Analysis of setup uncertainties for extremity sarcoma patients using surface imaging

Data-Driven Volumetric Computed Tomography Image Generation From Surface Structures Using a Patient-Specific Deep Leaning Model

PURPOSE

Optical surface imaging presents radiation-dose-free and noninvasive approaches for image guided radiation therapy, allowing continuous monitoring during treatment delivery. However, it falls short in cases where correlation of motion between body surface and internal tumor is complex, limiting the use of purely surface guided surrogates for tumor tracking. Relying solely on surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) may not ensure accurate intrafractional monitoring. This work aims to develop a data-driven framework, mitigating the limitations of SGRT in lung cancer radiation therapy by reconstructing volumetric computed tomography (CT) images from surface images.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a retrospective analysis involving 50 patients with lung cancer who underwent radiation therapy and had 10-phase 4-dimensional CT (4DCT) scans during their treatment simulation. For each patient, we used 9 phases of 4DCT images for patient-specific model training and validation, reserving 1 phase for testing purposes. Our approach employed a surface-to-volume image synthesis framework, harnessing cycle-consistency generative adversarial networks to transform surface images into volumetric representations. The framework was extensively validated using an additional 6-patient cohort with resimulated 4DCT.

RESULTS

The proposed technique has produced accurate volumetric CT images from the patient's body surface. In comparison with the ground truth CT images, those generated synthetically by the proposed method exhibited the gross tumor volume center of mass difference of 1.72 ± 0.87 mm, the overall mean absolute error of 36.2 ± 7.0 HU, structural similarity index measure of 0.94 ± 0.02, and Dice score coefficient of 0.81 ± 0.07. Furthermore, the robustness of the proposed framework was found to be linked to respiratory motion.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed approach provides a novel solution to overcome the limitation of SGRT for lung cancer radiation therapy, which can potentially enable real-time volumetric imaging during radiation treatment delivery for accurate tumor tracking without radiation-induced risk. This data-driven framework offers a comprehensive solution to tackle motion management in radiation therapy, without necessitating the rigid application of first principles modeling for organ motion.

Optical Surface-guided Radiation Therapy for Upper and Lower Limb Sarcomas: An Analysis of Setup Errors and Clinical Target Volume-To-Planning Target Volume Margins

Purpose

To assess the clinical benefits of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) in terms of setup error, positioning time, and clinical target volume-to-planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margin in extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

Methods and Materials

Fifty consecutive patients treated with radiation therapy were selected retrospectively. Treatment setup was performed with either laser-based imaging only (control group), or with laser-based and daily optical surface-based imaging (SGRT group). Pretreatment cone beam computed tomography images were acquired daily for the first 3 to 5 fractions and weekly thereafter, with the frequency adjusted as necessary. Translational and rotational errors were collected. CTV-PTV margin was calculated using the formula, 2.5Σ + 0.7σ.

Results

Each group consisted of 10 and 15 upper and lower limb STSs, respectively. For patients with upper limb sarcomas, the translation errors were 1.64 ± 1.34 mm, 1.10 ± 1.50 mm, and 1.24 ± 1.45 mm in the SGRT group, and 1.48 ± 3.16 mm, 2.84 ± 2.85 mm, and 3.14 ± 3.29 mm in control group in the left-right, supero-inferior, and antero-posterior directions, respectively. Correspondingly, for patients with lower limb sarcomas, the translation errors were 1.21 ± 1.65 mm, 1.39 ± 1.71 mm, and 1.48 ± 2.10 mm in the SGRT group, and 1.81 ± 2.60 mm, 2.93 ± 3.28 mm, and 3.53 ± 3.75 mm in control group, respectively. The calculated CTV-PTV margins of the SGRT group and control group were 5.0, 3.8, 4.1 versus 5.9, 9.1, 10.1 mm for upper limb sarcomas; and 4.2, 4.7, 5.2 mm versus 6.3, 9.6, and 11.4 mm for lower limb sarcomas in the left-right, supero-inferior, and antero-posterior directions, respectively.

Conclusions

Daily optical surface guidance can effectively improve the setup accuracy of extremity STS patients, and safely reduce the required CTV-PTV margins.

