). A significant difference in TBS was observed between the control and surface treated groups (p < 0.001) for both acrylic resins materials. However, there was no statistically significant difference in bond strength between the acrylic resins materials (p = 0.739). Surface treatment with airborne-particle abrasion demonstrated increased TBS of the soft denture liners to acrylic resins. The TBS of conventional and CAD/CAM acrylic resins to soft denture liners were not considerably different.

Annual review of selected scientific literature: A report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry

The Scientific Investigation Committee of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry offers this review of the 2020 professional literature in restorative dentistry to inform busy dentists regarding noteworthy scientific and clinical progress over the past year. Each member of the committee brings discipline-specific expertise to this work to cover this broad topic. Specific subject areas addressed include prosthodontics; periodontics, alveolar bone, and peri-implant tissues; implant dentistry; dental materials and therapeutics; occlusion and temporomandibular disorders (TMDs); sleep-related breathing disorders; oral medicine and oral and maxillofacial surgery; and dental caries and cariology. The authors focused their efforts on reporting information likely to influence day-to-day dental treatment decisions with a keen eye on future trends in the profession. With the tremendous volume of dentistry and related literature being published today, this review cannot possibly be comprehensive. The purpose is to update interested readers and provide important resource material for those interested in pursuing greater detail. It remains our intent to assist colleagues in navigating the extensive volume of important information being published annually. It is our hope that readers find this work useful in successfully managing the dental patients they encounter.

Evaluation of Tensile Bonding Strength of Permanent Soft Relining Material to Denture Base Acrylic Resin after Erbium:Yttrium- Aluminum-Garnet Laser Treatment - An in vitro Study

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to assess the effectiveness of erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser surface pretreatment at various pulse durations of exposure on increasing the tensile bonding strength of permanent soft relining material and acrylic resin.

Materials and Methods

Polymethyl methacrylate resin samples were fabricated and grouped as comparison group (no laser surface pretreatment) and three test groups (received Er:YAG laser surface pretreatment at various pulse durations of 10 s, 20 s, and 30 s) for bonding with the permanent soft relining material, Molloplast B. Following the surface pretreatment, the samples were tested for tensile stress using a universal testing machine. Loads at the point of failure were noted and the tensile bond strength values were obtained. Parametric tests of one-way-ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests were done.

Results

The highest tensile bonding strength was recorded in Group C, and the control group recorded the lowest bonding strength.

Conclusion

Er:YAG laser surface pretreatment at 10 Hz, 3 W, and 300 mJ for 30 s improved the bonding strength of the permanent soft relining material to heat-processed acrylic resin material.

Repairability of a 3D printed denture base polymer: Effects of surface treatment and artificial aging on the shear bond strength

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to evaluate the repairability of a 3D printed denture base material. The effects of surface treatments and artificial aging on the shear bond strength (SBS) were investigated.

METHODS

A total of 224 specimens were printed by digital light processing technology (Rapid Shape D30II) using a 3D printing denture base material (FREEPRINT denture). To evaluate the repairability, the SBS and failure modes were measured after surface treatment and artificial aging. Specifically, half of the specimens were further performed with thermocycling (5-55 °C, 5000 cycles) for artificial aging. The aged and non-aged specimens were further divided into four subgroups (n = 28) to simulate a denture base repair with one of the following treatments: control (without surface treatment), monomer (applying methylmethacrylate for 120 s), P600 (grinding with P600 silicon carbide paper) and sandblasting (blasted with 125 μm aluminum oxide with 2 bar), respectively. Surface roughness was measured (n = 6) and surface topography was observed by scanning electron microscopy (n = 2). A test rod was built on the sample surface using the same 3D printing material. Afterward, all specimens further underwent thermocycling (5-55 °C, 10,000 cycles).

RESULTS

For non-aged groups, no significant differences in SBS could be found (p < 0.05), and bondings failed cohesively in the denture base material. Regarding the aged control and monomer group, adhesive failures at the interface were primarily observed, and SBS values were statistically lower than those of the other groups (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D printed denture base material exhibited favorable repairability. For the realignment surface, the SBS at the bonding interface is satisfying and additional surface treatments could be not necessary. In contrast, the aged surface could significantly decrease the SBS; hence subtractive surface treatments are highly recommended.