1
|
Chiloiro G, Panza G, Boldrini L, Romano A, Placidi L, Nardini M, Galetto M, Votta C, Campitelli M, Cellini F, Massaccesi M, Gambacorta MA. REPeated mAgnetic resonance Image-guided stereotactic body Radiotherapy (MRIg-reSBRT) for oligometastatic patients: REPAIR, a mono-institutional retrospective study. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:52. [PMID: 38671526 PMCID: PMC11055272 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02445-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oligo-progression or further recurrence is an open issue in the multi-integrated management of oligometastatic disease (OMD). Re-irradiation with stereotactic body radiotherapy (re-SBRT) technique could represent a valuable treatment option to improve OMD clinical outcomes. MRI-guided allows real-time visualization of the target volumes and online adaptive radiotherapy (oART). The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity profile of MRI-guided repeated SBRT (MRIg-reSBRT) in the OMD setting and propose a re-SBRT classification. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed patients (pts) with recurrent liver metastases or abdominal metastatic lesions between 1 and 5 centimeters from liver candidate to MRIg-reSBRT showing geometric overlap between the different SBRT courses and assessing whether they were in field (type 1) or not (type 2). RESULTS Eighteen pts completed MRIg-reSBRT course for 25 metastatic hepatic/perihepatic lesions from July 2019 to January 2020. A total of 20 SBRT courses: 15 Type 1 re-SBRT (75%) and 5 Type 2 re-SBRT (25%) was delivered. Mean interval between the first SBRT and MRIg-reSBRT was 8,6 months. Mean prescribed dose for the first treatment was 43 Gy (range 24-50 Gy, mean BEDα/β10=93), while 41 Gy (range 16-50 Gy, mean BEDα/β10=92) for MRIg-reSBRT. Average liver dose was 3,9 Gy (range 1-10 Gy) and 3,7 Gy (range 1,6-8 Gy) for the first SBRT and MRIg-reSBRT, respectively. No acute or late toxicities were reported at a median follow-up of 10,7 months. The 1-year OS and PFS was 73,08% and 50%, respectively. Overall Clinical Benefit was 54%. CONCLUSIONS MRIg-reSBRT could be considered an effective and safe option in the multi-integrated treatment of OMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuditta Chiloiro
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Panza
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - Angela Romano
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Placidi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Nardini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Galetto
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Votta
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - Maura Campitelli
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Cellini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hall JT, Moon AM, Young M, Tan X, Darawsheh R, Danquah F, Tepper JE, Yanagihara TK. Biochemical Safety of SBRT to Multiple Intrahepatic Lesions for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2024; 11:443-454. [PMID: 38476559 PMCID: PMC10928924 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s447025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background We aim to better characterize stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)-related hepatic biochemical toxicity in patients with multiple intrahepatic lesions from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with HCC who underwent SBRT for 2 or more synchronous or metachronous liver lesions. We collected patient characteristics and dosimetric data (mean liver dose [MLD], cumulative effective volume [Veff], cumulative volume of liver receiving 15 Gy [V15Gy], and cumulative planning target volume [PTV]) along with liver-related toxicity (measured by albumin-bilirubin [ALBI] and Child-Pugh [CP] scores). A linear mixed-effects model was used to assess the effect of multi-target SBRT on changes in ALBI. Results There were 25 patients and 56 lesions with median follow-up of 29 months. Eleven patients had synchronous lesions, and 14 had recurrent lesions treated with separate SBRT courses. Among those receiving multiple SBRT courses, there were 7 lesions with overlap of V15Gy (median V15Gy overlap: 35 mL, range: 0.5-388 mL). There was no association between cumulative MLD, Veff, V15Gy, or PTV and change in ALBI. Four of 25 patients experienced non-classic radiation-induced liver disease (RILD), due to an increase of CP score by ≥2 points 3 to 6 months after SBRT. Sixteen of 25 patients experienced an increase in ALBI grade by 1 or more points 3 to 6 months after SBRT. Comparing the groups that received SBRT in a single course versus multiple courses revealed no statistically significant differences in liver toxicity. Conclusion Liver SBRT for multiple lesions in a single or in separate courses is feasible and with acceptable risk of hepatotoxicity. Prospective studies with a larger cohort are needed to better characterize safety in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob T Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Andrew M Moon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Michael Young
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Xianming Tan
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Rami Darawsheh
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Flora Danquah
