Reactivity to 35% carbon dioxide in bulimia nervosa and panic disorder

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of carbon dioxide provocation in psychiatric disorders

BACKGROUND

False suffocation alarm hypothesis has been widely used to explain carbon dioxide hypersensitivity in panic disorder (PD). However, hypersensitivity to carbon dioxide has been observed in other psychiatric disorders. We explored the specificity of carbon dioxide inhalation as a panic provocation test among psychiatric disorders via network meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic literature search on PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycNET was performed to acquire the studies using the carbon dioxide provocation test in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and checklists. Odds ratios (OR) for a panic attack (PA) induced by the carbon dioxide inhalation tests were extracted from each of the original studies and were pooled using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Network meta-analysis on a pool of 2181 participants from 41 studies was used to compare the efficacy of carbon dioxide provocation tests among psychiatric disorders. The network meta-analysis showed that the odds for PA in response to carbon dioxide inhalation are higher in patients with PD, premenstrual dysphoric syndrome (PMDD), and social anxiety disorder (SAD) than healthy controls (HC). The odds for PA were not significantly different among patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), major depressive disorder (MDD), and healthy controls (HC).

CONCLUSIONS

The vulnerability to the carbon dioxide provocation test is not limited to PD. The specificity of the test for PD is questionable, as individuals suffering from PMDD and SAD are also significantly more responsive to carbon dioxide inhalation compared to HC, OCD, MDD, and GAD. There may be shared underpinning biological mechanisms between PD, PMDD, and SAD.

Comparison of Sodium Lactate Infusion and Carbon Dioxide Inhalation Panic Provocation Tests: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sodium lactate (NaL) infusion and carbon dioxide (CO₂) inhalation are proven to provoke acute panic attacks (PAs) in patients with panic disorder (PD). A systematic literature search and meta-analysis were performed to compare the effect sizes of these methods.

METHODS

Odds ratios were calculated for each of the original studies and were pooled using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Either NaL or CO₂ provocations significantly increased the rates of PAs in individuals with PD compared to those in healthy controls. However, the effect size of NaL infusion (OR=25.13, 95% CI=15.48-40.80) was significantly greater than that of CO₂ inhalation (OR=10.58, 95%CI=7.88-14.21).

CONCLUSION

The evidence for the efficacy of the two panic provocation tests is very strong. Yet, the results support the superiority of NaL infusion over CO₂ inhalation challenge as a panic provocation test. Thus, lactate seems a much stronger stimulus than CO₂ for the brain suffocation detector.

Heightened affective response to perturbation of respiratory but not pain signals in eating, mood, and anxiety disorders

Several studies have recently suggested that an abnormal processing of respiratory interoceptive and nociceptive (painful) stimuli may contribute to eating disorder (ED) pathophysiology. Mood and anxiety disorders (MA) are also characterized by abnormal respiratory symptoms, and show substantial comorbidity with ED. However, no studies have examined both respiratory and pain processing simultaneously within ED and MA. The present study systematically evaluated responses to perturbations of respiratory and nociceptive signals across the levels of physiology, behavior, and symptom report in a transdiagnostic ED sample (n = 51) that was individually matched to MA individuals (n = 51) and healthy comparisons (HC; n = 51). Participants underwent an inspiratory breath-holding challenge as a probe of respiratory interoception and a cold pressor challenge as a probe of pain processing. We expected both clinical groups to report greater stress and fear in response to respiratory and nociceptive perturbation than HCs, in the absence of differential physiological and behavioral responses. During breath-holding, both the ED and MA groups reported significantly more stress, feelings of suffocation, and suffocation fear than HC, with the ED group reporting the most severe symptoms. Moreover, anxiety sensitivity was related to suffocation fear only in the ED group. The heightened affective responses in the current study occurred in the absence of group differences in behavioral (breath hold duration, cold pressor duration) and physiological (end-tidal carbon dioxide, end-tidal oxygen, heart rate, skin conductance) responses. Against our expectations, there were no group differences in the response to cold pain stimulation. A matched-subgroup analysis focusing on individuals with anorexia nervosa (n = 30) produced similar results. These findings underscore the presence of abnormal respiratory interoception in MA and suggest that hyperreactivity to respiratory signals may be a potentially overlooked clinical feature of ED.