Utility of a skin marker-less setup procedure using surface-guided imaging: a comparison with the traditional laser-based setup in extremity irradiation

This study aimed to assess the feasibility of a skin marker-less patient setup using a surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) system for extremity radiotherapy. Twenty-five patients who underwent radiotherapy to the extremities were included in this retrospective study. The first group consisted of 10 patients and underwent a traditional setup procedure using skin marks and lasers. The second group comprised 15 patients and had a skin marker-less setup procedure that used an SGRT system only. To compare the two setup procedures for setup accuracy, the mean 3D vector shift magnitude was 0.9 mm for the traditional setup procedure and 0.5 mm for the skin marker-less setup procedure (p < 0.01). In addition, SGRT systems have been suggested to improve the accuracy and reproducibility of patient setups and consistently reduce interfractional setup errors. These results indicate that a skin marker-less patient setup procedure using an SGRT system is useful for extremity irradiation.

Surface guided radiotherapy practice in paediatric oncology: a survey on behalf of the SIOPE Radiation Oncology Working Group

INTRODUCTION

Surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) is increasingly being implemented to track patient's surface movement and position during radiation therapy. However, limited information is available on the SGRT use in paediatrics. The aim of this double survey was to map SIOPE (European Society for Paediatric Oncology)-affiliated centres using SGRT and to gain information on potential indications, observed, or expected benefits.

METHODS

A double online survey was distributed to 246 SIOPE-affiliated radiotherapy (RT) centres. Multiple choices, yes/no, and open answers were included. The first survey (41 questions) was active from February to March 2021. A shortened version (13 questions) was repeated in March 2023 to detect trends in SGRT use within the same community.

RESULTS

Respectively, 76/142 (54%) and 28/142 (20%) responding centres used and planned to use SGRT clinically, including 4/34 (12%) new centres since 2021. Among the SGRT users, 33/76 (43%) already applied this technology to paediatric treatments. The main benefits of improved patient comfort, better monitoring of intrafraction motion, and more accurate initial patient set-up expected by future users did not differ from current SGRT-users (P = .893). Among non-SGRT users, the main hurdles to implement SGRT were costs and time for installation. In paediatrics, SGRT is applied to all anatomical sites.

CONCLUSION

This work provides information on the practice of SGRT in paediatrics across SIOPE-affiliated RT centres which can serve as a basis for departments when considering the purchase of SGRT systems.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Since little information is available in the literature on the use of SGRT in paediatrics, the results of this double survey can serve as a basis for departments treating children when considering the purchase of an SGRT system.

Feasibility of a Novel Surface-Guided Setup Technique to Reproduce Neck Curvature Using two Regions of Interest

PURPOSE

To improve the setup reproducibility of neck curvature using real-time optical surface imaging (OSI) guidance on 2 regions of interest (ROIs) to infer cervical spine (c-spine) curvature for surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) of head-and-neck (HN) and c-spine cancer.

METHODS

A novel SGRT setup approach was designed to reproduce neck curvature with 2 ROIs: upper-chest ROI and open-face ROI. It was hypothesized that the neck curvature could be reproduced if both ROIs were aligned within ±3 mm/2˚ tolerance. This was tested prospectively in 7 volunteers using real-time 3D-OSI guidance and lateral 2D-photography verification after the 3D and 2D references were captured from the initial conventional setup. Real-time SGRT was performed to align chest-ROI and face-ROI, and the longitudinal distance between them was adjustable using a head-support slider. Verification of neck curvature anteriorly and posteriorly was achieved by overlaying edge-extracted lateral pictures. Retrospectively, the relationship between anterior surface and spinal canal alignment was checked in 11 patients using their simulation CT (simCT) and setup cone-beam CT (CBCT). After the anterior surface was rigidly aligned, the spinal canal alignment was checked and quantified using the mean-distance-to-agreement (MDA) and DICE similarity index, and surface-to-spine correlation was calculated.