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Joel E Tepper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Ted K Yanagihara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gharzai LA, Wang C, Tang M, Jackson WC, Maurino C, Cousins MM, Mendiratta-Lala M, Parikh ND, Mayo CS, Haken RKT, Owen D, Cuneo KC, Schipper MJ, Lawrence TS. Efficacy of a Second Course of Radiation for Patients With Metachronous Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Pract Radiat Oncol 2023; 13:e504-e514. [PMID: 37295727 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Liver-directed radiation therapy is an effective treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but metachronous lesions develop outside the irradiated field in >50% of patients. We hypothesized that irradiation of these new lesions would produce an outcome like that of patients receiving a first course (C1) of treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS We included patients with HCC who received a second course (C2) of radiation therapy >1 month after C1. Toxicity was defined as Child-Pugh score increase ≥2 within 6 months posttreatment (binary model) and as the change in albumin-bilirubin during the year after treatment (longitudinal model). Overall survival (OS) and local failure (LF) were captured at the patient and lesion level, respectively; both were summarized with Kaplan-Meier estimates. Predictors of toxicity and OS were assessed using generalized linear mixed and Cox regression models, respectively. RESULTS Of 340 patients with HCC, 47 underwent irradiation for metachronous HCC, receiving similar prescription dose in C1/C2. Median follow-up was 17 months after C1 and 15 months after C2. Twenty-two percent of patients experienced toxicity after C1, and 25% experienced toxicity after C2. Worse baseline albumin-bilirubin predicted toxicity in both binary (odds ratio, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.46-3.94; P = .0005) and longitudinal models (P < .005). Two-year LF rate was 11.2% after C1 and 8.3% after C2; tumor dose (hazard ratio [HR], 0.982; 95% CI, 0.969-0.995; P = .007) and tumor size (HR, 1.135; 95% CI, 1.068-1.206; P < .005) predicted LF. Two-year OS was 46.0% after C1 and 42.6% after C2; tumor dose (HR, 0.986; 95% CI, 0.979-0.992; P < .005) and tumor size (HR, 1.049; 95% CI, 1.010-1.088; P = .0124) predicted OS. Reirradiation was not associated with toxicity (P > .7), LF (P = .79), or OS (P = .39). CONCLUSIONS In this largest series in the Western hemisphere, we demonstrate that irradiation for metachronous HCC offers low rates of LF with acceptable toxicity and OS like that of patients receiving a C1. These findings support judicious selection of patients for reirradiation in metachronous HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laila A Gharzai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
| | - Chang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Ming Tang
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - William C Jackson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Christopher Maurino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Matthew M Cousins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Neehar D Parikh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Charles S Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Randall K Ten Haken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Dawn Owen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Kyle C Cuneo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Matthew J Schipper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Theodore S Lawrence
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee SU, Kim TH. Current evidence and the potential role of proton beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Mol Hepatol 2023; 29:958-968. [PMID: 37822213 PMCID: PMC10577334 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2023.0274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death, and external beam radiation therapy has emerged as a promising approach for managing HCC. Proton beam therapy (PBT) offers dosimetric advantages over X-ray therapy, with superior physical properties known as the Bragg peak. PBT holds promise for reducing hepatotoxicity and allowing safe dose-escalation to the tumor. It has been tried in various clinical conditions and has shown promising local tumor control and survival outcomes. A recent phase III trial demonstrated the non-inferiority of PBT in local tumor control compared to current standard radiofrequency ablation in early-stage HCC. PBT also tended to show more favorable outcomes compared to transarterial chemoembolization in the intermediate stage, and has proven effective in-field disease control and safe toxicity profiles in advanced HCC. In this review, we discuss the rationale, clinical studies, optimal indication, and future directions of PBT in HCC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Uk Lee
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Tae Hyun Kim
- Center for Proton Therapy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
- Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. JOURNAL OF LIVER CANCER 2023; 23:1-120. [PMID: 37384024 PMCID: PMC10202234 DOI: 10.17998/jlc.2022.11.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Korean Liver Cancer Association (KLCA) and National Cancer Center (NCC) Korea
- Corresponding author: KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee (KPGRC) (Committee Chair: Joong-Won Park) Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10408, Korea Tel. +82-31-920-1605, Fax: +82-31-920-1520, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
2022 KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Korean J Radiol 2022; 23:1126-1240. [PMID: 36447411 PMCID: PMC9747269 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.
Collapse
|
7
|
2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Mol Hepatol 2022; 28:583-705. [PMID: 36263666 PMCID: PMC9597235 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.
