Stromal tumors of the lower female genital tract: Histogenetic, morphological and immunohistochemical similarities with the “Benign Spindle Cell Tumors of the Mammary Stroma”

Practical Approach to the Diagnosis of the Vulvo-Vaginal Stromal Tumors: An Overview

Background: The category of the “stromal tumors of the lower female genital tract” encompasses a wide spectrum of lesions with variable heterogeneity, which can be nosologically classified on the basis of their morphologic and immunohistochemical profiles as deep (aggressive) angiomyxoma (DAM), cellular angiofibroma (CAF), angiomyofibroblastoma (AMFB) or myofibroblastoma (MFB). Despite the differential diagnosis between these entities being usually straightforward, their increasingly recognized unusual morphological variants, along with the overlapping morphological and immunohistochemical features among these tumours, may raise serious differential diagnostic problems. Methods and Results: The data presented in the present paper have been retrieved from the entire published literature on the PubMed website about DAM, CAF, AFMB and MFB from 1984 to 2021. The selected articles are mainly represented by small-series, and, more rarely, single-case reports with unusual clinicopathologic features. The present review focuses on the diagnostic clues of the stromal tumours of the lower female genital tract to achieve a correct classification. The main clinicopathologic features of each single entity, emphasizing their differential diagnostic clues, are discussed and summarized in tables. Representative illustrations, including the unusual morphological variants, of each single tumour are also provided. Conclusion: Awareness by pathologists of the wide morphological and immunohistochemical spectrum exhibited by these tumours is crucial to achieve correct diagnoses and to avoid confusion with reactive conditions or other benign or malignant entities.

Potential Diagnostic Pitfalls in Evaluating Immunohistochemistry for Cervical Myofibroblastomas

Cervicovaginal myofibroblastoma (CVM) is a rare benign mesenchymal tumor of the lower female genital tract that shows chromosomal loss of 13q14 (RB1 gene located in this region). The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of immunohistochemistry (IHC) for desmin, CD34, and Rb in diagnosing CVM. All cervical polyps diagnosed from July 2016 to July 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Cases showing morphologic myofibroblastic differentiation were evaluated by IHC for desmin, CD34, and Rb. Desmin and CD34 staining was recorded as positive or negative. Rb nuclear staining was graded as follows: 0 (<10%), 1 (10%-25%), 2 (>25%-50%), 3 (>50%-75%), or 4 (>75%). Intact nuclear expression of Rb in endothelial cells served as an internal positive control. IHC was performed on 76 cases with 14 excluded from the final cohort due to poor Rb internal control. A total of 61/62 (98.4%) cases were positive for desmin and CD34 with the following Rb distribution: grade 0 (n=53, 86.9%), grade 1 (n=5, 8.2%), grade 2 (n=2, 3.3%), and grade 3 (n=1, 1.6%). One case negative for desmin and CD34 showed grade 3 Rb staining. Upon rereview of the histology, 7/175 cases (4%) were morphologically and immunohistochemically compatible with CVM (desmin and CD34+ grade 0 Rb staining). CVM is a rare and under-recognized entity (4% of cervical polyps) for which morphology remains the mainstay of diagnosis. IHC reliance serves as a potential diagnostic pitfall as 86.9% of cases showing myofibroblastic differentiation demonstrated the staining pattern of desmin and CD34 positivity and Rb deficiency.

Immunohistochemical Expression of Wilms’ Tumor 1 Protein in Human Tissues: From Ontogenesis to Neoplastic Tissues

The human Wilms’ tumor gene (WT1) was originally isolated in a Wilms’ tumor of the kidney as a tumor suppressor gene. Numerous isoforms of WT1, by combination of alternative translational start sites, alternative RNA splicing and RNA editing, have been well documented. During human ontogenesis, according to the antibodies used, anti-C or N-terminus WT1 protein, nuclear expression can be frequently obtained in numerous tissues, including metanephric and mesonephric glomeruli, and mesothelial and sub-mesothelial cells, while cytoplasmic staining is usually found in developing smooth and skeletal cells, myocardium, glial cells, neuroblasts, adrenal cortical cells and the endothelial cells of blood vessels. WT1 has been originally described as a tumor suppressor gene in renal Wilms’ tumor, but more recent studies emphasized its potential oncogenic role in several neoplasia with a variable immunostaining pattern that can be exclusively nuclear, cytoplasmic or both, according to the antibodies used (anti-C or N-terminus WT1 protein). With the present review we focus on the immunohistochemical expression of WT1 in some tumors, emphasizing its potential diagnostic role and usefulness in differential diagnosis. In addition, we analyze the WT1 protein expression profile in human embryonal/fetal tissues in order to suggest a possible role in the development of organs and tissues and to establish whether expression in some tumors replicates that observed during the development of tissues from which these tumors arise.