RESULTS

The reproducibility of neck curvatures using the 2xROI SGRT setup is verified and the mean neck-outline-matching difference is within ±2 mm in lateral photographic overlays. The chest-ROI alignment takes 110 ± 58 s and the face-ROI takes 60 ± 35 s. When the anterior body surface is aligned (MDA = 1.1 ± 0.6 mm, DICE = 0.96 ± 0.02,) the internal spinal canal is also aligned (MDA = 1.0 ± 0.3 mm, DICE = 0.84 ± 0.04) in 11 patients. The surface-to-spine correlation is c = 0.90 (MDA) and c = 0.85 (DICE).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the feasibility of the novel 2-ROI SGRT setup technique to achieve reproducible neck and c-spine curvature regardless of neck visibility and availability as ROI. Staff training is needed to adopt this unconventional SGRT technique to improve patient setup.

Intrafraction Motion Management With MR-Guided Radiation Therapy

High quality radiation therapy requires highly accurate and precise dose delivery. MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT), integrating an MRI scanner with a linear accelerator, offers excellent quality images in the treatment room without subjecting patient to ionizing radiation. MRgRT therefore provides a powerful tool for intrafraction motion management. This paper summarizes different sources of intrafraction motion for different disease sites and describes the MR imaging techniques available to visualize and quantify intrafraction motion. It provides an overview of MR guided motion management strategies and of the current technical capabilities of the commercially available MRgRT systems. It describes how these motion management capabilities are currently being used in clinical studies, protocols and provides a future outlook.

Surface-Guided Patient Setup Versus Traditional Tattoo Markers for Radiation Therapy: Is Tattoo-Less Setup Feasible for Thorax, Abdomen and Pelvis Treatment?

Purpose: In this study, patient setup accuracy was compared between surface guidance and tattoo markers for radiation therapy treatment sites of the thorax, abdomen and pelvis.

Methods and materials: A total of 608 setups performed on 59 patients using both surface-guided and tattoo-based patient setups were analyzed. During treatment setup, patients were aligned to room lasers using their tattoos, and then the six-degree-of-freedom (6DOF) surface-guided offsets were calculated and recorded using AlignRT system. While the patient remained in the same post-tattoo setup position, target localization imaging (radiographic or ultrasound) was performed and these image-guided shifts were recorded. Finally, surface-guided vs tattoo-based offsets were compared to the final treatment position (based on radiographic or ultrasound imaging) to evaluate the accuracy of the two setup methods.

Results: The overall average offsets of tattoo-based and surface-guidance-based patient setups were comparable within 3.2 mm in three principal directions, with offsets from tattoo-based setups being slightly less. The maximum offset for tattoo setups was 2.2 cm vs. 4.3 cm for surface-guidance setups. Larger offsets (ranging from 2.0 to 4.3 cm) were observed for surface-guided setups in 14/608 setups (2.3%). For these same cases, the maximum observed tattoo-based offset was 0.7 cm. Of the cases with larger surface-guided offsets, 13/14 were for abdominal/pelvic treatment sites. Additionally, larger rotations (>3°) were recorded in 18.6% of surface-guided setups. The majority of these larger rotations were observed for abdominal and pelvic sites (~84%).

Conclusions: The small average differences observed between tattoo-based and surface-guidance-based patient setups confirm the general equivalence of the two potential methods, and the feasibility of tattoo-less patient setup. However, a significant number of larger surface-guided offsets (translational and rotational) were observed, especially in the abdominal and pelvic regions. These cases should be anticipated and contingency setup methods planned for.