Collapse
|
8
|
Mohamad I, Barry A, Dawson L, Hosni A. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for colorectal liver metastases. Int J Hyperthermia 2022; 39:611-619. [DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1923836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Issa Mohamad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Aisling Barry
- The Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Laura Dawson
- The Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ali Hosni
- The Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Beddok A, Calugaru V, de Marzi L, Graff P, Dumas JL, Goudjil F, Dendale R, Minsat M, Verrelle P, Buvat I, Créhange G. Clinical and technical challenges of cancer reirradiation: Words of wisdom. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 174:103655. [PMID: 35398521 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the development of new radiotherapy techniques that have improved healthy tissue sparing, reirradiation (reRT) has become possible. The selection of patients eligible for reRT is complex given that it can induce severe or even fatal side effects. The first step should therefore be to assess, in the context of multidisciplinary staff meeting, the patient's physical status, the presence of sequelae resulting from the first irradiation and the best treatment option available. ReRT can be performed either curatively or palliatively to treat a cancer-related symptom that is detrimental to the patient's quality of life. The selected techniques for reRT should provide the best protection of healthy tissue. The construction of target volumes and the evaluation of constraints regarding the doses that can be used in this context have not yet been fully codified. These points raised in the literature suggest that randomized studies should be undertaken to answer pending questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Beddok
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France.
| | - Valentin Calugaru
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Ludovic de Marzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Pierre Graff
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Jean-Luc Dumas
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Farid Goudjil
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Rémi Dendale
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Mathieu Minsat
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Pierre Verrelle
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Irène Buvat
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yacoub JH, Mauro D, Moon A, He AR, Bashir MR, Hsu CC, Fishbein TM, Burke LMB. Therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: overview, clinical indications, and comparative outcome evaluation. Part two: noncurative intention. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:3540-3548. [PMID: 33864107 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03074-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2021] [Revised: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Locoregional therapies can be offered to hepatocellular carcinoma patients as a bridge to transplant, to downstage disease burden for transplant eligibility, or for disease control to prolong survival. Systemic therapies also play a large role in HCC treatment, occasionally in conjunction with other methods. This manuscript reviews the various treatment options for HCC with a historically noncurative intent.
Collapse
|
11
|
Kai Y, Toya R, Saito T, Matsuyama T, Fukugawa Y, Shiraishi S, Shimohigashi Y, Oya N. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Based on 99mTc-GSA SPECT Image-guided Inverse Planning for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. In Vivo 2020; 34:3583-3588. [PMID: 33144471 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Revised: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM A recent planning study suggested that 99mTc-labelled diethylene triamine pentaacetate-galactosyl human serum albumin (99mTc-GSA) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) image-guided inverse planning (IGIP) shows dosimetric superiority to conventional planning in sparing liver function. Here, we report the first clinical translation of 99mTc-GSA SPECT IGIP for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). CASE REPORT A 60-year-old male developed obstructive jaundice caused by recurrent HCC in segment 1 after hepatic resection. He underwent repeated radiotherapy (RT) consisting of 45 Gy in 15 fractions 8 years ago and 30 Gy in 5 fractions 2 years ago. We performed SBRT consisting of 40 Gy in 8 fractions using 99mTc-GSA SPECT-IGIP. We confirmed the dosimetric superiority of functional IGIP to conventional planning. He achieved complete response as assessed using the target volume. The patient has remained alive without recurrence for 18 months. He did not experience radiation-induced liver disease. CONCLUSION Recurrent HCC was successfully and safely salvaged via re-irradiation with SBRT using 99mTc-GSA SPECT-IGIP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yudai Kai
- Department of Radiological Technology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Ryo Toya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Saito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Tomohiko Matsuyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Fukugawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Shinya Shiraishi
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | | | - Natsuo Oya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Owen D, Lukovic J, Hosni A, Crane CH, Hong TS, Dawson LA, Velec M, Lawrence TS. Challenges in Reirradiation of Intrahepatic Tumors. Semin Radiat Oncol 2020; 30:242-252. [PMID: 32503790 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2020.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Definitive reirradiation using a stereotactic technique is an effective local treatment option for both recurrent liver metastases and recurrent primary liver cancers. The tolerance of the liver, bile ducts, and surrounding gastrointestinal luminal organs must be respected to ensure safe retreatment. The risks associated with retreatment to these organs must be carefully balanced with the probability of clinical benefit. We present 2 cases for consideration of repeat irradiation along with the opinions of 4 experts, along with conclusions about recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn Owen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jelena Lukovic
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ali Hosni
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Laura A Dawson
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Velec
