[Azoospermia and a history of inguinal hernia repair in adult]

[Prevalence of male infertility in a university hospital in Morocco]

INTRODUCTION

infertility in couples has become a public health problem in recent years. It can be related to a problem in the male, female or both. Men infertility accounts for 40% of cases. In Morocco, most studies have focused on the causes and risk factors for male infertility. The purpose of our study was to assess the prevalence of male infertility and semen parameters in infertile men or in men at high risk of developing infertility in a tertiary hospital in Rabat.

METHODS

we conducted an analysis of 482 patients referred for evaluation of infertility in the couple or as part of preoperative assessment of varicocele or testicular ectopia. Demographic data, risk factors for infertility, primary or secondary infertility were recorded for each patient. Semen parameters were assessed and interpreted according to WHO standards updated in 2010 based on studies of factors associated with their disturbance.

RESULTS

the average age of patients was 35.35±8.81 years. Primary infertility was found in 61.8% of cases. The most common risk factors for infertility were tobacco followed by varicocele and infection. Spermogram was altered in 53.1% of cases. The most common abnormality was sperm vitality issues (36.9%) followed by spermatic concentration (29.7%) and morphology (29.3%). Age was the unique factor which had a significant impact on spermogram (p=0.002). Abnormalities in mobility were detected in patients ≥31 years, sperm vitality issues in patients aged 34 years, abnormalities in morphology in patients aged 35 years and concentration in patients aged 37 years. Azoospermia was found in 16.4% of cases and was mainly associated with primary infertility. Oligo-astheno-teratozoospermia was the most common association (26.2%).

CONCLUSION

male infertility is common in our context. The major risk factor is age. Mobility is the earliest parameter achieved.

[Association of tension-free inguinal hernia repair and pathospermia in fertile men]

OBJECTIVE

To reveal the association of tension-free inguinal hernia repair and pathospermia in fertile men.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We have retrospectively analyzed medical records of 512 men who appealed to andrologist with complaints of the absence of pregnancy in wife in 2018. We evaluated duration and features of infertility, presence/absence of previous inguinal hernia repair, spermogram data (according to WHO criteria, 2010) in all patients.

RESULTS

Duration of infertility in men after inguinal hernia repair persists for 4.2±2.1 years. Right-sided hernia repair was performed in 36 (48.6%) patients, left-side - 23 (31%), bilateral repair - 15 (20.2%) patients. Men with impaired sperm motility prevailed among patients after right-sided inguinal hernia repair (17 (47.2%) people). Left-sided hernia repair was followed by asthenozoospermia in 8 (34.7%) cases, bilateral hernia repair - in 3 (20%) cases. The most severe abnormalities in semen analysis (azoospemia) develop after bilateral hernia repair.

CONCLUSION

Inguinal tension-free hernia repair is a risk factor for male infertility in 14.4% of cases. It is very important to examine a man in case of infertile marriage. Previous surgical interventions including inguinal hernia repair should be considered.

Does the use of hernia mesh in surgical inguinal hernia repairs cause male infertility? A systematic review and descriptive analysis

Objective

The aim of this study was to systematically review the available clinical trials examining male infertility after inguinal hernias were repaired using mesh procedures.

Methods

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Chinese Biomedical Medicine Database were investigated. The Jada score was used to evaluate the quality of the studies, “Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine-Levels of Evidence” was used to assess the level of the trials, and descriptive analysis was used to evaluate the studies.

Results

Twenty nine related trials with a total of 36,552 patients were investigated, including seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 616 patients and 10 clinical trials (1230 patients) with mesh or non-mesh repairs. The Jada score showed that there were six high quality RCTs and one low quality RCT. Levels of evidence determined from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine further demonstrated that those six high quality RCTs also had high levels of evidence. It was found that serum testosterone, LH, and FSH levels declined in the laparoscopic group compared to the open group; however, the testicular volume only slightly increased without statistical significance. Testicular and sexual functions remained unchanged after both laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP) and totally extra-peritoneal repair (TEP). We also compared the different meshes used post-surgeries. VyproII/Timesh lightweight mesh had a diminished effect on sperm motility compared to Marlex heavyweight mesh after a one-year follow-up, but there was no effect after 3 years. Additionally, various open hernia repair procedures (Lichtenstein, mesh plug method, posterior pre-peritoneal mesh repair, and anterior tension-free repair) did not cause infertility.

Conclusions

This systematic review suggests that hernia repair with mesh either in an open or a laparoscopic procedure has no significant effect on male fertility.