Small-cell carcinoma-associated ovarian mucinous carcinoma: A case report and literature review

Neuroendocrine Marker Expression in Primary Non-neuroendocrine Epithelial Tumors of the Ovary: A Study of 551 Cases

Expression of neuroendocrine (NE) markers in primary ovarian non-NE epithelial tumors has rarely been evaluated. The aim of our study was to evaluate the expression of the most widely used NE markers in these neoplasms and to determine any prognostic significance of NE marker expression. The cohort consisted of 551 primary ovarian tumors, including serous borderline tumors, low-grade serous carcinomas, high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC), clear cell carcinomas, endometroid carcinomas, mucinous borderline tumors, and mucinous carcinomas. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed using antibodies against INSM1, synaptophysin, chromogranin, and CD56 on tissue microarray. Positivity for INSM1, synaptophysin, chromogranin, and CD56 was most frequently observed in mucinous tumors (48.7%, 26.0%, 41.5%, and 100%, respectively). The positivity for these NE markers was mostly restricted to nonmucinous elements distributed throughout the tumor. The mucinous borderline tumor and mucinous carcinomas groups had similar proportions of positivity (mucinous borderline tumor: 53%, mucinous carcinomas: 39%). In the other tumor types, except for HGSC, there was only focal expression (5%-10%) or negativity for NE markers. HGSC showed high CD56 expression (in 26% of cases). Survival analysis was only performed for CD56 in HGSC as this was the only group with sufficient positive cases, and it showed no prognostic significance. Except for mucinous tumors, expression of NE markers in non-NE ovarian epithelial tumors is low. CD56 expression in HGSC occurs frequently but is without diagnostic or prognostic value.

Prognosis comparison between small cell carcinoma of ovary and high-grade serous ovarian cancer: A retrospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Small cell carcinoma of ovary (SCCO) is a rare and aggressive cancer primarily reported in the form of case reports. Due to limited epidemiological and prognostic analyses based on large populations, SCCO has varied considerably without prognostic models and a recognized first-line treatment strategy. The study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics, treatment methods, and prognosis of SCCO and high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), the most prevalent subtype of ovarian cancer, in a large sample and develop a predictive model for these two subtypes.

METHODS

Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program were analyzed for patients with SCCO or HGSOC from 2000 to 2017. Clinical, demographic, and treatment characteristics were compared between the two groups. Propensity-score matching, Cox risk regression analysis, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to assess the data. Finally, a nomogram was developed to predict the patient survival time.

RESULTS

A total of 32,185 women, including 31,979 (99.4%) diagnosed with HGSOC and 206 (0.6%) diagnosed with SCCO, were identified. Age ≤ 51 years, single, median house income less than $70,000, early stage, and unilateral disease were more common characteristics of patients with SCCO than those with HGSOC. Patients with SCCO were more likely to receive radiotherapy (6.8% vs. 0.8%, p <0.001) and have tumors ≥ 141 mm (38.3% vs. 9.7%, p <0.001) than patients with HGSOC. The independent risk factors for SCCO patients included older age at diagnosis, advanced stage, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, larger tumor size, and bilateral tumor. Overall and cancer-specific survival rates were significantly lower for SCCO than more malignant HGSOC. Prognostic models and nomograms had been constructed to predict the individual survival rates of patients with SCCO and HGSOC.

CONCLUSION

Patients with SCCO presented with the early-stage disease more frequently than patients with HGSOC and had decreased overall and cancer-specific survival rates.

A Rare Presentation of Dual Ovarian Pathologies: Small Cell Carcinoma of the Ovary and Mucinous Ovarian Cancer

The small cell carcinoma of ovaries co-occurring with mucinous ovarian cancer is a rare event. We report a 21-years-old lady with a composite tumour comprising small cell carcinoma and mucinous carcinoma of ovaries. The incidental finding of the left ovarian cyst led to further workup and revealed a solid cystic mass in the left adnexal area pathologically proven to be mucinous ovarian carcinoma. The initial surgery was deferred upon the patient's request. After a few more cycles of chemotherapy, at the completion of surgery as per ovarian protocol, the pathological evaluation showed small cell carcinoma in the left ovary with a residual focus of mucinous carcinoma.

In contrast, the right ovary also showed surface deposits of small cell carcinoma. The patient's clinical condition deteriorated very rapidly after that, and she passed away. Early recognition of small cell carcinoma in a composite tumour is critically essential for timely intervention.