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Barsky AR, Reddy VK, Plastaras JP, Ben-Josef E, Metz JM, Wojcieszynski AP. Proton beam re-irradiation for gastrointestinal malignancies: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 11:187-202. [PMID: 32175122 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.09.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Radiotherapy (RT) is part of the standard of care management of most gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Even with advanced RT, systemic therapy, and surgical techniques, locoregional recurrences or second primary cancers can still occur within previously irradiated fields, which can present challenges in delivering effective and safe treatment. Options for reirradiation are often limited, but given the favorable dosimetric aspects of proton-beam RT, it may provide an effective and safe re-irradiation option for patients with recurrent or second primary GI cancers. Methods We conducted a systematic review as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement protocol, assessing for reports of proton-beam reirradiation for recurrent or second primary GI cancers, primarily via PubMed. From the initial 373 articles identified, 7 articles were ultimately included in the analysis. Results The 7 included studies reported on proton-beam re-irradiation for the following disease sites: esophageal (n=2), pancreas (n=1), liver (n=2), rectal (n=1), and anal (n=1). Study sizes varied from as few as 1 to as many as 83 patients. Across studies, in patients who presented with tumor-related symptoms, palliation (stability/improvement) was achieved in 80-100% of the cases. Local control rates, with variable follow-up, ranged from 36-100%. All median overall survival values, when reported, were greater than 1 year. Across both liver studies, there were no cases of radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) from proton-beam re-irradiation. Across all studies, there were 2 acute (esophagopleural fistula in esophageal cancer, small bowel perforation in pancreatic cancer) and 1 late (esophageal ulcer in esophageal cancer) grade 5 toxicities, all favored to be due to progressive disease, rather than proton-beam re-irradiation. Two studies (1 esophageal, 1 rectal) generated comparison photon plans. One found that proton therapy reduced mean heart and lung doses, spinal cord dose, and lung V5Gy as compared to photon treatment, while resulting in higher lung V20Gy and V30Gy. The other found that protons decreased bowel V10Gy, V20Gy, and the dose to 200 and 150 cc of bowel, as compared to photons. Conclusions Based upon the published experiences, proton-beam re-irradiation for recurrent or second primary GI cancers appears effective for palliation, with good disease-control, limited toxicity, favorable dosimetry, and overall compares well with published non-proton-beam experiences. Given short follow-up, additional studies are warranted to determine if dosimetric advantages from proton therapy will translate into comparative toxicity benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew R Barsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Vishruth K Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - John P Plastaras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Edgar Ben-Josef
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James M Metz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Andrzej P Wojcieszynski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Siddiqui O, Pollock A, Samanta S, Kaiser A, Molitoris JK. Proton Beam Therapy in Liver Malignancies. Curr Oncol Rep 2020; 22:30. [PMID: 32108284 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-020-0889-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Proton beam therapy (PBT) allows for improved sparing of surrounding normal tissues compared with X-ray-based radiation therapy. This is especially important in the setting of liver malignancies, where an increase in integral dose leads to a higher risk of radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) as well as close proximity to vital gastrointestinal (GI) organs. RECENT FINDINGS We have data from multiple centers demonstrating that PBT can safely deliver high, ablative doses of radiation therapy conferring excellent local control with good tolerance of treatment. PBT is an effective treatment with longstanding evidence of efficacy that is increasing in availability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osman Siddiqui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Ariel Pollock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Santanu Samanta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Adeel Kaiser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Jason K Molitoris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Role of upper abdominal reirradiation for gastrointestinal malignancies: a systematic review of cumulative dose, toxicity, and outcomes on behalf of the Re-Irradiation Working Group of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO). Strahlenther Onkol 2019; 196:1-14. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-019-01519-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
|
16
|
In Reply to Slovak et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 104:696-697. [PMID: 31162061 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2019] [Revised: 03/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
17
|
Paradis KC, Mayo C, Owen D, Spratt DE, Hearn J, Rosen B, Kashani R, Moran J, Tatro DS, Beeler W, Vineberg K, Smith DC, Matuszak MM. The Special Medical Physics Consult Process for Reirradiation Patients. Adv Radiat Oncol 2019; 4:559-565. [PMID: 31681862 PMCID: PMC6817723 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Revised: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To present a systematic approach to the reirradiation special medical physics consult (ReRT-SMPC) process. Materials and Methods An in-house reirradiation committee of physicians and physicists was formed to develop a streamlined and well-documented approach to ReRT-SMPCs. Dosimetric goals and considerations for tissue repair were generated by the committee with input from the literature, clinical trial guidelines, and physician experience. Procedural workflow was also defined. Results The total number of ReRT-SMPCs performed in our department in 2018 was 401, corresponding to 369 unique patients and 16% of the total number of patients receiving external beam radiation in our department that year. This constituted a large increase over the 183 ReRT-SMPCs performed in 2017. We have found that a standardized ReRT-SMPC workflow helps to safeguard patients, documents the clinical decision-making process for medical and legal purposes, and facilitates the peer-review process. The data being collected from each consult along with toxicity and outcomes data can be used to help inform future re-treatment guidelines. Conclusions As the number of patients returning for additional courses of radiation continues to increase, a uniform method for the ReRT-SMPC workflow and analysis is a powerful tool for ensuring patient safety, understanding and predicting treatment toxicity, and refining reirradiation dosimetric limits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Dawn Owen
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | | | | | | | - Jean Moran
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|