Subjective and physiological responses to the 35% carbon dioxide challenge in healthy and non-clinical control populations: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND/RATIONALE

The carbon dioxide (CO₂) challenge has been reliably used in laboratory settings as a panicogen in clinical populations. However, the magnitude of these effects on healthy and non-clinical control populations are not clear. The aim of this meta-analysis and systematic review is to provide quantitative estimates of those effects. Specifically, the current paper will evaluate the relative efficacy of the CO₂ challenge in eliciting both subjective and physiological arousal in healthy and non-clinical control populations.

METHOD

A total of 16 articles with 35 independent samples were included in the meta-analysis, while 37 studies with 74 independent samples were included in the systematic review.

RESULTS

Both the meta-analysis and systematic review found the CO₂ challenge to elicit an increase in subjective distress via self-reported anxiety and fear. Physiological responses via blood pressure and heart rate were heterogeneous in studies sampled, with no significant changes observed across studies. Moderator analyses revealed the variations in findings may be attributed to participant screening and invasive sampling.

DISCUSSION

Findings highlight the CO₂ challenge as a useful tool in the provocation of subjective distress. Implications for both the use of the CO₂ challenge and its anticipated effects in healthy and non-clinical control populations are discussed.

Effects of 35% carbon dioxide (CO2) inhalation in patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial

BACKGROUND

In patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) two open pilot studies about the effects of 35% carbon dioxide (CO₂) exist. One shows an augmented panicogenic and anxiogenic response (Muhtz et al., 2011), the other does not (Talesnik et al. 2007). We further characterized the CO₂ reactivity in PTSD using for the first time placebo-controlled and double-blind conditions.

METHODS

In 20 patients with PTSD we assessed panic, anxiety, dissociative and PTSD symptoms after a single vital capacity inhalation of 35% CO₂ compared to a placebo gas condition in a within-participant cross-over, placebo-controlled, double-blind and randomized design.

RESULTS

Inhalation of 35% CO₂ versus placebo provoked significantly increased panic, anxiety, dissociative and PTSD symptoms. The reaction to placebo gas was minimal. Order of inhalation, patients' sex or age did not influence the results. The panic and anxiety response under CO₂ was considerably higher in the PTSD patients than in healthy controls from our previous open study.

CONCLUSIONS

The results corroborate that our preceding findings of an increased CO₂ reactivity in patients with PTSD are not false positive due to the open design or the lack of placebo control. Replication in a larger number of PTSD patients and matched control subjects is needed. The potential role of childhood traumatisation, psychiatric comorbidity, psychotropic medication and trait dissociation in prior contradictory reports should be clarified.

Re-conceptualizing stress: Shifting views on the consequences of stress and its effects on stress reactivity

BACKGROUND

The consequences of stress are typically regarded from a deficit-oriented approach, conceptualizing stress to be entirely negative in its outcomes. This approach is unbalanced, and may further hinder individuals from engaging in adaptive coping. In the current study, we explored whether negative views and beliefs regarding stress interacted with a stress framing manipulation (positive, neutral and negative) on measures of stress reactivity for both psychosocial and physiological stressors.

METHOD

Ninety participants were randomized into one of three framing conditions that conceptualized the experience of stress in balanced, unbalanced-negative or unbalanced-positive ways. After watching a video on stress, participants underwent a psychosocial (Trier Social Stress Test), or a physiological (CO2 challenge) method of stress-induction. Subjective and objective markers of stress were assessed.

RESULTS

Most of the sampled population regarded stress as negative prior to framing. Further, subjective and objective reactivity were greater to the TSST compared to the CO2 challenge. Additionally, significant cubic trends were observed in the interactions of stress framing and stress-induction methodologies on heart rate and blood pressure. Balanced framing conditions in the TSST group had a significantly larger decrease in heart rate and diastolic blood pressure following stress compared to the positive and negative framing conditions.

CONCLUSION

Findings confirmed a deficit-orientation of stress within the sampled population. In addition, results highlighted the relative efficacy of the TSST compared to CO2 as a method of stress provocation. Finally, individuals in framing conditions that posited stress outcomes in unbalanced manners responded to stressors less efficiently. This suggests that unbalanced framing of stress may have set forth unrealistic expectations regarding stress that later hindered individuals from adaptive responses to stress. Potential benefits of alternative conceptualizations of stress on stress reactivity are discussed, and suggestions for future research are made.