Inhaled corticosteroid therapy with nebulized beclometasone dipropionate

Loading of Beclomethasone in Liposomes and Hyalurosomes Improved with Mucin as Effective Approach to Counteract the Oxidative Stress Generated by Cigarette Smoke Extract

In this work beclomethasone dipropionate was loaded into liposomes and hyalurosomes modified with mucin to improve the ability of the payload to counteract the oxidative stress and involved damages caused by cigarette smoke in the airway. The vesicles were prepared by dispersing all components in the appropriate vehicle and sonicating them, thus avoiding the use of organic solvents. Unilamellar and bilamellar vesicles small in size (~117 nm), homogeneously dispersed (polydispersity index lower than 0.22) and negatively charged (~−11 mV), were obtained. Moreover, these vesicle dispersions were stable for five months at room temperature (~25 °C). In vitro studies performed using the Next Generation Impactor confirmed the suitability of the formulations to be nebulized as they were capable of reaching the last stages of the impactor that mimic the deeper airways, thus improving the deposition of beclomethasone in the target site. Further, biocompatibility studies performed by using 16HBE bronchial epithelial cells confirmed the high biocompatibility and safety of all the vesicles. Among the tested formulations, only mucin-hyalurosomes were capable of effectively counteracting the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) induced by cigarette smoke extract, suggesting that this formulation may represent a promising tool to reduce the damaging effects of cigarette smoke in the lung tissues, thus reducing the pathogenesis of cigarette smoke-associated diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, and cancer.

Treatment of severe asthma: entering the era of targeted therapy

INTRODUCTION

It is estimated that 5 - 10% of asthma patients suffer from severe asthma. Severe asthma is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. These patients are not controlled with currently available treatments and therefore additional treatment options are needed. Asthma is a heterogeneous disease, and different asthma patient groups probably have different underlying pathophysiology. Novel therapies with, for example, monoclonal antibodies that target certain immunological pathways have become available. These novel treatments are not effective in all patients but only in certain phenotypes.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the current evidence and novel developments in treatment with monoclonal antibodies in different asthma phenotypes. This includes monoclonal antibodies against IgE, against interleukin (IL)-5 and antibodies targeting IL-13 pathways. Although there is a certain overlap between patient groups benefiting from these treatments, a more detailed identification of responder profiles for these therapies is needed for personalized therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

In recent years, novel monoclonal antibodies have been developed, which are a promising addition to existing therapy in the treatment of severe asthma with eosinophilic inflammation and Th2-driven disease. We expect that several of the new antibodies will become available for clinical practice. In addition, it must be acknowledged that so far no effective strategies are available for patients with non-eosinophilic asthma and further research and development is necessary for this patient group.

Effect of nebulized beclomethasone on airway inflammation and clinical status of children with allergic asthma and rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

We aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect of nebulized beclomethasone dipropionate (nBDP) on both allergic asthma and rhinitis. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 40 children (mean age 10.7 ± 2.1 years) with allergic asthma and rhinitis received either nBDP (daily dose of 800 µg, administered twice daily) or placebo for 4 weeks (with a face mask), after a 2-week run-in period of clinical assessment. Nasal and oral fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measurements together with pulmonary function tests, nasal and oral exhaled breath condensate (EBC) collection for pH and interleukin-5 (IL-5) measurements as well as nasal and bronchial symptom scores were obtained at baseline and after 4-week treatment. A significant improvement in oral FeNO, oral and nasal EBC IL-5 and nasal EBC pH was observed in the nBDP group when comparing the values with baseline, together with an improvement in symptom score of the visual analogue scale, nasal obstruction, sneezing, rhinorrhea, breathing difficulty, cough, wheezing and sleep disturbance (nBDP end treatment vs. baseline, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). nBDP was more effective than placebo (ANCOVA test) in improving [difference Δ = response after treatment at the last visit (active or placebo) - value at baseline] nasal pH, oral IL-5, oral FeNO, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity, peek expiratory flow, visual analogue scale, breathing difficulty, cough, wheezing and sleep disturbance scores. No differences were observed between the nBDP and the placebo group for symptom score of rhinitis. nBDP is a useful treatment for airway inflammation and clinical status in children with concomitant allergic asthma and rhinitis.

Inhaler mishandling is very common in patients with chronic airflow obstruction and long-term home nebuliser use

Inhalers and nebulisers are devices used for delivering aerosolised drugs in subjects with Chronic Airflow Obstruction (CAO). This multicentre, cross-sectional observational study was performed in a large population of outpatients with CAO regularly using home aerosol therapy and referring to chest clinics. The aims of the study were to compare the characteristics of the group of subjects with CAO who were using home nebulisers but also experienced with inhalers vs. those only using inhalers and to investigate whether the first group of subjects was particularly prone to inhaler misuse. Information was gained evaluating the responses to a standardised questionnaire on home aerosol therapy and the observations of inhaler technique. We enrolled 1527 patients (58% males; mean ± SE; aged 61.1 ± 0.4 years; FEV1% pred 69.9 ± 0.6; 51% and 44% respectively suffering from COPD and asthma) who were only inhaler users (OIU group) and 137 (85% males; aged 67.7 ± 1.3 years; FEV1% pred 62.3 ± 2.9; 60% and 23% respectively suffering from COPD and asthma) who were using both nebulisers and inhalers (NIU group). Nebuliser users were older, had more severe obstruction, related symptoms and health care resources utilisation. Nebulisers users performed more critical inhalers errors than those of the OIU group (49% vs. 36%; p = 0.009). We conclude that our patients with CAO and regular nebuliser treatment had advanced age, severe respiratory conditions and common inhaler misuse.