Advances and potential of optical surface imaging in radiotherapy

This article reviews the recent advancements and future potential of optical surface imaging (OSI) in clinical applications as a four-dimensional (4D) imaging modality for surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT), including OSI systems, clinical SGRT applications, and OSI-based clinical research. The OSI is a non-ionizing radiation imaging modality, offering real-time 3D surface imaging with a large field of view (FOV), suitable for in-room interactive patient setup, and real-time motion monitoring at any couch rotation during radiotherapy. So far, most clinical SGRT applications have focused on treating superficial breast cancer or deep-seated brain cancer in rigid anatomy, because the skin surface can serve as tumor surrogates in these two clinical scenarios, and the procedures for breast treatments in free-breathing (FB) or at deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH), and for cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and radiotherapy (SRT) are well developed. When using the skin surface as a body-position surrogate, SGRT promises to replace the traditional tattoo/laser-based setup. However, this requires new SGRT procedures for all anatomical sites and new workflows from treatment simulation to delivery. SGRT studies in other anatomical sites have shown slightly higher accuracy and better performance than a tattoo/laser-based setup. In addition, radiographical image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is still necessary, especially for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). To go beyond the external body surface and infer an internal tumor motion, recent studies have shown the clinical potential of OSI-based spirometry to measure dynamic tidal volume as a tumor motion surrogate, and Cherenkov surface imaging to guide and assess treatment delivery. As OSI provides complete datasets of body position, deformation, and motion, it offers an opportunity to replace fiducial-based optical tracking systems. After all, SGRT has great potential for further clinical applications. In this review, OSI technology, applications, and potential are discussed since its first introduction to radiotherapy in 2005, including technical characterization, different commercial systems, and major clinical applications, including conventional SGRT on top of tattoo/laser-based alignment and new SGRT techniques attempting to replace tattoo/laser-based setup. The clinical research for OSI-based tumor tracking is reviewed, including OSI-based spirometry and OSI-guided tumor tracking models. Ongoing clinical research has created more SGRT opportunities for clinical applications beyond the current scope.

Evaluation of the detection accuracy of set-up for various treatment sites using surface-guided radiotherapy system, VOXELAN: a phantom study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the detection accuracy of a 3-dimensional (3D) body scanner, VOXELAN, in surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) of each part of the human body using a whole-body human phantom. We used A Resusci Anne was used as the whole-body phantom. The detection accuracy of VOXELAN in a radiotherapy treatment room with a linear accelerator (LINAC) was evaluated for two reference images: reconstruction of the planning computed tomography (CT) image (CT reference) and scanning by VOXELAN before the treatment (scan reference). The accuracy of the translational and rotational directions was verified for four treatment sites (open face shell, breast, abdomen, and arm), using the magnitude of the 6D robotic couch movement as the true value. Our results showed that the detection accuracy improved as the displacement from the reference position decreased for all the sites. Using the scan reference, the average accuracy of the translational and rotational axes was within 1.44 mm and 0.41°, respectively, for all sites except the arms. Similarly, using the CT reference, the average accuracy was within 2.45 mm and 1.35°, respectively. Additionally, it was difficult for both reference images to recognize misalignment of the arms. In conclusion we discovered that VOXELAN achieved a high detection accuracy for the head with an open face shell, chest, and abdomen, indicating that the system is useful in a clinical setting. However, it is necessary to pay attention to location matching for areas with few features, such as surface irregularities and potential errors, when the reference image is created from CT.

AAPM task group report 302: Surface guided radiotherapy

The clinical use of surface imaging has increased dramatically with demonstrated utility for initial patient positioning, real-time motion monitoring, and beam gating in a variety of anatomical sites. The Therapy Physics Subcommittee and the Imaging for Treatment Verification Working Group of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine commissioned Task Group 302 to review the current clinical uses of surface imaging and emerging clinical applications. The specific charge of this task group was to provide technical guidelines for clinical indications of use for general positioning, breast deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) treatment, and frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Additionally, the task group was charged with providing commissioning and on-going quality assurance (QA) requirements for surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) as part of a comprehensive QA program including risk assessment. Workflow considerations for other anatomic sites and for computed tomography (CT) simulation, including motion management are also discussed. Finally, developing clinical applications such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or proton radiotherapy are presented. The recommendations made in this report, which are summarized at the end of the report, are applicable to all video-based SGRT systems available at the time of writing. Review current use of non-ionizing surface imaging functionality and commercially available systems. Summarize commissioning and on-going quality assurance (QA) requirements of surface image-guided systems, including implementation of risk or hazard assessment of surface guided radiotherapy as a part of a total quality management program (e.g., TG-100). Provide clinically relevant technical guidelines that include recommendations for the use of SGRT for general patient positioning, breast DIBH, and frameless brain SRS, including potential pitfalls to avoid when implementing this technology. Discuss emerging clinical applications of SGRT and associated QA implications based on evaluation of technology and risk assessment. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Patient posture correction and alignment using mixed reality visualization and the HoloLens 2

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to develop and preliminarily test a radiotherapy system for patient posture correction and alignment using mixed reality (MixR) visualization. The write-up of this work also provides an opportunity to introduce the concepts and technology of MixR for a medical physics audience who may be unfamiliar with the topic.