Mammary Myofibroblastoma with Unusual Morphological and Immunohistochemical Features

Mammary myofibroblastoma (MFB) is a rare mesenchymal tumor, derived from mammary stromal fibro/myofibroblasts, which has various morphological features and characteristic immunohistochemical staining. The epithelioid morphologic variant is defined, accordingly, as a proliferation of exclusively or predominantly (>50%) epithelioid cells, variably embedded in a myxoid to fibrous stroma. These histological and cytological features may pose a diagnostic challenge mainly with metaplastic carcinoma and invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Thus, immunohistochemical staining by myofibroblastic markers is helpful for confirming diagnosis. Herein, we present a case of MFB in a 43-year-old female. This case report emphasizes the role of immunohistochemistry as gold standard in the diagnosis of MFB. This case is also being presented because of its unusual radiologic findings, its epithelioid histologic variant mimicking malignancy, and its uncommon immunohistochemical phenotype.

Wilms' tumor protein (WT1) in mammary myofibroblastoma: an immunohistochemical study

Wilms' tumor protein (WT1) has been immunohistochemically detected in the cytoplasm of some developing, adult normal and neoplastic human tissues, suggesting its complex regulator activity in transcriptional/translational processes. Among neoplastic tissues, WT1 has been documented in the cytoplasm of benign and malignant vascular tumors and in rhabdomyosarcoma, while there are no available studies about its expression in myofibroblastic tumors. Accordingly, we studied immunohistochemically the potential expression of WT1 in mammary myofibroblastoma (MFB), a prototypical myofibroblastic tumor. A series of 18 cases of mammary MFB, including several morphological variants (classic, fibrotic, myxoid, lipomatous, Schwannian-like, and epithelioid variants), were tested with antibodies against the N-terminal of WT1. The most striking finding was a diffuse and strong WT1 cytoplasmic immunostaining restricted to the "epithelioid cell MFB", a rare and diagnostically challenging variant. Conversely the other variants of MFB, including the classic-type, were negative or only focally positive. The present study shows that mammary epithelioid cell MFB should be added to the list of mesenchymal tumors which express WT1 in the cytoplasm of neoplastic cells. Accordingly, we suggest that the detection of WT1 cytoplasmic immunoreactivity is of complementary diagnostic value to conventional myofibroblastic markers in identifying epithelioid cell myofibroblastoma.

Mammary Myofibroblastoma: A Tumor With a Wide Morphologic Spectrum

Context.—Myofibroblastoma (MFB) of the breast is an unusual benign tumor that belongs to the family of the “benign spindle cell tumors of the mammary stroma.” The name MFB reflects its cellular composition, comprising mainly stromal cells with fibromyofibroblastic and, less frequently, myoid differentiation. Since the original description, the morphologic spectrum of MFB has been expanded by the recognition of several unusual morphologic variants, such as the cellular, infiltrative, epithelioid, deciduoid-like, lipomatous, collagenized/fibrous, and myxoid variants.

Objective.—To review the literature on mammary MFB, discussing the main clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features helpful for diagnosis. Since MFB may show alarming morphologic features, which can lead to a misdiagnosis of malignancy, histologic figures of this tumor, including its more unusual variants, are provided to offer pathologists a practical approach to a correct diagnosis. Histogenesis and pathogenesis of this tumor are also proposed.

Data Sources.—Clinicopathologic data on MFB were extracted from all identified articles through PUB Medline– based research. Histologic figures have been taken from the personal archive of the author.

Conclusions.—The incidence of MFB diagnosis has increased in recent years, likely due to the mammographic screening. Accordingly, this unusual benign tumor may represent a potential diagnostic pitfall, especially when interpreting fine-needle aspiration and/or needle core biopsy. Pathologists should be aware of the wide morphologic spectrum exhibited by MFB to avoid a misdiagnosis of malignancy.