Exploring the Relationship of Radiation Dose Exposed to the Length of Esophagus and Weight Loss in Patients with Lung Cancer

Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy Facility Type Affects Anastomotic Complications After Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy is a complex oncologic surgery that results in lower perioperative morbidity and mortality when performed in high-volume hospitals by experienced surgeons; however, limited data exists evaluating the importance of neoadjuvant radiotherapy delivery at high- versus low-volume centers. We sought to compare postoperative toxicity among patients treated with preoperative radiotherapy delivered at an academic medical center (AMC) versus community medical centers (CMC).

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer at an academic medical center between 2008 and 2018 were reviewed. Associations between patient factors and treatment-related toxicities were calculated in univariate (UVA) and multivariable analyses (MVA).

RESULTS

One hundred forty-seven consecutive patients were identified: 89 CMC and 58 AMC. Median follow-up was 30 months (0.33-124 months). Most patients were male (86%) with adenocarcinoma (90%) located in the distal esophagus or GEJ (95%). Median radiation dose was 50.4 Gy between groups. Radiotherapy at CMCs resulted in higher rates of re-operation after esophagectomy (18% vs 7%, p = 0.055) and increased rates of anastomotic leak (38% vs 17%, p < 0.01). On MVA, radiation at a CMC remained predictive of anastomotic leak (OR 6.13, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Esophageal cancer patients receiving preoperative radiotherapy had higher rates of anastomotic leaks when radiotherapy was completed at a community medical center versus academic medical center. Explanations for these differences are uncertain but further exploratory analyses regarding dosimetry and radiation field size are warranted.

Clinical commentary: Atypia in lung and mediastinal lymph node fine-needle aspiration

In patients with known or suspected lung cancer, pathologic reports of cytologic "atypia" in the mediastinal nodal fine-needle aspirate samples pose a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma. For the patents with non-operable disease, should the radiation oncologist empirically include lymph nodes with atypical findings in the radiation field, or should they exclude these mediastinal lymph nodes from the treatment field? Inclusion of an atypical finding in the management decision or radiation target would mean that the treating physicians are interpreting a pathologic report of "atypia" as probably "positive" rather than probably "negative" disease. Empirically treating lymph nodes without cancer involvement in thoracic radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer, also known as elective nodal irradiation, is generally avoided given increased treatment-related toxicities including esophagitis, pneumonitis, and cardiotoxicity without a demonstrated survival benefit. However, in the case of potentially curative chemoradiation, the discretion is left to the treating radiation oncologist to estimate the likelihood of oncologic involvement based on available and often clinically indeterminate radiologic findings and known routes of cancer spread. Alternatively, physicians may consider repeat or invasive diagnostic measures. The risks and benefits of additional procedures must be taken into careful consideration in our older patient population who present with co-morbid cardiopulmonary disease and pulmonary symptoms from their cancer. If atypia is reported, written and verbal communication to relay pathologist's concern for oncologic involvement is critical as it may affect oncologic treatment recommendations and cancer outcomes.

Improving Early Identification of Significant Weight Loss Using Clinical Decision Support System in Lung Cancer Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Early identification of patients who may be at high risk of significant weight loss (SWL) is important for timely clinical intervention in lung cancer radiotherapy (RT). A clinical decision support system (CDSS) for SWL prediction was implemented within the routine clinical workflow and assessed on a prospective cohort of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CDSS incorporated a machine learning prediction model on the basis of radiomics and dosiomics image features and was connected to a web-based dashboard for streamlined patient enrollment, feature extraction, SWL prediction, and physicians' evaluation processes. Patients with lung cancer (N = 37) treated with definitive RT without prior RT were prospectively enrolled in the study. Radiomics and dosiomics features were extracted from CT and 3D dose volume, and SWL probability (≥ 0.5 considered as SWL) was predicted. Two physicians predicted whether the patient would have SWL before and after reviewing the CDSS prediction. The physician's prediction performance without and with CDSS and prediction changes before and after using CDSS were compared.

RESULTS

CDSS showed significantly better prediction accuracy than physicians (0.73 v 0.54) with higher specificity (0.81 v 0.50) but with lower sensitivity (0.55 v 0.64). Physicians changed their original prediction after reviewing CDSS prediction for four cases (three correctly and one incorrectly), for all of which CDSS prediction was correct. Physicians' prediction was improved with CDSS in accuracy (0.54-0.59), sensitivity (0.64-0.73), specificity (0.50-0.54), positive predictive value (0.35-0.40), and negative predictive value (0.76-0.82).

CONCLUSION

Machine learning-based CDSS showed the potential to improve SWL prediction in lung cancer RT. More investigation on a larger patient cohort is needed to properly interpret CDSS prediction performance and its benefit in clinical decision making.

Sequential chemo-hypofractionated RT versus concurrent standard CRT for locally advanced NSCLC: GRADE recommendation by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO)

INTRODUCTION

Almost 30% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have locally advanced-stage disease. In this setting, definitive radiotherapy concurrent to chemotherapy plus adjuvant immunotherapy (cCRT + IO) is the standard of care, although only 40% of these patients are eligible for this approach.