METHODS

A MixR application was developed for on optical-see-through head-mounted display (HoloLens 2) allowing a user to simultaneously and directly view a patient and a reference hologram derived from their simulation CT scan. The hologram provides a visual reference for the exact posture needed during treatment and is initialized in relation to the origin of a radiotherapy device using marker-based tracking. The system further provides marker-less tracking that allows the user tofreely navigate the room as they view and align the patient from various angles. The system was preliminarily tested using both a rigid (pelvis) and nonrigid (female mannequin) anthropomorphic phantom. Each phantom was aligned via hologram and accuracy quantified using CBCT and CT.

RESULTS

A fully realized system was developed. Rigid registration accuracy was on the order of 3.0 ± 1.5 mm based on the performance of three users repeating alignment five times each. The lateral direction showed the most variability among users and was associated with the largest off-sets (approximately 2.0 mm). For nonrigid alignment, the MixR setup outperformed a setup based on three-point alignment and setup photos, the latter of which showed a difference in arm position of 2 cm and a torso roll of 6-7°.

CONCLUSIONS

MixR visualization is a rapidly emerging domain that has the potential to significantly impact the field of medicine. The current application is an illustration of this and highlights the advantages of MixR for patient setup in radiation oncology. The key feature of the system is the way in which it transforms nonrigid registration into rigid registration by providing an efficient, portable, and cost-effective mechanism for reproducing patient posture without the use of ionizing radiation. Preliminary estimates of registration accuracy indicate clinical viability and form the foundation for further development and clinical testing.

A retrospective comparison of two different immobilization systems for radiotherapy of extremity soft tissue sarcomas and its influence on CTV-PTV margin

BACKGROUND

On account of extremity wide range of movements and difficulty of reproducibility during irradiation of extremity sarcomas, assorted immobilization strategies are employed to eliminate setup errors. The study purpose was to compare the setup errors of the commonly used immobilization tools and to define planning target volume (PTV) margins for each device.

METHODS

A retrospective review comparing Vac-Loc™ and thermoplastic cast (Tcast) was conducted. On radiotherapy treatment, portal imaging was matched with the pre-treatment simulation imaging for both fixation tools. The isocenter shifts and total vector error (TVE) were compared. Random (σ) and systemic errors (Σ) were computed and PTV margins were defined.

RESULTS

Three hundred seven shifts in each direction measured in 14 patients. Mean displacements for the Vac-Loc™ and Tcast, respectively, were as follow: vertical; -0.01 cm vs. 0.02 cm, longitudinal; 0.03 cm vs. 0.04; lateral; 0.04 cm vs. 0.00 cm and TVE; 0.15 cm vs. 0.17 cm with no significant statistical difference. Random and systemic errors were comparable for both devices. The lateral displacement and rotational random errors were higher Vac-Loc™ compared to Tcast. Overall measured PTV margins were marginally lower for Tcast compared to Vac-Loc™.

CONCLUSION

Vac-Loc™ and Tcast are valid options for immobilization with no clear superiority of either device. The marginal advantage of Tcast warrants further prospective studies.

Prevention of Radiation Therapy Treatment Deviations by a Novel Combined Biometric, Radiofrequency Identification, and Surface Imaging System

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of Varian Identify, a novel combined radiofrequency identification, biometric and surface-matching technology, on its potential for patient safety and prevention of radiation therapy treatment deviations.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One hundred eight radiation therapy treatment deviation reports at our facility over the past 8 years were analyzed. Three major categories were defined based on the time point of occurrence: physician order deviations (19.4%), treatment-planning deviations (24.1%), and machine treatment deviations (56.5%). The impact of Identify on potential prevention of machine treatment deviations was analyzed. A failure mode and effects analysis was performed on the 5 most frequently occurring errors preventable with Identify. Safety analysis of the Identify system was reported based on 3.5 years of clinical data post-Identify system installation on 3 treatment vaults.

