|
1
|
Ahamed S, Singh N, Suryadevara A, Suvarna P. Monitor unit restrained hybrid approach using conformal arcs for radiosurgery of solitary brain metastasis. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2023.110817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
|
2
|
Fu Y, Zhang H, Morris ED, Glide-Hurst CK, Pai S, Traverso A, Wee L, Hadzic I, Lønne PI, Shen C, Liu T, Yang X. Artificial Intelligence in Radiation Therapy. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RADIATION AND PLASMA MEDICAL SCIENCES 2022; 6:158-181. [PMID: 35992632 PMCID: PMC9385128 DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2021.3107454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has great potential to transform the clinical workflow of radiotherapy. Since the introduction of deep neural networks, many AI-based methods have been proposed to address challenges in different aspects of radiotherapy. Commercial vendors have started to release AI-based tools that can be readily integrated to the established clinical workflow. To show the recent progress in AI-aided radiotherapy, we have reviewed AI-based studies in five major aspects of radiotherapy including image reconstruction, image registration, image segmentation, image synthesis, and automatic treatment planning. In each section, we summarized and categorized the recently published methods, followed by a discussion of the challenges, concerns, and future development. Given the rapid development of AI-aided radiotherapy, the efficiency and effectiveness of radiotherapy in the future could be substantially improved through intelligent automation of various aspects of radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yabo Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Hao Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Eric D. Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Carri K. Glide-Hurst
- Department of Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53792, USA
| | - Suraj Pai
- Maastricht University Medical Centre, Netherlands
| | | | - Leonard Wee
- Maastricht University Medical Centre, Netherlands
| | | | - Per-Ivar Lønne
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, PO Box 4953 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Chenyang Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75002, USA
| | - Tian Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Intraobserver Variability: Should We Worry? J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2016; 47:217-220. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2016.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2016] [Accepted: 06/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|