AIMS

A comparison between cCRT and hypofractionated radiotherapy regimens (hypo-fx RT) with the addition of sequential chemotherapy (sCHT) could be useful for future combinations with immunotherapy. We developed a recommendation about the clinical question of whether CHT and moderately hypo-fx RT are comparable to cCRT for locally advanced NSCLC MATERIALS AND METHODS: The panel used GRADE methodology and the Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework. After a systematic literature search, five studies were eligible. We identified the following outcomes: progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), freedom from locoregional recurrence (FFLR), deterioration of quality of life (QoL), treatment-related deaths, severe G3-G4 toxicity, late pulmonary toxicity G3-G4, and acute esophageal toxicity G3-G4.

RESULTS

The probability of OS and G3-G4 late lung toxicity seems to be worse in patients submitted to sCHT and hypo-fx RT. The panel judged unfavorable the balance benefits/harms.

CONCLUSIONS

The final recommendation was that sCHT followed by moderately hypo-fx RT should not be considered as an alternative to cCRT in unresectable stage III NSCLC patients.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Dosimetric Correlates for Early Detection of Acute Radiation Therapy-Related Esophagitis

BACKGROUND

We investigate the time to and clinical factors associated with patient-reported difficulty swallowing in lung cancer patients treated with radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS

Between October 2016 and October 2019, lung cancer patients treated with conventionally fractionated RT at a tertiary cancer center were identified. Weekly, patients reported difficulty swallowing (patient-reported outcome version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [PRO-CTCAE] v.1: 0-none, 1-mild, 2-moderate, 3-severe, 4-very severe). Physicians graded dysphagia (CTCAE v.4: 0-none, 1-symptoms without altered intake, 2-symptomatic; altered eating/swallowing, 3-severely altered eating/swallowing, 4-life-threatening consequences, 5-death). Tumor-related difficulty swallowing was not recorded at baseline; thus, patients reporting ≥moderate symptoms ≤7 days of RT start were excluded. We evaluated the time to new patient reports of ≥moderate difficulty swallowing and CTCAE grade 2+ dysphagia and development over time using the cumulative incidence method. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated associations between clinical factors, esophageal V60, and development of esophageal symptoms.

RESULTS

Of the 200 patients identified: median age was 69 years, 52% were male, and 89% had stage III+ disease. Patients received a median of 63 Gy with chemotherapy (91.5%). At least moderate difficulty swallowing during RT was reported by 76 of 200 patients (38%); clinicians rated dysphagia as altering oral intake or worse for 26 of 200 (13%). Median time to first report of symptoms was 21 days (interquartile ratio [IQR], 18-34.5) for the 76 patients who reported ≥moderate symptoms and 33 days (IQR, 24-42) in the 26 patients whose provider reported grade 2+ dysphagia. The 30-day incidence of patient-reported ≥moderate swallowing difficulty and provider grade 2+ dysphagia was 26% (95% CI: 20%-32%) and 6% (95% CI: 3%-9%), respectively. Esophageal V60 >7 % was the clinical factor most associated with patient-reported ≥moderate esophageal symptoms (odds ratio 6.1, 95% CI: 3.0-12.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients report at least moderate difficulty swallowing more often and earlier than providers report grade 2+ dysphagia. Esophageal V60 ≥7% was most associated with development of moderate severity or worse patient-reported swallowing difficulty.

Refusal of Local Therapy in Esophageal Cancer and Impact on Overall Survival

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to understand factors associated with refusal of local therapy in esophageal cancer and compare the overall survival (OS) of patients who refuse therapies with those who undergo recommended treatment.

METHODS

National Cancer Database data for patients with non-metastatic esophageal cancer from 2006 to 2013 were pooled. T1N0M0 tumors were excluded. Pearson's Chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess demographic, clinical, and treatment factors. After propensity-score matching with inverse probability of treatment weighting, OS was compared between patients who refused therapies and those who underwent recommended therapy, using Kaplan-Meier analyses and doubly robust estimation with multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

In total, 37,618 patients were recommended radiation therapy (RT) and/or esophagectomy; we found 1403 (3.7%) refused local therapies. Specifically, 890 of 18,942 (4.6%) patients refused surgery and 667 of 31,937 (2.1%) refused RT. Older patients, females, those with unknown lymphovascular space invasion, and those uninsured or on Medicare were more likely to refuse. Those with squamous cell carcinoma, N1 disease, higher incomes, living farther from care, and those who received chemotherapy were less likely to refuse. Five-year OS was decreased in patients who refused (18.1% vs. 27.6%). The survival decrement was present in adenocarcinoma but not squamous cell carcinoma. In patients who received surgery or ≥ 50.4 Gy RT, there was no OS decrement to refusing the other therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified characteristics that correlate with refusal of local therapy. Refusal of therapy was associated with decreased OS. Patients who received either surgery or ≥ 50.4 Gy RT had no survival decrement from refusing the opposite modality.