RESULTS

Of the 61 machine treatment deviations, 47 (77%) were interpreted as being preventable by using Identify. Our failure mode and effects analysis showed reductions in all risk priority numbers post-Identify application. Safety analysis of the Identify system from our direct observation that for approximately 7 cumulative years of Identify use in 3 different treatment vaults, where 9 deviations would have been expected to occur over this combined period, zero machine treatment events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of Identify biometric, radiofrequency identification, and surface-matching technologies was observed to enable an effective process for enhancing safety and efficiency of radiation therapy treatment. A significant reduction in machine-related deviations was observed.

Assessment of the use of different imaging and delivery techniques for cranial treatments on the Halcyon linac

Purpose

In this work, we investigated the effect on the workflow and setup accuracy of using surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) for patient setup, megavoltage cone beam CT (MVCBCT) or kilovoltage cone beam CT (kVCBCT) for imaging and fixed IMRT or volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for treatment delivery with the Halcyon linac.

Methods

We performed a retrospective investigation of 272 treatment fractions, using three different workflows. The first and second workflows used MVCBCT and fixed IMRT for imaging and treatment delivery, and the second one also used SGRT for patient setup. The third workflow used SGRT for setup, kVCBCT for imaging and VMAT for delivery. Workflows were evaluated by comparing the number of fractions requiring repeated imaging acquisitions and the time required for setup, imaging and treatment delivery. Setup position accuracy was assessed by comparing the daily kV‐ or MV‐ CBCT with the planning CT and measuring the residual rotational errors for pitch, yaw and roll angles.

Results

Without the use of SGRT, the imaging fields were delivered more than once on 11.1% of the fractions, while re‐imaging was necessary in 5.5% of the fractions using SGRT. The total treatment time, including setup, imaging, and delivery, for the three workflows was 531 ± 157 s, 503 ± 130 s and 457 ± 91 s, respectively. A statistically significant difference was observed when comparing the third workflow with the first two. The total residual rotational errors were 1.96 ± 1.29°, 1.28 ± 0.67° and 1.22 ± 0.76° and statistically significant differences were observed when comparing workflows with and without SGRT.

Conclusions

The use of SGRT allowed for a reduction of re‐imaging during patient setup and improved patient position accuracy by reducing residual rotational errors. A reduction in treatment time using kVCBCT with SGRT was observed. The most efficient workflow was the one including kVCBCT and SGRT for setup and VMAT for delivery.

Long-time clinical experience in patient setup for several particle therapy clinical indications: management of patient positioning and evaluation of setup reproducibility and stability

OBJECTIVE

Accurate patient positioning is crucial in particle therapy due to the geometrical selectivity of particles. We report and discuss the National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO) experience in positioning accuracy and stability achieved with solid thermoplastic masks fixed on index base plates and assessed by daily orthogonal X-ray imaging.

METHODS

Positioning data were retrospectively collected (between 2012 and 2018) and grouped according to the treated anatomical site. 19696 fractions of 1325 patients were evaluated.The study was designed to assess:(i) the number of fractions in which a single correction vector was applied(SCV);(ii) the number of fractions in which further setup verification was performed (SV);(iii) the number of fractions in which SV lead to an additional correction within (MCV<5min) or after (MCV>5min) 5 minutes from the first setup correction;(iv) the systematic (Σ) and random (σ) error components of the correction vectors applied.

RESULTS

A SCV was applied in 71.5% of fractions, otherwise SV was required. In 30.6% of fractions with SV, patient position was not further revised. In the remaining fractions, MCV<5min and MCV>5min were applied mainly in extracranial and cranial sites respectively.Interfraction Σ was ≤ 1.7 mm/0.7° and σ was ≤ 1.2 mm/0.6° in cranial sites while in extracranial sites Σ was ≤ 5.5 mm/0.9° and σ was ≤4.4 mm/0.9°. Setup residuals were submillimetric in all sites. In cranial patients, maximum intrafractional Σ was 0.8 mm/0.4°.

