Complementary Relation Between the Improvement of Dose Delivery Technique and PTV Margin Reduction in Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

Comparative Study of Eclipse and RayStation Multi-Criteria Optimization-Based Prostate Radiotherapy Treatment Planning Quality

Multi-criteria optimization (MCO) function has been available on commercial radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning systems to improve plan quality; however, no study has compared Eclipse and RayStation MCO functions for prostate RT planning. The purpose of this study was to compare prostate RT MCO plan qualities in terms of discrepancies between Pareto optimal and final deliverable plans, and dosimetric impact of final deliverable plans. In total, 25 computed tomography datasets of prostate cancer patients were used for Eclipse (version 16.1) and RayStation (version 12A) MCO-based plannings with doses received by 98% of planning target volume having 76 Gy prescription (PTV76D98%) and 50% of rectum (rectum D50%) selected as trade-off criteria. Pareto optimal and final deliverable plan discrepancies were determined based on PTV76D98% and rectum D50% percentage differences. Their final deliverable plans were compared in terms of doses received by PTV76 and other structures including rectum, and PTV76 homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI), using a t-test. Both systems showed discrepancies between Pareto optimal and final deliverable plans (Eclipse: -0.89% (PTV76D98%) and -2.49% (Rectum D50%); RayStation: 3.56% (PTV76D98%) and -1.96% (Rectum D50%)). Statistically significantly different average values of PTV76D98%,HI and CI, and mean dose received by rectum (Eclipse: 76.07 Gy, 0.06, 1.05 and 39.36 Gy; RayStation: 70.43 Gy, 0.11, 0.87 and 51.65 Gy) are noted, respectively (p < 0.001). Eclipse MCO-based prostate RT plan quality appears better than that of RayStation.

Moderate hypofractionated helical tomotherapy for older patients with localized prostate cancer: long-term outcomes of a phase I-II trial

BACKGROUND

Our previous study showed that two different regimens of moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) delivered with helical tomotherapy (HT) are well tolerated in older prostate cancer patients. We provide a longterm efficacy and toxicity after > 7 years of follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study recruited 33 patients from February 2009 to July 2011 (76 Gy/34F; Group-1); and 34 from July 2011 to February 2014 (71.6 Gy/28F; 50.4 Gy/25F for the risk of pelvic lymph nodes involvement (LNI) >15%; Group-2). The primary outcomes were biochemical failure (BF), biochemical failure and clinical disease failure (BCDF), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity.

RESULTS

The average ages of two groups were 80 and 77 years and the proportions of patients with LNI > 15% were 69.7% and 73.5%, respectively. At the final follow-up in February 2020, 27.3% and 20.6% cases experienced BF, with a median time until BF of 3.3 years. A total of 38.8% patients reached primary endpoints, in which 18 deaths were reported BCDF events (45.5% vs. 32.4%, p = 0.271). There was no significant difference in 7-year PFS (68.6% vs. 74.8%, p = 0.591), BCDF (45.5% vs. 32.4%, p = 0.271) and OS (71.9% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.376) for full set analysis and for subgroup analysis (all p > 0.05). The incidence of grade ≥ 2 late GU (6.2% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.127) and GI toxicities (9.4% vs. 15.6%, p = 0.554) was comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

In older patients with localized prostate cancer, two moderate hypofractionated regimens were all well tolerated with similar, mild late toxicities and satisfactory survival, without necessity of prophylactic pelvic node irradiation.

Bowel and bladder reproducibility in image guided radiation therapy for prostate cancer: Results of a patterns of practice survey

Purpose

Optimal management of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) to achieve bowel and bladder reproducibility for radiation therapy (RT) and the appropriate planning target volume (PTV) expansions for use with modern image guidance is uncertain. We surveyed American Society of Radiation Oncology radiation oncologists to ascertain practice patterns for definitive PCa RT with respect to patient instructions and set up, daily image guidance, and subsequent PTV expansions.

Methods and Materials

A pattern of practice survey was sent to American Society of Radiation Oncology radiation oncologists who self-identified as specializing in PCa. Respondents identified the fractionation regimens routinely used, and their practices regarding diet, bowel, and bladder instructions for patients with PCa before RT simulation and throughout treatment. Questions regarding PTV margins, daily set up practices, and use of image guidance were included.

Results

Of 190 respondents, 158 reported using conventional fractionation (CFx), 49 moderate hypofractionation (MHFx), and 61 stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Diet modifications during RT were advised by 84% of respondents, treatment with full bladder by 96%, and bowel instructions by 78%. Prescription of bowel medication was higher for respondents using SBRT (95.1%) versus those using CFx/MHFx (55.1%; 34.7%). The most common implantable device reported was fiducial markers, with increased use in SBRT (86.0%; 68.9%) versus CFx/MHFx. Cone beam computed tomography was the most common daily imaging technique across fractionation regimens. SBRT showed correlation between PTV margin expansions, fiducial marker use, and image guidance.

Conclusions

Survey results indicate heterogeneity in treatment modality, dose, patient instructions, and PTV expansions used by radiation oncologists in the treatment of patients with PCa. Further investigation to define appropriate patient instructions on bowel preparation to maximize target reproducibility in PCa is needed, as is continued guidance on evidence-based approaches for image guidance and PTV margin selection.