CONCLUSION

This report extensively quantifies inter- and intrafraction setup accuracy on an institutional basis and confirms the need of image guidance to fully benefit from the geometrical selectivity of particles.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The reported analysis provides a board institutional data set on the evaluation of patient immobilization and bony anatomy alignment for several particle therapy clinical indications.

A service evaluation of on-line image-guided radiotherapy to lower extremity sarcoma: Investigating the workload implications of a 3 mm action level for image assessment and correction prior to delivery

INTRODUCTION

Although all systematic and random positional setup errors can be corrected for in entirety during on-line image-guided radiotherapy, the use of a specified action level, below which no correction occurs, is also an option. The following service evaluation aimed to investigate the use of this 3 mm action level for on-line image assessment and correction (online, systematic set-up error and weekly evaluation) for lower extremity sarcoma, and understand the impact on imaging frequency and patient positioning error within one cancer centre.

METHODS

All patients were immobilised using a thermoplastic shell attached to a plastic base and an individual moulded footrest. A retrospective analysis of 30 patients was performed. Patient setup and correctional data derived from cone beam CT analysis was retrieved. The timing, frequency and magnitude of corrections were evaluated. The population systematic and random error was derived.

RESULTS

20% of patients had no systematic corrections over the duration of treatment, and 47% had one. The maximum number of systematic corrections per course of radiotherapy was 4, which occurred for 2 patients. 34% of episodes occurred within the first 5 fractions. All patients had at least one observed translational error during their treatment greater than 0.3 cm, and 80% of patients had at least one observed translational error during their treatment greater than 0.5 cm. The population systematic error was 0.14 cm, 0.10 cm, 0.14 cm and random error was 0.27 cm, 0.22 cm, 0.23 cm in the lateral, caudocranial and anteroposterial directions. The required Planning Target Volume margin for the study population was 0.55 cm, 0.41 cm and 0.50 cm in the lateral, caudocranial and anteroposterial directions.

CONCLUSION

The 3 mm action level for image assessment and correction prior to delivery reduced the imaging burden and focussed intervention on patients that exhibited greater positional variability. This strategy could be an efficient deployment of departmental resources if full daily correction of positional setup error is not possible.

Evaluation of a surface imaging system's isocenter calibration methods

AlignRT is a surface imaging system that has been utilized for localizing and tracking patient position during radiotherapy. AlignRT has two calibration procedures that can set the system's isocenter called “Monthly Calibration” (MC) and “Isocentre Calibration” (IC). The MC utilizes a calibration plate. In addition to the calibration plate, the IC utilizes a cubic phantom that is imaged with the linac treatment beam to aid in aligning the AlignRT and treatment‐beam isocenters. This work evaluated the effects of misaligning the calibration plate during the calibration process. The plate was intentionally shifted away from isocenter ±3.0 mm in the longitudinal and lateral directions and ±1.0 mm in the longitudinal, lateral, and vertical directions. A mock stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment was used to evaluate the effects of the miscalibrations. An anthropomorphic head phantom was placed in an SRS treatment position and monitored with the AlignRT system. The AlignRT‐indicated offsets were recorded at 270°, 315°, 0°, 45°, and 90° couch angles for each intentional misalignment of the calibration plate during the MC. The IC was also performed after each miscalibration, and the measurements were repeated and compared to the previous results. With intentional longitudinal and lateral shifts of ±3.0 mm and ±1.0 mm of the calibration plate, the average indicated offsets at couch rotations of ±90° were 4.3 mm and 1.6 mm, respectively. This was in agreement with the theoretical offset of √2*(shift‐of‐the‐calibration plate). Since vertical shifts were along the rotation axis of the couch, these shifts had little effect on the offsets with changing couch angle. When the IC was applied, the indicated offsets were all within 0.5 mm for all couch angles for each of the miscalibrations. These offsets were in agreement with the known magnitude of couch walkout. The IC method effectively removes the potential miscalibration artifacts of the MC method due to misalignments of the calibration plate.

Dosimetric comparison of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy and impact of setup errors in lower limb sarcoma radiation therapy

PURPOSE

This study compared dosimetric data between 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans in a population of patients with lower limb sarcoma immobilized with an in-house device and quantified the impact of systematic and random errors on these techniques. The dosimetric effects of displacements on target coverage and organs at risk (OARs) were considered.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Plans were created for 11 postoperative patients using both 3DCRT and IMRT. The techniques were compared dosimetrically. Population-based systematic and random errors were applied and the results compared with the initial plans.

RESULTS

Higher target D95, D2, D98, and D50 and the best homogeneity index resulted with IMRT compared with 3DCRT. Systematic errors increased target D2 in IMRT. Random errors decreased target homogeneity in IMRT. Maximum bone dose was higher in IMRT than in 3DCRT. Neither error type increased OAR dose for either technique.

CONCLUSIONS

IMRT could become the favored lower limb sarcoma radiation therapy technique because of superior target coverage and homogeneity. Offline imaging can adequately correct for systematic errors in these patients when an in-house immobilization device is used.

Can surface imaging improve the patient setup for proton postmastectomy chest wall irradiation?

PURPOSES/OBJECTIVES

For postmastectomy radiation therapy by proton beams, the usual bony landmark based radiograph setup technique is indirect because the target volumes are generally superficial and far away from major bony structures. The surface imaging setup technique of matching chest wall surface directly to treatment planning computed tomography was evaluated and compared to the traditional radiograph-based technique.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifteen postmastectomy radiation therapy patients were included, with the first 5 patients positioned by standard radiograph-based technique; radiopaque makers, however, were added on the patient's skin surface to improve the relevance of the setup. AlignRT was used to capture patient surface images at different time points along the process, with the calculated position corrections recorded but not applied. For the remaining 10 patients, the orthogonal x-ray imaging was replaced by the AlignRT setup procedure followed by a beamline radiograph at the treatment gantry angle only as confirmation. The position corrections recorded during all fractions for all patients (28-31 each) were analyzed to evaluate the setup accuracy. The time spent on patient setup and treatment delivery was also analyzed.

RESULTS

The average position discrepancy over the treatment course relative to the planning computed tomography was significantly larger in the radiograph only group, particularly in translations (3.2 ± 2.0 mm in vertical, 3.1 ± 3.0 mm in longitudinal, 2.6 ± 2.5 mm in lateral), than AlignRT assisted group (1.3 ± 1.3 mm in vertical, 0.8 ± 1.2 mm in longitudinal, 1.5 ± 1.4 mm in lateral). The latter was well within the robustness limits (±3 mm) of the pencil beam scanning treatment established in our previous studies. The setup time decreased from an average of 11 minutes using orthogonal x-rays to an average of 6 minutes using AlignRT surface imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of surface imaging allows postmastectomy chest wall patients to be positioned more accurately and substantially more efficiently than radiograph only-based techniques.

Dosimetric feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging-guided tri-cobalt 60 preoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy for soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the dosimetric differences of delivering preoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity (ESTS) with a teletherapy system equipped with 3 rotating (60)Co sources and a built-in magnetic resonance imaging and with standard linear accelerator (LINAC)-based IMRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The primary study population consisted of 9 patients treated with preoperative radiation for ESTS between 2008 and 2014 with LINAC-based static field IMRT. LINAC plans were designed to deliver 50 Gy in 25 fractions to 95% of the planning target volume (PTV). Tri-(60)Co system IMRT plans were designed with ViewRay system software.

RESULTS

Tri-(60)Co-based IMRT plans achieved equivalent target coverage and dosimetry for organs at risk (long bone, skin, and skin corridor) compared with LINAC-based IMRT plans. The maximum and minimum PTV doses, heterogeneity indices, and ratio of the dose to 50% of the volume were equivalent for both planning systems. One LINAC plan violated the maximum bone dose constraint, whereas none of the tri-(60)Co plans did.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a tri-(60)Co system, we were able to achieve equivalent dosimetry to the PTV and organs at risk for patients with ESTS compared with LINAC-based IMRT plans. The tri-(60)Co system may be advantageous over current treatment platforms by allowing PTV reduction and by elimination of the additional radiation dose associated with daily image guidance, but this needs to be evaluated prospectively.